Zohran Mamdani's Foes Go to Unusual Lengths to Derail His Mayoral Hopes
Former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and Mayor Eric Adams, two Democrats currently planning to run in the November election as independents, each called on the other to drop out.
A third independent candidate, Jim Walden, was less specific in his similarly themed proposal last week. He suggested that a poll be taken in the fall to determine who has the best chance of defeating Mr. Mamdani, a candidate whose left-leaning platform and democratic socialist affiliation have alarmed some of the Democratic establishment. Whoever doesn't win the poll, Mr. Walden said, should pledge to bow out and support the winner.
Mr. Walden's proposal was backed on Monday by Mr. Cuomo as well as former Gov. David A. Paterson, a Democrat who held a news conference to announce his support alongside the Republican billionaire John Catsimatidis and Sid Rosenberg, a radio host and supporter of President Trump.
The underlying notion is that in a city where Democrats outnumber Republicans six to one, the only way to defeat Mr. Mamdani is for his challengers — the three independents and Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate — to consolidate their support behind just one of them, and avoid splitting the vote in a five-way race.
In some ways, the calls for unity among the independent candidates echo the push that left-leaning groups made during the primary, when they urged supporters to lock arms in an effort to defeat Mr. Cuomo.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wealth tax for school funding initiative starts signature collection with opposition pouncing
A copy of the petition to be circulated by the Invest in MI Kids Ballot Proposal Coalition. July 31, 2025 | Photo By Kyle Davidson/Michigan Advance The constitutional amendment to implement a new tax on wealthy Michiganders is still aiming for the 2026 ballot after facing some initial setbacks and new attacks, with its signature collection driving kicking off on Friday. Members of Invest in MI Kids said it started collecting signatures last week using the 100-word summary that was approved June 27 by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers. That has opened up further complications for the effort, as the board on July 10 walked back the approval for the previous 100-word summary and then deadlocked on a revised summary at their July 31 meeting. Initiative officials said Friday that the effort which resulted in the board deadlocking was just one part of well-funded right-wing attacks against the proposal, which is estimated to generate nearly $1 billion annually. But those attacks keep coming. The Coalition to Stop the Business and Family Tax Hike, an organization opposed to the Invest in MI Kids initiative, issued a cease and desist motion to prevent the group from collecting its signatures. Jase Bolger, CEO of West Michigan Policy Forum and a former Republican Michigan House speaker, said in a statement that the amendment would hurt small businesses – even though the initiative was aimed at the wealthiest Michiganders. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'I applaud the move today by the Coalition to Stop the Business and Family Tax Hike,' Bolger said. 'They filed a cease and desist motion to stop the signature gathering for an unapproved ballot initiative. Because, the proponents of this devastating proposal are using language that is misleading. Voters should not be fooled.' In response, Imani Foster, a spokesperson for the Invest MI Kids initiative, told Michigan Advance that the coalition is focused on the task at hand. 'While we're busy engaging Michiganders, together with our thousands of volunteers, we won't be distracted by meaningless letters from big money Washington lawyers,' Foster said. The group also noted its belief that the board had no authority under Michigan law to rescind its prior approval of the petition summary language. 'The petitions currently being circulated by Invest in MI Kids include a petition summary that the director of elections has deemed compliant with the Michigan Election Law twice and that the Board of Canvassers has approved as compliant once,' Foster added. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel's CEO Draws Support for Revival From SoftBank, Trump
(Bloomberg) -- Less than two weeks after President Donald Trump called for the ouster of Intel Corp.'s Lip-Bu Tan, the company's chief executive officer has a shot at securing billions of dollars in fresh capital that could help him turn around the troubled US chipmaker. The Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10% in Intel, possibly by converting grants made to the company under the US Chips and Science Act into equity, according to people familiar with the matter. That could allow Intel to tap about $10 billion in capital as Tan works out a strategy for revival. A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds In another surprise, SoftBank Group Corp. agreed to take a $2 billion stake in Intel, as the Japanese company seeks a broader role in the artificial intelligence boom. Founder Masayoshi Son already owns a majority stake in chipmaker Arm Holdings Plc and has laid plans to compete with Nvidia Corp. in AI chips. Intel's chipmaking skills could help SoftBank manufacture chips to run — and possibly train — AI models like ChatGPT. Intel shares rose about 7% in pre-market trading on Tuesday. SoftBank's own stock price fell 4% in Tokyo. Earlier this month, Tan's hold on his CEO role looked precarious after Trump called on him to resign over alleged conflicts of interest. Yet the executive quickly visited Trump at the White House to clear the air, with the president then praising the Intel CEO for his career success and 'amazing story.' That set the stage for the government's possible investment, which would make the US the chipmaker's largest shareholder. The federal government is considering an investment that, under one scenario, would involve converting some or all of the $10.9 billion in grants the company had won under the Chips Act, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is confidential. The company can also draw on up to $11 billion in loans under the 2022 law. The grant money, which was originally designed to be disbursed over time as Intel meets project milestones, is roughly enough to pay for the targeted holding. At Intel's current market value, a 10% stake in the chipmaker would be worth around $10.5 billion. The exact size of the stake, as well as whether the White House chooses to move ahead with the plan, is still in flux, the people said. White House spokesman Kush Desai declined to comment on the specifics of the discussions, saying only that no deal is official until it's announced by the administration. The Commerce Department, which oversees the Chips Act, also declined to comment. Intel didn't respond to a request for comment. SoftBank's investment is another unconventional bet on Tan's ability to revive Intel's fortunes. The Japanese company announced its plan to buy new shares at $23 a share, a small discount to Intel's last close. Son has ambitions to design an energy-efficient AI chip through what he calls the 'Izanagi' project to compete with Nvidia's products, though that has yet to translate into a marketable product. Son held talks with Intel's chief executive about buying the company's contract chipmaking business before agreeing to make the $2 billion investment, the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the talks. The investment doesn't preclude a bigger deal for that part of Intel's business, the newspaper said. A big question is whether a government holding and SoftBank's vote of confidence would help reinvigorate Intel's business. The tech pioneer has fallen behind Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. in contract chipmaking and Nvidia Corp. in chip design, missing out on a boom in spending on artificial intelligence. Last week, Intel's stock had its biggest one-week rally since February, after the initial news of the government's possible investment. Tan, who served on SoftBank's board for two years, is seeking a turnaround. But his efforts have largely been focused on cutting costs and eliminating jobs. Intel will add large-scale manufacturing capacity only once customers are committed to using its more advanced production techniques, Tan said last month, sparking concern among investors that the company may be bowing out of the race for semiconductor leadership. The Trump administration is particularly focused on shoring up Intel's sprawling project in Ohio, the home state of Vice President JD Vance. Intel has repeatedly delayed the anticipated opening of that site, which the company originally envisioned as the world's biggest semiconductor facility. Beyond Intel, the White House official also floated the possibility that the administration could convert other Chips Act awards into equity stakes. It's not clear whether that idea has gained traction broadly within the administration or whether officials have broached the possibility with any companies that could be affected. The Chips Act set aside $39 billion in manufacturing grants — plus loans and tax credits — to revitalize the American semiconductor industry after decades of production shifting to Asia. Using Chips Act money for an Intel stake would mean the chipmaker isn't necessarily getting a bigger government infusion than expected — possibly just one that's on a faster timeline. As is the case for all Chips Act winners, Intel's award was designed as a reimbursement, with the grant money split into tranches tied to specific project benchmarks. Intel had received $2.2 billion of its award as of January. It's unclear whether that amount would be included in the possible equity stake, whether the company has received additional disbursements of its award since Trump took office, and on what schedule Intel would receive money under a possible equity stake. While TSMC and South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. are expanding their US operations with Chips Act support, having an American company like Intel building cutting-edge chips on domestic soil has been a priority for both the Trump and Biden administrations. Biden officials, for example, tried to get companies like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. to consider using Intel as a manufacturing partner, and also explored long-shot ideas like a tie-up between Intel and GlobalFoundries Inc. Earlier this year, Trump's team held early-stage conversations with TSMC about potentially operating Intel's factories — an arrangement from which TSMC has backed away. Trump officials have also internally floated the prospect of seeking an Intel investment from the United Arab Emirates. It's unclear whether either of those approaches has progressed much past a thought exercise. Washington has become more aggressive in strategic sectors. The Trump administration's secured an agreement to receive a 15% cut of AI chip sales to China and took a so-called golden share in United States Steel Corp. as part of a deal to clear its sale to a Japanese rival. That's while the Defense Department announced a plan that would make it the largest shareholder in US rare-earth producer MP Materials Corp. The US government and the Japanese tech conglomerate both see the potential for a turnaround at Intel, although each likely values different parts of the business. For the Trump administration, a recovery of the chipmaker's manufacturing prowess would help win jobs and voters. For SoftBank, Intel's chip design operations beckon with the promise of high margins. --With assistance from Brody Ford, Ville Heiskanen, Ryan Gould, Josh Wingrove, Min Jeong Lee and Edwin Chan. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Yosemite Employee Fired After Flying Trans Pride Flag ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Republicans say they'll sue to block California redistricting plan. Do they have a case?
Gov. Gavin Newsom's plan to ask the voters to redesign California's congressional districts to enable Democrats to add House seats is drawing challenges from Republicans who claim the proposal violates the state Constitution and federal law. But the law doesn't appear to be on their side. As the Democratic-controlled Legislature prepares to vote this week on Newsom's proposed November ballot measure to change districts that were drafted by an independent commission, Assembly Member Carl DeMaio, R-San Diego, asked the nonpartisan Legislative Counsel's Office to declare the measure illegal. He said he was also prepared to go to court. 'By concocting this partisan redistricting scam, Gavin Newsom and Democrat politicians are openly violating the California Constitution and their oath of office,' DeMaio said in a news release. 'Any vote … on this corrupt plan would be unlawful and unconstitutional.' He argued that the state Constitution, under a ballot measure approved by the voters in 2008, allows only a bipartisan commission to draw district lines and does not permit them to be redrafted for political purposes. The National Republican Congressional Committee also said Newsom's plan would be challenged in court as well as the ballot box. Newsom 'is shredding California's Constitution and disenfranchising voters to prop up his Presidential ambitions,' Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C., chair of the committee, said on X. But Rick Hasen, a professor of law and political science at UCLA who has written widely on election law issues, said the Legislature can ask California voters to change the state Constitution by placing an amendment on the ballot with two-thirds majority votes in each house. Newsom and legislative Democrats introduced their measure on Monday. 'If it's a constitutional amendment approved by voters, then there is no state law problem with amending the earlier constitutional amendment,' Hasen said. Newsom's November ballot measure, a response to plans by Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas to redraw the state's House districts and allow Republicans to pick up five seats next year, would likewise redesign California's congressional districts for the remainder of the decade to enable Democrats to add five seats to their current 43-9 majority in the state if Texas or any other state redrew its district lines. The proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, dubbed the Election Rigging Response Act, was introduced Monday with 43 coauthors in the Assembly and 20 in the state Senate, all of them Democrats. They plan legislative votes on Thursday. The ballot proposal would temporarily suspend the state constitutional limits on redistricting that DeMaio cited. But he contended the Legislature has no authority even to ask the voters to remove restrictions they had added to the state Constitution, and that such changes could be made only by an initiative from private citizens. DeMaio said he would actually prefer a U.S. constitutional amendment establishing an independent commission to draw nonpartisan House district lines in every state. Until that happens, he told the Chronicle, Newsom and his fellow Democrats should refrain from asking Californians to 'act like a bunch of toddlers because two wrongs make a right.' Another election law professor, Justin Levitt of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, who was a national policy adviser for democracy and voting rights under President Joe Biden, said DeMaio was correct that the California Constitution currently prohibits legislators from redrawing district lines. 'But that's exactly why the Legislature is proposing a constitutional amendment,' Levitt said. 'And I'm not aware of any limitation on the Legislature to propose such an amendment for the voters to consider.' DeMaio also said federal law allows changing district lines only after each 10-year census and prohibits mid-decade redistricting. But the Supreme Court ruled otherwise in a 2006 case, League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, allowing Republican legislators in Texas to redraw House district lines in their favor. 'The text and structure of the Constitution and our case law indicate there is nothing inherently suspect about a legislature's decision to replace mid-decade a court-ordered plan with one of its own,' Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for a 7-2 court majority. Texas' current Republican majority, and partisans on both sides in other states, have relied on that ruling to propose off-year redistricting for their own advantage. Levitt said he'd prefer to limit the practice to once per decade. 'I wish there were such a law — and Congress could clearly pass one,' the Loyola law professor said, noting that legislation to prohibit mid-decade redistricting of U.S. House seats has been proposed in Congress for more than 20 years. 'But that's not currently where federal law stands.' Hasen of UCLA said Newsom's proposal might be challenged on other legal grounds, such as the rule limiting California ballot measures to a single subject. But he said opponents' strongest argument would probably be a political one — that the voters should reject a plan to suspend the nonpartisan redistricting program they approved 17 years ago. DeMaio appeared to agree on Monday. 'If we stop it in court, fine,' he said at a press conference in the state Capitol. 'But more than likely it will have to be stopped at the ballot box.' Also Monday, DeMaio submitted a proposed initiative for the 2026 state ballot that would ban any legislators from seeking any elected office for 10 years who voted to put Newsom's redistricting measure on the ballot. 'There is no free ride on casting a corrupt vote this week — if a state legislator votes in favor, they better be prepared to get a real job for the next 10 years,' DeMaio said.
