Matt Wrack plans to stay in post as teaching union's general secretary
Matt Wrack, whose appointment as general secretary of the NASUWT led to a week of legal challenges and the reopening of nominations for the post, said he would stand in a new election as the nominee of the union's executive.
He also claimed 'there is some coordination' in a number of media 'hatchet jobs' from senior Tory figures, including the former ministers Michael Gove and Damian Green.
In his first interview since the row was dragged into the courts last week, Wrack also:
Dismissed claims he does not have enough experience to lead a teaching union, saying 'neither do many secretaries of state or senior civil servants'.
Reassured members that he would not merge the union with the National Education Union and denied claims that he was friends with the NEU's general secretary.
Said he had never downplayed antisemitism, as claimed by reports, saying: 'I'm not a Zionist but I believe in a two-state solution.'
Amid speculation that he could stand aside, Wrack told the Guardian he would remain the official candidate of the union's ruling body. 'I've simply been informed by the national executive that I remain the nominee of the national executive,' he said.
Wrack believes that senior Conservatives have jumped into the row in an attempt to damage trade unionism. Gove, a former education secretary, told a Spectator podcast: '[Wrack] is not a teacher, he is a former firefighter and a former member of the Militant tendency.' Damian Green, the former Home Office minister, told the Telegraph that Wrack was a 'frightening 1970s socialist'.
Wrack said: 'I've never met Michael Gove in my life, but he seems to not like me. Damian Green, he seems to not like me. There seems to be quite a determined effort to portray me in a certain way, which I think is because I am an effective trade unionist.
'In 2022 the fire service was one of the few bits of the public sector that did not take action and achieved a pay settlement without a strike, through collective bargaining. So the idea that I simply want strikes is ludicrous and, frankly, a bit daft.'
Wrack suspects there has been 'some coordination' in the media criticism. 'It's about trying to do a hatchet job on me because they don't want effective trade unionism,' he said.
In April, Wrack was appointed as general secretary to Britain's second largest teaching union – a surprise because for the last 20 years he was best known as the leftwing leader of the Fire Brigades Union, whose politics contrasted with the more moderate positions of the NASUWT.
Critics pounced on the fact he had never been a teacher and his appointment meant he did not have to contest an election.
This week his position was thrown into doubt by a legal challenge, amid claims that his appointment was a 'fix' by the national executive that unfairly excluded potential candidates.
Facing an injunction, the union was forced to backpedal and said it would reopen nominations and hold elections if other candidates were nominated. The high court ruled that the union had to pay costs of £78,000 for the legal challenge, with its own legal costs pushing the bill well over £100,000.
Wrack said he could not comment on either the legal challenge or the upcoming re-election contest for fear of breaching the union's rules. 'I will not be discussing [the legal case against the NASUWT], that's not appropriate, and nor will I be discussing the NASUWT election,' he said.
Some NASUWT members say they fear that Wrack is too close to Daniel Kebede, the NEU general secretary, and wants to see a merger between the two unions.
Wrack dismissed the reports, saying he would not argue for a merger. 'The NASUWT conference took a very clear position on [a merger]. That's the decision-making body of the union, and whoever is the general secretary has to respect that decision. So I'm a bit bemused as to where this story has come from,' he said.
'I have spoken at, probably, I don't know, one or two meetings with Daniel over the years. I've been around the trade union movement for a very long time and on the TUC general council for 20 years. I know most people in senior positions in the trade union movement.'
Wrack has been accused of being too close to Jeremy Corbyn and of downplaying antisemitism in Labour. Wrack said the claims were wrong, saying he was criticised at the FBU for working with cross-community groups in the UK and Israel.
'I wouldn't describe myself as a Zionist but I support a two-state solution in the Middle East … the FBU supported a position that is exactly the same as the TUC, which is to support a boycott of products from the occupied territories, but not a broader anti-Israeli boycott,' he said.
Wrack, who went to a Catholic grammar school in Manchester and studied with the Open University before doing a part-time master's degree at the London School of Economics, said his lack of teaching experience was irrelevant.
'It strikes me that people seem to be able to be the secretary of state for education without any teaching experience,' he said.
Asked if he had done the right thing by standing to be general secretary of the teaching union so soon after losing an attempt at re-election as FBU general secretary, Wrack said: 'I've made my decisions. I stand by them. The process will be what the process will be. And none of the criticisms are going to affect my personal outlook on life or on politics.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Row as gender-critical feminist book excluded from National Library exhibition
Editors of The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, a collection of essays by gender-critical feminists who campaigned against transgender law reforms, have written to National Librarian Amina Shah to express their fury that the book was not included in the Dear Library exhibition. The exhibition aims to highlight the importance of libraries and how they can 'empower individuals and the communities they belong to'. Lucy Hunter Blackburn and Susan Dalgety (below, second from right) claimed that their book had been nominated for display four times, which they said made it one of the most nominated books, but that it had been excluded after pressure from staff. In their letter to Shah, they said that internal correspondence they obtained through a Freedom of Information request showed that bosses had 'capitulated' to staff they say had threatened to disrupt the exhibition if the book was included. They claimed that the book was 'singled out' for an equality impact assessment but that the library had 'recognised that a range of other books from the alternative perspective would be going on display, with no questioning at all'. READ MORE: Top author says Nicola Sturgeon book launch could 'seriously' harm his sales Hunter Blackburn and Dalgety added: 'You then capitulated to what we can only describe as threats from within the Library to disrupt the centenary exhibition. 'You felt unable to stand up to these threats from some of your staff, who also invoked the risk of further disruption from external activists, other parts of the local literary establishment and possibly your funders.' The book, published in 2024 and featuring contributions from JK Rowling (below), former SNP MSP Joan McAlpine, Tory MSP Pam Gosal and others, tracks the campaign against the Scottish Government's failed bid to reform transgender identification laws. The letter said: 'These are women who have changed the course of politics not just in Scotland but in the UK, and who spoke up for many who felt less able to do so. All these women have been smeared and their words excluded from the exhibition by your decision.' Hunter Blackburn and Dalgety accused the National Library of having 'discriminated against this book purely for the position it takes on questions of sex and gender identity'. They added: 'It is evident that you felt this decision was easier than including a single book in your exhibition which challenges the approved view of the political and cultural establishment of Scotland on this issue. 'This is nothing less than a betrayal of the principles which are core to your role and the place of the library in our nation's cultural and intellectual life. That the centenary exhibition is laced with claims about freedom of expression, the exchange of ideas, democracy and censorship just adds to the insult.' They demanded the book be included in the display, a meeting with the National Librarian, an 'unreserved apology' and for the National Librarian to read the book. Ash Regan MSP added: 'Another public body bullied into cowardice. The real reputational harm isn't a book by 34 women – it's a National Library too scared to platform it. 'Time to end this dark chapter and grow a spine. Scotland deserves its proud tradition of fearless, evidence-based debate back.' The National Library was approached for comment.
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Who's on JD Vance's Cotswolds guest list?
Well, well, well. The US Vice President has taken a family trip to the UK this summer, to enjoy a stay at an 18th-century Georgian manor in the Cotswolds. But although this getaway was supposed to provide some leisure time for JD Vance, the VP has made space to meet with a stream of British politicians and, er, at least one wannabe politico. So who is on Vance's guest list? First up was Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who took a fishing trip with Donald Trump's second in command at the weekend to discuss the war in Gaza and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick – and onetime Tory leadership contender – met with the Vice President on Tuesday, for a tête-à-tête before a drinks event. Jenrick wasn't the only shadow cabinet member to get the call up, however, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp also invited to see Vance on Tuesday. His boss, Kemi Badenoch has not been so fortunate – although a Conservative spokesperson insisted that the VP and Tory leader 'just couldn't make it work with schedules'. Vance's press secretary, Taylor Van Kirk, added: The Vice-President met with a number of people during his trip to the United Kingdom. He specifically tried to see Kemi Badenoch, a friend of his, but a meeting was not possible due to their conflicting schedules. Any suggestion otherwise is false. That's that then! Reform leader Nigel Farage didn't manage to meet President Trump during his visit to Scotland last month, but he has been luckier this time. The Clacton MP secured an eleventh-hour meet with the VP, and is seeing Vance this morning for breakfast in the Cotswolds. And there's more: Vance met with his friend (and Spectator writer) James Orr on Monday for a barbecue, alongside Tory MP Danny Kruger and, er, even one Thomas Skinner – who befriended Vance online. It's certainly not the first time the Apprentice and MAGA have crossed paths, eh? Bosh.
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Britain needs Peter Mannion MP
The current Labour government grows ever more farcical. Despite its promise to 'tread lightly' on people's lives, we've seen war declared on farmers, private schools, pubs, humour at work and even allotment owners. This week came the news that drivers over the age of 70 must take compulsory driving tests, with a mandatory ban if they fail – presumably so that, when younger relatives start ushering them towards the 'assisted dying' clinic, they won't be able to make a quick getaway. Starmer, on winning the election, promised the 'sunlight of hope', yet things have rarely felt gloomier. Rachel Reeves may have wept for the nation in parliament last month, but its miseries are so often of her devising. You can't help wondering what The Thick of It would make of it all. In Armando Iannucci's satire on 21st-century politics, which ran from 2005–2012, ludicrous policies like the above, some of them apparently dreamt up on the hoof, might have been all in a day's work for characters like Labour MP Nicola Murray (Rebecca Front) – whose greatest policy idea is wooden toys – or Lib Dem Fergus Williams (who buys a bank 'out of social embarrassment'). But how would Peter Mannion MP, the series' urbane, likeable Tory, react to them? Mannion (as played by RSC stalwart Roger Allam) is an old-school Conservative from the Major or late-Thatcher era. He studied classics at university, still smokes and, though married, has the mandatory lovechild with a parliamentary colleague. Increasingly adrift in the 21st century, Mannion is an analogue politician in a digital world. Dressed stubbornly in suit and tie, he winces at phrases like 'silicone playground' and can't even grapple with the functions on his Nokia dumbphone ('Is this 'settings'? I think I've just taken a photo of my feet'). Called a 'digitard' by one character, he's described by another as being 'tuned 24/7 to the Yesterday Channel watching Cash in the Attic and wondering why it's taking place inside his head'. Much of the comedy in Mannion's scenes comes from seeing this relatively dignified politician (apparently based on David Davis, but with an obvious smattering of Ken Clarke as well) wrestle with the new touchy-feely, hug-a-hoodie inanities of David Cameron's Conservative rebranding. 'I'm modern!' he protests at one point. 'I say 'black' instead of 'coloured'. I think women are a good thing. I have no problems with gays – many of them are very well turned out, especially the men. Why is it this last year I'm being made to feel as if I'm always two steps behind, like I can't programme a video or convert everything back to old money?' 'You've still got a video?' his aide asks incredulously. Mannion is a Victor Meldrew before his time, a man tormented to a state of anguish by the sheer silliness of modern life. He is endlessly afflicted by spin doctors and spads who feel the most useful thing he can do is take his tie off; by newspapers which catch him smoking or holding (catastrophically) a bottle of champagne; by members of the public who leave toxic comments on his blog ('You always have a pained expression on your face. Do you take it up the chutney?'). Frequently, losing his cool, he starts to spit out strings of expletives (you need to hear Allam, a classical actor with a voice as beautiful as Michael Gambon's, snarling the f-word to realise how it's done or why that word even exists). In calmer moments, he lapses into an ironic lethargy several steps beyond despair as though, realising the futility of his existence, there is little else to do but make drawling, jaded asides about it. In a post-Blair world of 'uniparty' soundbites and 'caring' initiatives, conservatism itself seems to be collapsing. Asked by Tory director of communications Stewart Pearson – the bane of his life, whose mission is to 'detoxify' the Tory brand – if he's 'up to speed' with the 'new line', Mannion lapses into sarcasm: Well, I don't know, am I? Because I get people stopping me in the street and saying 'Are you still for locking up yobbos?' and I say 'Yeah, of course we are!' And then I think, are we? Because maybe I missed a memo from you. Maybe I should understand yobbos now… or not even call them yobbos. Call them young men with issues around stabbing. If Mannion, with his grey suits and black sense of humour, represents an age of lost common sense, Stewart Pearson (Vincent Franklin) is the man who has no intention of finding it. A kind of walking rainbow flag, always dressed in brightly coloured shirts (untucked and open two buttons), Pearson is the coming era made flesh. He's the kind of man (we all know them) who drinks ginseng tea, wears a high-visibility tabard to ride a bike, and whose dementing natural habitat is the whiteboard brainstorming session: 'Let's architecturalise this… Let's graphicise and three-dimensionalise our response… Time is a leash on the dog of ideas.' 'What was that word I used this morning?' he demands of Mannion at one point. 'You used a lot of words,' says Mannion wearily. 'It was like a fucking Will Self lecture.' The Thick of It ended in 2012 – a year or two before 'woke' came in to land – but now and then you find it deliciously ahead of the curve. In an episode of series 4, Mannion is summoned by Stewart to attend an out-of-town 'thought bubble' group seminar – the kind of life-sapping, compulsory, organised infantilisation we're now accustomed to from our betters. At one point, the characters take part in a 20-questions bonding game where they must guess the political concept written on their foreheads. Mannion, with the word 'inclusivity' flapping above his eyes on a Post-It note, asks a series of increasingly exasperated questions. 'Am I a sensible, solid concept?' ('No'). 'Would I be comfortable talking to Andrew Marr about this concept on television?' ('No'). 'Am I 'diversity'?' 'Oh for fuck's sake,' he snaps when he rips off the label. 'Inclusivity's practically the same as diversity.' Did the writers know then that in the coming decade these two abstract nouns would batter us over the head until we were gurgling in prone stupefaction? Or that the age of Stewart Pearson – that era of bullying power-play shrouded in bright primary colours – had barely begun? Most of us these days have become some form of Peter Mannion – looking at the wreckage of things we once believed in (Radio 4, the sanctity of certain prizes, Oxbridge, the National Trust, you name it) and, like him, asking in bewilderment: 'How the sow's tits did this happen? Nothing matters any more. Politics, faith, values, whatever your thing is. Nothing.' How would Mannion have survived an era of take-the-knee, pronoun badges and rainbow lanyards, or reacted to a government bent on destroying all that he and his supporters hold most dear? It's certainly kinder to him – though a loss to the viewer – that we were never allowed to find out.
