logo
Carney tells NATO critical minerals development will move Canada toward its defence spending goal

Carney tells NATO critical minerals development will move Canada toward its defence spending goal

Canada will reach an even higher NATO spending target in part by developing its critical minerals and the infrastructure needed to get them to market, Prime Minister Mark Carney said as the annual leaders' summit of alliance members got underway in the Netherlands.
Carney is in The Hague for the NATO leaders' summit, and made the comments in a pre-summit interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour that aired on Tuesday.
Leaders are debating how much to hike the NATO spending target, with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte proposing to more than double it from the current two per cent of GDP, to five per cent.
Carney said he expects leaders will agree to boost spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP in ten years.
Rutte's proposal is to hike spending to 3.5 per cent of annual GDP on core defence needs — like jets and other weapons — and another 1.5 per cent on defence-adjacent areas like infrastructure, cybersecurity and industry.
Carney said five per cent of Canada's GDP would amount to about $150 billion per year. NATO said last year Canada spent $41 billion on defence.
The prime minister said Canada will reach the target in part by developing deposits of critical minerals and that some of the work will be done in partnership with the European Union, EU member states, the U.K. and other countries.
Canada will reach an even higher NATO spending target in part by developing its critical minerals and the infrastructure needed to get them to market, Prime Minister Mark Carney said.
"Some of the spending for that counts towards that five per cent. In fact, a lot of it will count toward that five per cent because of infrastructure spending — it's ports and railroads and other ways to get these minerals out," Carney said.
"So that's something that benefits the Canadian economy but is also part of our NATO, our new NATO responsibilities."
Critical minerals refers to a series of metals and mineral deposits including lithium, cadmium and nickel, which are key elements for modern technology in everything from laptops and cellphones to high end defence systems.
NATO released a list of 12 critical minerals last year that are a must for defence. They include aluminum, which NATO described as "pivotal" to producing lightweight planes and missiles, graphite, used in the production of tanks, and cobalt, essential in the production of jet engines, submarines and jet engines.
Canada has some of the worlds largest deposits of critical minerals.
Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand was at The Hague with Carney on Tuesday, where she told reporters that Canada is committed to increasing its defence spending but has questions about the "timeline" for hitting the new NATO spending target.
When asked if her government accepts the new spending benchmark, Anand said Canada has consistently supported NATO's spending targets.
"The question, really, is the timeline,' she told reporters in The Hague.
She added some allies have proposed a 2029 deadline for meeting the target.
'We'd like to see steps along the way where there can be a re-examination of whether this is the right approach, augmenting at this rate in terms of domestic spend," said Anand.
In a call back to reporters in Ottawa Tuesday, Anand said it would be "imprudent" to discuss Canada's position publicly before the NATO leaders discuss it at the table. She said questions remain about how much flexibility NATO members will be given as they pursue the five per cent target.
All 32 NATO member states have to agree on a new spending target — and no member state is spending anywhere close to five per cent. At 3.38 per cent, U.S. defence spending as a share of GDP was the highest in the alliance in 2024.
U.S. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth and Rutte have both said they expect alliance representatives at the summit to agree to the new five per cent target. But U.S. President Donald Trump has said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States — only to its allies.
Trump shared on social media Tuesday screenshots of a text sent to him by Rutte. A spokesperson for NATO confirmed for The Canadian Press that the text was legitimate.
In the text, Rutte congratulated and thanked Trump for his "decisive action" in ordering airstrikes on Iranian sites linked to its nuclear program. He told the president he was "flying into another big success" in The Hague and that "we've got them all signed onto 5 per cent!"
"Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win," Rutte said.
Britain, France, the Netherlands and Germany have all committed to the five per cent goal. NATO nations closer to the borders of Ukraine, Russia and its ally Belarus have also pledged to do so.
But not everyone seems to be on board. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said Sunday that Spain reached a deal with NATO excluding it from the new spending target. Like Canada, Spain has long struggled to meet the two per cent target and has rejected the new proposal.
On Tuesday, Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico suggested that his country might be better off embracing neutrality. He also released a statement saying the new defence spending target would amount to almost a fifth of the country's budget, which he called 'absolutely absurd.'
Rutte warned Monday that no country can opt out of the target and that progress made toward the new target will be reviewed in four years.
NATO set the current two per cent target in 2014. This year, for the first time ever, all 32 member nations are expected to meet it. In 2014, when the current two per cent target was set, only three NATO members hit the mark — the U.S., the U.K. and Greece.
Canada's defence spending hasn't reached five per cent of GDP since the 1950s, and hasn't been above two per cent since 1990. NATO estimates that Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. In 2014, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence.
Ottawa said last year it would be able to hit two per cent by 2032, but Carney said earlier this month it will happen this year. In Brussels on Monday, he also announced that Canada had formally signed a new defence and security pact with the European Union that opens the door to defence procurement deals between Canada and European countries.
Anand said that new partnership will expand Canada's defence industrial base.
The main talks in The Hague won't happen until Wednesday and leaders spent much of Tuesday in bilateral meetings.
Carney met with leaders from Latvia and the Netherlands. He also met with representatives of Nordic nations to discuss Arctic and transatlantic security.
The prime minister also had an audience with King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima of the Netherlands.
Lauren Speranza, a fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said the NATO summit is coming at a 'very precarious moment,' marked by uncertainty about the U.S. commitment to Europe, the grinding conflict between Russia and Ukraine and ongoing tensions over transatlantic trade.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Economists split on what inflation numbers mean for Bank of Canada rate cut
Economists split on what inflation numbers mean for Bank of Canada rate cut

Calgary Herald

time32 minutes ago

  • Calgary Herald

Economists split on what inflation numbers mean for Bank of Canada rate cut

Article content Inflation growth held steady in May at 1.7 per cent year over year, but economists are split on whether it provides enough evidence for the Bank of Canada to cut rates at its next policy meeting in July. Article content Core CPI-median and CPI-trim inflation grew three per cent in May, down from 3.2 per cent and 3.1 per cent in April, respectively, matching analyst estimates while remaining well above the Bank of Canada's inflation target of two per cent. Article content Article content Bank of Canada policymakers have made it clear that their attention is focused on inflation and the possibility that tariffs could cause another spike. Article content Article content The Bank of Canada's target range for inflation is one per cent to three per cent. Article content Here's what economists think the latest inflation numbers mean for the Bank of Canada and interest rates. Article content An ongoing pullback in rent and mortgage costs will help counter the effects of tariffs on the price of goods, Katherine Judge, an economist at CIBC Capital Markets, said. Article content The cost of food boosted the Bank of Canada's favoured core inflation measures, but the price of groceries 'sharply' fell last month. Article content 'The appreciation in the Canadian dollar over the last few months is helping to contain food prices amidst tariffs,' she said in a note. Article content Article content Canada has a lot of exemptions on its counter tariffs on the U.S., so the effects of U.S. levies are mostly on finished goods, such as vehicles and some food. Article content 'Tariff impacts will become more evident in the releases ahead, but we look for waning demand tied to the rise in the unemployment rate to provide an offset, along with the appreciation in the Canadian dollar, and a deceleration in shelter inflation,' Judge said.

Tasha Kheiriddin: Carney puts Poilievre between a rock and a hard place
Tasha Kheiriddin: Carney puts Poilievre between a rock and a hard place

Calgary Herald

timean hour ago

  • Calgary Herald

Tasha Kheiriddin: Carney puts Poilievre between a rock and a hard place

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, left, and Prime Minister Mark Carney. Photo by Bryan Passifiume, Greg Southam/Postmedia Network What a difference six months make. In December, Canada's Conservatives were in the catbird seat with 48 per cent support, while the Liberals dropped to 19. Practically everyone pegged Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre as Canada's next prime minister. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Calgary Herald ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Calgary Herald ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Then Justin Trudeau stepped down, Donald Trump took office and Mark Carney got elected Liberal leader. One federal election later, the Liberals have a minority and would likely have a majority if a vote were held today. It's a reversal of fortunes worthy of a Shakespearean play (or, for the gen Z crowd, a Netflix drama). The lesson is that politics is all about timing. While Poilievre was the perfect foil for the hapless Trudeau, it's not clear how he counters Carney. Apple chomping videos won't cut it. In the current climate, they look positively juvenile. The world sits on the brink of another world war, Canada is trying to get a trade deal with the U.S. and we just inked a defence agreement with the European Union. This is a game for grownups, not social media stars. Your weekday lunchtime roundup of curated links, news highlights, analysis and features. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again It also doesn't help that the Liberals are implementing much of the Conservative agenda, starting with a carbon tax cut, an income tax cut and legislation to speed up major projects and resources development. The latter, Bill C-5, passed with the help of the Conservatives, and despite opposition from Indigenous and environmental groups, both key constituencies for the previous Liberal government. Such a thing would have never happened under Trudeau, for whom electoral calculus and virtue-signalling trumped the national interest. He said it was a shame that a female president hadn't been elected instead of Trump. He apologized for abuses at Canada's residential schools, but turned a blind eye to the torching of churches. And he trashed Canada's relationship with India to gain favour with Sikh voters, while turning his back on Israel to court the Muslim vote. In contrast, Carney is emerging as a non-ideological pragmatist. He's hell-bent on getting Canada what it needs: a trade deal with the U.S., diversified partnerships in trade and security and a renewed relationship with India. At the G7 summit, he praised Trump, hosted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and managed expectations of a final communique even before the confab began. He may not be an experienced politician, but he is a diplomat, and it showed. This advertisement has not loaded yet. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That's not to say Carney doesn't have a belief system, notably on climate change. Left-wing outlets may decry his embrace of oil and gas, but if they read between the lines, it's clear that he prefers a greener path. However, he realizes that unless you do both, he won't pass Go: it's not just the Trump administration that takes a dim view, but hard-up consumers who are also turning their backs on electric vehicles. And on the other end of the political spectrum, Carney is also raising eyebrows. At a press conference with EU leaders, he described Canada as 'the most European of the non-European countries,' and talked of 'increased harmonization of our regulatory frameworks.' The EU is famous for its byzantine and overweening regulations, from the ingredients in baguettes to ESG mandates to rules governing the digital economy — an approach that's curiously at odds with the get 'er done spirit of Bill C-5. But this quixotic approach may be exactly what keeps Carney in power, because it marginalizes both the left and the right, squeezing them into more extreme spaces that centrist voters eschew. For Poilievre, it's bad news: if he meets Carney on his middle ground, he risks alienating the anti-globalist crowd, but if he panders to those voters, he will drive even more 'progressive conservatives' to Carney. For the Conservative leader, it could be a long, hot summer, indeed. Tasha Kheiriddin is Postmedia's national politics columnist.

Donald Trump's F-word and his discovery of some hard truths about the world
Donald Trump's F-word and his discovery of some hard truths about the world

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Donald Trump's F-word and his discovery of some hard truths about the world

The sportswriter Bill Simmons coined the phrase 'the Tyson Zone' to describe the rarified state of being – named after Mike Tyson – in which a celebrity's behaviour becomes so unglued that nothing you hear about them seems impossible anymore. It was almost 20 years ago in his ESPN column that he originated the idea, but Donald Trump was a little later in discovering the powerful sorcery of occupying the Tyson Zone in politics. He does and says whatever he wants to such extremes that none of it shocks or even matters anymore. The more outrageous his actions, the more he expands the comfy cocoon of the Tyson Zone around himself. And yet, somehow, the F-word was a new bridge to cross. This he hadn't done before; this was a surprise. There was something in this reaction that mattered. How Trump's Israel-Iran ceasefire agreement came together in a chaotic 48 hours Trump pivots from budget bill to big, beautiful Middle East settlement On Tuesday as he prepared to leave for a NATO summit in the Netherlands, Mr. Trump faced a barrage of questions about the ceasefire he had declared the previous night between Israel and Iran, which had been breached immediately and explosively. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing,' Mr. Trump snarled, physically leaning into the end of the sentence. He finished by barking 'Do you understand that?' at the reporters crowding around, before stalking away to his helicopter. It read like a true temper tantrum: naked, overwhelmed, a bubbling over of the insides. On one hand, Mr. Trump may have been simply expressing intense frustration about a long-running conflict that is intractable, destructive, bloody and, yes, incredibly frustrating on a geopolitical scale. There appeared to be an element of aggrieved surprise, as though he had thought he could quell a roiling sea just by saying so. He didn't seem to have accounted for 75 years of conflict in the Middle East, burning even hotter in the past few years, and still more in the past couple of weeks. But Mr. Trump's reaction to the world around him – particularly his most energetic responses – are never about the world, but rather about the centre of the universe: Donald J. Trump. What we saw on Tuesday was the President discovering in real time that some forces in the world will not be bent to his will, no matter how badly he wants to claim a big win. Around 1 a.m. ET on Monday, Mr. Trump posted on his social-media network, Truth Social, 'THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!' The prim, limp politeness of that was overshadowed in strangeness only by the way he signed it, like an official, enforceable order, 'DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!' By the time day broke in Washington, the ceasefire had been breached and Israel and Iran were each blaming the other. During the same press gaggle in which he launched that expletive, the President said he 'didn't like the fact that Israel unloaded right after we made the deal.' Mr. Trump thinks of himself as the consummate dealmaker. And here he was trying to broker the biggest deal imaginable – what could be more consequential or difficult, after all, than peace in the Middle East – and the whole world could see it failing. It's plain that Mr. Trump sees the ability to end conflicts as a demonstration of authority and negotiating prowess. He has repeatedly asserted that Russia's invasion of Ukraine would not have happened on his watch, and in the last several days, he's taken to listing off all the accomplishments for which he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. On Monday, a Ukrainian parliamentarian who had nominated Mr. Trump for the Nobel for brokering negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv withdrew the nomination. Then a Republican congressman stepped in on Tuesday to nominate him for the hours-old ceasefire. Re-posting that nomination letter was among the manic blizzard of social-media activity Mr. Trump mashed out aboard Air Force One as it hummed toward The Hague, following his meltdown on the White House lawn. He posted a praise-filled message from the NATO Secretary-General, he wrote a long tirade that combined the alleged stupidity of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez with a flex about his own cognitive testing, and he shared multiple posts about his approval ratings and various brownnosers declaring he should win the Nobel Peace Prize. In the decade that he's dominated world news, Mr. Trump has said and done so many things that breach unthinkable boundaries that it's not even worth trying to count them. But he's never dropped an F-word before. Consider how many times the President – who grew up as a boy with a rich and ruthless father who paved New York City for him, before he became a rich and ruthless man himself – has been told 'no' in his life. How often has he not gotten something he really wanted? How many times in the past 10 years? (Once at least, in November, 2020, and we know how that went.) How many times since election night last fall? Later in the day on Tuesday, Iran and Israel confirmed the ceasefire, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pronounced that 'Donald Trump is the greatest friend that Israel has ever had in the White House.' By the time he gaggled with reporters aboard his plane, Mr. Trump seemed to be feeling more optimistic and in control. 'Israel, as you know, turned back. They didn't do that raid this morning,' he said. He added, 'So the ceasefire is very much in effect and I think we're going to keep it there for a very long time.' Now, the President figured he was on his way to NATO to 'solve a new set of problems.' He answered more questions, and then when he'd had enough, he turned away from the reporters to walk back to his private section of the plane. 'Do you think you'll get the Nobel Peace Prize now, sir?' a reporter called after him. Mr. Trump mustn't have heard her, because he didn't turn back.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store