logo
Letters to the editor, July 22: ‘Perhaps we should be thanking Donald Trump for getting our government to say it will clamp down on the dumping of foreign steel in Canada'

Letters to the editor, July 22: ‘Perhaps we should be thanking Donald Trump for getting our government to say it will clamp down on the dumping of foreign steel in Canada'

Globe and Mail3 days ago
Re 'Softwood deal a top priority in trade talks, Carney says' (July 17): I recall statements made in our King's recent speech from the Throne calling for more houses and using more Canadian technology and material. Furthermore, I believe the primary material in most individual homes and multiplexes is lumber and other wood products.
A financier as clever as our Prime Minister should be able to initiate a homebuilding program which vigorously supports the Canadian lumber industry. How about a guaranteed quota with guaranteed prices to keep mills open and employees, both in lumber and construction, working?
Steven Harker Kingston
Re 'Carney cracks down further on cheap steel imports in bid to protect domestic mills' (July 17): Perhaps we should be thanking Donald Trump for getting our government to say it will clamp down on the dumping of foreign steel in Canada. This has been a problem for many years, but it didn't seem to be a concern for prior governments.
And perhaps we should also thank Mr. Trump for forcing our governments to crack down on fentanyl. The opioid scourge has been killing and disabling Canadians for years, but their lives didn't seem to be a concern for prior governments.
If the U.S. President would demand change about our courts granting repeated bail to accused persons who violate the conditions under which they were released, perhaps there would be less violence on our streets. When I read about such travesties, I wonder why our police officers bother to risk their lives to capture the same offenders over and over again, only to see them released.
Ted Crljenica Windsor, Ont.
Re 'Defence spending should be leveraged to boost Canada's R&D' (July 17): Our military equipment is obsolescent, if not obsolete. Canada needs a well-equipped, well-trained military with state-of-the-art equipment.
However, strong spending on research and development, a heathy economy and an excellent national infrastructure are preconditions for national defence. Our weak R&D spending, along with our inability to translate our world-class innovations into new industries, contributes to our declining standard of living.
Economic health is essential to our national security, so devoting 20 per cent of our defence budget to R&D seems reasonable. The exodus of world-class researchers from American universities could, if harnessed, reinvent and create entire industries here.
We can also learn much from other countries such as the United States for best practices: The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has created entirely new industries; Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works repeatedly undertook state-of-the-art aerospace projects; Stanford University played a critical role in creating of Silicon Valley.
John Shepherd Richmond, B.C.
Re 'Army removes commanding officer after alleged racist, sexual social-media posts by soldiers' (July 18): Seriously?
The Defence Minister thinks the Cameron Highlanders' alleged posting of racist comments and sexual images is 'unacceptable?' And any member participating 'should expect to face administrative and/or disciplinary consequences?'
Well, that sure sounds serious. I have a better idea: Boot them out, zero tolerance.
Who wants to have people like these, in 'a prestigious reserve unit' playing 'a major role' in Ottawa ceremonial events, representing us anywhere? I sure don't.
Let's get real about these types of incidents.
Erin Scullion Ottawa
Re 'Strength in numbers' (Letters, July 15): A letter-writer asserts that the NDP and Liberals should merge to form a left-leaning bloc to confront the Conservatives in the next election. This would be a bad idea.
Firstly the parties have different backgrounds, with the NDP standing for the working class and the Liberals associated with the mainstream middle class. Their ideologies are separate, and combining the two parties would make for an uneasy alliance in which radicals and moderates both vie for power – rather like the modern Conservative Party.
The merger would also accelerate the slide toward a two-party system, which would only intensify political polarization and make centrist coalitions, such as those in Denmark and Germany, more unlikely.
Let's instead embrace a diversity of parties and adopt a mixed-member proportional system, so we can have a fairer election for once.
Iain McInnes Ottawa
Re 'U.K. plans to lower voting age to 16 in national elections' (July 18): This has encouraged those campaigning to reduce the voting age in Canada to 16.
Before that happens, or at least at the same time, the Youth Criminal Justice Act should lower the maximum age of criminal responsibility to 16.
If they are old enough to vote, they are old enough to face consequences in adult courts.
Andrew Chong Toronto
Re 'Costa Rica is no longer a safe haven for Nicaraguan exiles' (July 18): I was pretty well in agreement with the contributor until the last paragraph about the need for 'regime change' in Nicaragua.
That's language right out of the ill-conceived Bush Doctrine, and we all know what happened in post-2003 Iraq. The last thing the United States should be doing, or the Organization of American States for that matter, is trying to destabilize the illiberal government in Managua.
Besides, the disastrous U.S.-sponsored 'Contra war' of the 1980s, which led to the vicious deaths of thousands of innocent Nicaraguans, is another reminder of why Washington should stay out of the business of trying to topple Central American governments.
Peter McKenna Professor, department of political science, University of Prince Edward Island; Charlottetown
Re 'Giller Prize says it will be forced to cease operations without federal funding' (July 17): The Giller Foundation wasn't forced to eject Scotiabank as its sponsor.
It seems to have caved in response to some 'holier than thou' folks, and now the Canadian taxpayer is asked to pay the bill instead. As much as I love the arts, I would rather that the bank paid.
Leave politics to the politicians.
Cassandra King Stratford, Ont.
Re 'A North Dakota city is being overrun by ground squirrels and officials are not amused' (July 18): Regarding the nefarious squirrels 'overrunning' Minot, N.D., it seems these squirrels are native to the region.
So I suppose they were there for thousands of years until humans came and destroyed their habitat, forcing them to move into town.
Who is overrunning whom, I wonder?
Glenn Parsons Guelph, Ont.
Are ground squirrels tasty?
Michael Arkin Toronto
Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@globeandmail.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada still working toward Aug. 1 trade deal deadline, LeBlanc says, as U.S. senator casts doubt
Canada still working toward Aug. 1 trade deal deadline, LeBlanc says, as U.S. senator casts doubt

CTV News

time30 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Canada still working toward Aug. 1 trade deal deadline, LeBlanc says, as U.S. senator casts doubt

President of the King's Privy Council for Canada Dominic LeBlanc speaks at a press conference while Prime Minister Mark Carney listens, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Thursday, June 19, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Patrick Doyle WASHINGTON — Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc said Thursday he's feeling "encouraged" after meeting with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and American lawmakers in Washington, D.C., ahead of next week's tariff deadline. LeBlanc, however, indicated a new economic and security arrangement may not materialize by U.S. President Donald Trump's latest deadline. "Canadians expect us to take the time necessary to get the best deal we can in the interest of Canadian workers," LeBlanc said outside the Dirksen Senate Office Building. "So we are only going to be in a position to accept a deal when the prime minister decides that it is the best deal we can get in the interest of Canadian workers and the Canadian economy." U.S. President Donald Trump has sent letters to multiple nations, including Canada, saying that if no deal is made by Aug. 1, he will impose high tariffs on imports to the United States. Trump's letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatened Canada with 35 per cent tariffs but the White House has said the levies will not be applied to imports compliant with the Canada-U.S-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canada is also being hit with Trump's tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles, and will be impacted by copper duties that are also expected to kick in on Aug. 1. Only a handful of frameworks of trade deals have been announced since Trump first threatened his so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs in April. The president this week said his administration made deals with Japan and the Philippines, adding to previous agreements with Indonesia, Vietnam and the United Kingdom. Many details within the agreements remain vague but all include some level of a tariff, and it's unclear whether the deals would shield countries from Trump's plan to implement further sectoral duties on things like semiconductors and lumber. LeBlanc said "complex negotiations" are continuing between Canada and the United States and he will be returning to Washington next week. LeBlanc described his meeting with Lutnick as productive and cordial. The minister, who was joined by Canadian Ambassador to the U.S. Kirsten Hillman, also had meetings with Republican senators Kevin Cramer, Roger Marshall, Shelley Moore Capito, Todd Young and Tim Scott. LeBlanc said they discussed border security and defence issues and the American lawmakers shared a "desire to see more stability and predictability in the relationship with the United States." "My conversations have focused on how we share so many priorities of President Trump's administration that we should be able to figure out together a deal that's in the best interest of Canadian workers, and obviously they are going to do their side of the table in terms of the American economy and American workers," LeBlanc said. Federal officials have remained tightlipped about what Trump's team has said it wants from Canada. After this week's trade deals were announced, Trump boasted on social media, saying he will only consider lowering tariff rates if countries open their markets to the United States. The president also said Japan would invest $550 billion in the U.S. 'at my direction." When Trump first browbeat Canada over tariffs, saying it was linked to the flow of deadly fentanyl, Ottawa responded with a boosted border plan and named a "Fentanyl Czar." Last month, Ottawa walked back its digital services tax after Trump threatened to halt all trade talks. Carney last week announced measures to stop Chinese steel dumping in Canada. Hillman said those efforts help Canada in its ongoing negotiations. "In our discussion with the American senators this week, the American administration, the measures that Canada has taken on steel in particular... are some of the strongest in the world," she said. "And that has been recognized and very much appreciated. So we are making some positive progress." Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski joined a bipartisan group of American lawmakers in Ottawa last week. The Republican said on Thursday that "we would all like to get to a better place with our trade relationship with Canada" but remained skeptical it would happen ahead of Aug. 1. Canada cannot be treated "as yet one more country that we need to reconcile tariffs on" because of shared economic and national security issues, she said. "I wish that I could say, 'It feels good,' that this is all going to be taken care of before the first of August, but I'm not sensing that," she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press

DE LUCA-BARATTA: Canada's other supply management problem
DE LUCA-BARATTA: Canada's other supply management problem

Toronto Sun

time30 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

DE LUCA-BARATTA: Canada's other supply management problem

Dairy cows being checked out by a farmer and vet during feeding. Photo by Getty Images While Canada-U.S. trade negotiations reignite debates over supply management for dairy and poultry, Canadians overlook a far costlier system — the unofficial supply management of housing through restrictive land-use regulations . This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Most Canadians support weakening or abolishing the current agricultural supply management program , a long overdue realization. Under this program, a national marketing agency sets provincial production quotas for eggs, poultry, and dairy. Farmers then receive permission to produce and sell a set amount of each good at a guaranteed minimum price. A University of Manitoba study found that families pay over $900 million more per year for supply-managed goods than they would in a free market. But the effects of Canada's second, unofficial supply management system are much worse. Through a web of urban planning rules , municipalities prevent housing construction from keeping up with growing demand, causing home prices and rents to balloon. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The two systems differ in their details, but not in their effects, because the underlying economics are the same. When the government artificially constrains supply, consumers foot the bill through higher prices. Under supply management, the federal government directly sets production ceilings to stabilize prices and guarantee farmers' incomes. This system protects farmers at the expense of consumers, who pay more for groceries than they otherwise would. Under land-use regulations, local governments limit building heights, set aesthetic standards, ban certain types of construction in designated areas, and impose other rules, such as parking requirements and minimum lot sizes. These rules have various goals, from environmental protection to the preservation of historic neighbourhoods. However, by making housing harder and more costly to build, they also constrain supply and radically inflate prices. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Individually, these rules may seem reasonable, but cumulatively, they stifle development by outright banning projects or layering costs that render new housing unprofitable. The result is a shortage of housing, most of which becomes too costly for the average homebuyer or renter. When more people bid for goods, the price of those goods rises. In a free market , producers respond by producing more of them, lured by the prospect of higher profits. Over time, as more producers enter the market and existing firms compete with one another to attract buyers, prices decrease to attract new customers. Firms that overcharge lose revenue, since customers can simply move to a seller offering a better deal. In Canada, construction of new housing has not kept up with demand for decades, because developers cannot respond to higher prices by simply building more units. When they do manage to build, the process is usually extremely costly. Those costs are ultimately passed on to homebuyers and renters. Excessive land-use regulations thus make luxury-tier housing the only kind of housing worth building. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A study by the C.D. Howe Institute found that in eight urban areas — Vancouver, Abbotsford, Victoria, Kelowna, Calgary, Toronto, and Ottawa-Gatineau — homebuyers paid an extra average of $230,000 for a new house due to land-use regulations that prevent new construction. In Vancouver — where the average home costs $2 million — regulatory costs account for nearly half the price. In Toronto ($1.2 million average), it's 20%. This system is especially unfair to young people, who often find themselves priced out of the housing market altogether. To understand just how unaffordable housing in Canada has become, consider a family earning $183,000 per year, nearly $100,000 above the median Canadian household income. That family would have to set aside 10% of its income for 15 to 25 years (depending on the income split between the spouses) to afford a down payment on a house in Toronto. The average young family simply does not stand a chance. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Those who blame greed instead of overregulation for Canada's housing crisis should look at cities with few land-use regulations, like Houston, Texas . For the most part, builders are free to build in response to demand. The median home price in Houston is about $350,000. Houston's developers are no less 'greedy' than Toronto's; they're simply constrained by competition in a freer market. A relatively free housing market incentivizes them to compete for customers through lower prices and an almost non-existent regulatory burden allows those prices to remain quite low indeed. The same can be true in Canadian cities if governments get out of the way. It's about time for Canadians — young Canadians in particular — to start demanding that local officials get rid of regulations that price them out of the housing market. Federal and provincial governments must penalize those who cling to obstructionist rules. Canadians are tired of overpaying for a carton of milk — and rightfully so. It is time we lost patience with paying too much for housing, too. Anthony De Luca-Baratta is a contributor to the Center for North American Prosperity and Security, a project of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute Sports World Ontario Canada Toronto & GTA

Canada's trade team downplays chances of deal with Trump by Aug. 1

timean hour ago

Canada's trade team downplays chances of deal with Trump by Aug. 1

With the clock ticking on U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to boost tariffs on some Canadian exports to 35 per cent starting Aug. 1, Canada's top trade negotiators are downplaying the likelihood of reaching a deal by that deadline. Dominic LeBlanc, minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, and Canada's ambassador to the U.S., Kirsten Hillman, wrapped up two days of meetings with Republican senators. These included a brief sit-down between LeBlanc and Howard Lutnick, the U.S. secretary of commerce and Trump's point man on tariffs. We've made progress, but we have a lot of work in front of us, LeBlanc told reporters outside a Senate office building on Thursday. LeBlanc said he had a productive, cordial discussion with Lutnick and plans to return to Washington next week. He also added some caveats about the path to reaching a deal. We're going to continue to work toward the Aug. 1 deadline,' he said. But all of these deadlines are with the understanding that we'll take the time necessary to get the best deal that we think is in the interest of the Canadian economy and Canadian workers." Hillman, who was appointed Canada's chief negotiator with the U.S., also suggested an agreement with the Trump administration is not imminent. WATCH | Dominic LeBlanc speaks after meeting Trump's point man on tariffs: It's important for us to recognize that there is a time when the deal is the right deal, and it's important for us to be in a position to continue negotiating until we get to that point, she said. Their comments are the latest evidence that Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is not in a rush to sign a deal with the U.S. Carney said Tuesday that his objective is "not to reach a deal whatever it costs (new window) ." Following Carney's meeting with Canada's premiers earlier this week, Nova Scotia's Tim Houston said the prime minister isn't dead set on signing a deal by the deadline. Other countries reach tariff deals with Trump This comes amid Trump's announcements this week of framework agreements on tariffs struck with Japan (new window) and Indonesia, and reports the U.S. is closing in on a deal with the European Union. Canada may be less panicked than other trading partners about the Aug. 1 deadline because only a small portion of Canada's exports to the U.S. would be affected by Trump's threat of 35 per cent tariffs. That's because most goods enter the U.S. tariff-free (new window) under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, or CUSMA. Officials say LeBlanc and Hillman met with five Republican senators in Washington: Kevin Cramer (North Dakota), Roger Marshall (Kansas), Shelley Moore Capito (West Virginia), Tim Scott (South Carolina) and Todd Young (Indiana). Another Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, told reporters in Washington on Thursday that the U.S. shares a lot of security and economic interests with Canada and shouldn't treat it as just another country when it comes to tariffs. "I wish that I could say it feels good, that this is all going to be taken care of before the first of August, but I'm not sensing that," said Murkowski, who visited Ottawa on Monday (new window) to meet Carney and some of his cabinet ministers. Mike Crawley (new window) · CBC News · Senior reporter Mike Crawley has covered Ontario politics for CBC News since 2009. He began his career as a newspaper reporter in B.C., spent six years as a freelance journalist in various parts of Africa, then joined the CBC in 2005. Mike was born and raised in Saint John, N.B. Follow Mike Crawley on Twitter (new window)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store