NOVAGOLD Announces Appointment of New Director
'I am very pleased to welcome Ali Erfan to NOVAGOLD's Board', said Dr. Thomas S. Kaplan, NOVAGOLD's Chairman. 'Mr. Erfan brings a wealth of knowledge and experience as a long-standing Vice-Chairman of The Electrum Group, investment adviser to Electrum Strategic Resources, which is the Company's largest shareholder and a global leader in precious metals mining, with multi-billion-dollar investments and operations in North America. I also wish to extend my deepest appreciation to Diane Garrett for her valued guidance and significant contributions to the Company over her seven years of committed service.'
Mr. Erfan has extensive capital markets and industry experience as one of the key executives at Electrum, which he joined in 2007, and as a founding board member of Leor Energy, a privately held North American natural gas producer that went from a start-up in 2003 to being sold to Encana in 2007 for $2.6 billion. He later served on the board of Gatos Silver from IPO through to its merger with First Majestic and presently sits on the boards of Gabriel Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: GBU.V), and Electrum's two privately-held silver vehicles — Sunshine Silver Mining & Refining and Sinda.
Prior to joining Electrum, Mr. Erfan was a senior partner at 3i Group plc's London headquarters, one of the world's most prominent listed private equity and venture capital investment companies. Earlier in his career, Mr. Erfan was invested in several early-stage technology companies that achieved IPOs and M&A exits internationally. These included, among others, HTE (acquired by BASF), Insensys (acquired by Moog Inc.), Smart Fuel Cells (IPO Frankfurt), and CSR (IPO London, then acquired by Qualcomm). Mr. Erfan graduated from the University of Oxford with a BA and an MA in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. He holds an MBA from the London Business School and is a member of Kauffman Fellows Class 10.
About NOVAGOLD
NOVAGOLD is a well-financed precious metals company focused on the development of the Donlin Gold project in Alaska, one of the safest mining jurisdictions in the world. With approximately 39 million ounces of gold in the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource categories, inclusive of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves (541 million tonnes at an average grade of approximately 2.24 grams per tonne, in the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource categories on a 100% basis)1, the Donlin Gold project is regarded to be one of the largest, highest-grade, and most prospective known open-pit gold deposits in the world. According to the 2021 Technical Report and the S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary, once in production, the Donlin Gold project is expected to produce an average of more than one million ounces per year over a 27-year mine life on a 100% basis.
NOVAGOLD Contacts:
Mélanie Hennessey
Vice President, Corporate Communications
Frank Gagnon
Manager, Investor Relations
604-669-6227 or 1-866-669-6227
info@novagold.com
www.novagold.com
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This media release includes certain 'forward-looking information' and 'forward-looking statements' (collectively 'forward-looking statements') within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, including the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward- looking statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as 'expects', 'continue', 'ongoing', 'anticipates', 'believes', 'intends', 'estimates', 'potential', 'possible', and similar expressions, or statements that events, conditions, or results 'will', 'may', 'could', 'would' or 'should' occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements contained in this media release are based on a number of material assumptions, including but not limited to the following, which could prove to be significantly incorrect: our ability to achieve production at Donlin Gold; the cost estimates and assumptions contained in the 2021 Technical Report and the S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary; estimated metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs, together with other assumptions underlying our resource and reserve estimates; our expected ability to develop adequate infrastructure and that the cost of doing so will be reasonable; assumptions that all necessary permits and governmental approvals will be obtained and the timing of such approvals; assumptions made in the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of our mineral deposits; our expectations regarding demand for equipment, skilled labor and services needed for exploration and development of mineral properties; our ability to improve our ESG initiatives and goals; and that our activities will not be adversely disrupted or impeded by development, operating or regulatory risks. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on several opinions, estimates and assumptions that management of NOVAGOLD considered appropriate and reasonable as of the date such statements are made, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that may cause the actual results, activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding perceived merit of properties; mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; and the success of the strategic mine plan for the Donlin Gold project, including expected production and mine life. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, intentions, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead represent the expectations of NOVAGOLD management's estimates and projections regarding future events or circumstances on the date the statements are made. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations include the need to obtain additional permits and governmental approvals; the timing and likelihood of obtaining and maintaining permits necessary to construct and operate; the need for additional financing to complete an updated feasibility study and to explore and develop properties; availability of financing in the debt and capital markets; disease pandemics; uncertainties involved in the interpretation of drill results and geological tests and the estimation of reserves and resources; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation and exploration successes; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in the United States or Canada; the need for continued cooperation between the owners of Donlin Gold LLC to advance the project; the need for cooperation of government agencies and Native groups in the development and operation of properties; risks of construction and mining projects such as accidents, equipment breakdowns, bad weather, disease pandemics, non-compliance with environmental and permit requirements, unanticipated variation in geological structures, ore grades or recovery rates; unexpected cost increases, which could include significant increases in estimated capital and operating costs; fluctuations in metal prices and currency exchange rates; whether or when a positive construction decision will be made regarding the Donlin Gold project; and other risks and uncertainties disclosed in NOVAGOLD's most recent reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, particularly the 'Risk Factors' sections of those reports and other documents filed by NOVAGOLD with applicable securities regulatory authorities from time to time. Copies of these filings may be obtained by visiting NOVAGOLD's website at
www.novagold.com
, or the SEC's website at
www.sec.gov
, or on SEDAR+ at
www.sedarplus.ca
. The forward-looking statements contained herein reflect the beliefs, opinions and projections of NOVAGOLD on the date the statements are made. NOVAGOLD assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements of beliefs, opinions, projections, or other factors, should they change, except as required by law.
__________________________________
1 Donlin Gold data as per the report titled 'NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Donlin Gold project, Alaska, USA' with an effective date of June 1, 2021 (the '2021 Technical Report') and the report titled 'S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary on the Donlin Gold project, Alaska, USA' (the 'S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary'), dated November 30, 2021. Donlin Gold possesses Measured Resources of approximately 8 Mt grading 2.52 g/t and Indicated Resources of approximately 534 Mt grading 2.24 g/t, each on a 100% basis and inclusive of Mineral Reserves, of which approximately 5 Mt of Measured Resources and approximately 320 Mt of Indicated Resources inclusive of Reserves is currently attributable to NOVAGOLD through its 60% ownership interest in Donlin Gold LLC. Exclusive of Mineral Reserves, Donlin Gold possesses Measured Resources of approximately 0.9 Mt grading 2.23 g/t and Indicated Resources of approximately 69 Mt grading 2.44 g/t, of which approximately 0.5 Mt of Measured Resources and approximately 42 Mt of Indicated Resources exclusive of Mineral Reserves is currently attributable to NOVAGOLD. Donlin Gold possesses Proven Reserves of approximately 8 Mt grading 2.32 g/t and Probable Reserves of approximately 497 Mt grading 2.08 g/t, each on a 100% basis, of which approximately 5 Mt of Proven Reserves and approximately 298 Mt of Probable Reserves is attributable to NOVAGOLD. Mineral Reserves and Resources have been estimated in accordance with NI 43-101 and S-K 1300.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trans Mountain pipeline delivers $12.6 billion in new revenue to oilpatch, windfall to governments: report
The Trans Mountain pipeline — finished years behind schedule and massively over-budget — has delivered an estimated $12.6 billion in new revenues to the Canadian oilpatch and padded government budgets, according to a new report. Still, the report by the financial group Alberta Central says any new export pipeline that might be built under Prime Minister Mark Carney's nation-building infrastructure agenda would not likely bring in a similar windfall. The expanded Trans Mountain pipe that stretches from Alberta to the British Columbia coast, which came into service in May 2024, has significantly boosted market access for Canadian oil and raised prices for the country's producers, the report suggests. 'Whether these benefits justify the $34 billion in cost is likely to remain a source of debate for many years to come, (but) our analysis suggests that the benefits from TMX will outweigh the costs in the long run,' Charles St-Arnaud, Alberta Central's chief economist, said in the report. The federal government under Justin Trudeau bought the Trans Mountain pipeline for $4.5 billion in 2018, but the price tag for the expansion later ballooned to $34 billion. And while it was the first new pipeline to the west coast in 70 years, it was finished six years behind schedule. Still, economists like St-Arnaud and the University of Calgary's Trevor Tombe have argued it was worth every penny. Trans Mountain has increased Canadian oil shipments to refineries in the United States and more than tripled the share of exports to countries abroad, including China. This expanded market access has allowed Canadian oil producers to fetch higher prices. The country's heavy oil trades at a discount partly because the costs of refining it are higher. In recent years, the discount against North American prices expanded even more because there weren't enough pipelines, leading to an oversupply. The Trans Mountain expansion, which nearly tripled the pipeline's capacity, has helped to ease that pressure and shave the discount to levels that are well below historical norms. As a result, the Alberta Central report suggests the pipeline boosted overall oilpatch revenues by $12.6 billion, an estimate that does not account for increased production made possible by the expansion. The lift in prices is also expected to boost tax and royalty windfalls for the federal and provincial governments. Alberta could bring in $5.4 billion in additional funds, which would account for almost seven per cent of the province's revenues for the 2024-25 fiscal year, according to the report. While the Trudeau government approved the pipeline project, the Liberals had also ushered in a spate of new policies that expanded environmental regulations and were widely seen in Alberta and Saskatchewan as hostile to the energy sector. The Carney government is promising a change in tone with an agenda that favours oil and gas development. The prime minister has said a new oil export pipeline is 'highly likely' to make a list of so-called nation-building projects that would receive much faster approvals from the federal government. Still, any new pipe may not bring the same kinds of financial benefits as Trans Mountain. A theoretical project — no private-sector proponent has come forward with a proposal — would not likely lead to even higher prices, according to the Alberta Central report. Instead, it would prevent Canadian prices from falling as companies produce more oil. Already, there are signs that the country's pipeline capacity may not be keeping pace with a rise in crude production. The energy analytics firm RBN Energy said in a recent note that the oilpatch could face bottlenecks within the next three years. 'Things only get harder from here, because we don't have additional pipeline capacity coming on now, and the pipeline capacity that we do have, we're only going to keep filling it,' said Rory Johnston, publisher of oil market research report Commodity Context. Ottawa may not want to get out of the pipeline business just yet: Trans Mountain CEO 'Northern Leg' to Trans Mountain pipeline attracts interest amid brewing trade war 'We're going to run into pricing pressure earlier than you'd think.' • Email: rsouthwick@ With files from Meghan Potkins
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Union Pacific Is Buying Norfolk Southern in a Major Railway Deal. Should You Buy the Dividend Stock Here?
Railroad giant Union Pacific (UNP) has bid to acquire Norfolk Southern (NSC) in a deal worth $85 billion. The proposed merger, if approved, would create the first U.S. transcontinental railroad, combining Union Pacific's network with Norfolk Southern's network. The railroad would encompass more than 50,000 miles, spanning 43 states and connecting to major ports on both the East Coast and West Coast. On the other hand, this mega-merger is likely to face some scrutiny. Investors have also been skeptical about the move, with investor rights law firm Halper Sadeh LLC already investigating the company regarding this acquisition. More News from Barchart Palantir's Free Cash Flow Margins and Forecasts Rise - Where This Leaves PLTR Stock Cathie Wood is Buying Figma Stock with Both Hands. Should You Buy This Hot IPO, Too? Can SoundHound's Q2 Results Send the Stock Soaring on August 7? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. About Union Pacific Stock Founded in 1862 and headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska, Union Pacific is one of the largest freight rail network operators in the United States. Union Pacific operates more than 32,000 miles of track across 23 states. As a key player in the North American logistics market, the company transports a wide range of goods, including agricultural products and industrial equipment. Currently, Union Pacific has a market capitalization of $131 billion. UNP stock has been beaten down for quite some time. Over the past 52 weeks, the stock has declined by 5%. For comparison, the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has gained 21% over the same period. So far this year, UNP stock is down by about 2%. Currently, UNP is trading only 9% higher than its 52-week low. Moreover, news of the merger has not been well received by investors, as UNP has declined slightly over the past five days. On the other hand, this selloff has culminated in an attractive valuation. Union Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio stands at 19 times, which is lower than the industry average. On July 16, the company announced a 3% increase in its quarterly dividend rate to $1.38 per share, payable to shareholders on Sept. 30. Its forward annual dividend of $5.52 per share yields an attractive 2.4% on prevailing prices. The company has a record of paying dividends for 126 years, and this raise marks its 19th consecutive year of an annual dividend hike. Union Pacific's Q2 Results Topped Estimates On July 24, Union Pacific reported sound growth in its second-quarter financial results. The company's total operating revenues increased 2% from the prior-year period to $6.15 billion. At the center of this growth was higher volume and solid gains in core pricing. However, growth was hindered by factors such as reduced fuel surcharges and the business mix. The topline figure was also higher than the $6.11 billion that Wall Street analysts were expecting. Union Pacific's freight revenue increased 4% year-over-year (YOY) to $5.84 billion. The company's adjusted operating ratio was 58.1%. Adjusted EPS stood at $3.03, representing an 11.8% annual increase and surpassing Wall Street analysts' consensus estimate of $2.89. For the current fiscal year, Union Pacific expects pricing dollars to be accretive to its operating ratio. The company's EPS growth is aligned with its long-term target of achieving a three-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of high single to low double digits. Union Pacific is also adhering to its long-term capital allocation strategy, with a capital plan of $3.4 billion and share repurchases of $4 billion to $4.5 billion. Wall Street analysts are still optimistic about Union Pacific's future earnings. They expect the company's EPS to increase by 7.6% YOY to $2.96 for the third quarter of 2025. For the current fiscal year, EPS is projected to surge 5.2% annually to $11.67, followed by 9.9% growth to $12.83 in the next fiscal year. What Do Analysts Think About Union Pacific Stock? Wall Street analysts are reasonably optimistic about this railroad giant. Following the news release of the mega-merger, analysts at RBC Capital raised their price target from $257 to $276 while maintaining an 'Outperform' rating. RBC Capital analysts are optimistic about the creation of a 'Trans-Continental powerhouse' that provides significant operating advantages. On the other hand, analysts at Susquehanna lowered their price target on UNP stock from $260 to $257. However, the financial firm continues to maintain a 'Positive' rating on the stock. This most likely means that Susquehanna is taking a cautiously optimistic stance on the company's merger prospects. Union Pacific remains a reliable name on Wall Street, with analysts giving it a consensus 'Moderate Buy' rating overall. Of the 25 analysts rating the stock, a majority of 15 analysts rate it a 'Strong Buy,' one analyst suggests a 'Moderate Buy,' eight analysts play it safe with a 'Hold' rating, and one analyst gives the stock a 'Strong Sell' rating. The consensus price target of $260.12 represents 17% potential upside from current levels. The Street-high price target of $286 represents 28% potential upside from here. Bottom Line While the merger is likely to face regulatory scrutiny, if approved, it is expected to be highly accretive to Union Pacific's operations. While a cautious stance might be prudent, investors may find other aspects of the company exciting, such as its growing dividend. Therefore, it might be sound to consider investing in Union Pacific now. On the date of publication, Anushka Dutta did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
VW unit PowerCo, undeterred by tariffs, launches hiring blitz for Canadian battery plant
Volkswagen Group battery unit PowerCo has begun hiring for hundreds of job openings at its $7-billion battery cell manufacturing plant planned for Ontario, shrugging off the threat posed to the big-ticket investment by U.S. tariffs. PowerCo Canada said its first major recruitment drive that launched Aug. 6 focuses on a wide range of roles, including chemists, engineers, data analysts, sustainability experts and IT professionals. The hiring campaign comes as the company prepares to start construction on the site in St. Thomas, midway between Toronto and Windsor, Norman Wickboldt, chief human resources officer at PowerCo Canada, told Automotive News Canada. 'Our groundbreaking is just weeks away. So, we really need the right people to support this project and we remain fully committed with the start of our production in 2027.' How and why Volkswagen picked Canada for its $7B EV battery plant The initial phase of hiring covers hundreds of positions, for which PowerCo said it will prioritize local hiring, when possible. The company plans to support its recruitment efforts with a multi-channel, Canada-wide advertising blitz that will roll out over the next few months. Wickboldt said many of the initial roles are specialized positions that require certain skill sets, but the company will also begin hiring its frontline manufacturing workforce this fall. The battery-cell production environment is a rough blend of the type of serial production seen in automotive manufacturing and a chemistry lab, he said, making those with experience in both or either arena well-suited. With battery-cell production experience exceedingly rare in Canada, PowerCo plans to give workers a crash course as it brings them aboard. 'Our strategy is to really train that before you start the job, and also on the job,' Wickboldt said. Sign up for Automotive News Canada Breaking Alerts and be the first to know when big news breaks in the Canadian auto industry. PowerCo Canada already has more than 200 staff working out of its office in St. Thomas, and Wickboldt said the company anticipates doubling that tally by the end of 2025. The battery plant is likely to require between 500-1,000 workers to start cell production in 2027, Wickboldt said. When ramped up to full capacity, the project is expected to create up to 3,000 direct jobs. The hiring campaign and imminent start of construction follow months of relative uncertainty for what is expected to become Canada's largest single automotive investment. PowerCo chose St. Thomas to build its sole North American battery plant in March 2023. It initially planned to start construction on its roughly 350-acre (140 hectare) site in fall 2024. But while crews recently completed a 1,100-space parking lot for future employees and have advanced a flurry of related road, rail, water and electrical upgrades over the past year, work on the plant itself has yet to begin. U.S. tariffs and slowing growth in EV adoption, meantime, have pushed other automakers such as Honda to put their Canadian EV supply chain projects on hold, casting doubt on PowerCo's plans. Top VW Group officials said in March that U.S. tariffs on Canadian exports present a risk to the St. Thomas plant, which will build battery cells for Volkswagen assembly plants in the United States. Despite the evolving trade war, however, the company has continually reiterated its commitment to the Canadian project, citing the strong fundamentals of the long-term investment. Currently, Canadian-made auto components compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement are exempt from U.S. tariffs. Wickboldt said the tense trade environment is a factor PowerCo 'wouldn't have wished for,' but the cell producer and wider VW Group have mitigation measures available. 'It's a long-term investment,' a project that needs to be looked at with a decades-long timeline, not the perspective of two or three years, he said. But while the tariffs have not disrupted PowerCo's plans for St. Thomas, the slower growth trajectory for the North American EV market has pushed the company to adjust its ramp-up timeline at the plant. Originally, the first of the plant's six production blocks was scheduled to begin battery output in 2027, with the five others coming online by mid-2028. The company remains on track to begin producing batteries in St. Thomas in 2027, but now plans to start output at each successive production block as EV demand picks up. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
