Stefanik would be ‘absolutely fantastic candidate' for NY governor: RNC chief
Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley on Tuesday said Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) would be an 'absolutely fantastic' candidate for New York governor as she considers a run for the office.
Whatley said on NewsNation's 'The Hill' that New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) is vulnerable as she struggles with poor approval ratings and that Stefanik would be a strong candidate against her.
'Kathy Hochul right now is absolutely a wounded governor. She is very, very weak. She is very unpopular across the state, and that state is ready for a change,' he told host Blake Burman. 'Elise Stefanik is one of several people that are taking a serious look at this race right now. She would be an absolutely fantastic candidate.'
But Whatley avoided weighing in on if the New York Republican would be the best candidate, saying 'we'll wait and see who's going to get into that race' and acknowledging others that are considering bids.
The comments come after Stefanik was reported to be eying a run for governor following her withdrawal as President Trump's choice for United Nations ambassador. The congresswoman has increasingly taken on a higher profile as a close Trump ally and strong advocate for Israel.
But that could throw a wrench in Rep. Mike Lawler's (R-N.Y.) plans as he had been seen as a likely candidate for governor for months. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman has also been viewed as a possible candidate.
Republicans have said they're excited at the prospect of having multiple strong possible candidates in contention for the role but hope to avoid a messy primary that could distract from focusing attention on Hochul and Democrats.
Lawler has also been a strong critic of Hochul, whose approval ratings have often been underwater. Combining her numbers with her narrower-than-expected victory in 2022 has given Republicans hope at pulling off an upset next year.
But the Empire State governor's numbers did improve somewhat in the most recent round of Siena College polling, having a net positive favorability rating for the first time since January 2024. A plurality of voters also said they approve of her job performance for the first time since February 2024.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
Bengals' Trey Hendrickson contract standoff gets a hot take from VP JD Vance
Bengals' Trey Hendrickson contract standoff gets a hot take from VP JD Vance Cincinnati Bengals defensive end Trey Hendrickson now has politicians talking about his contract standoff with the team. Appearing on Theo Von's podcast this week, Vice President JD Vance joked around about the contract standoff, with the Middletown, Ohio, politician expressing optimism about the Bengals in the process. "Trey, if you're watching this show: If you're a Republican, I will show up to a Bengals game and take a photo with you if you sign on with the Bengals," Vance joked. "And if you're a Democrat, I'll stay the hell away. Just sign with the Bengals, because we've got a chance, man." RELATED: Bengals news: Jermaine Burton buzz, practice urgency and more As Bengals fans know all too well, though, outside noise doesn't really have a way of impacting how the team does business. That's a rule that will certainly apply to an office as high as Vance's right now, even if he does happen to hail from Ohio. Joe Burrow and others have commented on Hendrickson's standoff with the team recently, too. The next entry in the saga will happen soon when it's revealed if the star pass-rusher shows up to mandatory minicamp or gets fined by the team. RELATED: Bengals' Andrei Iosivas adds 15 pounds while eyeing breakout season
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Newsom Formally Asks Trump to Pull National Guard Out of L.A.
Stepping up his confrontation with the White House, Gov. Gavin Newsom demanded on Sunday that President Trump pull California National Guard troops off the streets and away from the demonstrations unfolding in Los Angeles. Mr. Newsom asserted on X that the deployment order was 'unlawful' and called on the Trump administration to return the command of the guard to his office. It is extremely rare for a president to call up a state's National Guard troops without the permission of that state's governor for the purpose of quelling unrest or enforcing the law. In California, the adjutant general of the state National Guard is appointed by the governor. 'Rescind the order,' Mr. Newsom wrote Sunday on X. 'Return control to California.' Read the Letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth On Sunday, Gov. Gavin Newsom's office sent a letter by email to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth objecting to the deployment of California National Guard troops to Los Angeles. The Democratic governor made his demand as protests against the immigration crackdown took place in parts of Los Angeles, marked by clouds of tear gas and confrontations between demonstrators and law enforcement. There was no immediate response from the White House. 'We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' Mr. Newsom said. 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed.' Mr. Trump's attempt to bypass Mr. Newsom's authority and activate the Guard relied on a seldom-used reading of federal law. In signing the order on Saturday, the president cited a provision within Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services that allows the federal deployment of National Guard forces if 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' The last time a president overrode a state governor to activate the National Guard to stop unrest or enforce the law was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama in 1965 to protect civil rights demonstrators, according to Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice. In a letter to Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, David Sapp, the governor's legal affairs secretary, argued there was no need for such an intervention and that the situation was being adequately controlled by local police officers. 'Local law enforcement resources are sufficient to maintain order,' Mr. Sapp told Mr. Hegseth in urging him to rescind the order. 'In dynamic and fluid situations such as the one in Los Angeles, state and local authorities are the most appropriate ones to evaluate the need for resources to safeguard life and property,' Mr. Sapp wrote. He also told Mr. Hegseth that the president's order did not follow the law, which he said requires that deployment orders be issued through a state's governor.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Latinas for Trump co-founder blasts ‘inhumane' immigrant arrests
Florida state senator Ileana Garcia (R), co-founder of Latinas for Trump, issued a sharp rebuke of President Trump on Sunday as his administration seeks to ramp up deportations and other actions against undocumented immigrants. Garcia took particular issue with reported tactics in southern Florida, where immigration officials have allegedly been making arrests in immigration courts and taking other steps to target individuals otherwise in compliance with legal orders. 'This is not what we voted for,' Garcia wrote in a post on X. 'I have always supported Trump, @realDonaldTrump, through thick and thin. However, this is unacceptable and inhumane.' 'I understand the importance of deporting criminal aliens, but what we are witnessing are arbitrary measures to hunt down people who are complying with their immigration hearings—in many cases, with credible fear of persecution claims—all driven by a Miller-like desire to satisfy a self-fabricated deportation goal,' she continued in her post, referring to White House homeland security adviser and deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. 'This undermines the sense of fairness and justice that the American people value,' Garcia added. The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment. Garcia's comments followed criticism from Rep. María Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.), who issued a statement saying she's 'fully aware' of and 'heartbroken… because of the recent immigration actions of the administration.' She said the administration's actions have 'left thousands exposed to deportation' and jeopardized 'our duty to due process that every democracy must guarantee.' Salazar said anyone with a pending asylum claim 'deserves to go through the legal process,' noting that, 'It is an indisputable fact' that most of these claims come from people who fled Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua, which Salazar noted are 'the three most brutal regimes in our hemisphere and sworn enemies of the United States.' 'I wholeheartedly agree that the administration must kick out every criminal here illegally, just as President Trump promised. Many still remain, and we should keep our focus on them,' Salazar added, noting that she plans to meet with administration officials this coming week. Garcia issued her statement in response to Salazar's remarks, saying, 'I stand with Congresswoman Salazar.' 'As the state senator who represents her district and the daughter of Cuban refugees, who are now just as American, if not more so than Stephen Miller, I am deeply disappointed by these actions. And I will not stand down,' Garcia wrote.
