Irish leaders call for ‘immediate de-escalation' between Iran and Israel
Ireland's premier and deputy premier have called for an 'immediate de-escalation' between Israel and Iran and for diplomatic talks to restart.
Irish premier Micheal Martin said Iran should make clear it will not pursue further enrichment of uranium.
Irish deputy premier Simon Harris, who is also the minister for foreign affairs, said work was ongoing at EU level to engage with citizens in Israel and Iran who may wish to leave.
Iran and Israel have been striking each other's territory for a week, deepening the crisis in the Middle East.
Israel said it launched an attack to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, far in excess of the levels required for power stations and a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
After a missile attack on a hospital in southern Israel, defence minister Israel Katz said Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'absolutely should not continue to exist'.
US President Donald Trump has also reportedly been considering involving the US by targeting a uranium enrichment facility in Iran.
Asked what role Ireland can play in the crisis, Mr Martin said Ireland and the EU can urge 'restraint and de-escalation'.
'The world needs stability and it needs peace – and dialogue is the way to resolve the nuclear issue in terms of Iran,' the Taoiseach told RTE Radio.
'Iran has been a malign actor in the Middle East for quite a long time in terms of supporting Hezbollah, Hamas the Houthis – it's a theocratic autocratic state.
'But there was dialogue on the way between Iran and the United States on that issue, I think that should restart.
'I think Iran should make it very clear that it will not pursue further enrichment of uranium, or indeed progress to developing nuclear bomb capacity.'
Meanwhile, Mr Harris said there was a 'massive effort' at EU level to support citizens and diplomats in Iran and Israel.
He said the EU was engaging with Germany, France and the UK to persuade the Iranians back into talks.
'It is almost impossible to overstate the potential danger of this, if there ends up being involvement of other countries, or indeed spill-over into other countries,' he said on Thursday.
'Ireland, whilst far away in one way, does obviously have a number of citizens in both countries, have a significant number of troops in Lebanon, is very concerned about the situation in Palestine, so there's quite a lot of moving parts in this.'
He told RTE Radio: 'Nobody wants to see Iran with nuclear capabilities.
'Everybody is aware of the dangers that Iran poses, but at the same time, the way you resolve these issues is through the talks that were scheduled to take place and which were obviously ultimately postponed as a result of Israeli (incursion).'
He said Irish embassies had contacted citizens in Iran and Israel on Wednesday who would like to leave when the opportunity arises.
There are around 29 Irish citizens and 12 dependants in Iran, and 200 Irish citizens in Israel.
'There's the massive effort at a European level to make sure we try to provide support to our own citizens and our own diplomats in what is becoming a really dangerous environment and a really difficult environment in which to operate from and function from as well,' he told RTE Radio.
He said that as the airspace is closed in Iran, evacuation would mean going over the land border, and for those in Israel it means travelling to Jordan or Egypt.
'There are a number of options available to us. We're working very closely with a number of member states, and we're also having to now, in a very serious way, also look at how we best support our diplomats, because the situation is deteriorating quite significantly in terms of being able to effectively operate in the country, and also obviously safety and security issues,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
38 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Video: Trump Sees 'Substantial Chance of Negotiations' With Iran
President Trump sees a 'substantial chance of negotiations' and will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. gets involved in the Israel-Iran conflict, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday. "Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," Leavitt said, reading a statement from Trump. She declined to respond as to whether Trump would seek authority from Congress for any military action in Iran.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ministers to offer olive branch on welfare plans to avert Labour rebellion
Ministers are to offer mutinous Labour MPs an olive branch on the government's welfare plans to help avert a major rebellion in a crucial vote early next month. Liz Kendall, the welfare secretary, wants to reassure angry MPs who have threatened to rebel over fears that sick and disabled people will be hardest hit. The Guardian has been told she will put 'non-negotiable' protections for the most vulnerable benefits recipients on the face of the welfare reform bill when it is published next week, providing additional support to those with the most severe conditions who will never work. But with Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, ruling out a U-turn on disability benefit cuts and government aides insisting there will be no substantial change to the bill, it is unclear whether the tweaks will be enough to prevent a rebellion that could even risk a defeat. Labour MPs are demanding big changes to the proposals first put forward in March in the welfare green paper, including a rethink on eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip) for disabled people and benefits for carers. Kendall's plans to save £5bn a year by overhauling the welfare system, including by cutting Pip, triggered alarm among Labour MPs, with experts warning that up to 1.2 million people with disabilities are expected to lose thousands of pounds a year. With an extra 250,000 people falling into relative poverty by 2029-30, according to the government's own impact assessment, ministers are braced for their biggest rebellion yet, with as many as 170 MPs saying they could vote against the plans. After a consultation on the biggest shake-up of Britain's welfare system since universal credit was introduced more than a decade ago, and discussions with multiple MPs, Kendall is now offering a series of modifications to help alleviate concerns. Hundreds of thousands of people who will no longer qualify for Pip, which is intended to help with their quality of life and is not connected to employment, will continue to receive payments for 13 weeks, a more generous transition than the four-week period more usually adopted by government. During this time they will receive support for health, care and employment needs. Carer's allowance will be protected throughout this period but will end when Pip is withdrawn. The sickest benefit recipients with less than 12 months to live and those with lifelong, often progressive and incurable conditions will automatically get a higher rate of universal credit and will not have to go through reassessments, which take place on average every three years. The new 'right to work' scheme for those on health and disability benefits, previously announced by Kendall, will be introduced at the same time as the bill so welfare recipients can try to return to work without risking losing their entitlements. Kendall told the Guardian: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. 'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. These protections will be written into law – a clear sign they are non-negotiable.' While Reeves insisted she would not be rethinking her decision on disability benefit cuts on Thursday, despite speculation that the government could soften its stance, she said she was 'taking into account' representations from Labour MPs. Pressed by the BBC on whether she would change her mind, Reeves said: 'No, we're not going to be changing that. It is important that we reform the way the welfare state works so that there is a welfare state there for people. 'We are the only developed country where the number of people in the labour market is lower than it was before Covid, the number of economically inactive people of working age is rising.' But she added: 'We've already announced that we are reviewing the criteria for accessing Pip. Even with these changes, we will substantially be increasing the amount of money we are paying in sickness and disability benefits during the course of this parliament.' Under the changes already announced, claimants would not qualify for Pip unless they score a minimum of four points on a single daily living activity. Government sources have ruled out any further changes to the assessment criteria. Assessments score from 0 to 12 the difficulty that claimants face in a range of living activities such as preparing and eating food, communicating, washing and getting dressed. Just over 370,000 people who claim Pip will lose the payments, while another 430,000 who would have become eligible in the future will not now get it. On average these people will lose £4,500 a year. The government has argued the welfare system needs dramatic reform as 1,000 people a day are newly claiming benefits. Even with the cuts, it will still be spending more on Pip, with an extra 750,000 people receiving payments by the end of this parliament. As part of the measures, the Department for Work and Pensions will spend up to £1bn a year extra on helping people back into jobs. About 170 MPs, including some loyalists, are understood to be preparing to rebel by either voting against the government on changes to eligibility for Pip payments or abstaining. One Labour MP suggested that making small changes to the plans would not be enough to win over sceptics. 'Small tweaks here and there won't be enough. As long as the welfare reforms punish the most vulnerable, they'll face opposition,' they said. A government source suggested the numbers were starting to fall after Kemi Badenoch said the Tories would oppose the plans. 'The idea of voting against the government becomes more difficult for people if it means walking through the lobbies with the Tories,' they said. Labour whips have suggested that the expansion of free school meals last week and indications from senior ministers that they were open to lifting the two-child benefit cap was also helping to reassure concerned MPs.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UK borrowing rises to £17.7bn, adding to pressure on Rachel Reeves
Higher tax receipts were unable to prevent a rise in public sector borrowing in May to £17.7bn, up from £17bn a year earlier and the second highest for the month on record. A poll of City economists had forecast public sector net borrowing – the difference between public spending and income – would be £17.1bn. The figures will add to concerns that the government is struggling to bring down the annual deficit to keep within strict spending rules. While last October's budget allowed for more than £100bn of extra investment spending, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has said day-to-day Whitehall budgets must remain within strict limits. However, the measure of the monthly shortfall in day-to-day spending – the current budget deficit – remained below the forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which provides independent forecasts of the public finances. The OBR said it expected the current deficit to be £13bn in May but it was £12.8bn, marking the second consecutive month when the deficit fell under the OBR prediction. Reeves has introduced extra taxes on businesses – including a rise in national insurance contributions – which were implemented in April. At the budget statement in March, the chancellor said she needed to cut the welfare bill to maintain a near-£10bn buffer in the current budget. Backbench Labour MPs are expected to rebel against cuts to benefits worth more than £5bn in the welfare bill introduced to parliament on Wednesday. Most major economic forecasters, including the International Monetary Fund and the Bank of England have downgraded the UK's growth prospects this year, potentially reducing tax receipts over the longer term and forcing the chancellor to make further spending cuts or raise taxes to bridge the gap. In March, the OBR said it expected borrowing to fall from £152bn in 2024-25 to £117.7bn in the 2025-26 financial year. Alex Kerr, a UK economist at Capital Economics, said the OBR was likely to follow other forecasters and downgrade UK growth when its next economic outlook is published alongside the autumn budget, forcing the chancellor to implement either further welfare cuts or tax rises. He said a recent U-turn on cuts to winter fuel allowance, downward revisions to the OBR's growth forecasts and higher borrowing costs 'may mean that to maintain her current £9.9bn buffer, Reeves has to raise £13bn-£23bn later this year'. Thomas Pugh, an economist at the accountancy company RSM UK, said figures for April and May were better than expected but the longer-term outlook was looking more difficult. 'Looking ahead to the budget in the autumn, the underperformance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the chancellor may already have lost the £9.9bn of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March,' he said. 'Throw in the tough outlook for many government departments announced in the spending review and U-turns on welfare spending, and the chancellor will probably have to announce some top-up tax increases after the summer.' He added that tax increases would probably need to fill a deficit of £10bn-£20bn based on lower OBR forecasts for growth. 'We are pencilling in tax increases of £10bn-£20bn. The good news is that with interest rates likely to be about 4% at the time of the budget, there is plenty of scope for the Bank of England to cut rates to offset the impact of any fiscal consolidation on the economy.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
