King's Birthday public holiday trading hours: Coles, Woolies, Kmart and Bunnings
Millions of Australians are gearing up for a long weekend in celebration of King Charles III's 76th birthday.
The public holiday is celebrated by most of the country in June, however those in Western Australia and Queensland will have to wait until later in the year to catch an extended break.
For those in NSW, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, the ACT and the Northern Territory, here's what you need to know about what's open and when on the Monday public holiday.
Coles
VIC: all stores open
NSW/ACT: all stores open
TAS: all stores open
NT: all stores open with reduced trading hours
SA: all supermarkets closed except for the following stores:
Port Lincoln
Port Pirie
Berri
Port Augusta
Mount Barker
Adelaide Rundle Place
Whyalla
Murray Bridge Green
Mount Gambier
Victor Harbor.
Woolworths
VIC: all stores open
NSW/ACT: all stores open
TAS: all stores open
SA: some store are open, customers are encouraged to check their local stores' trading hours on the Woolworths Store Finder for specific trading hours
NT: some store are open, customers are encouraged to check their local stores' trading hours on the Woolworths Store Finder for specific trading hours
Some Woolworths Metro stores are open, but customers are again encouraged to check their local stores' trading hours on the Woolworths Store Finder for specific trading hours.
Liquorland
NSW/ACT: all stores are open for trade except for:
Charlestown
Wyong
Toronto
Gunnedah
Long Jetty Liquor Barn
Lismore
VIC: all stores are open for trade except for:
Horsham
Truganina
Harpley
SA: all stores are open for trade except for:
Parkholme
Greenacres
Marion
Berri
Gawler Green
Firle
Kurralta Park
Elizabeth
Parafield Gardens
St Agnes
West Lakes
Paralowie
Port Adelaide
Modbury Heights
Churchill
Athelstone
Munno Para
St Clair
Seaford
Mount Barker
McLaren Vale
TAS: all stores are open for trade
NT: all stores are open for trade except for:
Pinelands
Alice Springs
WA: all stores are open for trade except for:
Secret Harbour
Erskine
Altone Park
Bunbury
North Perth – Charles St
Dan Murphy's and BWS
Most stores will be 10am-7pm across the states observing the King's Birthday public holiday. However some hours may vary store to store, and customers can check their local store's trading hours online for specific trading hours.
IGA
As IGA stores are independently-owned, the hours will differ between stores — some stores will be trading as normal while others may have restricted hours. IGA customers can check trading hours with their local IGA or online.
Big W
Most Big W stores are open, but customers are encouraged to check for their local stores on the Big W Store Finder for specific trading hours.
VIC: all stores are open, with operating hours at 10am to varied hours between 5pm to 9pm.
SA: all stores are closed with exception:
Mount Gambier (9am to 5pm)
Port Augusta (9am to 5pm)
Murray Bridge (9am to 5pm)
NSW/ACT: all stores are open, with operating hours at 9am to varied hours between 5pm to 9pm.
TAS: all stores are open, with operating hours at 10am to 6pm.
NT: all stores are open, with operating hours at 9am to 5pm.
ALDI
ALDI stores in NSW, ACT and VIC will operate as per normal, with no change to trading hours. However trading hours may vary in SA, and customers are advised to visit the ALDI store locator for more information on individual store trading hours.
Westfield
Bunnings
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
42 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Commonwealth Bank soars past $300 billion value but experts have concerns
Commonwealth Bank shocked the world this week when its value topped an eye-watering $300 billion, dwarfing even Wall Street's biggest banks and outpacing its Australian competitors. For some perspective, the staggering rise of CBA puts it well above the combined value of two of the big four banks in Australia — Westpac and National Australia Bank. It also becomes an outlier as the first ever ASX-listed company to be valued at more than $300 billion and is the most expensive bank stock in the history of the world thanks to a 49 per cent rise in the past 12 months. But experts say not all is as it seems. One says CBA is completely overvalued and the $300 billion figure ignores 'anemic earnings growth'. Share trader author Alan Hull told Commonwealth Bank shares are 'a risky share to be buying'. 'Smart money is not buying CBA,' he said. 'It's seriously overvalued. It's earnings growth is anemic. The current divident yield is 3.74 per cent including tax imputations. 'It's overpriced, which means it's a risky share to be buying and it's only yielding 3.74 per cent.' He credits CBA's exponential rise to a 'popularity competition'. 'The share price is going up simply because the share price is going up. If you look at the price of CBA shares, it's exponential. It's price feeding on price. I buy CBA, I tell you about CBA, price goes up 10 per cent. You buy CBA, price goes up another 10 per cent and you tell all your mates. 'We've also got new money coming in. Dumb money starts coming into the market and what do they buy? All the new dumb money is buying CBA. That's all it is. There's nothing going on here that is a secret.' He said all the major shares are running 'because that's all that dumb money knows'. 'That's the moron portfolio and at the top of the moron portfolio sits CBA.' So what happens now? Mr Hull has a prediction. 'It'll get to $200 a share and you'll probably see a correction,' he said. 'Do I think it could go up? Yeah. 'But a big correction is coming. It's literally 50 per cent overpriced. So when it corrects, it's going to be a big correction. It's trading a fair distance away from its underlying fundamentals.' Chief economist at AMP, Shane Oliver, told Commonwealth Bank is benefiting from a number of different factors — one of which being a less hostile US President Donald Trump. 'Its rise lately has mostly been driven by the same factors as the broader market, (including) an easing in concerns about Trump's tariffs and increased expectations for interest rate cuts, which are seen as positive for the banks,' he said. 'That said there also appears to be an element of momentum by which past relatively strong performance appears to be driving expectations that this will continue, resulting in ongoing strong relative demand for its shares.' Mr Hull said CBA is doing nothing different to the other big banks in Australia 'apart from being more popular'. 'It's a popularity competition,' he said. 'CBA is first, ANZ is second and Westpac and NAB are third.' In its latest results, Commonwealth Bank made $9.48 billion after tax, while Westpac made $7 billion, NAB made $6.96 billion and ANZ made $6.53 billion. Kevin Doodney, an Australian housing futurist at the High Yield Property Group, told in April that 'the big four Australian banks make up four of the eight most profitable banks in the world'. 'They are making that money from a population of just 27 million people. There's 8 billion people out there, for Christ's sake. 'What the Australian public needs to ask is, how on Earth can that be possible? Because, I think the Australian people are going to look at that and go, nah, that's not possible.' Mr Doodney said successive federal governments and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) have justified these profits made in the banking sector because they have called for a 'robust banking system'. 'I'm calling bulls**t on that, because my attitude is that, you know, for the first time in history, affordable housing is becoming a serious issue for any government, and you've got to look at who's making the money out of that, between either the government themselves or the banking system,' he said.
News.com.au
43 minutes ago
- News.com.au
NSW Land and Environment Court rules on Battiato v Clifton tree dispute
A long-running tussle between neighbours over a pine tree and a crumbling retaining wall has finally ended, with a court ordering both parties to share costs for the fix-up. The brouhaha between Vince and Natalie Battiato of 20 Kanangra Ave and Faye Clifton of 22 Kanangra Ave in the coastal NSW town of Corlette escalated into a legal stoush because of the dilapidated wall that splits the two properties. The wall needed to be fixed and the neighbours could not agree on who should pay. The Battiatos contended that the roots of an old pine tree, which has since been removed, on Ms Clifton's property was the main contributor to the damage to the wall. But Ms Clifton shot back and argued the age of the wall was the central factor underpinning its dilapidation. In their application to the NSW Land and Environment Court, the Battiatos said Ms Clifton should remove all remaining trees on her property to facilitate the reconstruction of the wall and then pay for the fix-up. They also wanted her to bear all court costs. In her submission, Ms Clifton pushed for a 'just and fair outcome to a lengthy ongoing dispute', court documents show. She asked for costs to be shared between the parties for the reconstruction job. Acting Commissioner Peter Nichols AC, settling the dispute, visited the site and concluded age was the primary cause of the wall's dilapidation. But he added the tree had also likely caused some damage. 'The tree has been shown to have exacerbated damage to the section of the retaining wall, thus engaging the court's jurisdiction, however orders made for any compensation are a matter of discretion,' he said. 'Given the nature of the retaining wall, it appears that, in the main, the dilapidation was a function of the age and inappropriate design and construction materials of the retaining wall.' In his decision, handed down this week, Dr Nichols upheld the application from the Battiatos but only 'in part'. He ordered Ms Clifton to remove seven trees from her property, including tree stumps, trunks and roots 'with a diameter of greater than 100mm located within 200mm of the shared property boundary between 20 and 22 Kanangra Ave'. The trees are camellia, lemon and pine trees. But he ordered for the wall reconstruction costs to be split '50-50'. 'Within 365 days of the date of these orders the applicants (Battiatos) and respondent (Ms Clifton) are to arrange and pay for the design and construction of the replacement retaining wall, including obtaining all necessary approvals from Port Stephens Council … sharing the costs 50-50,' he said. The neighbours were ordered to swap quotes beforehand to find the cheapest option from 'suitably qualified and experienced building contractors'. Further, Dr Nichols ordered the parties to construct a new boundary fence on the top of the new retaining wall on the shared property boundary, splitting the costs 50-50. Legislation within the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours Act) from 2006 and the Dividing Fences Act from 1991 covered the dispute. Port Stephens Council sits north of Newcastle in NSW's Hunter Valley region.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Coalition sticks to defence spending pledge but won't say how it'll pay for it
The Coalition remains committed to lifting defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP but won't detail where the money will come from, as the shadow finance minister suggested the opposition would be open to considering broader tax reform. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet with Donald Trump on the sidelines of G7 summit next week, amid pressure from the United States to increase defence spending from the current level of 2.04 per cent to to 3.5. Trade Minister Don Farrell on Sunday said the government was committed to a "significant uplift in the amount of defence spending". "We're focused on what Australia needs to do and we'll make our decisions based on what's in our national interest," he told Sky News. The Coalition went to the election promising to earmark an additional $21 billion for the military between now and 2030, almost double what Labor had pledged. Appearing on Insiders on Sunday, Shadow Finance Minister James Paterson said the Coalition's target of 3 per cent of GDP in a decade had not changed since the party's devastating election loss last month. "The exact profiling of that increase is something that we'll determine through the policy process and closer to the next election. We'll be completely up front and transparent about that," he said. "But yes, we have an objective of reaching the 3 per cent of GDP because we think it is in our national interest." Senator Paterson said the Coalition had three years to outline where that additional funding would go, but listed some potential areas for investment as recruitment and retention, a munitions stockpile, northern military bases, air and missile defence and drones. "There is no shortage of good things we could spend on that would increase our ability to defend ourselves and safeguard our sovereignty," he said. But he would not be drawn on where the money to pay for the increase would come from, saying that work would occur over the coming years. Senator Paterson did suggest the opposition was open to a discussion about the way superannuation is taxed, despite its rejection of the government's plan to double the tax on super balances above $3 million from 15 to 30 per cent. "We're happy to contemplate tax reform. We're happy to talk to the government about tax reform. But we are not interested in increasing taxes, because I don't think that that is what the Australian economy needs right now," he said. "If the government was genuinely serious about a broad-based tax reform process, then we'd be up for that conversation. Now, the government has to take the first steps there." US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth asked Defence Minister Richard Marles to increase spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP "as soon as possible" on the sidelines of a dialogue in Singapore this week, according to a statement from the US Department of Defense. Mr Hegseth had previously made similar requests, but it was the first time the administration nominated an exact figure. Negotiations with the United States over Mr Trump's 10 per cent tariffs on Australian exports continue, with the subject likely to dominate the anticipated meeting between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump. Access to Australia's critical minerals has been put forward as a potential bargaining chip as Australia continues to push for an exemption. The Coalition had previously said they would oppose Labor's plan to acquire stockpiles of critical minerals from commercial projects, to be held in a national reserve and made available to domestic industry and international partners. But Senator Paterson told Insiders it "might be necessary" for the government to support the mining and processing of critical minerals. "We're very happy to see what the government is proposing here. I can't commit to it in principle without having seen the details, but we're certainly open to it," Senator Paterson said. "Any sensible steps that represent an economic opportunity for Australia and an opportunity for us to demonstrate that we are a good alliance partner of the United States is something that we would offer bipartisan support to." Mr Farrell said Australia had offered the United States "an expanded arrangement in regards to critical minerals" as part of efforts to secure an exemption from the tariffs, which came into force in April. The trade minister met with his American counterpart, trade representative Jamieson Greer, in Paris last week, where he said he made clear that Australia wanted "all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them". "The position I put to Jamieson Greer is that the tariffs the United States has imposed on Australia are unjustified."
