Islamist preacher unable to 'bury' anti-Semitism ruling
Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was ordered by the Federal Court earlier in July not to repeat the perverse and racist tropes used in a series of fiery sermons from November 2023.
In the speeches, Mr Haddad - who is also known as William Haddad or Abu Ousayd - variously referred to Jewish people as "vile", "treacherous", "murderous" and "mischievous".
Justice Angus Stewart found the sermons contained "perverse generalisations" against Jewish people and included racist, anti-Semitic tropes.
The judge on Thursday ordered the preacher "pin" or "feature" corrective notices describing the court's findings to the centre's website and social media pages on Facebook, Rumble, Instagram and Soundcloud.
He has been given 21 days to comply with the order and the posts had not been made as of Thursday afternoon.
Mr Haddad objected to prominently displaying the notices, saying this would go beyond what was ordinarily ordered by the courts.
Pinning the posts would be tantamount to promoting or advertising the findings, he said.
Justice Stewart ordered the notices to be pinned for 30 days, saying the requirement was not unduly burdensome and would stop them disappearing from view.
"It will prevent them from being deliberately buried by way of successive further posts," the judge wrote.
Promoting the notices was part of their objective, he said.
"The respondents promoted the unlawful lectures and it is not disproportionate to require them to promote the corrective notice in the relatively constrained manner described above as an appropriate form of redress," he wrote in his judgment.
The notice itself highlights the "unlawful behaviour based on racial hatred" of Mr Haddad and the centre.
The three lectures - titled "The Jews of Al Medina" and published on video hosting site Rumble - were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish members of the Australian community, the notice says.
The lawsuit was brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who claimed the lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jewish people.
The pair said they were vindicated by Justice Stewart's findings, saying no community in Australia should be dehumanised.
"Freedom of expression should not be abused by the promotion of hateful anti-Semitism and those who wish to do so should know that conduct shouldn't be tolerated by us," Mr Goot told reporters after the judgment.
The cleric has been ordered to remove the lectures and not to repeat similar racist statements about Jewish people in public.
He will also have to pay the legal bill for Mr Wertheim and Mr Goot, which is estimated to be in the six figures.
Mr Haddad's speeches were delivered after Hamas, designated by Australia as a terrorist group, attacked Israel on October 7, 2023.
The attack sparked Israeli retaliation that has left Gaza in turmoil and tens of thousands of civilians dead.
An Islamist preacher who used harmful racial stereotypes about Jewish people in sermons will be forced to tell the world of his anti-Semitism through prominent online posts.
Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was ordered by the Federal Court earlier in July not to repeat the perverse and racist tropes used in a series of fiery sermons from November 2023.
In the speeches, Mr Haddad - who is also known as William Haddad or Abu Ousayd - variously referred to Jewish people as "vile", "treacherous", "murderous" and "mischievous".
Justice Angus Stewart found the sermons contained "perverse generalisations" against Jewish people and included racist, anti-Semitic tropes.
The judge on Thursday ordered the preacher "pin" or "feature" corrective notices describing the court's findings to the centre's website and social media pages on Facebook, Rumble, Instagram and Soundcloud.
He has been given 21 days to comply with the order and the posts had not been made as of Thursday afternoon.
Mr Haddad objected to prominently displaying the notices, saying this would go beyond what was ordinarily ordered by the courts.
Pinning the posts would be tantamount to promoting or advertising the findings, he said.
Justice Stewart ordered the notices to be pinned for 30 days, saying the requirement was not unduly burdensome and would stop them disappearing from view.
"It will prevent them from being deliberately buried by way of successive further posts," the judge wrote.
Promoting the notices was part of their objective, he said.
"The respondents promoted the unlawful lectures and it is not disproportionate to require them to promote the corrective notice in the relatively constrained manner described above as an appropriate form of redress," he wrote in his judgment.
The notice itself highlights the "unlawful behaviour based on racial hatred" of Mr Haddad and the centre.
The three lectures - titled "The Jews of Al Medina" and published on video hosting site Rumble - were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish members of the Australian community, the notice says.
The lawsuit was brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who claimed the lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jewish people.
The pair said they were vindicated by Justice Stewart's findings, saying no community in Australia should be dehumanised.
"Freedom of expression should not be abused by the promotion of hateful anti-Semitism and those who wish to do so should know that conduct shouldn't be tolerated by us," Mr Goot told reporters after the judgment.
The cleric has been ordered to remove the lectures and not to repeat similar racist statements about Jewish people in public.
He will also have to pay the legal bill for Mr Wertheim and Mr Goot, which is estimated to be in the six figures.
Mr Haddad's speeches were delivered after Hamas, designated by Australia as a terrorist group, attacked Israel on October 7, 2023.
The attack sparked Israeli retaliation that has left Gaza in turmoil and tens of thousands of civilians dead.
An Islamist preacher who used harmful racial stereotypes about Jewish people in sermons will be forced to tell the world of his anti-Semitism through prominent online posts.
Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was ordered by the Federal Court earlier in July not to repeat the perverse and racist tropes used in a series of fiery sermons from November 2023.
In the speeches, Mr Haddad - who is also known as William Haddad or Abu Ousayd - variously referred to Jewish people as "vile", "treacherous", "murderous" and "mischievous".
Justice Angus Stewart found the sermons contained "perverse generalisations" against Jewish people and included racist, anti-Semitic tropes.
The judge on Thursday ordered the preacher "pin" or "feature" corrective notices describing the court's findings to the centre's website and social media pages on Facebook, Rumble, Instagram and Soundcloud.
He has been given 21 days to comply with the order and the posts had not been made as of Thursday afternoon.
Mr Haddad objected to prominently displaying the notices, saying this would go beyond what was ordinarily ordered by the courts.
Pinning the posts would be tantamount to promoting or advertising the findings, he said.
Justice Stewart ordered the notices to be pinned for 30 days, saying the requirement was not unduly burdensome and would stop them disappearing from view.
"It will prevent them from being deliberately buried by way of successive further posts," the judge wrote.
Promoting the notices was part of their objective, he said.
"The respondents promoted the unlawful lectures and it is not disproportionate to require them to promote the corrective notice in the relatively constrained manner described above as an appropriate form of redress," he wrote in his judgment.
The notice itself highlights the "unlawful behaviour based on racial hatred" of Mr Haddad and the centre.
The three lectures - titled "The Jews of Al Medina" and published on video hosting site Rumble - were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish members of the Australian community, the notice says.
The lawsuit was brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who claimed the lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jewish people.
The pair said they were vindicated by Justice Stewart's findings, saying no community in Australia should be dehumanised.
"Freedom of expression should not be abused by the promotion of hateful anti-Semitism and those who wish to do so should know that conduct shouldn't be tolerated by us," Mr Goot told reporters after the judgment.
The cleric has been ordered to remove the lectures and not to repeat similar racist statements about Jewish people in public.
He will also have to pay the legal bill for Mr Wertheim and Mr Goot, which is estimated to be in the six figures.
Mr Haddad's speeches were delivered after Hamas, designated by Australia as a terrorist group, attacked Israel on October 7, 2023.
The attack sparked Israeli retaliation that has left Gaza in turmoil and tens of thousands of civilians dead.
An Islamist preacher who used harmful racial stereotypes about Jewish people in sermons will be forced to tell the world of his anti-Semitism through prominent online posts.
Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad was ordered by the Federal Court earlier in July not to repeat the perverse and racist tropes used in a series of fiery sermons from November 2023.
In the speeches, Mr Haddad - who is also known as William Haddad or Abu Ousayd - variously referred to Jewish people as "vile", "treacherous", "murderous" and "mischievous".
Justice Angus Stewart found the sermons contained "perverse generalisations" against Jewish people and included racist, anti-Semitic tropes.
The judge on Thursday ordered the preacher "pin" or "feature" corrective notices describing the court's findings to the centre's website and social media pages on Facebook, Rumble, Instagram and Soundcloud.
He has been given 21 days to comply with the order and the posts had not been made as of Thursday afternoon.
Mr Haddad objected to prominently displaying the notices, saying this would go beyond what was ordinarily ordered by the courts.
Pinning the posts would be tantamount to promoting or advertising the findings, he said.
Justice Stewart ordered the notices to be pinned for 30 days, saying the requirement was not unduly burdensome and would stop them disappearing from view.
"It will prevent them from being deliberately buried by way of successive further posts," the judge wrote.
Promoting the notices was part of their objective, he said.
"The respondents promoted the unlawful lectures and it is not disproportionate to require them to promote the corrective notice in the relatively constrained manner described above as an appropriate form of redress," he wrote in his judgment.
The notice itself highlights the "unlawful behaviour based on racial hatred" of Mr Haddad and the centre.
The three lectures - titled "The Jews of Al Medina" and published on video hosting site Rumble - were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish members of the Australian community, the notice says.
The lawsuit was brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who claimed the lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jewish people.
The pair said they were vindicated by Justice Stewart's findings, saying no community in Australia should be dehumanised.
"Freedom of expression should not be abused by the promotion of hateful anti-Semitism and those who wish to do so should know that conduct shouldn't be tolerated by us," Mr Goot told reporters after the judgment.
The cleric has been ordered to remove the lectures and not to repeat similar racist statements about Jewish people in public.
He will also have to pay the legal bill for Mr Wertheim and Mr Goot, which is estimated to be in the six figures.
Mr Haddad's speeches were delivered after Hamas, designated by Australia as a terrorist group, attacked Israel on October 7, 2023.
The attack sparked Israeli retaliation that has left Gaza in turmoil and tens of thousands of civilians dead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Bradley Murdoch's life behind bars after murdering British backpacker Peter Falconio
To Bradley John Murdoch's family, he was known as "proud Poppy" and a "gentle giant with a heart of gold". To those who knew him in prison, the convicted murderer was a "lone wolf", a skilled mechanic and a master in manipulation. And to the loved ones of Peter Falconio, Murdoch is the monster who ruined their lives. As the world comes to grips with Murdoch's death from terminal cancer this week, details are emerging about what the 67-year-old killer was like behind bars. Murdoch died on Tuesday night at Alice Springs Hospital's palliative care unit. He was serving a life prison sentence for fatally shooting 28-year-old British backpacker Peter Falconio, near the remote Northern Territory town of Barrow Creek in 2001. Murdoch was also convicted for assaulting and trying to kidnap Mr Falconio's girlfriend Joanne Lees, tying her wrists with cable ties before she escaped into bushland. Murdoch never revealed the location of Mr Falconio's body, which authorities believe could be anywhere between Alice Springs and Broome. The 28-year-old's parents have never been able to bury their son. "We didn't have much faith, but we were hoping Bradley John Murdoch would reveal where Peter was before he died," Mr Falconio's family said in a statement this week. Twenty-four years ago, the brutal and unprovoked nature of Murdoch's attack on the side of the Stuart Highway prompted intense international media attention and made tourists and truck drivers look over their shoulders on Australia's outback roads. His death has cast a spotlight on the case once more, but little is known about the man's character behind bars. Murdoch spent more than 20 years inside correctional centres in Alice Springs and Darwin, alongside some of the NT's most hardened criminals. Zak Grieve, who served 12 years in Darwin's Berrimah and Holtze prisons, described Murdoch as a "lone wolf" who expected special treatment from prison guards. He recalled an incident in 2014 when the Australian horror film Wolf Creek played on free-to-air television inside the Darwin Correctional Centre. Grieve said Murdoch was surprised to learn the film was loosely based on his murder of Mr Falconio and attempted kidnapping of Ms Lees. "He watched it and he was f***ing gutted," Grieve said. Grieve said Murdoch later let him borrow a copy of Ms Lees's biography, which he kept in his prison cell. He also said Murdoch manipulated prison guards and inmates by sharing personal information behind their backs. "It didn't matter whether you were a prisoner or an officer, if he could use you to gain something, he'd give you up in a heartbeat," he said. One former prison guard, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, agreed that Murdoch could be calculating. "If he got jealous, he could set things up in a way that would cause suspicion on another prisoner," the former guard said. He said Murdoch was popular with other correctional officers who appreciated his dry sense of humour and work ethic. An experienced bush mechanic, Murdoch had a knack for trade skills and was known for sharing his expertise with other prisoners. He also had a reputation as a decent cook while on kitchen duty, baking desserts for correctional officers on Christmas Day. But Murdoch's charms only went so far. "If you were a female officer, he hated your guts … but if you were a male officer he'd try and get into your good books," Grieve said. Before his arrest for Mr Falconio's murder, Murdoch had faced charges of abducting and raping a 12-year-old girl and her mother in South Australia, but was ultimately acquitted. He had also served jail time in Western Australia for shooting at a crowd of Aboriginal football fans in Fitzroy Crossing. The sentencing judge at the time said Murdoch fired up to 10 rounds during "a fit of rage", and that it was clear he had "a long-standing hatred of Aborigines". Gerry McCarthy, who was appointed NT corrections minister in 2009, said Murdoch was mostly well behaved in prison. "He was a high-profile prisoner, and he was listed as high security because of his ingenuity," he said. "He was a very intelligent, intuitive person who could operate lots of equipment and machines." In 2020, Murdoch gave evidence at a coronial inquest into the death of Darwin inmate Christopher Malyschko, who died from asphyxiation after using synthetic cannabis, known as kronic. Murdoch told the inquest he condemned the use of the drug, and said he'd warned prisoners "someone's going to die from this" just days before Malyschko died. While Murdoch said he had never used kronic, he'd previously worked as a truck driver and drug smuggler in the outback, using amphetamines to stay awake on the road. The common view is Murdoch was reserved in prison, and even those on his good side never knew the real him. "I think a lot of the prisoners were a bit intimidated by him, and felt that he was a pretty tough sort of fellow," the former prison guard told the ABC. On multiple occasions, the officer said he probed Murdoch for answers about what happened on that night in 2001, but to no avail. "I made a joke with him when he first came in, with the idea of trying to get his trust and breach the truth … but he never gave any indication whatsoever of the truth behind what happened," he said. Uncooperative until the end, Murdoch has now taken his secrets to his grave. For Mr Falconio's family, their quest for answers continues. "Even now, we still hold out hopes that his remains will be found," they said in a statement.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Salim Mehajer breaks silence after walking from prison
Disgraced former politician and convicted domestic violence offender Salim Mehajer has shared his 'deep gratitude' in his first social media post after walking free from prison on Friday morning. Mehajer exited the gates of John Morony Correctional Centre at Berkshire Park in northwestern Sydney just after 9:30am and into a black Mercedes hire car, giving him his first taste of freedom in almost five years. In a heartfelt Instagram post on Saturday morning, Mehajer said he wanted to 'formally convey his deep gratitude' for the opportunity granted to him by the State Parole Authority. 'I am fully committed to fulfilling the expectations placed before me,' he wrote. 'Additionally, I express my sincere appreciation for the unwavering support of my family and friends, as well as the dedication of my legal representative, who has consistently stood by me throughout this journey.' Mehajer added that he requests privacy, ahead of his appeal scheduled for three weeks time. Meanwhile, the former politician's first stops after freedom on Friday were to Parramatta Westfield, Service NSW for a new drivers' licence and to a cosmetic dentist in Hornsby to fix his smile after years behind bars, the Daily Mail reported. Hornsby Dental offers teeth whitening from $549, composite veneers starting at $700 and full mouth implants starting at $24,990 per arch. He did not stop to speak to waiting media as he left custody, but his lawyer, Zawat Zreika of Zreika Law, told NewsWire the former Auburn Mayor's concern was primarily for his family. 'Mr Mehajer has now been released from custody,' she said. 'This is a long awaited and deeply personal moment for him and his family. 'He asks that their privacy be respected during this time.' The 39-year-old former Auburn deputy mayor was released after the expiry of a non-parole period he was serving for domestic violence and fraud offences. He has been in prison just short of five years and has served back-to-back sentences for multiple offences.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Why Mark Latham is likely to remain in NSW parliament
As politicians call for Mark Latham's conduct in parliament to be investigated by the privileges committee, a top constitutional lawyer says it would be "very, very difficult" to have him expelled even if the allegations were proven. It follows media reports he allegedly took photos of female colleagues speaking in parliament and made disparaging comments about them in private messages and participated in a consensual sex video in his office. Mr Latham has denied any wrongdoing. In posts on X, Mr Latham said the media had used his messages out of context, cherry-picking and missing in-jokes. Of the alleged sex video, Mr Latham has repeatedly said no media claimed to have seen the alleged tape and there was "no suggestion of any law or rule broken". NSW Premier Chris Minns said on Thursday if proved true, Mr Latham's alleged behaviour in the parliamentary chamber "almost certainly" broke standing orders. Mr Minns said the privileges committee should investigate the allegations and "make a decision about sanctioning him". in an interview with 2SM, Mr Latham said he had not breached any standing order of NSW parliament. The leader of government in the upper house, Penny Sharpe, has also said she would move a motion to refer Mr Latham to the privileges committee for allegedly "disclosing authorised information" after he used parliamentary privilege to allegedly reveal confidential information from a psychologist's report prepared for civil proceedings brought by MP Alex Greenwich. Mr Latham said his remarks were not based on confidential information. He asked for a fair go from voters who said he should leave parliament. "They've got a rigorous process there about behaviour inside the parliament, a complaints officer, a committee of woke people who monitor what you do in the building," he said. "I've never received notification of any complaint through that process. "So for any of you listeners saying kick him off, what happened to the principle of innocent and innocent until proven guilty?" Mr Latham's parliamentary term expires in 2031. University of Sydney professor of constitutional law Anne Twomey said NSW parliament had the power to expel MPs — unlike in federal parliament after such powers were abolished in 1987. But she added that in NSW it was "very, very hard to expel" an MP. Professor Twomey said an MP could face expulsion if they committed criminal offences or engaged in conduct that brings the house into disrepute; however, this has very rarely happened since the 1800s. "As a general principle, it only gets used when the person has had findings made against them," she said. Mr Latham is not accused of any criminal offences, and no inappropriate conduct has been proven. While Mr Minns said if the allegations against Mr Latham were proven "in a typical workplace, he'd be gone tomorrow", he acknowledged it was voters who elected him to parliament. Professor Twomey said the threshold for expulsion was very high, and there were many historic examples of MPs who had avoided expulsion threats. In 1997, NSW Labor MP Franca Arena faced a motion calling for her suspension until she apologised after using parliamentary privilege to allege a criminal conspiracy by certain politicians to cover up paedophilia, which a special commission concluded was false. She refused to apologise but read a statement of regret, which attracted enough support from enough Coalition and crossbench MPs to avoid suspension. Another ground for expulsion is bankruptcy. In Victoria, former state Liberal leader John Pesutto narrowly avoided bankruptcy and possible expulsion from parliament after he was able to secure a loan from the party to help cover a $2.3 million legal payout he owes MP Moira Deeming from a defamation case. Mr Latham was last year ordered to pay $140,000 in a defamation suit after making graphic, homophobic comments in a tweet about Mr Greenwich and has appealed. The extent of Mr Latham's financial resources and ability to pay is not clear. The NSW parliament also has powers to temporarily suspend MPs and in 2022 the then-Coalition government suspended two of its MPs. Professor Twomey said the power to expel or suspend MPs was problematic, as it could be used for political purposes. "I think the better answer would be maybe shorter terms for the Legislative Council so that the people in the end get to decide."
