Raskin: Trump looking to ‘exact vengeance' on Harvard with foreign student block
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said during a recent interview that President Trump is looking to 'exact vengeance' on Harvard University after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) blocked the Ivy League institution from enrolling foreign students.
Raskin said on Friday night that the administration's move to rescind Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification is 'definitely unconstitutional because it was in retaliation for Harvard rejecting the last round of unconstitutional attacks on its autonomy.'
'When Donald Trump essentially said that the federal government of the United States was going to take over their admissions process, take over their faculty hiring process, take over their curriculum, Harvard just said, that's a bridge too far. No way,' Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said during his Friday night appearance on CNN's 'Erin Burnett OutFront' show.
The Maryland Democrat, a Harvard Law School alumnus, argued Trump is 'trying to exact vengeance and retaliation again by taking it out on 7,000 students from other countries, forcing them to completely change their plans, turning their lives upside down and stripping Harvard of a quarter of its students.'
The White House slammed Raskin on Saturday, stating Harvard is 'facing the consequences' for its actions.
'Jamie Raskin has zero credibility left after he's unsuccessfully launched one liberal hoax after another against President Trump,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told The Hill.
'Harvard has turned into a hotbed for anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist agitators that put American students at risk,' she continued. 'They've repeatedly failed to address the serious issues plaguing their campus, despite warnings, and now they're facing the consequences.'
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, when announcing the foreign student ban, said the administration was holding the elite school accountable for 'fostering violence,' not doing enough to combat antisemitism and 'coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.'
The administration's task force for combating antisemitism said earlier this month that Harvard has 'failed to confront the pervasive race discrimination and anti-Semitic harassment plaguing its campus.' A Harvard University Police Department report, released in October last year, found that a number of hate crimes reported to law enforcement at the school doubled, going from five to 10 between 2022 and 2023.
Noem said that because of the certification being revoked, international students will need to transfer to another school or they would risk jeopardizing their legal status in the U.S.
Harvard filed a lawsuit Friday morning alleging the administration's actions violated the First Amendment. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs granted a temporary restraining order hours later and set a hearing for May 29 to deliberate whether a longer pause is necessary.
The White House said on Friday that the American people elected Trump, 'not random local judges with their own liberal agenda –— to run the country.'
'These unelected judges have no right to stop the Trump Administration from exercising their rightful control over immigration policy and national security policy,' Jackson previously said.
Raskin characterized the administration's actions as a 'completely lawless situation.'
'The administration doesn't get to control higher education in America and tell colleges and universities what to do. They don't get to control newspaper entities and TV networks the way Donald Trump has been trying to do,' Raskin said Friday night. 'And they don't get to control law firms or any other private entity, but they're trying to move us into an authoritarian situation, so he can continue to embark upon his corruption tour of the world.'
The Trump administration has gone back-and-forth with Harvard in recent months, terminating nearly $3 billion worth of federal grants as the president warns the school that its tax-exempt status could be revoked.
'We are going to be taking away Harvard's Tax Exempt Status. It's what they deserve!' Trump said on Truth Social in early May.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariff-Resistant Economy Soothes Traders Ahead of Jobs Day
(Bloomberg) -- Options traders are betting the S&P 500 Index will post its smallest swing in months following Friday's US employment report, highlighting how a spate of better-than-expected data has calmed investor worries over the economic impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs. The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access LA City Council Passes Budget That Trims Police, Fire Spending ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract NYC Residents Want Safer Streets, Cheaper Housing, Survey Says The benchmark is projected to move 0.9% in either direction on Friday, according to data compiled by Piper Sandler & Co. That figure, based on the prices of S&P 500 options straddles as of Tuesday's close, is the smallest implied swing ahead of a jobs print since February and below an average realized move of 1.3% over the past year. Concern over the global trade war's impact on US growth flared in early April, after Trump unveiled a list of tariffs aimed at the country's trading partners around the globe. Stocks tumbled, with the S&P 500 falling to the edge of a bear market. But Trump has mitigated or stalled many of those levies in the weeks since, while data on measures such as inflation and job openings suggest the economy is taking the trade chaos in stride. The S&P 500 is just 2.8% off its all-time high reached earlier this year, following a weekslong surge. 'Tariffs initially spooked markets, but stocks have recovered because there aren't meaningful cracks in the economy yet,' said Vishal Vivek, equity trading strategist at Citigroup Inc. 'The risk is if unemployment unexpectedly spikes. Then stocks would need to reprice for slower growth.' Economists polled by Bloomberg expect the US economy to have created roughly 130,000 in May, down from 177,000 a month prior. The jobless rate is expected to hold steady at 4.2%. ADP Research data on Wednesday showed hiring decelerated to the slowest pace in two years last month, raising concern that Friday's non-farm payrolls figures could also show labor conditions weakening. A separate report showed activity at US service providers slipped into contraction territory last month for the first time in nearly a year. The S&P 500 Index traded 0.1% higher at 10:04 a.m. in New York. Sanguine Outlook Trader positioning reflects a sanguine outlook going into the report. After the S&P 500 soared 6.2% last month — its best May since 1990 — hedge funds and other large speculators have turned net short on futures tied to the Cboe Volatility Index for the first time in five weeks, data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission show. Solid economic numbers helped boost their confidence. The Citigroup US Economic Surprise Index, a rolling measure of whether economic indicators are clocking in above or below expectations, turned positive in late May for the first time since mid-February, when the S&P 500 traded at records. Meanwhile, the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model sees real gross domestic product growing at a 4.6% annualized rate in the second quarter, up from a contraction of 0.2% in the first three months of the year. Of course, a negative jobs day surprise could sour the mood. JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s trading desk, led by Andrew Tyler, said in a Monday note the S&P 500 may drop as much as 3% if the economy created fewer than 100,000 jobs in May. The chance of such an outcome, however, is only around 5%, according to his estimates. In the most likely scenario, jobs growth last month will come in between 115,000 to 135,000, with the index gaining 0.25% to 1%, Tyler says. The jobs data will also help investors gauge whether the Federal Reserve will keep rates on hold for the foreseeable future, as it attempts to balance trade war uncertainties with threats of slowing growth and accelerating inflation that could result from the tariffs. The central bank enters a blackout period this weekend ahead of its June 18 rate decision. 'Even if jobs growth somewhat slows, traders will give this report a pass because employment data lags,' said Larry Benedict, chief executive of The Opportunistic Trader, a financial market-research firm. 'It will take a few months before the tariff impacts will really begin to appear in those figures.' (Updates with ADP, services data, S&P 500 trading in sixth paragraph.) YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Video games and podcasts: Can Democrats win back the bros?
Advertisement Throughout the campaign, I Meanwhile Trump was Advertisement Democrats are just coming around to that reality. Pete Buttigieg gets soft kudos for recently Even though Buttigieg recently Or when they got onto the topic of public services, Buttigieg argued that the Scandinavians' high taxes turn into top-notch public resources. To which Schulz declared: Public spending is 'easy to do when, like, every girl's hot.' Granted, Buttigieg is gay, but even when Schulz conceded that Scandinavian dudes are cute, too, Buttigieg laughed, shrugged a little, and eventually asked: 'Where were we?' Pete Buttigieg at a Town Hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on May 13. THALASSA RAASCH/NYT To be fair, those are questions that would make both woke progressives and straight-laced conservatives squirm. But Trump isn't a polished politician — he's a guy's guy. You can imagine him in that situation, completely at ease. He would have chuckled at the joke about not hiring women, smirking and wagging a finger at Schulz: 'You're a funny guy, you know that, but boy, you're gonna get me in trouble.' And on the question of spending money on attractive women, well, we know where Trump falls there. He would have made them laugh, just like he did when he Advertisement Trump clearly never had any qualms about going on edgy shows. But Democrats did. Akaash Singh, one of Schulz's cohosts, told Buttigieg: 'We've begged so many Democrats to come on this platform. You're the first one.' Trump didn't need to be begged. He simply took advice from his In their rush to find a tough-talking guy who can mobilize voters against Trump, Democrats could find themselves embracing influencers who alienate some of their own voters. Like streamer Hasan Piker, a former Rutgers frat boy who loves lifting, who's been The biggest problem Democrats will have is convincing bros of their authenticity. It took an electoral walloping for Buttigieg to embrace the manosphere. And while Democrats try to talk the talk, they still hold onto the same progressive ideas that alienated them from many voters. On a podcast in March with the conservative bro-in-chief Charlie Kirk, who cofounded the right-wing political machine Turning Point USA, Gavin Newsom said that the question of whether to allow transgender athletes in women's sports is 'an issue of fairness.' But as California continued to be under fire for its liberal policies on transgender athletes, Newsom Advertisement Is just showing up in bro-ey spaces enough to win back some young voters for Dems? I conducted my own little study, free of charge, to find out. Gabe, a finance worker in his early 20s who voted for Trump and declined to give his last name, told me that Democrats might win over a few curious voters with a new male outreach strategy, but ultimately, cosmetic changes alone won't make a lasting difference. 'I think you have to realign the ideology,' he told me, listing frustrations about equity-based initiatives, costly energy policies, lockdowns during COVID, and more. 'You might be wearing a flannel, have a beard, drink protein shakes,' he said. But Democrats are 'still spewing the same garbage.' This column first appeared in , Globe Opinion's free weekly newsletter about local and national politics. If you'd like to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up . Carine Hajjar is a Globe Opinion writer. She can be reached at
CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump budget bill would increase deficit by $2.4 trillion and 10.9 million would lose health insurance, CBO says
Washington — Republicans' sweeping policy bill aimed at advancing President Trump's second-term agenda would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to a new estimate prepared by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The CBO also estimates that 10.9 million more people would be without health insurance in 2034 as the result of the House-passed legislation, given changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act under the bill. House Republicans are aiming to cut at least $1.5 trillion in spending to offset trillions in tax cuts, while also raising the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. The package, which Mr. Trump refers to as the "big, beautiful bill," is now in the hands of the Senate after making it out of the House before Memorial Day. The bill is expected to undergo changes in the Senate before heading back to the lower chamber. This is a developing story and will be updated.
