Manitobans call Trump's pitch to take over Gaza Strip grotesque, vulgar and 'wholly unlawful'
U.S. President Donald Trump's idea to take ownership of the Gaza Strip, move Palestinians out and redevelop it has stunned the Palestinian community in Manitoba and outraged an expert in international law.
"I don't know where or how he thinks he's even capable of doing that. It's shocking, disgusting," said Ramsey Zeid, president of the Canadian Palestinian Association of Manitoba.
"What gives him the right to say or do any of that? He has no right to get involved at all," Zeid said.
"This is not a TV show. This is not one of his own businesses that he's operating. These are countries that don't belong to him. These are people's lives that he's playing with, and he needs to tread lightly."
During a joint news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday in Washington, Trump said he wants Palestinians in Gaza to be "permanently" resettled outside the war-torn territory, which would then be developed into the "Riviera of the Middle East."
"Everybody I've spoken to loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land," he said. He did not rule out sending U.S. troops in to secure Gaza.
Earlier, in the Oval Office of the White House, Trump said Palestinians would love to leave Gaza if there was another option.
"What do they have? It is a big pile of rubble," he told reporters.
He proposed the 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza move to neighbouring countries, calling for Jordan, Egypt and other Arab states to take them in.
"Not only is it absurd politically, but it's a grotesque, vulgar display of power that violates every single basic principle of international law that we have. It's wholly unlawful," said Nathan Derejko, an assistant law professor at the University of Manitoba and the Mauro Chair in Human Rights and Social Justice.
"It breaches some of the most basic and fundamental provisions of the United Nations Charter."
War crime
The charter, the United Nations' founding document that came into force in 1945 following the end of the Second World War, creates the international body of law that regulates relationships among all 193 member states.
"And some of those bedrock rules are the prohibition of the use of the threats of force, annexation or acquisition of territory through through force. These things are categorically prohibited," Derejko said.
If the U.S. brought in troops to force a takeover, it would "immediately activate an international armed conflict" and bring into effect the laws of war, he said.
"This would also amount to, under the laws of war, a war crime — the war crime of forcible deportation or forcible transfer," Derejko said.
It also amounts to ethnic cleansing by denying Palestinians the right to self-determination, he said.
"It would breach almost every single legal framework of international law that is out there."
For Trump to claim he knows what Palestinians want is offensive, Zeid said.
"That's their home, their land. They have lived there for generations. Their ancestors are from there," he said. "It's for them to decide if they want to stay or leave. You can't just pick people up and say 'you're not welcome here.'
"I don't know what our Canadian government can do, but they need to put pressure on not only the Israeli government but on the United States government to follow international law, to let the Palestinians live their lives in their land, on their own."
Canada must speak out
Derejko agreed that Canada has been far too silent.
"The problem with international law, and how it differs from domestic law, is that it's a horizontal legal system. It has to be enforced by the participants, that is [the member] states. They have a legal obligation to arrest suspects … or implement the decisions of the International Court of Justice," he said.
"We need governments, Canada included, to stand up and categorically reject this absurd notion of the United States ethnically cleansing Gaza Strip to build some kind of Riviera."
Canada has preached international law for decades, "and yet it sits back and just watches human rights violations occur without taking a principled stand," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada Standard
10 minutes ago
- Canada Standard
"What's the difference between Pakistan Muslim League and Jairam Ramesh?": BJP MP Nishikant Dubey slams Congress
New Delhi [India], June 15 (ANI): BJP MP Nishikant Dubey targeted Congress over their foreign policy in the past on Sunday. Speaking about his X post against Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, he alleged that Congress fell into Pakistan's trap and believed that the Chief of Pakistan Army, Asim Munir, had been invited to the White House in the USA. Speaking to ANI, Nishikant Dubey said, 'The opposition, especially the Congress, has stopped reading and writing. For the last 2-3 days, the entire Congress party kept saying that Pakistan's Army Chief General Asim Munir is going to the US. This was a trap by Pakistan. People across the country turned the opposition to Modi into opposition to the country. Today, it is known that the White House or the US military never called Asim Munir. What is the difference between the Pakistan Muslim League and Jairam Ramesh?' Referring to the Kanishka bombing incident, when Khalistani extremists bombed an Air India flight, he said, 'Big accident happened in Ahmedabad. Secondly, when the Kanishka bomb blast happened in 1985, when did Canada start its investigation? It started in 2006. Former Canadian PM Justin Trudeau's father was the Prime Minister of Canada from 1968 to 1984. Indira Gandhi wrote seven letters to him for 16 was not replying her letters, he was not listening to her and was giving shelter to Khalistani terrorists and you are teaching us foreign policy?' Launching an attack on Congress's stand on Israel and Palestine, he alleged that Congress has secretly supported Israel after taking a stand for Palestine in the United Nations in 1950. He told ANI, '.In 1948, Israel and Palestine became two countries. In 1948, Nehruji supported Palestine in the UN and opposed Israel, but in 1950, Nehruji secretly opened his trade office Mission in Mumbai. In 1953, its Consulate General was opened in Mumbai. In the 1971 war with Pakistan, we used Israeli weapons, and the Mossad was used to plan the attack on Pakistan along with the then Lieutenant General Jacob. In 1992, the first Israeli embassy was opened in Delhi. Palestine's Office finally opened in India in now, from 1948 to 2014, as long as their government was in power, more than 50 times, either we supported Israel in the UN Security Council, or we abstained. Today, when you talk about Palestine, do you think that we will support Hamas? India is with the citizens of Palestine, we have given them aid of almost 200 million from 2020 till this budget too, we have kept 39 million for Palestine. But as far as Israel is concerned, if Hamas attacks them, kidnaps their children, beats them, then are we supporting a terrorist organisation like Hamas?' Lauding PM Narendra Modi's foreign policy, Dubey said, 'Their entire foreign policy was only Nehru-family centric, the country is suffering the consequences of that and PM Modi is constantly working towards strengthening India's position abroad. That's why he is attending the G7 and G20 summits. And people know how he was welcomed in Saudi Arabia, which is a Muslim country. Let Congress do politics for vote bank and Muslim appeasement, and one day, Congress will not win even a seat in the Lok Sabha. He also alleged that after 26/11, when Congress won elections in 2009, Manmohan Singh made an agreement with Pakistan and, under global pressure, supported terrorism and Pakistan. As India abstained from voting on the UN's motion on Gaza, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra targeted the BJP and called it 'shameful'. Replying to Priyanka Gandhi, Dubey shared an X post saying, 'This is what happens when you haven't studied history @priyankagandhi, 1. Do you know that after America, the first office of the Israeli Mission was opened in Mumbai by Nehru Ji in 1950, which means we gave undeclared recognition to Israel? 2. Do you know that in the 1971 war with Pakistan, Indira Gandhi used Israeli weapons, and the Mossad people used to plan the attack on Pakistan along with the then Lieutenant General Jacob? 3. Do you know that the Congress government opened the first declared Israeli embassy in Delhi in 1992? 4. Do you know that from 1948 to 2014, India either voted in favour of Israel or abstained 56 times in the Security Council 5? Palestine's embassy finally opened in India in 1996. After eating a hundred rats, the cat went for Hajj. I don't know what will happen to this country?' (ANI)
Canada Standard
10 minutes ago
- Canada Standard
"Iran-Israel talks going to dominate G7 summit in Canada": KP Fabian
New Delhi [India], June 15 (ANI): The upcoming G7 Summit in Canada is expected to prioritise discussions on the escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, according to Foreign Affairs expert KP Fabian. Speaking to ANI, Fabian stated that the G7, well, earlier, the war in Ukraine was going to dominate the talks. Now, it is reasonably clear that the Iran-Israel Tension and hostilities are going to dominate the G7. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney made it clear that there will be no joint communique, only action-oriented statements. Fabian noted that this decision is likely an effort to avoid irritating US President Donald Trump, who previously walked out of a G7 Summit in Canada after disagreeing with the joint communique. 'The host government... wants to make sure that nothing irritates Trump,' Fabian said. 'So Prime Minister Carney is playing it very carefully, very cautiously,' he added. Fabian also highlighted Iran's scepticism towards nuclear talks with the US following Israel's recent strikes on Iran. Simplifying the scenario, he affirmed that Iran believes that Israel's actions were only possible with the approval of the United States, rendering further negotiations with America pointless. 'Iran honestly believes, and Iran is not wrong, that. Israel struck only with the approval of President Donald Trump. So if that is the case, what's the point in talking to America? If America is permitting Israel to strike. Then there's no point in talking. Iran is right,' he said. 'Now, this doesn't mean there will be no more talks because Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump have spoken to each other, and it is possible, I say, after a few days,' he added. Trump on Saturday (local time) revealed that he received a call from Russian President Putin on his 79th birthday and talked about the war between Israel and Iran, which both leaders agreed 'should end.' The conversation occurred before Trump is set to mark his 79th birthday in the evening by attending a military parade on the streets of Washington, DC, to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social, 'President Putin called this morning to very nicely wish me a Happy Birthday, but to more importantly, talk about Iran, a country he knows very well.' The phone call, which lasted around an hour, primarily focused on the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran. (ANI)
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Tariffs, wildfires and AI on the agenda as Canada hosts world leaders at G7
OTTAWA – Prime Minister Mark Carney has tried to pare down Canada's priorities as the G7 summit host, but there's still a lengthy list of global issues for leaders to discuss over the coming days. 'Leaders (will) meet at a moment of enormous flux globally, when tensions among G7 members are especially pronounced,' Carney's foreign policy adviser David Angell told a panel this week. He did not directly reference U.S. President Donald Trump, who famously walked out of the last G7 summit Canada hosted in 2018. Here's a look at what's on the agenda in Kananaskis, Alta., and what to expect. Economics On the formal agenda, the first discussion is about the 'global economic outlook,' followed by a working lunch on economic security and supply chains. Angell said this will include a discussion on 'anti-market practices by large, non-G7 economies.' China is among those countries accused of anti-market practices. 'There's no doubt that important discussion of President Trump's tariff strategy will take place,' he added. John Kirton, head of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto, said the discussion will likely set the tone on how countries balance fiscal stimulus through tax cuts or possibly more defence spending along with cutting back deficits. He said leaders will need to navigate the difficult reality that Trump's tariffs are hurting economic growth and likely caused the downgrading of Washington's credit ratings. Leaders are set to discuss critical minerals, and Kirton said this might involve setting labour and environmental transparency standards for minerals acquired in fragile countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo. Sen. Peter Boehm, who played a central role in many G7 summits, said he expects Canada to raise the dysfunction of the World Trade Organization, though this might happen in an informal setting instead of part of the structured G7 meetings. The WTO's appeal body is the main global enforcer of resolutions in trade disputes, and it has been effectively stalled for years as the U.S. blocks the appointment of panel members, following frustration of how the WTO has ruled against Washington. In 2018, Canada launched the Ottawa Group, a committee urging WTO reform made up of more than a dozen economies ranging from Kenya to Norway, but it has had limited success. Wildfires and foreign interference The second session taking place Monday will involve safety, particularly wildfires, foreign interference and transnational crime. Canada is set to release a Kananaskis Wildfire Charter, spanning mitigation, response and recovery. Kirton said discussion around the document will focus on 'equipment interoperability' to allow G7 members to support each other during emergencies, as well as the use of satellite imagery to fight wildfires. He said the topic has become 'a burning issue' in part because wildfires in places like Los Angeles and across the Prairies show how the threat is relevant to Washington and its G7 peers. Leaders might try to raise climate change, but Kirton doubts that phrase will appear in any closing statements, with Trump pushing back on the topic. A brief circulated among G7 planners from various countries originally included the term 'countering migrant smuggling and drug trafficking' but Kirton noted that the term did not appear in later drafts. Kirton said he expects leaders to discuss tighter co-operation in combating the drug trade, given that the U.S. concern over opioids matches concerns other countries have about heroin trafficking. 'Making the world secure' The topic title of the Monday working dinner is broad. While such a session would normally involve conflicts in Israel and the Palestinian territories, North Korea and Sudan, analysts expect that recent strikes between Israel and Iran will dominate this discussion. Ukrainian sovereignty Tuesday's working breakfast will come after G7 leaders have a chance to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and amid concerns from other G7 members that the U.S. might sign a deal from Russia that only encourages further invasion of European countries. After that, G7 leaders have a larger meeting with the invited guests, which so far includes leaders of Australia, Brazil, India, Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine, NATO, the United Nations and the World Bank. It's unclear whether Canada's bid to raise issues of foreign interference will come up in talks with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose government the RCMP has linked to extortion, coercion and homicide cases. In January, the foreign interference inquiry's final report said 'India is the second most active' threat actor, which is 'clandestinely providing illicit financial support to various Canadian politicians in an attempt to secure the election of pro-India candidates or gain influence.' Energy security Tuesday afternoon's discussion is set to include making energy affordable and creating the infrastructure needed to diversify of energy sources. Angell said 'a number of key leaders' visiting the summit as guests will be part of the talks. Carney's office has said Canada is seeking coalitions with reliable partners to open new markets, and generate large infrastructure investments. AI and quantum tech Carney's office says G7 leaders will discuss 'using artificial intelligence and quantum to unleash economic growth,' though it's not clear where in the schedule this will take place. Experts say quantum computing could rapidly speed up processing times and allow for more accurate or efficient tasks. But they say cryptography might be needed to prevent powerful quantum computers from breaking power grids and banking systems. Kirton said the discussion will likely include discussion on how to include developing countries in the gains of AI and how it can boost the efficiency of government bureaucracies and business of all sizes. Something useful — and Canadian While federal officials have warned that the summit will unlikely end with a lengthy communiqué that has been part of almost every other G7 summit, Boehm has faith Canada will still deliver points of consensus that liberal democracies can act on. Last month, finance ministers and central bankers agreed on action around cyber threats to the financial sector and the need to assess the possibilities and risks posed by artificial intelligence. In March, foreign ministers pledged to focus on maritime security, a topic that affects all G7 countries who also happen to share three oceans with Canada, giving grounds to look at everything from unregistered vessels undermining sanctions to illegal fishing and threats to undersea fibre-optic cables. These were largely seen as ways to bridge the growing gap between Europe and the U.S. and focus on shared goals. It's a skill G7 allies turn to Canada for, sometimes literally, in the middle of the night. 'There's often come a time, usually at three in the morning or something, where someone will look at me, or whoever is in the Canadian chair and say … 'it's time for the great Canadian initiative to compromise, and get this thing done.' So we do add value,' Boehm said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 15, 2025.
