logo
Measles is spreading among unvaccinated Utahns

Measles is spreading among unvaccinated Utahns

Axios10 hours ago

Measles has arrived in Utah amid plummeting immunization rates, as parents increasingly seek waivers for "religious" and "personal" reasons.
Why it matters: Measles is extremely contagious and dangerous.
More than 1 in 10 confirmed U.S. patients have been hospitalized this year, the CDC reports — a figure that rises to 1 in 5 for children age 4 and younger.
Driving the news: As of Wednesday, state health officials had confirmed three measles cases in two counties, marking the state's first infections since 2017.
Two are in Utah County and one is in the Southwest Utah Health District, which covers Washington, Iron, Kane, Beaver and Garfield counties.
All three patients are unvaccinated and did not contract measles from each other.
Between the lines: The first Utah patient, reported last week in Utah County, had not left the state recently, meaning they were infected by at least one other carrier here.
Health officials have not said whether the two newest patients had traveled recently.
The big picture: The CDC reports Utah had the nation's third highest rate of immunization waivers for incoming kindergartners in 2023, the most recent year for which data is available.
By the numbers: To protect unvaccinated people — infants, for example — herd immunity requires at least 95% of a community be fully vaccinated.
Statewide, just 87% of kindergartners were up to date on all their shots last year, per the Utah Department of Health and Human Services.
Over 90% of all Utahns have been vaccinated, per state health officials.
Zoom in: Anti-vax sentiments have taken particular hold in southwest Utah, where 81.5% of kindergartners were fully immunized.
Meanwhile, Gov. Spencer Cox appointed a longtime anti-vaccine activist to the state Legislature this year to represent part of Utah County.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fast food consumption decreased, CDC data shows
Fast food consumption decreased, CDC data shows

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Fast food consumption decreased, CDC data shows

Kids and teens consumed fewer calories from fast foods over the decade that ended in mid-2023, according to newly published CDC data. Why it matters: It showed the country may have been heading toward healthier options well before Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took office and made cleaning up America's diet a priority. Where it stands: Kids ages 2 through 19 consumed an average of 11.4% of their daily calories from fast food on a given day between August 2021 and August 2023, according to data from the CDC's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. That's down from an average of nearly 14% in 2013 and 2014, per CDC data. For adults age 20 and up, average calories from fast food fell from about 14% in 2013 and 2014 to 11.7% during mid-2021 to mid-2023. Food reported as "restaurant fast food/pizza" on survey responses was considered fast food for these analyses, CDC's data brief said. Zoom out: About 30% of youth ages 2 through 19 ate fast food on any given day between August 2021 and 2023. That figure exceeded 36% between 2015 and 2018, CDC found. The research did not identify a difference in fast food consumption between boys and girls, or between adult men and women.

Contradicting RFK Jr., CDC says the COVID vaccine protects pregnant women, babies, and children
Contradicting RFK Jr., CDC says the COVID vaccine protects pregnant women, babies, and children

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Contradicting RFK Jr., CDC says the COVID vaccine protects pregnant women, babies, and children

Here's how one of the well-laid plans of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went blooey. Earlier this month, Kennedy dismantled the all-important Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and remade it into the spearhead for his anti-vaccination campaigns. The rejiggered committee met for the first time Wednesday. Unfortunately for Kennedy's goals, the very first presentation it heard from CDC scientists involved the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, particularly for pregnant women, infants and children. CDC studies found 'no increased risk' that the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines caused adverse effects during pregnancy, Sarah Meyer, director of the CDC's Immunization Safety Office, said at the meeting, citing data from 28 analyses of 68,000 pregnant women. The data showed no increases in miscarriages, stillbirths, preterm births, major birth defects, neonatal ICU admissions, infant deaths, abnormal uterine bleeding or other pregnancy-related conditions. In fact, the CDC found that 'maternal vaccination is the best protection against COVID-19 for pregnant women and infants less than six months of age,' CDC immunologist Adam MacNeil told the panel. The COVID vaccines aren't approved for infants younger than six months, so maternal immunization is their only protection. That's important because Kennedy, on May 17, removed the vaccines from the recommended list for pregnant women and children. 'It's common sense and it's good science' to remove the recommendation, Kennedy said in a 58-second video posted on X. 'We're now one step closer to realizing President Trump's promise to make America healthy again,' Kennedy crowed, flanked by Marty Makary, the newly appointed commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, and Jay Bhattacharya, the newly appointed director of the National Institutes of Health. Neither body plays a role in issuing vaccine recommendations for the government. That's the job of the CDC, which has been operating without a director, and which didn't have a representative on the video. Pediatric and obstetric organizations decried the decision, which ran counter to the findings of extensive research. 'Clear benefits of maternal immunization versus COVID in terms of dramatic reductions in maternal mortality and protecting the newborn infant ... has been detailed in the biomedical literature,' vaccinologist Peter Hotez told me by email. I asked Kennedy through his agency's public information team for comment on the CDC presentation, but received no reply. On June 9, Kennedy fired all 17 members of ACIP of the immunization advisory committee and replaced them with eight handpicked members, a cadre that includes 'antivaxxers, the antivax-adjacent, and the unqualified,' as veteran pseudoscience debunker David Gorski noted. The COVID vaccines have been a leading target of anti-vaccine activists, including Kennedy, since they were introduced in 2021. They've been blamed for a host of purported health harms, most of which have been found by researchers to be largely imaginary. The anti-vaccine camp maintains that the vaccines weren't adequately studied before rolling them out to the general public and haven't been sufficiently monitored for adverse effects since then. The CDC officials' presentation debunked almost all these claims. Indeed, Meyer said, the COVID-19 vaccines have been subjected to 'the most extensive safety monitoring program in U.S. history.' The CDC has investigated more than 65 possible adverse effects of the vaccine, Meyer said, including heart attacks, meningitis, spontaneous abortion, seizures and hospitalization. Other than pain at the injection site, fainting and other transitory conditions common to most vaccines, it has found evidence for one condition — myocarditis, a heart inflammation seen especially in men aged 12 to 29. That appears to be a short-term condition, with 83% of patients recovering within 90 days of onset, and more than 90% fully recovered within a year. No deaths or heart transplants are known to have occurred, the CDC data show. No confirmed cases were seen in children younger than 5. The myocarditis rate among vaccine recipients aged between 6 months and 64 years appeared to spike in 2020-22, when it seemed to be related to the original vaccine and the original booster. After the booster was reformulated, the rate among those aged 12 to 39 fell to about one case per million doses in 2024-25 — half the rate found in the general population. Despite the relative rarity of myocarditis, the condition has underpinned a campaign by anti-vaccine activists to take the vaccines off the market. Among them is Joseph Ladapo, the Florida surgeon general, who in 2022 advised males aged 18-39 not to get the COVID vaccine. His advisory earned him a crisp upbraiding from the then-heads of the FDA and CDC, who informed him by letter that 'the known and potential benefits of these vaccines clearly outweigh their known and potential risks.... Not only is there no evidence of increased risk of death following mRNA vaccines, but available data have shown quite the opposite: that being up to date on vaccinations saves lives compared to individuals who did not get vaccinated.' And on Wednesday, just as the CDC team was telling ACIP that the myocarditis effect had ebbed to insignificance, the FDA announced that it was expanding the warning label on the mRNA vaccines to increase the caution about myocarditis — a change with the potential to undermine acceptance of the vaccines. Overall, the rate of death seven days after mRNA vaccinations has been lower than the background rates among the general population for the most common causes of death — such as heart disease, cancer and stroke. I've written before that Kennedy's anti-science campaign against vaccination — or more properly, his science-free campaign — has set the stage for a public health crisis in the U.S. Videos posted on X citing nonexistent evidence is no substitute for medical judgments based on science. They won't make America healthy, but will make Americans much sicker. Kennedy's actions are potentially deadly, and the CDC has the data to prove it.

This Vaccine Preservative Is Again Under Scrutiny. What Does the Science Show?
This Vaccine Preservative Is Again Under Scrutiny. What Does the Science Show?

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

This Vaccine Preservative Is Again Under Scrutiny. What Does the Science Show?

For decades, anti-vaccine groups have targeted thimerosal, a vaccine preservative that they claim, without credible evidence, is linked to autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. These claims about the mercury-based preservative have long existed at the fringes — until now. Under the leadership of the health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy — who wrote a book supporting 'the immediate removal of mercury' from vaccines — these claims are now to be seriously considered by newly appointed members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, an influential group that makes vaccine recommendations to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. On Thursday, the panel is expected to discuss and vote on the use of thimerosal in flu vaccines, the only routine shots that still include the additive. Instead of a C.D.C. scientist presenting on the subject, as is custom, Lyn Redwood, the former leader of a prominent anti-vaccine group, will speak to the committee. Slides from that presentation, which were posted online ahead of the meeting, argue thimerosal is 'neurotoxic' and harmful for pregnant women and children — claims that are contradicted by dozens of rigorous studies and have largely been rejected by vaccine scientists. Why is thimerosal used in vaccines? Scientists started using thimerosal as a preservative in vaccines in the 1930s. The preservative can prevent vials that contain multiple shots from becoming contaminated when new needles draw out a dose. Today, it is rarely used in routine vaccines. During the last influenza season, roughly 96 percent of all flu shots in the United States were thimerosal-free, according to data from the C.D.C. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store