Fire at San Jose post office prompts response from about 50 firefighters
The fire happened just before 3 a.m. on the 6500 block of Crown Boulevard. A photo shared by the Fire Department shows what appears to be a vehicle inside the building. But the agency has not yet said what started the fire.
About 50 firefighters were sent to the scene after a second alarm was called, and the fire was knocked down around 4:30 a.m., the Fire Department said.
According to the United States Postal Service, the US Postal Inspection Service is investigating the incident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Is Wall Street So Bearish on Lucid Group? There's 1 Key Reason.
Key Points Electric car stocks have surged due to robotaxi optimism. But severe near-term challenges remain. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Several electric car stocks got huge boosts in recent weeks over enthusiasm for the promise of robotaxis. Tesla launched its robotaxi pilot program in Austin, Texas, last month. Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID), meanwhile, recently partnered with Uber Technologies to deliver 20,000 self-driving vehicles alongside a $300 million cash infusion. But not every analyst is bullish. CNBC's Jim Cramer, for example, recently questioned the value of Lucid's deal with Uber. This month, seven other major Wall Street analysts reaffirmed their price targets for Lucid stock. Everyone predicts that shares will fall in value over the next 12 months. Why is Wall Street still so bearish? There's one obvious culprit. The near-term reality for EV stocks is frightening Cathie Wood, CEO of Ark Invest, thinks robotaxis will be a $10 trillion industry long term. That has investors excited. Over the next 12 to 24 months, however, most EV makers will be feeling the pain. That's because federal tax credits for EVs are set to expire this September, effectively making a new EV purchase $7,500 more expensive. While the exact impact remains unknown, this shift should sizably lower demand growth. Federal automotive regulatory credits, meanwhile, are also set to lose their value given fines for noncompliance are being eliminated. Lucid has earned more than $200 million through these programs. And while it won't lose access to the entirety of this profit source, given that many state and international programs will remain, the financial impact will be sudden and meaningful. Every EV maker will be affected by these regulatory shifts, including Rivian, Tesla, and Lucid. EV sales in the second quarter of 2025 are already down 6.3% year over year. We could see these declines persist, or even accelerate, given reduced incentives. Lucid's robotaxi opportunity remains lucrative long term. But analysts are rightfully worried about the next year or two when it comes to reduced sales and profit growth. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Is Wall Street So Bearish on Lucid Group? There's 1 Key Reason. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why does the White House want to redesign gas cans? Explaining the situation
The White House says it wants to 'Make Gas Cans Great Again.' Under a plan announced July 24 by President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency, the federal government is encouraging manufacturers to add vents to portable fuel containers, also known as gas cans. It would effectively reverse a 2009-rule by federal environmental officials at the time that required portable gas cans - used for lawnmowers, chainsaws, ATVS and stranded vehicles - to have special vents that stop the vapors from escaping. Proponents of that rule - which was finalized in 2007 - said the vapors that escape contributed to ozone pollution. But the 2009 rule created an online market for pre-ban gas cans among buyers dissatisfied with the new cans. Why does Trump want to redesign gas cans? 'Gas cans used to pour gas,' Trump's head of the EPA, Lee Zeldin, said on X, formerly Twitter. 'Now they just dribble like a child's sippy cup.' But many modern designs are often infuriatingly ineffective at actually filling tanks because the vents work so poorly, critics argue. Instead of stopping vapors from flowing out the complicated spouts and relief valves, the new designs often cause gasoline spills, which some critics say are far worse than a tiny amount of vapor escaping from an older design. Some rules for gas cans will still remain in place Other rules for gas cans have to remain in place under federal law, like making sure they're child-resistant and limiting the risk of flash fires. What happens next for gas cans? The EPA's announcement is non-binding for manufacturers and doesn't prohibit the vents. Rather, the EPA is asking manufacturers to redesign the gas cans to have vents 'to facilitate fast and smooth fuel flow.' This article contains material from USA TODAY Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook This article originally appeared on Gas can redesign considered by Trump White House. Here's why
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Affordable Can the Entry Tesla Model Y Be, Without Being Too Cheap?
Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirms a more affordable Model Y is on the way later this year, set to play the role of an entry-level volume model. Years ago Tesla had planned a $25,000 offering at times called a "Model 2," but had effectively abandoned that project amid a focus on the Cybertruck and other projects like the Optimus robot. A decontented Model Y is now expected to arrive on sale by the end of the year. Tesla began teasing the idea of a $25,000 car long ago, before inflation rapidly overtook that number, so the EV maker has focused instead on its delayed Cybertruck and other projects like the Robotaxi, as well as the Optimus robot. But the idea of a stripped-down budget model never quite went away, it turns out, even though we would have expected it to land before 2025. Now, just such a model is on the way into mass production later this year, and as rumored earlier this spring it'll be just a decontented Model Y. On a recent earnings call, Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirmed that a more affordable Model Y is indeed on the way. "It's just a Model Y," Musk said in response to a question about Tesla's future volume model. "Let the cat out of the bag there." This makes plenty of sense from Tesla's point of view. How Low Can Tesla Go? The Model Y has already seen plenty of variants over the six years it has been in production, so there is an extensive catalog of parts that can be added (or subtracted) from the vehicle with ease. It also makes sense not to develop something new and different, which is what Tesla has tried to do with its entire model range. There's also the reality that EV buyers don't really want something truly smaller in size, as evidenced by the lack of popularity of hatchback-sized EVs with correspondingly small batteries. So something close to the Model Y but cheaper seems to be the optimal solution. Just how much more affordable this Model Y will be remains to be seen. The least expensive Model Y currently offered in the US starts at $46,630, and that's before any tax incentives, which are slated to expire in a matter of weeks. We think it's pretty clear that the previous $25,000 target price for a budget model is entirely off the table, and that hitting a $35,000 price point will be quite an achievement, if it does not come with a laughably small battery. Where to Cut Corners? One of the issues with the updated Juniper Model Y is that the crossover itself was already quite basic, with so much having been trimmed as part of Tesla's drive to reduce complexity. So one way to decontent is to opt for harder, police-grade interior plastics, manually adjustable seats, fewer interior features, and less trim. Another tactic Tesla has already used is locking out part of the battery by software. And long ago General Motors practiced the art of decontenting a car by ditching the rear seat in the Chevette and applying the Scooter badge to it. So a more basic rear bench seat could probably be added, with no third-row option. The Model Y is already quite skimpy inside, so cost savings could have to be found via the hardware underneath, such as a smaller and less expensive LFP battery offering less range and a less powerful motor. This tactic has worked well for other EV makers seeking to offer a shorter-range, single-motor model, and it might work for Tesla as well. But this more affordable Model Y must hit a certain desirability point as well, in order to gain interest from buyers. It cannot be too cheap inside or offer too little range. It's a tough balancing act for any automaker, especially one already known for cutting corners whenever possible. Still, we think a $35,000 price before any incentives could be achieved if Tesla were to apply all the cost-cutting measures at its disposal for its popular crossover. A less expensive volume model—as small and inexpensive challengers like the Volvo EX30 start to arrive—could be just what Tesla needs at the moment. How should an entry Model Y be priced and what kind of range would it need to interest enough buyers to be a success in the marketplace? Please comment below.
