Huge haul of fake footy shirts worth £5m seized by City of London Police
A series of targeted operations across the country resulted in a total of 67,573 dupes being seized since January 2025.
If genuine, the seized merch would have been worth a massive £5.1 million, according to City of London Police.
The pre-season crackdown is part of a collaboration between the force's Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU), the Intellectual Property Office (IPO), Border Force, Trading Standards and industry partners.
City of London Police also warned customers to avoid counterfeit products as they are "poorer quality" and may fund other illegal activities.
On how to spot phoney merch, they say to check the price, quality, details, swing tags, and reputation of the seller - as well as checking for pen marks.
Recommended Reading
London's 'most patriotic estate' has England flags cut down
London man's £150 fine for putting bins out early scrapped
Buckingham Palace's café where cake and water cost £11
Two sportswear brands have seized nearly 7,000 counterfeit items – including fake football shirts, kits and jerseys – across the UK and Ireland since January.
In addition, Back Four Brand Protection has seized a total of 54,400 fake football shirts, kits and socks since January.
A representative from the Football Association of England said: 'Brand abuse and counterfeiting negatively impact the income the FA generates from merchandising, which directly funds football at every level. Counterfeit products should be avoided by fans as they're often of poor quality, and fans deserve better.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Teenagers charged with murder at seaside resort appear in court
A 16-year-old girl and two boys, aged 14 and 15, have appeared in court charged with the murder of a man in a seaside resort. Kent police were called to the Warden Bay Road area of Leysdown-on-Sea, on the Isle of Sheppey, shortly after 7pm on Sunday, following an altercation involving a small number of people. Alexander Cashford, 49, was confirmed dead at the scene, with the force saying multiple injuries to his body were reported. The three teenagers, all from London, are thought to have been on holiday in Kent at the time of the attack. They were jointly charged with murder on Tuesday and appeared at Medway Magistrates on Wednesday afternoon. The defendants were accompanied in the well of the court by their parents, while other family members watched from the public gallery. Prosecuting, Dylan Bradshaw said: 'What we know is that Alexander Cashford, a 49-year-old male, shortly after 7pm on Sunday August 10, went to the beach area of Warden's Bay. 'About an hour and five mins later, he was pronounced dead – during that period, he was the subject of a violent assault.' The attack is alleged to involve a glass bottle and rocks being thrown, the court heard. The 16-year-old and 14-year-old both cried during the hearing while the 15-year-old looked at the floor, rocking slightly. A 12-year-old girl, arrested on Tuesday in Basildon, Essex, is still in custody. The girl and two boys, who cannot be named for legal reasons, have been remanded into youth detention accommodation to appear on Thursday at Maidstone Crown Court.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Family 'devastated' as rare antiques 'collected for decades' stolen
An Oxfordshire family has been left "devastated" after rare antiques were stolen from their home. The property in a village just outside of Oxford, which was not named by Thames Valley Police (TVP), was attacked in June earlier this summer. A large number of antique items were stolen from the home, leaving the family "devastated", according to police. READ MORE: George Osborne 'arranged JD Vance's holiday in the Cotswolds' One of the rare antiques which was stolen. (Image: Thames Valley Police) The force has now put out an appeal along with photographs of some of the stolen items, in the hopes that members of the public with information will come forward. A spokesperson for TVP said: "The burglary team in Abingdon are investigating a series of burglaries. "In June this year, one attacked property in a village just outside of Oxford had a large number of antique items stolen. READ MORE: Series of early hours 'car break-ins' results in two arrests Help support trusted local news Sign up for a digital subscription now: As a digital subscriber you will get: Unlimited access to the Oxford Mail website Advert-light access Reader rewards Full access to our app "These items are rare and have great sentimental value to the family that has collected them over decades, leaving them devastated. "The attached images are only a small portion of the items that were stolen. "If anyone has any information on the whereabouts of the stolen property, please contact the police on 101 quoting Occurrence 43250337295."
Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
UK Judge Affirms Legality Of Public-Submitted Road Crime Footage In Landmark Ruling
A U.K. court ruling has upheld the public's right to submit dashcam and helmet-cam footage to police, after a retired solicitor attempted to sue a 'caped crusader' cyclist who filmed her using a mobile phone while driving. The judgment, handed down by a judge at Newcastle County Court, found that the cyclist's actions did not breach data protection laws. The solicitor had argued that the footage was unlawfully obtained and that the cyclist—who submitted the video to police via the National Dash Cam Safety Portal—was acting as an unregistered 'data controller.' Had the claim succeeded, the judge warned, it could have required millions of motorists and cyclists to register with the U.K.'s Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and pay an annual fee, under threat of criminal sanction. The court's decision, the judge said, avoids a 'chilling' effect on the submission of road traffic evidence by members of the public. The case is subject to an anonymity order, but I have obtained the judge's decision in full. The decision was delivered in March, but with the involved parties now allowed to discuss it. The case concerns an incident that occurred in Whitley Bay in July 2022. Helmet-cam footage showed the solicitor holding a mobile phone while behind the wheel of a car. She was subsequently convicted, fined, and handed six penalty points. In a 50-page ruling, which has not been published, the judge emphasised the growing role of citizen-sourced evidence in policing, noting: 'Many private motorists and cyclists use dashcams and body-worn video equipment.' He said it was clear that filming road crime from public highways—including with smartphones—is both legal and valuable to police investigations. 'Bringing the activity of responding to police requests for video footage within the scope of data protection law would have a chilling effect on the public's willingness to respond,' said the judge in his lengthy decision. The solicitor, who previously worked for two magic circle law firms, represented herself. She accused cyclists of acting like 'caped crusaders' enforcing a 'police-controlled state.' She claimed that cyclists actively seek out law-breaking motorists and film them without consent. However, the judge found her account to be unreliable and criticised her 'lack of candour' in dealings with the ICO. He stated that she failed to disclose the ongoing legal proceedings when making complaints to the regulator. He further ruled that the footage contradicted her allegation that the cyclist had banged on her car roof. The solicitor also claimed that she was not driving carelessly or dangerously when filmed by the cyclist. The judge dismissed this, saying that the footage 'captured her in a criminal act' and that those who upload videos of such law-breaking help to deter future road crime. Law professor Sally Kyd, the former head of Leicester University's law school, said the judge had provided 'clear support for the police use of third party reporting through uploading videos to online portals' and that the judge had shown the 'deterrent effect on other drivers in seeing the potential to be caught.' Furthermore, added Professor Kyd, it is 'clear that the court takes the commission of the criminal offence of use of a mobile phone whilst driving seriously. This is pleasing to see, given that historically such offences have been framed by some as quasi-criminal.' The cyclist, who also represented himself, told me: 'The judge admitted that the case gave him lots to think about. Thankfully, the court sided with me.' The solicitor told me by email: 'Although [this] is one of the most important data protection rights cases to come before the courts this year, the hostility from the public bodies involved was deliberately used to undermine precious privacy rights. It should not have been left to me as a private citizen to expose the unlawful data protection behaviours of cyclists uploading digital material—obtained covertly from other private citizens—to portals for police prosecution purposes.' Legal experts said the ruling sends a strong signal in support of public involvement in traffic enforcement. Martin Porter KC, joint head of chambers at 2 Temple Gardens, said that although the decision does not set a binding precedent, the judge considered the case with great care 'perhaps with an eye to appeal.' 'The idea that data protection has any bearing on being filmed driving your car on a public road and committing traffic offences is ridiculous,' added Porter. 'The police will be interested in the outcome of this case,' said Professor Kyd, 'as it makes clear that uploading videos is a legitimate means of helping to enforce motoring offences.'
