Musical cicadas brought back to UK from France
Cicadas, whose musical courtship calls once echoed around an ancient forest in southern England, have been reintroduced from France by conservationists hoping to re-establish the insect's UK population.
Conservationists from the Species Recovery Trust believe New Forest cicadas went extinct in the 1990s, due to changes in the way land was managed.
They have now released 11 female cicadas, some of which are believed to be pregnant, into a specially created habitat just outside the woods they once populated.
"This has been a really challenging project so it's amazing to see New Forest cicadas in England after all this time," said Charlotte Carne, project officer at Species Recovery Trust.
"It's like bringing them back from the dead," she said.
Having returned from a collection trip to Slovenia empty-handed, the trust called on a prominent French entomologist and cicada expert to help source some insects.
The 11 insects, which are black with golden rings and transparent wings, were caught in northern France and shipped to the UK on Wednesday.
Conservationists will not know until 2029 whether this phase of the project has been successful, and whether the cicadas have reproduced, as their offspring spend at least four years underground as nymphs.
If they survive, conservationists will release the adults in the New Forest.
"We believe the New Forest cicada probably went extinct because of changes to the way land was managed but we have worked with Forestry England to put the right kind of management in place," said Dominic Price, Species Recovery Trust director.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
a day ago
- eNCA
Musical cicadas brought back to UK from France
Cicadas, whose musical courtship calls once echoed around an ancient forest in southern England, have been reintroduced from France by conservationists hoping to re-establish the insect's UK population. Conservationists from the Species Recovery Trust believe New Forest cicadas went extinct in the 1990s, due to changes in the way land was managed. They have now released 11 female cicadas, some of which are believed to be pregnant, into a specially created habitat just outside the woods they once populated. "This has been a really challenging project so it's amazing to see New Forest cicadas in England after all this time," said Charlotte Carne, project officer at Species Recovery Trust. "It's like bringing them back from the dead," she said. Having returned from a collection trip to Slovenia empty-handed, the trust called on a prominent French entomologist and cicada expert to help source some insects. The 11 insects, which are black with golden rings and transparent wings, were caught in northern France and shipped to the UK on Wednesday. Conservationists will not know until 2029 whether this phase of the project has been successful, and whether the cicadas have reproduced, as their offspring spend at least four years underground as nymphs. If they survive, conservationists will release the adults in the New Forest. "We believe the New Forest cicada probably went extinct because of changes to the way land was managed but we have worked with Forestry England to put the right kind of management in place," said Dominic Price, Species Recovery Trust director.
eNCA
19-05-2025
- eNCA
The US towns that took on 'forever chemical' giants
WASHINGTON - No corner of the Earth is untouched. From Tibet to Antarctica, so-called "forever chemicals" have seeped into the blood of nearly every living creature. Tainting food, water and wildlife, these toxic substances have been linked to ailments ranging from birth defects to rare cancers. Yet if it weren't for the efforts of residents in two heavily impacted American towns, the world might still be in the dark. In the new book "They Poisoned the World: Life and Death in the Age of Chemicals," investigative journalist Mariah Blake recounts how people in Parkersburg, West Virginia, and Hoosick Falls, New York, blew the whistle on the industrial giants that poisoned them -- and, in the process, forced the world to reckon with per‑ and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS. "We're talking about a class of chemicals that doesn't break down in the environment," Blake tells AFP, calling it the "worst contamination crisis in human history." First developed in the 1930s, PFAS are prized for their strength, heat resistance, and water- and grease-repelling powers. Built on the carbon-fluoride bond -- the strongest in chemistry -- they persist like radioactive waste and accumulate in our bodies, hence the "forever" nickname. Blake's research traces their history, from accidental discovery by a DuPont chemist to modern usage in cookware, clothing, and cosmetics. They might have remained a curiosity if Manhattan Project scientists hadn't needed a coating that could withstand atomic-bomb chemistry, helping companies produce them at scale. - Corporate malfeasance - AFP | Robyn Beck Industry knew the risks early. Internal tests showed plant workers suffered chemical burns and respiratory distress. Crops withered and livestock died near manufacturing sites. So how did they get away with it? Blake tracks the roots to the 1920s, when reports emerged that leaded gasoline caused psychosis and death among factory workers. In response, an industry-backed scientist advanced a now-infamous doctrine: chemicals should be presumed safe until proven harmful. This "Kehoe principle" incentivised corporations to manufacture doubt around health risks -- a big reason it took until last year for the US to finalise a ban on asbestos. DuPont's own studies warned that Teflon had no place on cookware. But after a French engineer coated his wife's muffin tins with it, a Parisian craze took off -- and an American entrepreneur sold the idea back to DuPont. Soon, nonstick pans were flying off shelves, thanks in part to a regulatory gap: PFAS, along with thousands of other chemicals, were "grandfathered" into the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act and required no further testing. - Massive litigation - The cover-up began to unravel in the 1990s in Parkersburg, where DuPont had for decades been dumping Teflon waste into pits and the Ohio River. The town reaped economic benefits, but female plant workers were having babies with birth defects, a cattle farmer downstream was losing his herd, and residents developed rare cancers. Blake tells the story through "accidental activists." One is Michael Hickey, a preppy insurance underwriter with no interest in politics or the environment. After cancer took his father and friends, he started testing Hoosick Falls's water. Another is Emily Marpe, "a teen mom with a high school education" who saved to buy her family's dream house in upstate New York, only to learn the water flowing from the taps was fouled with PFAS that now coursed through their blood in massive levels. "She knew the science inside out," says Blake, "and became an incredibly articulate advocate." Years of litigation yielded hundreds of millions in settlements and forced DuPont and 3M to phase out two notorious PFAS. But the companies pivoted to substitutes like GenX -- later shown to be just as toxic. Still, Blake argues the tide is turning. France has banned PFAS in many consumer goods, the EU is considering a ban, and in the US, states are moving to restrict PFAS in sludge fertilizer and food packaging. Liabilities linked to the chemicals are driving major retailers from McDonald's to REI to pledge PFAS-free products. Her optimism is tempered by the political climate. Just this week, the Trump administration announced the rollback of federal drinking water standards for four next-generation PFAS chemicals. But she believes the momentum is real. "Ordinary citizens who set out to protect their families and communities have really created this dramatic change," she says. "It's like climate change -- it feels intractable, but here's a case where people have made major headway."
Daily Maverick
18-05-2025
- Daily Maverick
The science of soap — a chemist explains how it works to keep you clean and smelling fresh
There's a science behind soap that ensures you can get rid of all types of dirt when you wash up, regardless of whether it's muddy or oily. How does soap clean our bodies? – Charlie H (8), Stamford, Connecticut Thousands of years ago, our ancestors discovered something that would clean their bodies and clothes. As the story goes, fat from someone's meal fell into the leftover ashes of a fire. They were astonished to discover that the blending of fat and ashes formed a material that cleaned things. At the time, it must have seemed like magic. That's the legend, anyway. However it happened, the discovery of soap dates back about 5,000 years to the ancient city of Babylon in what was southern Mesopotamia – today, the country of Iraq. As the centuries passed, people around the world began to use soap to clean the things that got dirty. During the 1600s, soap was a common item in the American colonies, often made at home. In 1791, Nicholas Leblanc, a French chemist, patented the first soapmaking process. Today, the world spends about $50-billion every year on bath, kitchen and laundry soap. But although billions of people use soap every day, most of us don't know how it works. As a professor of chemistry, I can explain the science of soap – and why you should listen to your mom when she tells you to wash up. The chemistry of clean Water (scientific name: dihydrogen monoxide) is composed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. This molecule is required for all life on our planet. Chemists categorise other molecules that are attracted to water as hydrophilic, which means water-loving. Hydrophilic molecules can dissolve in water, so if you wash your hands under a running tap without using soap, you'd probably get rid of lots of whatever hydrophilic bits are stuck to your skin. But there is another category of molecules that chemists call hydrophobic, which means water-fearing. Hydrophobic molecules do not dissolve in water. Oil is an example of something that's hydrophobic. You probably know from experience that oil and water just don't mix. Picture shaking a jar of vinaigrette salad dressing – the oil and the other watery ingredients never stay mixed. So just swishing your hands through water isn't going to get rid of water-fearing molecules such as oil or grease. Here's where soap comes in to save the day. Soap, a complex molecule, is both water-loving and water-fearing. Shaped like a tadpole, the soap molecule has a round head and long tail; the head is hydrophilic and the tail is hydrophobic. This quality is one of the reasons soap is slippery. It's also what gives soap its cleaning superpower. A microscopic view To see what happens when you wash your hands with soap and water, let's zoom all the gunk you touch during the day that builds up on your skin to make your hands dirty. Maybe there are smears of food, mud from outside, or even sweat and oils from your own skin. All that material is either water-loving or water-fearing on the molecular level. Dirt is a jumbled mess of both. Dust and dead skin cells are hydrophilic, naturally occurring oils are hydrophobic, and environmental debris can be either. If you use only water to clean your hands, plenty will be left behind because you'd only remove the water-loving bits that dissolve in water. But when you add a bit of soap, it's a different story, thanks to its simultaneously water-loving and water-fearing properties. Soap molecules come together and surround the grime on your hands, forming what's known as a micelle structure. On a molecular level, it looks almost like a bubble encasing the hydrophobic bit of debris. The water-loving heads of the soap molecules are on the surface, with the water-fearing tails inside the micelle. This structure traps the dirt, and running water washes it all away. To get the full effect, wash your hands at the sink for at least 20 seconds. Rubbing your hands together helps force the soap molecules into whatever dirt there is to break it up and envelope it. It's not just dirt Along with dirt, your body is covered by micro-organisms – bacteria, viruses and fungi. Most are harmless and some even protect you from getting sick. But some micro-organisms, known as pathogens, can cause illness and disease. They can also cause you to smell if you haven't taken a bath in a while. These bacteria break down organic molecules and release stinky fumes. Although micro-organisms are protected by a barrier – it's called a membrane – soap and water can disrupt the membrane, causing the microorganism to burst open. The water then washes the remains of the micro-organism away, along with the stink. To say that soap changed the course of civilisation is an understatement. For thousands of years it's helped to keep billions of people healthy. Think of that the next time mom or dad asks you to wash up – which is likely to be sometime soon. DM First published by The Conversation. Paul E Richardson is a professor of biochemistry at Coastal Carolina University in South Carolina. This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
