logo
As Waltz faces UN post hearings, an update on the Signal situation that led to his initial ousting

As Waltz faces UN post hearings, an update on the Signal situation that led to his initial ousting

Yahoo15-07-2025
As Mike Waltz, President Donald Trump's nominee for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, appears before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Tuesday for his confirmation hearing, focus returns to his ousting as national security adviser over what some referred to as 'Signalgate.'
The former Florida Republican congressman served mere weeks in Trump's administration before revelations that he mistakenly added journalist Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic to a private Signal chat that was used to discuss sensitive military plans, including planning for strikes on Houthi militants in Yemen.
Calls came quickly for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to be removed from office, accompanied by criticism of the Trump administration for failing to take action against the top national security officials who discussed plans for the military strike in Signal. After weeks of scrutiny, Waltz left his security post but was swiftly nominated to the U.N. position.
Months after the chat was disclosed, questions remain over the controversy, including if federal laws were violated, if classified information was exposed on the commercial messaging app and if anyone else will face consequences.
Here's what we know and don't know:
___
KNOWN: Signal is a publicly available app that provides encrypted communications, but it can be hacked. It is not approved for carrying classified information. On March 14, one day before the strikes, the Defense Department cautioned personnel about the vulnerability of Signal, specifically that Russia was attempting to hack the app, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak to the press and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
One known vulnerability is that a malicious actor, if they have access to a person's phone, can link their own device to the user's Signal — and monitor messages remotely.
NOT KNOWN: How frequently the administration and the Defense Department use Signal for sensitive government communications, and whether those on the chat were using unauthorized personal devices to transmit or receive those messages. The department put out an instruction in 2023 restricting what information could be posted on unauthorized and unclassified systems.
At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing earlier this year, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard would not say whether she was accessing the information on her personal phone or government-issued phone, citing an ongoing investigation by the National Security Council.
___
KNOWN: The government has a requirement under the Presidential Records Act to archive all of those planning discussions.
NOT KNOWN: Whether anyone in the group archived the messages as required by law to a government server. The images of the text chain posted by The Atlantic show that the messages were set to disappear in one week.
___
KNOWN: Hegseth had an internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols — known in the IT industry as a 'dirty' internet line — set up in his office to use Signal on a personal computer, two people familiar with the line have told The Associated Press.
Other Pentagon offices have used them, particularly if there's a need to monitor information or websites that would otherwise be blocked. The biggest advantage of using such a line is that the user would not show up as an IP address assigned to the Defense Department — essentially the user is masked, according to a senior U.S. official familiar with military network security.
NOT KNOWN: If use of the line left any Defense-related materials more vulnerable than they would have been on a Pentagon secure line.
___
KNOWN: The chat group included 18 members, including Jeffrey Goldberg, top editor of The Atlantic. The group, called 'Houthi PC Small Group,' likely for Houthi 'principals committee' — was comprised of Trump's senior-most advisers on national security, including Gabbard, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. The National Security Council said the text chain 'appears to be authentic.'
NOT KNOWN: How Goldberg got added. Waltz said he built the message chain and didn't know how Goldberg ended up on the chat. He called it a mistake.
___
KNOWN: Just hours before the attack on the Houthis in Yemen began, Hegseth shared details on the timing, targets, weapons and sequence of strikes that would take place.
NOT KNOWN: Whether the information was classified. Gabbard, Ratcliffe and the White House have all said it was not classified, and Hegseth said the same in a post on social media. Democrats said that strains credulity.
___
KNOWN: Hegseth has adamantly denied that 'war plans' were texted on Signal, something current and former U.S. officials called 'semantics.' War plans carry a specific meaning. They often refer to the numbered and highly classified planning documents — sometimes thousands of pages long — that would inform U.S. decisions in case of a major conflict.
But the information Hegseth did post — specific attack details selecting human and weapons storage targets — was a subset of those plans and was likely informed by the same classified intelligence. Posting those details to an unclassified app risked tipping off adversaries of the pending attack and could have put U.S. service members at risk, multiple U.S. officials said.
Sharing that information on a commercial app like Signal in advance of a strike 'would be a violation of everything that we're about,' said former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who served under Democratic President Barack Obama.
NOT KNOWN: If anyone outside the messaging group got access to the Signal texts.
___
KNOWN: Hegseth began cracking down on unauthorized leaks of information inside the Defense Department, and his chief of staff issued a memo on March 21 saying the Pentagon would use polygraph tests to determine the sources of recent leaks and prosecute them.
NOT KNOWN: Whether Hegseth will take responsibility for the unauthorized release of national defense information regarding the attack plans on the Houthis. Trump in March bristled at a suggestion that Hegseth should step down, saying 'He's doing a great job. He had nothing to do with it.'
___
KNOWN: In April, Dan Caldwell, a senior Hegseth adviser who in the Signal chat had been designated as the secretary's point person, was placed on administrative leave and escorted out of the Pentagon by security. Officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters told The AP that the former Marine's sudden downfall was tied to an investigation into unauthorized disclosure of department information.
NOT KNOWN: If any others affiliated with the Signal situation will face reprisals.
___
KNOWN: Also in April, Hegseth was forced to defend himself against a second assertion that he shared classified material through an unapproved and unsecured network, this time taking airstrike information from a military communications channel and sharing it in a Signal chat with his wife, his brother and others. A person familiar with the chat confirmed to The AP that Hegseth pulled the information — such as launch times and bomb drop times of U.S. warplanes about to strike Houthi targets in Yemen — he posted in the chat from a secure communications channel used by U.S. Central Command.
NOT KNOWN: If that's the extent of Hegseth's Signal usage.
___
KNOWN: The Pentagon's watchdog has begun looking into Hegseth's use of Signal, and also whether any of Hegseth's aides were asked to delete Signal messages that may have shared sensitive military information with a reporter.
NOT KNOWN: What the inspector general will find, or what will be done as a result of those findings.
___
Kinnard can be reached at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More Ukrainians now want a negotiated end to the war with Russia, new Gallup poll shows
More Ukrainians now want a negotiated end to the war with Russia, new Gallup poll shows

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

More Ukrainians now want a negotiated end to the war with Russia, new Gallup poll shows

WASHINGTON (AP) — After more than three years of war, Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion, according to a new Gallup poll published Thursday — although only about a quarter of Ukrainians surveyed expect the guns to fall silent within the next 12 months. The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 — the year the war began — when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. The poll came out on the eve of U.S. President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about 7 in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month renewed his offer to meet with Russia's Vladimir Putin, but his overture was rebuffed as Russia sticks to its demands, and the sides remain far apart. Most Ukrainians do not expect a lasting peace anytime soon, the poll found. Only about one-quarter say it's 'very' or 'somewhat' likely that active fighting will end within the next 12 months, while about 7 in 10 think it's 'somewhat' or 'very' unlikely that active fighting will be over in the next year. Approval of U.S. falls, approval of Germany rises Ukrainian views of the American government have cratered over the past few years, while positive views of Germany's leadership have risen, according to Gallup. Three years ago, about two-thirds of Ukrainians approved of U.S. leadership. That's since fallen to 16% in the latest poll, reflecting new tensions between the two countries since Trump took office in January. But although the dip from last year was substantial — approval of U.S. leadership was 40% in 2024 — positive views of U.S. leadership were already dropping before Trump took office, perhaps related to the antipathy that prominent Republican politicians showed toward billions of dollars in U.S. support for Ukraine. Germany has grown more popular among Ukrainians over the past few years, rising to 63% approval in the new poll. Hope for NATO, EU acceptance has fallen Ukrainians are much less optimistic that their country will be accepted into NATO or the European Union in the next decade than they were just a few years ago. In the new poll, about one-third of Ukrainians expect that Ukraine will be accepted into NATO within the next 10 years, while about one-quarter think it will take at least 10 years, and one-third believe it will never happen. That's down from 2022, when about two-thirds of Ukrainians thought acceptance into NATO would happen in the coming decade and only about 1 in 10 thought it would never happen. Hope for acceptance into the EU is higher but has also fallen. About half, 52%, of Ukrainians now expect to be part of the EU within the next decade, down from 73% in 2022. ___ Hatton reported from Lisbon, Portugal. ___ Follow AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at

Texas AG launches probe into Beto O'Rourke's political group over funding for Democrats who fled state
Texas AG launches probe into Beto O'Rourke's political group over funding for Democrats who fled state

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Texas AG launches probe into Beto O'Rourke's political group over funding for Democrats who fled state

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton opened an investigation Wednesday into potential 'unlawful activity' undertaken by former Rep. Beto O'Rourke's political group to help state Democratic lawmakers stay away from the capital amid a Republican-led effort to redraw congressional maps. Paxton is probing whether Powered by People, a political action committee founded by O'Rourke in 2019, may have violated bribery and other state laws by 'bankrolling' the more than 50 Texas House Democrats who have stalled a special legislative session by fleeing the state. 'Any Democrat coward breaking the law by taking a Beto Bribe will be held accountable,' Paxton said in a statement. 'Texas cannot be bought. I look forward to thoroughly reviewing all of the documents and communications obtained throughout this investigation.' Advertisement 3 Former Texas congressman Beto O'Rourke speaks during a town hall, Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025, at the University of Nebraska Omaha in Omaha, Neb. AP 'These jet-setting runaways have already lost public trust by abandoning our state, and Texans deserve to know if they received illegal bribes to do it.' O'Rourke's group, which reported having $3.5 million in cash at the end of June, has reportedly covered airfare, lodging and other logistical expenses the absent state reps have incurred, according to the Texas Tribune. Advertisement A 2021 effort by Texas Democrats to stall new state voting laws by fleeing the capital was similarly supported by Powered by People, which spent more than half a million dollars to back the stunt, the outlet reported at the time. O'Rourke criticized Paxton's investigation in an X post Wednesday, and referenced the AG's own bribery scandal for which he was acquitted in 2023. 'The guy impeached for bribery is going after the folks trying to stop the theft of five Congressional seats,' O'Rourke wrote. 3 Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton pauses while speaking during a news conference in Washington, DC, on April 26, 2022. REUTERS Advertisement 3 Paxton is investigating whether Powered by People, a political action committee founded by O'Rourke in 2019, violated bribery and other state laws by funding more than 50 Texas House Democrats who stalled a special legislative session by leaving the state. Getty Images Asked about his group's funding scheme in a CNN interview, the former congressman and Democratic presidential primary candidate said it was 'absolutely' worth it. 'If we fail, the consolidation of authoritarian power in America will be nearly unstoppable,' O'Rourke argued, warning that the redistricting push – which could give Republicans five additional seats in the House of Representatives by the 2026 midterm elections – would 'roll out a royal red carpet for a Trump third term.' Advertisement O'Rourke insisted that he believes the Democrats in hiding 'can stay out long enough to stop this steal in Texas.' As part of the investigation into Powered by People, Paxton has demanded documents and communications from the group regarding potentially unlawful activity, including its involvement in the Democrats' scheme to break quorum, his office said in a statement.

Trump repeats claim Kimmel, Fallon are ‘next' after Stephen Colbert cancellation
Trump repeats claim Kimmel, Fallon are ‘next' after Stephen Colbert cancellation

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump repeats claim Kimmel, Fallon are ‘next' after Stephen Colbert cancellation

President Donald Trump doubled down on Wednesday that late-night hosts Jimmy Fallon and Jimmy Kimmel would be 'next' to be canceled during a press conference. During the presser, Real America's Voice reporter Brian Glenn asked about reports that radio host Howard Stern may part ways with Sirius XM after his contract expires this fall. Advertisement With that in mind, Glenn asked if the 'hate Trump' entertainment model was losing popularity with Americans. Trump cited CBS' recent cancellation of 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' as an example and added that he believes Fallon and Kimmel are next. 'Well, it hasn't worked,' Trump said. 'And it hasn't worked, really, for a long time, and I would say pretty much from the beginning. Colbert has no talent. I mean, I could take anybody here. I could go outside in the beautiful streets and pick a couple of people that do just as well or better. They'd get higher ratings than he did. He's got no talent.' He continued, 'Fallon has no talent. Kimmel has no talent. They're next. They're going to be going. I hear they're going to be going. I don't know, but I would imagine because they'd get—you know, Colbert has better ratings than Kimmel or Fallon.' Advertisement 4 President Trump suggested Jimmy Fallon and Jimmy Kimmel's late-night shows are 'next' to be canceled. AP 4 CBS announced 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' will end in May 2026. AP Trump made a similar declaration on Truth Social after Colbert's show was canceled last month. 'The word is, and it's a strong word at that, Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes and, shortly thereafter, Fallon will be gone,' Trump wrote. Advertisement He continued, 'These are people with absolutely NO TALENT, who were paid Millions of Dollars for, in all cases, destroying what used to be GREAT Television. It's really good to see them go, and I hope I played a major part in it!' 4 'Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes,' President Trump wrote on Truth Social. AP 4 President Trump predicted that 'The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon' would be dropped by NBC. Rosalind O'Connor/NBC via Getty Images Advertisement Although some liberal commentators claimed CBS canceled Colbert's show for political reasons to appease Trump, Paramount—CBS' parent company—insisted it was 'purely a financial decision.' Regarding Stern, Trump remarked how he used to 'have fun' when he appeared on his show. He went on to say that Stern went downhill after endorsing Hillary Clinton for president in 2016. 'He lost his audience. People said give me a break. He went down when he endorsed Hillary Clinton,' Trump said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store