logo
How Old Was Natalia Grace When She Was Living Alone? She Testified To Unimaginable Conditions

How Old Was Natalia Grace When She Was Living Alone? She Testified To Unimaginable Conditions

Forbes09-04-2025

GOOD AMERICAN FAMILY - 'Name the Lie' - Left to her own devices, Natalia struggles to come to terms ... More with her circumstances and how the world sees her. (Disney/Ser Baffo)
Warning: Spoilers ahead from Episode 5 of Hulu's Good American Family.
The opening credits of Good American Family Episode 5, 'Too Hurty Without It,' include a disclaimer noting that the claims made in the episode are alleged by Natalia Grace—marking one of the first times the series presents the mysterious true story from her perspective.
The fifth episode picks up after Natalia, who has a rare form of dwarfism called spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita, was dropped off at an apartment complex in Indiana by her adoptive parents, Kristine and Michael Barnett, shortly after they legally changed her age.
Natalia's original birth records listed 2003 as her birth year, meaning she would have been around six or seven in 2010. But two years after adopting her, the Barnetts petitioned a Marion County court to change her Ukrainian documents, legally altering her birth year to 1989, making her 22.
The Barnetts went to great lengths to change Natalia's age because they were convinced she wasn't who she said she was. They believed she was an adult posing as a child, pointing to early signs of puberty and behavior they found life-threatening. Michael told Good Morning America that doctors who had evaluated Natalia allegedly warned the family that she was a sociopath, a con artist and that they were 'all in danger.'
As you watch the alleged conditions Natalia faced while living alone, you might wonder whether these events actually happened—and whether the Barnetts were ever held accountable. During Michael Barnett's trial, Natalia took the stand. She shared disturbing details about her time living in two separate apartments, which are similar to the events depicted in the Hulu drama series.
GOOD AMERICAN FAMILY - 'Name the Lie' - Left to her own devices, Natalia struggles to come to terms ... More with her circumstances and how the world sees her.
Yes, as depicted in Hulu's Good American Family, the Barnetts set up two apartments for Natalia—one in Westfield and another later in Lafayette, Indiana.
During Michael's trial, Indiana State Police Detective Brandon Davenport testified that Michael Barnett claimed they provided Natalia with Social Security disability benefits, food stamps, and Medicaid when they moved her in. Michael also said he checked in on her once a week, according to Journal & Courier.
Meanwhile, Natalia testified during Michael's trial that she was abruptly relocated three counties away without any input on where she would live. She also claimed that she didn't know where any stores were or how to get to them.
Additionally, Natalia testified that she was unaware the Barnetts and their three biological sons were moving to Canada so their eldest child could begin graduate school at age 15. She recalled being taken to an office in Lafayette, where she signed a lease listing Michael Barnett as the payee for the rent.
GOOD AMERICAN FAMILY - 'Name the Lie' - Left to her own devices, Natalia struggles to come to terms ... More with her circumstances and how the world sees her.
In 2012, Natalia moved into an apartment in Westfield on North 11th Street, where she had to climb or descend 12 steps to reach the second-floor unit. 'I wanted to be with the Barnetts,' she testified. 'I wanted to live with them.'
According to her testimony, Natalia said that during her first year living alone, she mostly survived on peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, Ramen noodles, and the occasional pizza she ordered.
Natalia testified that she often got bored in Westfield and would walk three blocks to the library. The walk took her 30 minutes, and she had to stop four or five times to rest because of her disability. A couple of times, she even got lost. (One scene in Good American Family shows Natalia going to the library to get Kristine's book, 'The Spark: A Mother's Story of Nurturing, Genius and Autism.' But it's unknown whether this happened in real life.)
As the Barnetts prepared to move to Canada, they relocated Natalia again in July 2013—marking her second year living independently. At the time, she said she still didn't know how to cook or use a washing machine, according to the Journal & Courier.
As shown in Episode 5, Natalia's disability limited the use of her hands and arms, making everyday tasks like opening canned food or washing herself extremely difficult. She testified that her deformed hips, legs, knees, and feet caused her to fall several times while getting in and out of the bathtub.
Natalia testified that she didn't know how to restore the power when her electricity was shut off at her Lafayette apartment. 'I didn't know what to do, honestly,' Natalia said, revealing that she called the landlord who restored the electric service. (In Good American Family, Michael returns to the apartment to get the power back on after failing to pay the electricity bill.)
Toby Miles and his wife, Melanie, lived across the street from Natalia's apartment complex in Westfield. In the spring of 2013, Natalia regularly chatted with them about their flowers and landscaping. According to the Journal & Courier, while she didn't look visibly dirty, her body odor was 'profound.' Miles said they could smell her from about 10 feet away while her hair looked greasy and unwashed.
GOOD AMERICAN FAMILY - 'Name the Lie' - Left to her own devices, Natalia struggles to come to terms ... More with her circumstances and how the world sees her.
Natalia had been living alone for over a year when she moved into her second apartment in Lafayette. One day, while walking down the street, she paused a few houses away to rest. A homeowner noticed her and stepped outside to greet her with unexpected kindness.
This homeowner called her friend, Cynthia Mans, who came over and quickly became friends with Natalia. Within a few days, Natalia moved in with Cynthia, her husband Antwon, and their ten children.
Cynthia later testified that they charged Natalia $250 a month in rent and taught her how to read, write, and do math. Natalia admitted that she didn't know how to count money, didn't understand the purpose of her food stamp card, and was unaware that she had Social Security disability benefits.
The real Natalia Grace when she was living with the Barnett family.
In August 2023, a blood test conducted by the medical lab TruDiagnostic determined that Natalia was approximately 22 years old at the time of testing. This finding suggests that Natalia was around nine years old when the Barnetts adopted her in 2010—and only about eleven when she first started living alone in 2012.
'It just proves that I was not lying about my age," Natalia said in an episode of Investigation Discovery's docuseries, Natalia Speaks. "They ignored everything that was pointing to the truth just so they could create this stupid lie. They knew it and they still did what they did.'
The ID docuseries also alleges that the Barnetts were aware of an endocrinologist's 2010 evaluation, which estimated Natalia's age to be between nine and eleven years old. A dentist interviewed in the series recalled Kristine visiting his office in 2011 and asking whether he could determine Natalia's age by examining her teeth. After an X-ray, the dentist found that Natalia still had 12 baby teeth. 'When mom and Natalia left mom knew Natalia was around 8 or 9,' the dentist says in the docuseries.
The Mans family formally adopted Natalia in 2023. However, things also took a dark turn with her second adoptive parents, Cynthia and Antwon, after they allegedly tried to restrict her internet access after discovering she had a boyfriend in the U.K.
According to People, neighbors and friends also allegedly saw the Mans physically abuse Natalia. They claimed that she was whipped with a belt, slapped in the face, locked in a room, and assaulted. (Natalia declined to confirm or deny those allegations to the site.)
Natalia is now happily living with the DePaul family, a couple with dwarfism who wanted to adopt her when she was a child. Nicole DePaul told People that while she doesn't plan to adopt Natalia legally, their life together is primarily peaceful, though there are times when they don't get along.
GOOD AMERICAN FAMILY - 'Name the Lie' - Left to her own devices, Natalia struggles to come to terms ... More with her circumstances and how the world sees her.
Michael and Kristine Barnett were each charged with six counts of neglect of a dependent and two counts of conspiracy to commit neglect of a dependent. However, prosecutors weren't able to charge them with neglect of a child because The Barnetts legally changed Natalia's age to 22, People reported.
Michael was acquitted in October 2022 after a jury trial, while the charges against Kristine were dismissed in March 2023 due to 'insufficient evidence.' According to the Purdue Exponent, the charges against Kristine were dismissed with prejudice, meaning she can't be charged again for the same thing.
Good American Family is now streaming on Hulu. Watch the official trailer below.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bryan Cranston shares why TV son Erik Per Sullivan turned down 'Malcom in the Middle' revival
Bryan Cranston shares why TV son Erik Per Sullivan turned down 'Malcom in the Middle' revival

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Bryan Cranston shares why TV son Erik Per Sullivan turned down 'Malcom in the Middle' revival

Bryan Cranston was thrilled to reunite with his Malcolm in the Middle family for a revival series after nearly two decades off the air. But it was a bittersweet reunion, as the whole gang wasn't able to return. On the the latest episode of the Fly on the Wall podcast, the actor opened up about the upcoming Disney+ project, telling hosts Dana Carvey and David Spade, "It's amazing how these boys who were my boys on that show are now around the same age I was when we first started, and they've got children of their own." When Spade asked about Erik Per Sullivan, who played youngest son Dewey on Malcolm, Cranston lamented that he was "the only one who didn't come back to act in the show." He added, "I talked to Eric and I said, 'Hey, we got the show! It's going to come back.' He goes, 'Oh, that's fantastic!' And I go, 'Yeah, so we're looking forward to having you back.' He goes, 'Oh, no, no, I don't want to do it. But it's fantastic.'" Though most of the dysfunctional TV family — filled out by Jane Kaczmarek, Frankie Muniz, Christopher Masterson, and Justin Berfield — continued on in the entertainment industry, Sullivan made a radical departure. "He's actually going to Harvard," Cranston explained. "He's really, really smart, and he's getting his master's at Harvard right now. He said, 'Oh God, no, I haven't acted since I was 9 or something. So I'm not into it.'" Malcolm in the Middle ran from 2000 to 2006 on Fox, making stars out of Muniz, Cranston, and Kaczmarek and winning seven Emmys. Fans had pushed for a reboot, revival, or some kind of fulsome reunion ever since, and Cranston pushed right alongside them. "It's something I was pushing for for the last 10 years, because I thought that the audience is there," he said, but it took years of talks with obstinate series creator Linwood Boomer to get things moving."I just started wearing him down until he said, 'I've got an idea.' I said, 'good,'" Cranston quipped. Muniz, Masterson, and Berfield were confirmed to return as brothers Malcolm, Francis, and Reese earlier this year. The role of Dewey will now be played by Wynonna Earp alum Caleb Ellsworth-Clark. Titular star Muniz got fans eager to see what shape the revival will take when he posted a giddily smiling photo with Cranston and Kaczmarek in April, and though he now believes Malcolm is "the worst character on that show," he admitted to being "really excited" for fans to finally catch up with their favorite TV family. Listen to Cranston's full appearance on Fly on the Wall above. Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly

Disney has filed an AI lawsuit that could shift the future of entertainment
Disney has filed an AI lawsuit that could shift the future of entertainment

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Disney has filed an AI lawsuit that could shift the future of entertainment

As AI rapidly develops, tech companies have raced to build and monetize tools that generate Hollywood-grade images and videos. Now these tools are poised to transform moviemaking and the entertainment industry in coming years, experts say, and this lawsuit represents a bid by some of Hollywood's giants to secure their place in that future. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's sort of a 'finally' moment,' said Chad Hummel, principal at the Los Angeles office of the law firm McKool Smith. Previously, entertainment giants had stayed on the sidelines even as researchers documented how AI tools could be used to generate apparently infringing content. Now they've entered the fray in a big way. Advertisement Midjourney is one of a handful of AI generators that has captured the world's imagination by letting users spin up images on demand. What started as a novelty quickly became a major source of online content, as people used Midjourney and other generators such as OpenAI's Sora and Stable Diffusion to generate everything from memes to pornography to reimaginations of popular characters from movies and TV. Advertisement But the resulting images don't come from a vacuum - the AI models are trained by ingesting millions of words and images from across the internet, including copyrighted work from individual artists and entertainment studios. AI companies claim that their generators are spitting out entirely new creations and that the training data falls under 'fair use' according to copyright law. Artists and midsize media companies have pushed back, saying the AI is stealing their work. Disney and Universal's lawsuit frames the issue as a matter of good versus evil, calling Midjourney 'a bottomless pit of plagiarism.' AI industry advocates counter that legacy media companies are standing in the way of a technological advance that could unleash a wave of creativity. Midjourney did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. In the suit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the companies allege that Midjourney 'seeks to reap the rewards' of Disney's creative work by selling an AI image service that 'functions as a virtual vending machine, generating unauthorized copies of Disney's and Universal's copyrighted works.' Indeed, AI-generated content depicting beloved - and copyrighted - characters such as Mario, Shrek or Winnie the Pooh has circulated online, at times going viral on social media and spawning a new approach to fan art. Star Wars junkies, for instance, no longer have to comb the web for stories and visuals based on their favorite characters - they can use an AI video generator to create an original 11-minute Star Wars movie with photorealistic sets and characters. AI video still isn't advanced enough to produce passable full-length films or TV shows, Washington Post tests found. Advertisement That might be why copyright holders waited to file lawsuits against AI video generators, said James Grimmelmann, a law professor at Cornell University. While AI audio can now produce songs that sound human-generated, AI video hasn't made that leap, he said. OpenAI's Sora, for example, can only generate content roughly a minute long. And although the speed and fluency is a remarkable improvement compared to older models, it doesn't offer the kind of fine-grained controls directors and studios need, according to Grimmelmann. But production companies are already using AI for preproduction brainstorming, special effects and on-screen images. The quality of AI-generated content has improved rapidly since OpenAI first released its image generator DALL-E in 2021, with companies including OpenAI and Google now offering video generators to the public. Many believe it's a matter of time before content that's entirely AI generated makes its way into mainstream entertainment. SAG-AFTRA, the union representing film and TV actors, has struck deals with voice AI companies allowing actors to license their voices, and this week the union reached a tentative agreement with a collection of video game companies to pay actors if their voices or likenesses appear in AI-generated games. 'Patience and persistence has resulted in a deal that puts in place the necessary A.I. guardrails that defend performers' livelihoods in the A.I. age,' the union said in a blog post Monday. Meanwhile, a new class of AI start-ups such as Moonvalley and Runway are already working with Hollywood studios to integrate AI into the production process, the companies have said. This lawsuit is the latest in a barrage by rightsholders - including artists, authors and media companies - alleging infringement by AI firms. Among the highest-profile cases is one filed by the New York Times against OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT. At the same time, many are signing multimillion-dollar licensing deals with AI firms granting them full access to their content - for a price. (The Washington Post has a content-sharing deal with OpenAI.) Advertisement The Disney and Universal suit takes a different tack from other lawsuits, demanding that Midjourney filter what it generates rather than avoid scraping the studios' intellectual property altogether. 'This one seems more aimed at establishing the kind of expectations that copyright owners have of non-AI platforms: You need to take down obvious copies of our works,' said Grimmelmann. What the movie studios don't want, according to Hummel, is for tech firms to be able to cut them out of the equation by training models on their work without having to pay for it. 'This is not going to be Hollywood trying to shut down generative AI,' Hummel said. 'It's about compensation.' Already, many visual artists are feeling the effects of AI's entry, said Jon Lam, a video game artist and creators rights activist. He said he has watched his circle of professional contacts struggle to find work when AI can replicate different art styles with the click of a mouse. Wednesday's lawsuit was 'a huge confidence boost' for creatives like Lam hoping for an upset that stops film, TV and video game studios from drawing on artists' work without paying them, he said. A win for Disney and Universal wouldn't necessarily protect artists in the entertainment industry from getting replaced by AI, said Ben Zhao, a professor of computer science at University of Chicago who helped build Glaze, a software tool that protects visual art from AI mimicry. But it could drastically limit the material that AI tools can draw from, he said. Without fresh data, AI generators would regurgitate the same visual ideas over and over, Zhao said, making them less useful for production companies. In that sense, both AI companies and entertainment studios rely on artists who produce new work and make a living wage. Advertisement Some tech industry leaders have argued that creating tools such as ChatGPT would be impossible if they couldn't be trained on copyrighted data - and that requiring AI companies to pay every creator would stall an AI boom that promises vast economic benefits. Studios such as Disney and Universal should embrace AI video rather than suing to stop it, said Adam Eisgrau, who leads a program on AI, creativity and copyright for the Chamber of Progress, a center-left trade group that represents technology companies including Midjourney. 'My initial reaction is that the movie industry has a long history and a short memory,' Eisgrau said. He compared the lawsuit to one decades ago in which studios sued the makers of videocassette players and lost - which he said was 'lucky for them,' because they ended up profiting greatly from the technology. Meanwhile, each step forward for AI video is met with rapt attention from fans of the tech. A clip posted Sunday in the Reddit forum r/aivideo showed a short trailer for a nonexistent movie - one with visual references starkly similar to science fiction series such as Star Wars. 'Please turn this into a feature film. It would be freaking crazy,' one commenter said. 'That's the plan!' replied the poster. Advertisement - - - Nitasha Tiku contributed to this report.

Miley Cyrus Lost Major Film Role To Selena Gomez After Penis Cake Controversy
Miley Cyrus Lost Major Film Role To Selena Gomez After Penis Cake Controversy

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Miley Cyrus Lost Major Film Role To Selena Gomez After Penis Cake Controversy

Miley Cyrus has opened up about losing high-profile jobs over controversies earlier on in her career. The Grammy winner is currently on the promo trail for her new album Something Beautiful, and recently sat down for an interview with Monica Lewinsky for her podcast Reclaiming. During the conversation, Miley spoke about having her privacy violated from an early age, and how numerous leaked photos and videos cost her several big gigs. '[There was] a bong video when I was 16, and that cost me a very large, multi-multi-million dollar Walmart deal,' she explained. 'I had to email the Walmart CEO an apology for being 16 and smoking weed… which most 16-year-olds do. But my email address at the time was 'Miley loves weed'... and it actually wasn't weed, it was Salvia, but I needed to write to him, 'I'm sorry for smoking weed'. And my mum was like, 'what the hell? What's your email? You have to change that!'. 'He was old, so I changed my email to 'Miley loves old people'. It didn't help very much, I still got fired. But these things that you know… to have adults firing a teenager for smoking pot, and you know when they were 16 or 17 they were smoking weed. 'The difference is, I didn't know I was being filmed. I might have known someone was filming and not cared because I was high on Salvia, but I didn't know that my camera would then get stolen at a teen party, because that's how it got leaked, my backpack got stolen at a party.' Miley then reflected on another controversy from the first few years of her career, when TMZ published pictures of her celebrating then-boyfriend Liam Hemsworth's birthday with a penis-shaped cake. 'As a joke, I got my boyfriend a penis cake for his birthday,' she recalled. 'And I got fired. I was the lead actress in Hotel Transylvania, and they fired me, and replaced me, because I had made an inappropriate adult joke. But I was 18! So yes, I was fine to work in a kids' movie, but I [wasn't] a kid.' Miley was replaced in the film by fellow Disney album Selena Gomez, who went on to return for three big-screen sequels. 'What felt ridiculous to me about getting fired [for] a penis cake is that they sell penis cakes for all bachelorettes. In Nashville, Tennessee, you can get penis cakes,' she quipped. 'It's not that big of a deal. 'So, I thought, 'this is a very simple, not vulgar, joke. This is silly, and you can do this for all bachelorette parties'... it felt ridiculous. 'To be fired for regular things that girls my age [do], but at that time, I wasn't someone that was appropriate for kids, even though that was my personal life. And that photo, again, only revealed itself because the camera had been stolen.' Miley has been getting reflective throughout the promo cycle for her latest album. In the last week, she made headlines when she revealed that Madonna was poised to mud-wrestle Miranda Kerr in one music video from her Bangerz era, before her record label stepped in, also making a surprising admission about another of her collaborators, Dua Lipa. Miley Cyrus Reveals How She Tried To Save Relationship With Liam Hemsworth We Can't Stop Thinking About Madonna Mud Wrestling In The Miley Cyrus Video That Never Was Miley Cyrus Breaks Silence On Popular Jennifer Lawrence Flowers Music Video Theory

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store