Latest news with #Raskin
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Raskin notes ‘bipartisan urgency' for DOJ to release all Epstein files
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said Thursday he thought the Trump administration would have to turn over all the Epstein files due to what he characterized as significant bipartisan support for their release. 'We need total disclosure of the complete file, redacting only the names and the identities of the minor victims,' the Maryland Democrat said during an appearance on MSNBC. 'There is overwhelming bipartisan, popular demand, Congressional demand, to release all of this stuff.' Without control of the chamber, House Democrats are unable to do much on their own to force the release of any evidence held by the federal government. However, a resolution spearheaded by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to force a House vote on the matter has garnered bipartisan support from figures as wide-ranging as Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.). Raskin is not an official co-sponsor on the resolution. The Maryland lawmaker, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, instead said Tuesday that Bondi and other top administration officials should testify about Epstein, and floated the possibility of a subpoena. 'I think the cat is out of the bag and they're going to have to turn everything over to us,' Raskin said on MSNBC Thursday. Many Democrats have seized on the controversy roiling MAGA World to demand that the Trump administration release documents related to the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender. 'In other words, we're asking for exactly what Donald Trump was demanding and exactly what Pam Bondi was demanding before they got into power and got to look at everything,' Raskin said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
3 days ago
- Politics
- The Hill
Raskin notes ‘bipartisan urgency' for DOJ to release all Epstein files
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said Thursday that he thought the Trump administration would have to turn over all the 'Epstein files' due to what he characterized as significant bipartisan support for their release. 'We need total disclosure of the complete file, redacting only the names and the identities of the minor victims,' the Maryland Democrat said during an appearance on MSNBC. 'There is overwhelming bipartisan, popular demand, Congressional demand, to release all of this stuff.' Without control of the chamber, House Democrats are unable to do much on their own to force the release of any evidence held by the federal government. However, a resolution spearheaded by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to force a House vote on the matter has garnered bipartisan support from figures as wide-ranging as Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.). Raskin is not an official co-sponsor on the resolution. The Maryland lawmaker, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, instead said Tuesday that Bondi and other top administration officials should testify about Epstein, and floated the possibility of a subpoena. 'I think the cat is out of the bag and they're going to have to turn everything over to us,' Raskin said on MSNBC Thursday. Many Democrats have seized on the controversy roiling the MAGA-verse to demand that the Trump administration release documents related to the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender. 'In other words, we're asking for exactly what Donald Trump was demanding and exactly what Pam Bondi was demanding before they got into power and got to look at everything,' Raskin said.
Daily Record
4 days ago
- Sport
- Daily Record
Nico Raskin on Real Betis transfer 'radar' as definitive update emerges over 'Brazilian Paul Pogba'
Betis are hunting midfield replacements for departing duo while Metinho looks to have settled on his next club after Troyes Real Betis are set to test Rangers ' resolve over Nico Raskin, according to a report. The Belgian impressed last term despite Gers falling well short in the title race and ending the season trophyless. That's led to him being linked with moves away from Ibrox and with Raskin two years out from the end of his current contract, the window in which Rangers can realise his maximum value is closing. Now Spanish outlet muchodeporte claim that Betis have Raskin on their radar as they hunt midfield replacements. American international Johnny Cardoso has left for La Liga rivals Atletico Madrid, while William Carvalho looks destined for the exit door as well. The Portuguese international failed to report last week for pre-season testing and could well be on his way to Qatar. The Seville-based club have seemingly identified Raskin as one of a number of replacement options this summer. It would mean forking out a significant fee however, with Gers keen to avoid repeating past mistakes and letting their best players leave for nothing at the end of their deals. One player who won't be arriving at Ibrox is Metinho. The player dubbed the 'Brazilian Paul Pogba' had been linked with the Light Blues and a £4million fee quoted. However, Basel are on the brink of making his switch from Troyes permanent after he helped them win the Swiss Super League title last season. You can get all the news you need on our dedicated Rangers and Celtic pages, and sign up to our newsletters to make sure you never miss a beat throughout the season. We're also onWhatsApp where we bring all the latest breaking news and transfer gossip directly to you phone. Join our Rangers community here and our Celtic community here.
Scottish Sun
4 days ago
- Sport
- Scottish Sun
Rangers star Nico Raskin ‘wanted by European giants as replacement for Euros winner'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RANGERS are desperate to keep Nico Raskin beyond this summer after a standout campaign at Ibrox last season. But Russell Martin may face a fight to hold onto the star midfielder as he's reportedly a transfer target for a Europa League club this window. Sign up for the Rangers newsletter Sign up 2 A European club are looking at a potential deal for Nico Raskin Credit: Willie Vass 2 Rangers are desperate to keep the midfielder Credit: Willie Vass Raskin, 24, has two years left on his Rangers deal but SunSport understands the club are set to offer him a bumper new contract. We told you last month how the Light Blues were preparing to fend off interest with fresh terms for the midfielder who recently broke his way into the Belgium squad. Gers boss Martin wants to build his team around the midfield dynamo and contract discussions are on the agenda. But they may need to act fast to tie him down as Spanish giants Real Betis have reportedly joined the race for him this week. Spanish outlet Mucho Deporte claim the four-cap Belgian ace is one player Manuel Pellegrini is looking at as a replacement for outgoing midfielders Johnny Cardoso and William Carvalho. The pair helped Betis reach the Uefa Conference League final last season, where they were beaten by Chelsea. Cardoso, 23, has since sealed a big-money move to rivals Atletico Madrid, while the report suggests club icon Carvalho is also on his way out. Carvalho has been at the club since 2018 and has enjoyed great success with his national team Portugal - winning the 2016 Euros and 2018/19 Nations League. Pellegrini will be left with two massive voids to fill ahead of next season and is already weighing up moves for a replacement - or two. And it's stated that Raskin has caught the Italian's eyes. 'Absolutely brilliant or RUBBISH' - Gassama Rangers transfer verdict and Souttar to leave Rangers spent around £1.75million to sign Raskin from Standard Liege in January 2023 and his value is soaring. The Ibrox club are in line to bank a huge profit on the midfielder should he depart in the coming weeks. But sporting director Kevin Thelwell and the club's new US owners are determined to tie him down on a longer deal to protect their asset. Keep up to date with ALL the latest news and transfers at the Scottish Sun football page
UPI
6 days ago
- Politics
- UPI
Partisan clash erupts over federal grants to 'leftist' nonprofits
1 of 2 | Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, argued the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight hearing Tuesday was designed to advance President Donald Trump's political agenda, while ignoring pressing civil rights and public safety issues. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo WASHINGTON, July 15 (UPIU) -- Republican lawmakers alleged Tuesday that Democratic leaders have funneled hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars to nonprofit organizations run by political allies, advancing what they called a "radical agenda" without public accountability. Democrats fired back, calling the hearing a partisan distraction aimed at vilifying groups that serve vulnerable communities. The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight's hearing, titled "How Leftist Nonprofit Networks Exploit Federal Tax Dollars to Advance a Radical Agenda," drew sharp partisan lines. The subcommittee chair, Chair Rep. Jefferson Van Drew, R-N.J., said nonprofits that receive federal funds through agencies like USAID and the Justice Department are enacting policies Americans haven't voted for, accusing Democratic leaders of "abuse of power." Related Bill would allow charitable nonprofits to endorse candidates Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, passionately disagreed, arguing the hearing was designed to advance President Donald Trump's political agenda, while ignoring pressing civil rights and public safety issues. "This committee is spending its time holding a hearing with a title that sounds like it was ripped from a conspiracy law," Crockett said. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, echoed the committee chair's concerns, calling several taxpayer-funded initiatives under the Biden administration "stupid," including spending on public broadcasting, diversity, equity and inclusion programs, and federal education grants. Democrats, however, argued that the hearing lacked substance and accountability. Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., criticized the proceeding as a "waste of time," as it focused on grievances rather than governance, and that the committee did not call a single official from any of the groups allegedly advancing a radical agenda. "If our motto is going to be finger-pointing for losers, then this hearing is for losers," Raskin said. Hen added that Republicans have been failing to address systemic challenges like gun violence and climate change, and that none of the groups mentioned has been involved in illegal actions, but instead the Republicans simply do not like what certain groups are doing. For example, Raskin cited the mass firings of Justice Department attorneys who prosecuted Americans for their involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. "Due process is what separates our freedoms from arbitrary state power," he said. As the hearing continued, Raskin was the first to bring the Jeffrey Epstein files into the conversation, questioning the Trump administration's sudden lack of commitment to transparency by not releasing the information. "Remember that they said this would be the most transparent administration in the United States," he said. Witnesses invited by Republican lawmakers argued that taxpayer dollars are being funneled into politically motivated organizations that push divisive agendas. Tyler O'Neil, senior editor at The Daily Signal, singled out a $2 million grant to the nonprofit Vera Institute of Justice for immigration-related services, calling it part of a broader "immigration industrial complex." O'Neill also criticized federal support for the ACLU and the AFL-CIO, arguing that union dues from federal employees were indirectly subsidizing left-leaning political causes. Insha Rahman, vice president of advocacy and partnerships at the Vera Institute, told UPI, "Today's congressional hearing was a distraction from the honest debate the American public deserves about the solutions that work to prevent crime, respond to crisis, and stop violence. "The Department of Justice's abrupt and illegal terminations of $820 million in grant funding to hundreds of organizations, including Vera, jeopardizes programs and services across the country -- including in suburban and rural jurisdictions -- that save lives and make communities safer." Scott Walter, president of the Capital Research Center, attempted to redirect the conversation. He said that while he personally supports conservative organizations, like the Heritage Foundation, he would oppose federal funding for any ideologically driven group -- including those with whom he agrees. He argued that taxpayer dollars should only go to feeding the hungry and clothing the poor -- actions he associated as biblically related good doings -- but not socially controversial issues. Mike Gonzalez, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation and contributor to the conservative blueprint Project 2025, testified in a personal capacity and criticized USAID's funding decisions under Ambassador Samantha Power, suggesting it began the pathway for the agency to prioritize progressive global initiatives over national interest. Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., and Gonzalez got into an escalated exchange when Gonzalez confronted Democrats about so-called "dark money" -- where the source is not disclosed to the public -- for groups tied to liberal causes. Johnson fired back, pointing to the Heritage Foundation's own opaque funding sources and ties to conservative megadonors like billionaire Charles Koch. A last minute addition to the witness list was Luis CdeBaca, a former U.S. ambassador and anti-trafficking expert. CdeBaca defended the work of civil society organizations, arguing that they provide critical services to vulnerable populations -- often filling gaps left by under-resourced government programs. He warned against politicizing federal grantmaking, which he said should be based on impact, not ideology. Rahman reacted similarly to Vera's work, defending that "The DOJ grants Vera received supported our evidence-based work with correctional staff across the country to improve prison operations, training, and culture for both officers and people incarcerated; expand access to counseling and treatment for people in mental health crisis; and support police and law enforcement to better serve deaf survivors of domestic violence."
