The Paramount comics, Colbert and Stewart, are sharp critics of the '60 Minutes' deal
CBS 'Late Show' host Stephen Colbert condemned parent company Paramount Global's settlement of President Donald Trump's lawsuit over a '60 Minutes' story as a 'big fat bribe' during his first show back from a vacation.
Colbert followed 'The Daily Show' host Jon Stewart's attack of the deal one week earlier. Stewart works for Comedy Central, also owned by Paramount, making the two comics the most visible internal critics of the $16 million settlement that was announced on July 1.
Colbert's 'bribe' reference was to the pending sale of Paramount to Skydance Media, which needs Trump administration approval. Critics of the deal that ended Trump's lawsuit over the newsmagazine's editing of its interview last fall with Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris suggested it was primarily to clear a hurdle to that sale.
'I am offended,' Colbert said in his monologue Monday night. 'I don't know if anything — anything — will repair my trust in this company. But, just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.'
He said the technical name in legal circles for the deal was 'big fat bribe.'
Jon Stewart terms it 'shameful'
Stewart began discussing the 'shameful settlement' on his show a week earlier when he was 'interrupted' by a fake Arby's ad on the screen. 'That's why it was so wrong,' he said upon his 'return.'
He discussed the deal in greater detail with the show's guest, retired '60 Minutes' correspondent Steve Kroft, making his views clear through a series of leading questions.
'I would assume internally, this is devastating to the people who work in a place that pride themselves on contextual, good journalism?' Stewart asked.
'Devastating is a good word,' Kroft replied.
A handful of media reports in the past two weeks have speculated that Skydance boss David Ellison might try to curry favor with Trump by eliminating the comics' jobs if the sale is approved. A representative for Ellison did not immediately return a message for comment on Tuesday.
It would be easier to get rid of Stewart, since he works one night a week at a network that no longer produces much original content. Colbert is the ratings leader in late-night broadcast television, however, and is a relentless Trump critic.
The antipathy is mutual. Trump called Colbert 'a complete and total loser' in a Truth Social post last fall, suggesting CBS was wasting its money on him. 'HE IS VERY BORING,' Trump wrote.
Colbert slips in a quip
Colbert alluded to reports about his job security in his monologue, pointing to the mustache he grew during his vacation. 'OK, OK, but how are they going to put pressure on Stephen Colbert, if they can't find him?' he joked.
Colbert and Stewart both earned Emmy nominations this week for outstanding talk series. Together with ABC's Jimmy Kimmel, all three nominees are tough on Trump.
CBS News journalists have largely been quiet publicly since the settlement's announcement. Two top executives, CBS News CEO Wendy McMahon and '60 Minutes" executive producer Bill Owens, both quit or were forced out prior to the settlement for making their dissatisfaction about the idea known internally.
Reporting about the settlement on the day it was announced, 'CBS Evening News' anchor John Dickerson said viewers would have to decide on their own what it meant to them.
'Can you hold power to account after paying it millions?" Dickerson asked. 'Can an audience trust you when it thinks you've traded away that trust? The audience will decide that. Our job is to show up to honor what we witness on behalf of the people.'
___
David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.
David Bauder, The Associated Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
U.S. Firms In China Committed To Market Amid Headwinds
U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a chart while speaking during a 'Make America Wealthy Again' ... More trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2. Touting the event as 'Liberation Day', Trump is expected to announce additional tariffs targeting goods imported to the U.S. (Photo by) More than 80% of American companies doing business in China were profitable last year and remain committed to doing business there despite rising concerns about Washington-Beijing relations and tariffs, according to a new survey by a top U.S.-China business group. 'While most U.S. companies are holding off on new investments in the near term, they remain committed to pursuing opportunities in China over the long term,' according to an annual membership survey from the U.S.-China Business Council released on Wednesday. 'Over 80% of respondents say they invest in China to serve the domestic market, while nearly all report they cannot remain globally competitive without their China operations,' the council said. In spite of headwinds, 82% of companies reported profits in 2024, the council said. The Washington, D.C.-headquartered council represents more than 270 American companies doing business in China including multinationals such GM, Fedex, McDonald's, Harley-Davidson and Starbucks. The survey was conducted between March and May 2025, and drew from a pool of 130 members companies. Overall U.S.-China relations continue to rank among companies' top concerns, along with tariffs, which jumped from eighth to second place amid recently renewed trade friction, the council said. Eighty-eight percent of respondents are affected by U.S.-China relations, compared with 79% last year, and 68% have been impacted by tariffs, the council said. Among other challenges, U.S. companies doing business in China are losing market share there as the country intensifies its rollout of industrial policies and subsidies designed to help domestic firms, the council said. 'Chinese industrial policies are boosting local competitors as American companies continue to lose market share in China,' the council said. Chinese overcapacity, once mostly confined to industrial sectors, 'has begun to impact wider swaths of the economy, including health care and consumer goods. Insufficient domestic demand and overcapacity remain the top constraints on profitability.' Back at home, U.S. export controls and investment restrictions vis-à-vis China have also had a negative effect on business there for about 40% of respondents, the council said. Many of those businesses are 'experiencing lost sales, severed customer relationships, and reputational damage in China to the intensifying perception that U.S. firms are unreliable suppliers,' the council said. 'Fewer than half (of survey participants) are optimistic about the future, reflecting concerns about over tariffs, deflation, and policy uncertainty,' the council said. Click here for the full report.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hailee Steinfeld Says She Started Following a Plant-Based Diet After ‘Stomach Sensitivities'
Hailee Steinfeld takes healthy eating very seriously. 'I'm not vegan, but I did follow a plant-based diet for a few years when I was having a lot of stomach sensitivities,' Steinfeld, 28, wrote in the Friday, July 18, issue of her 'Beau Society' newsletter. 'I met with a gastroenterologist and did one of those crazy panels, which showed my body was reactive to so many things I was eating.' She added, 'It's not that the foods were bad, but I think I was overdoing it. So I went plant-based, and it was wonderful. I actually realized that there are so many meals I eat — and love — that are 'vegan' and I wasn't even conscious of it.' While the Sinners star did not reveal why or when she stopped following the nutritional plan, she's been candid about adopting a healthy mindset about food. Celebrity Vegans and Vegetarians: Miley Cyrus, Milo Ventimiglia and More 'My relationship to food is rather simple. I eat when I'm hungry,' Steinfeld told Women's Health in 2022. 'I eat so that I can train, I don't train so that I can eat, and I feel I can perform to the best of my ability if I have that mindset.' Now, she is somewhat of an aspiring chef and noted on Friday that she recently made a cacio e pepe ravioli that she described as 'chef's kiss.' 'Making pasta is time-consuming, but dare I say, fairly easy,' she recalled. 'We made bruschetta too. Next up is this Alison Roman chicken and artichoke dinner [recipe].' Steinfeld also balances her diet with frequent workouts. Kristin Cavallari, Demi Lovato and More Celebs Share Their Diet and Workout Secrets With Us 'I've never left a workout or a gym session feeling anything other than great and happier,' the actress added to Women's Health. 'Just knowing what my body is capable of and being able to challenge myself…it does something for you mentally that not a lot of other things do.' At the time, Steinfeld revealed that she trains with her dad, who 'really sees [her] potential.' 'He believes in me and he pushes me and knows what I'm capable of,' Steinfeld stressed. 'It's all about finding your balance and understanding where you're coming from that day, and what it is you wanna achieve, and giving yourself grace and patience, and being kind to yourself.' Steinfeld's workout regimen also includes taking her two dogs, Martini and Brando, for walks outside. Steinfeld's pups even got a sweet shoutout in her Friday newsletter. 'I actually never planned on getting tiny dogs, but here we are! Martini and Brando would love a big dog,' she gushed, adding that she hopes to adopt another canine companion down the line. 'My brother has a golden retriever (Dwight!), and they spend a lot of time with him and get along great.'
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump calls for Commanders to go back to old nickname, threatens to block D.C. stadium deal if they don't
President Donald Trump is using the bully pulpit again in the NFL, this time to get a franchise to revert to its former nickname that was changed after decades of controversy. Trump made multiple long posts on Truth Social on Sunday calling for the Washington Commanders to switch back to their old "Washington Redskins" team name. He even threatened to block the Commanders' impending move back to D.C. and their new stadium if they fail to do so. Trump also called for MLB's Cleveland Guardians to go back to their former "Indians" nickname. While not mentioning Trump by name, Guardians president Chris Antonetti made it clear the team isn't interested in going back Sunday. 'I understand there are very different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago, but it's a decision we made and we've gotten the opportunity to build the brand as the Guardians over the last four years and we're excited about the future that's in front of us,' he said, via The Athletic. The Commanders have not addressed Trump's post. The Guardians officially changed their team name ahead of the 2022 season, shortly after they stopped using the 'Chief Wahoo' logo, which many saw as racist and offensive toward Native Americans. The Commanders retired their old 'Redskins' nickname in 2020. They went by the Washington Football Team briefly before landing on the Commanders. Their old nickname, which had been in use since 1933, was widely seen as an offensive slur and drew plenty of criticism in its final years of use. 'For obvious reasons,' Commanders owner Josh Harris said in August, that can't return. 'I think [Commanders] is now embraced by our team, by our culture, by our coaching staff,' he said earlier this year, via ESPN. 'So we're going with that.' Though it's unclear if the threat of blocking their stadium deal, real or not, will sway the Commanders, both Harris and Antonetti seem very content with their franchises' new names. As for the validity of Trump's stadium threat, the Associated Press wrote: The Commanders and the District of Columbia government announced a deal earlier this year to build a new home for the football team at the site the old RFK Stadium, the place the franchise called home for more than three decades. Trump's ability to hold up the deal remains to be seen. President Joe Biden signed a bill in January that transferred the land from the federal government to the District of Columbia. The provision was part of a short-term spending bill passed by Congress in December. While D.C. residents elect a mayor, a city council and commissioners to run day-to-day operations, Congress maintains control of the city's budget.