
Civil Service spends £27m on diversity in a year
Whitehall spent £27 million on diversity in a single year, the first ever audit of bureaucracy 'wokery' has revealed.
An internal report from the Cabinet Office, commissioned by the last Conservative government, reveals there are 380 ' equality, diversity and inclusion ' (EDI) staff in the Civil Service.
They are paid £53,000 a year on average and their salaries cost taxpayers £20 million overall.
EDI staff in departments have been criticised for promoting contested theories such as that there is a spectrum of genders and that people can be guilty of microaggressions towards other people based on their race, gender or sexuality.
Gender-critical feminists have also claimed it can make them reluctant to speak openly about their views but proponents claim they ensure minority communities are treated fairly.
The cost of activities, including learning and development sessions, added up to £4.9 million in departments and £700,000 cross-government.
Another £800,000 was spent on 'external benchmarking' and membership of EDI organisations such as the controversial LGBT charity Stonewall.
And £700,000 went towards diversity and inclusion staff networks. This comes to a total of £27.1 million in just one year.
This amount would pay for the winter fuel payments of 135,000 pensioners, or would fund the employment of more than 1,000 nurses.
The report found that the equivalent of 350 people within departments worked full time in EDI roles, along with 30 in cross-governmental functions.
It also said there are 570 'diversity staff networks' in government departments. These networks, with 2,965 committee members, represent different minority groups, and some Civil Service members spend half their weeks running them.
The report came as it emerged the Government is planning to get rid of around 50,000 Civil Service posts – one in 10 – to get the size of Whitehall down to pre-Brexit levels.
On Thursday, one Right-leaning think tank called on Labour to go further and sack a half of human resources staff and two in three communications roles to help save £5 billion a year.
Meanwhile, Reform UK has made slashing diversity and inclusion roles a key part of its policy platform.
The document, Civil Service EDI Expenditure Review Data, appeared on the Cabinet Office website on Thursday afternoon.
A total of 19 ministerial departments and 45 arm's-length bodies responded to the government review.
The research also looked at how much was spent on EDI in the big five departments – Department for Work and Pensions, Home Office, HM Revenue and Customs, Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Justice.
In 2023-24, the total spent in these five departments was £12.8 million.
A government spokesman said the £27 million equated to 0.006 per cent of Civil Service spend.
'This spending took place under the previous government,' she said.
'We are absolutely focused on ensuring every pound spent of taxpayer money delivers for the public – ending hospital backlogs, putting police back on the beat and securing our borders.'
Meanwhile, the Policy Exchange think tank called on the Government to go further and reduce the Civil Service by 80,000.
Within this, the report proposes halving the size of the senior Civil Service, the policy profession and the HR profession and a 70 per cent reduction in communications staff.
Commenting on the report, a former Treasury second permanent secretary said: 'Whether you believe in a big or a small state, we should all want one that is efficient and effective.
'An over-resourced administrative machine inevitably generates ever more process for itself and slows itself down.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Woodeaton Manor School to move despite £1.6m spend on improvements
A school for pupils with special educational needs that a council has spent £1.6m improving is still operating on a "dilapidated" site and will eventually need to Manor School, near Oxford, was rated inadequate and found to be "chaotic" by Ofsted inspectors who visited in October 2023 and its governing body later resigned.A new head teacher and governors were appointed but - while inspectors found it had improved on a visit in March - it remains in special County Council said it had suffered "significant financial implications" after the school's former governing body did not "appropriately invest" in its Grade II* listed building and wider site. It also said the school previously lacked "robust financial management and other leadership", which had left its budget "significant overspent" to the tune of about £1.5m in a report to councillors that will be discussed at a meeting next Friday, the council's director of children's services Lisa Lyons said the school's site was "not fit for purpose".She added: "Despite significant investment from the county council, this site and building cannot be improved to deliver quality education and the long-term plan is to relocate the school into more appropriate premises."The school has about 80 pupils, all of whom have Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs). It previously offered residential placements but they were paused following Ofsted's inspection in 2023 and they have since been year, the council agreed to spend £900,000 on replacing fire doors as well as making other "fire safety improvements to meet the legislative standards".It said that money was also going to be spent on "suitable perimeter fencing" and new entrance gates. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.


BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Kent County Council Doge head quit due to 'doubt' over project
The tech entrepreneur who quit heading up Reform UK's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) says he did so because the resignation of the party's chairman left him with "a bit of doubt" about the future of the 11 months in the role, Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf resigned on Thursday alongside Nathaniel Fried, who was said to be leading the unit. Speaking to Politics South East, Mr Fried said the outgoing chairman was "spearheading" the Doge initiative and expressed concerns that the scheme "might not turn out how I wanted it to" without councillors at Kent County Council (KCC) have said it is "business as usual" following the double resignation. KCC deputy leader Brian Collins said "absolutely nothing's changed" following the double departure."We have a focus, we have a mission, that mission hasn't changed, business as usual," he told BBC South East on Friday Mr Yusuf and Mr Fried were part of the Doge team which attended its first meeting at KCC on said the meeting was "very productive" but the party admitted it did not know how long it would take for the unit to produce scheme, modelled on the Doge unit created by billionaire Elon Musk as part of Donald Trump's second term as US president, aims to identify and eliminate wasteful to claims that the "engine room" of the unit had now been lost, Mr Collins said: "The engine room is the 57 councillors that have been elected to run this council." 'Circus coming to town' Conservative councillor Sarah Hudson described the current situation as a "mockery".She said: "It's like a circus coming to town, and then you've got various clowns, and they've thrown their toys out of the pram at the first issue that's come along."Mr Fried said he took on the project for free because he felt the "social contract between tax payers and the British government has been a little bit broken".Asked what people in Kent would make of the resignations, just four days into the project, he said he was sure they were "disappointed"."I have great confidence in the local councillors who are working very hard at the moment, especially the head of the council," he said."I'm sure that people are disappointed but thus is politics."A spokesperson for Reform UK said: "The work of the Reform UK Doge unit will continue. The team is larger than just one man."Many Reform-controlled councils already have their respective Doge cabinet members, so this work was happening before and will continue after."


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Most new homes will need solar panels under Government plans
New Homes in England will be required to have solar panels and low-carbon heating systems under the Future Homes Standard (FHS) to be published this autumn. The FHS aims to reduce carbon emissions from new housing, addressing the UK's carbon footprint from gas heating in Homes. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband stated that solar panels could save households hundreds of pounds on energy bills, making their installation a common-sense requirement. The government says the measures will help cut household energy bills and boost the nation's energy security, with typical Homes potentially saving around £530 a year by installing rooftop solar. While the government isn't banning gas boilers, the FHS mandates minimum energy efficiency criteria, effectively requiring greener heating systems in new builds, and recent planning rule changes have made heat pump installations easier.