ASUS Zenbook A14 review: A lightweight in every sense
Now to be clear, the Zenbook A14 is a serviceable laptop for light productivity work. Since it's a Copilot+ AI PC, it comes with at least 16GB of RAM, so it can easily deal with juggling dozens of browser tabs and your typical office and photo editing apps. But the A14's Snapdragon X X1 chip limits its ability to do anything truly demanding, so don't expect it to be playing many games or rendering video. And since it's powered by that Arm chip, the Zenbook also has to run apps designed for Intel and AMD CPUs in a slower emulation. Some software won't work at all, including very old apps, and games like Fortnite that use anti-cheat software.
So while the Zenbook A14 may seem like a MacBook Air killer at first glance, it's more of a reminder of how well Apple has balanced that laptop. Sure, it's half a pound heavier, but the MacBook Air can also edit videos, render 3D and play games in a pinch. You won't feel the same sort of performance limitations you'll undoubtedly encounter on the Zenbook A14.
That being said, there's still an audience for an ultra-light, under-powered laptop. The A14 is an ideal machine for writing on the go, since you can travel with it effortlessly and it offers a whopping 18 hours and 16 minutes of battery life (according to the PCMark 10 benchmark). And let's face it, the Zenbook's sluggish gaming chops may actually boost your productivity.
I could see it being a perfect secondary computing device if you've already got a desktop or heftier laptop setup at home. And if you really just need to browse the web, reply to emails and watch the occasional video, you probably won't notice its performance issues.
The Zenbook A14 makes a startling first impression long before you see it in action. Its retail box feels alarmingly weightless, as if it only contains air and some cardboard cushioning. And once you open it up, it's hard to comprehend how a 14-inch laptop can weigh a mere 2.2-pounds. It also feels as well balanced as an artisanal chef's knife, making it easy to hold. As impressed as I was by the ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 and G16 last year, the Zenbook A14 feels like a stronger example of how far the company has come from producing cheap MacBook clones.
Also adding to the Zenbook A14's overall polish is that aforementioned Ceraluminum case, which simply feels nice to hold. It's warm and inviting to touch, whereas Apple's MacBooks and most other all-metal laptops almost always feel cold (especially in heavily-chilled offices). As we've seen on other recent ASUS notebooks, Ceraluminum also feels sturdy, as there's no flex on the A14's slight frame.
The company clearly spent time fine-tuning the usability of such a light machine. Opening it up with one hand is effortless, thanks to a new hinge design that keeps the A14 from tilting backwards as you raise the screen. I've tested other light notebooks, including earlier Zenbook models, that required two hands: one to hold the computer's keyboard section down, and another to lift the display. I can tell you from experience that it's helpful to be able to flip open your computer with one hand while holding a crying kid in the other.
The Zenbook A14 sports an impressively thin profile when it's open, but it's also well-built enough to keep its screen steady when typing on your lap. That may seem like a niche point, but I've grown to despise unstable displays on lesser thin notebooks. It's yet another sign of ASUS getting the little things right in the A14.
And speaking of getting things right, I appreciated that ASUS was able to squeeze in a ton of ports: two USB-C connections, one USB Type A, a full-sized HDMI connection and a headphone jack. Apple, meanwhile, only includes two USB-C ports, a MagSafe charging connection and a headphone jack on the MacBook Air.
It's a shame that all of ASUS' thoughtful hardware design is held back by the Snapdragon X X1, an eight-core system on a chip (SOC) meant for ultra-slim and low-power devices. In benchmarks and general usage, it's clearly a much slower solution than the X Elite and X Plus chips that graced the Surface Pro and other Copilot+ systems. As I mentioned up top, that's the major compromise ASUS had to make to deliver such a slim notebook, and for some, it may be a complete dealbreaker.
The Zenbook A14 handled my basic productivity workflow just fine: browsing on Chrome and Edge with dozens of tabs, while also running Slack, Spotify and occasional photo editing apps. But in comparison to the Surface Pro and Laptop, it's like driving an entry-level car instead of a true luxury offering. And that's a shame since it's priced similarly to those PCs. Best Buy currently lists our review unit, which includes 32GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD, for $1,100. If those specs were paired with a better processor, I'd consider the A14 a smart purchase. Instead, it feels like a machine that should clearly be under $1,000 with 16GB of RAM and a smaller SSD.
On Edge and Chrome, I noticed slight hiccups when I was jumping between tabs and multiple windows. And those were native apps developed for Arm processors! Snapdragon chips need to emulate older x64 and x86 Windows apps, which introduces even more slowdown. While writing this review in Evernote (an x64 app), the A14 would often have trouble smoothly scrolling down long notes, and it would sometimes take a few seconds to load older notes. (Evernote owner Notion says it "does not officially support ARM processors at this time," which means users are out of luck if they encounter more significant issues.)
One upside to running a fairly slow processor? Excellent battery life. In the PCMark 10 battery benchmark, the Zenbook A14 lasted 18 hours and 16 minutes. That's around 30 minutes more than Dell's Copilot+ XPS 13 with a Snapdragon X Elite, and it's also two and a half hours longer than last year's Intel Core Ultra-powered Zenbook S14.
I appreciated the Zenbook A14 the most when I wasn't trying to benchmark it or search for its occasional slowdowns. It's a wonderful machine to grab when you just want to focus on writing, clearing out e-mail or finalizing accursed corporate training. Its keyboard is responsive and comfortable to type on, though I wish its touchpad measured clicks more accurately.
The Zenbook A14 is also great for catching up on Netflix shows in bed, since it feels practically weightless and video looks tremendous on its 14-inch OLED screen. Its speakers sound terribly tinny, though, so I'd use headphones for any serious binge-watching sessions. I was also surprised that its 1080p webcam actually produced decent footage, and it also lets you log into the A14 easily with Windows Hello IR support.
Given the combined issues of Arm compatibility and a slow processor, I wouldn't recommend the Zenbook A14 as a primary computer for most people, even though it's priced like a true MacBook Air competitor. If anything, it's a bit of an experiment by ASUS to see what compromises consumers will tolerate to get such a lightweight laptop. Instead of an impossibly light and underpowered notebook, most people would be better off with something like the Zenbook 14 OLED, which currently sells for $1,050 with 16GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD. Sure, it weighs 2.8 pounds instead of 2.2, but it's still pretty portable.
Apple's 13-inch MacBook Air, which starts at $999 with an M4 chip, is a half pound heavier than the Zenbook A14, but far more capable overall. Even the older M2 chip is faster than the Snapdragon X, and macOS has a wider selection of Arm-compatible apps, as well as faster emulation than Windows.
If ASUS' goal was to make an impressively premium ultra-light laptop, it almost got there with the Zenbook A14. While it outdoes the MacBook Air in weight and value, its slow processor makes it far less capable than Apple's ultraportable. Perhaps one day, with future revisions and more capable hardware, ASUS could finally deliver a powerful near-two-pound laptop. For now, though, you're better off waiting for a discount so the A14 can serve as a secondary PC.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
23 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Touch ID on Apple Watch — New Code Reveals Major Security Boost for Future Models
Apple has several new devices in the works, and some are slated to be revealed next month at the company's big iPhone 17 launch event. However, Apple isn't just thinking about the next batch of devices — the firm also has future models in its vision. According to a report from MacRumors, Apple is working to add Touch ID to future Apple Watch models. The publication found mention of the feature in some internal code. Based on what it saw, the feature could be included in the 2026 Apple Watch models, which are essentially right around the corner. It's essential to note that the code only indicates that Apple is exploring ways to integrate Touch ID into the Apple Watch. The company hasn't announced any official intentions, nor does the code indicate that Apple has found a satisfactory way to implement the feature in the watch form factor. If Apple decides to add Touch ID, there are two likely ways it would implement it: a button on the side of the watch or a sensor embedded underneath the screen. The button seems probable, as Apple has a patent for Touch ID on the side button of a watch. That doesn't confirm that it'll be on the side — Apple has plenty of patents that it doesn't use — but it makes that installation method feel a bit more likely. There have even been reports of a Touch ID sensor on the underside of the watch, but that doesn't sound nearly as practical as having it under the display or on the side, where the security feature is more readily available. A recent rumor from DigiTimes suggests that Apple is planning a "major redesign" for Apple Watch, and adding a significant feature like Touch ID would certainly be a significant design change, even if it's not the most visually apparent switch. Again, these are the 2026 devices that will receive the feature based on this code, so don't expect the Apple Watch Series 11 or Apple Watch Ultra 3 to have it. More likely devices are the Series 12 or Ultra 4, but there's no guarantee it happens even by the time those devices hit store shelves. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.

Hypebeast
an hour ago
- Hypebeast
A First for Apple: U.S.-Bound iPhones to Be Produced in India
Summary In a historic shift in its global supply chain,Appleisreportedlyexpanding its iPhone production to India to fulfill the majority of demand for its latest models in the United States. This marks the first time in history that all new variations of the upcomingiPhone 17, including the premium Pro models, will be manufactured in India from the start for a major Western market. The move is a strategic pivot for Apple, driven by a desire to reduce its reliance on China and to mitigate the potential impact of tariffs and geopolitical tensions. According to sources familiar with the matter, Apple has significantly ramped up its production in five Indian factories, including new plants operated by the Tata Group and Foxconn Technology Group. This expansion has already led to a surge in iPhone exports from India, with the U.S. becoming the country's primary export destination. This change is not just about avoiding potential tariffs; it is a long-term strategy to diversify Apple's manufacturing footprint. The shift has delivered substantial results, with India's iPhone exports surging to $7.5 billion USD in just the four months beginning April, nearly half of the previous fiscal year's total. This move solidifies India's role as a major hub in Apple's global production ecosystem, signaling a new era for both the company and the country's manufacturing sector.


Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, AMZN: Why Fund Managers Are Trimming Holdings in Mega-Cap Tech Stocks
Mega-cap tech stocks, including Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Meta (META), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Nvidia (NVDA), are the most under-owned by institutional investors in more than 16 years, according to a new report from Morgan Stanley (MS). Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. These companies account for a large share of the S&P 500 (SPX) index, yet active fund managers hold fewer of them than their benchmark weightings. The under-ownership of mega-cap tech stocks grew to roughly 140 basis points in the second quarter, compared with 115 in the first quarter. Notably, mega-cap companies are those with a market capitalization of $200 billion or more. Most of these companies boast well-established business models, strong brand power, and global operations. Nvidia Leads the Gap Nvidia, now the world's most valuable company, saw the gap between its institutional ownership and S&P 500 weighting widen by 92 basis points in the quarter, reaching -2.41%, the largest underweight among big tech stocks. This comes even as Nvidia's stock has skyrocketed nearly 1,346% over the past five years, powered by surging demand for its AI GPUs. In 2025 alone, shares have jumped 30.8%, far outpacing the S&P 500's 9.65% gain. Nvidia leads the gap, but others are not far behind. Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon are also underweight in institutional portfolios by 2.39%, 1.66%, and 1.40%, respectively. Still, these stocks have all delivered strong long-term gains, with Microsoft up 137%, Apple up 95%, and Amazon up 38% over the past five years. Why Funds Are Holding Back Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring said that mega-cap tech stocks now make up such a large share of the S&P 500 that active managers are cutting exposure to avoid concentration risks. Some managers are also cautious for company-specific reasons. For instance, Apple has been hit by slower iPhone sales and ongoing regulatory challenges. Still, Woodring believes that this under-ownership could be a bullish signal. If fund managers raise their holdings to match index levels, it could trigger another wave of buying, pushing mega-cap tech stocks to fresh record highs. Which Mega-Cap Stock Looks Most Attractive? Using TipRanks' Stock Comparison Tool, we compared NVDA, AMZN, AAPL, and MSFT to see which stocks analysts favor most. Nvidia, Amazon, and Microsoft all carry Strong Buy ratings, with analysts projecting more than 10% upside for each. Apple, on the other hand, holds a Moderate Buy rating, with a more limited upside of about 3.7% from current levels.