
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Galaxy Z Fold 5: will this summer be the time to upgrade?
Samsung's foldables are coming in hot this summer, and while the Galaxy Z Flip 7 will likely continue to be the playful, fashion-forward option, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is where the real evolution is expected to happen.
Now, if you're still holding on to the Galaxy Z Fold 5, you are probably still fine. That's a piece of futuristic tech that barely feels old in 2025. But the Fold 7 may be the time when Samsung makes an effort in pushing the big-screen foldable forward. We're hearing about meaningful changes this time: a sleeker body, better usability, maybe even a camera that doesn't feel like a last-gen hand-me-down. So if you're wondering whether the Fold 7 finally makes a proper case for an upgrade, let's break it down.
Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Galaxy Z Fold 5 expected differences:
Table of Contents:
Design
Display
Performance
Camera
Battery
Specs
Summary The Galaxy Z Fold 5 was lighter, flatter, and had a new hinge that finally folded flush—nice! But beyond that, it still felt... a bit chunky. The outer screen was too narrow, and that 13.4mm folded profile? Not exactly pocket-friendly, especially with its added weight.
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 , though, is shaping up to be a real design refinement. Rumors point to a folded thickness of just 8.2mm. If true, we're talking about a foldable that starts to feel like a regular phone in your hand and pocket.
We're also expecting some screen growth. The cover display could stretch from 6.2 to 6.5 inches, and the inner screen may nudge from 7.6 to 8 inches. But the best part? The cover screen will likely get wider, not taller. That means no more typing like you're trying to send a text on a TV remote.
Its bezels should also be thinner than the ones on the Fold 5, which are starting to get unsightly when compared to modern competitors. And yes, IP48 or better water resistance should still be there. Foldables aren't meant to swim — but they shouldn't fall apart in the rain either. Display Differences If you liked the displays on the Z Fold 5 , you'll probably love what's coming on the Fold 7 . We're still expecting Dynamic AMOLED 2X panels on both the inner and outer screens, each with a 1-120Hz adaptive refresh rate, high resolution, and insane peak brightness—2,600 nits or more.But the real story here is shape and usability.
The cover screen getting wider means it should finally feel less claustrophobic when dual-thumb typing on it. And the inner screen may also shift slightly away from the square and more towards a widened aspect ratio, so it may be better for content consumption.
Oh and yes, we might finally get a real solution to the crease. Multiple leaks hint that Samsung may have tamed that visible dip in the middle of the display. Will it disappear completely? Probably not. But if it becomes less annoying, that's still a win. This is where things really start to split.
The Galaxy Z Fold 5 runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy—a great chip in 2023, still good for daily use, but already starting to show its limits in sustained performance and AI tasks. The Fold 7 will most likely be powered by the 3nm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, which already proved its grit on the Galaxy S25 series.
Not only will this translate to faster performance, but also better battery efficiency and cooler thermals. Early whispers also suggest Samsung will keep the 12GB RAM baseline, with a possible 16GB variant if AI features demand more memory headroom, but we wouldn't bet on the upgrade just yet. Software-wise, the Fold 5 shipped with Android 13 and One UI 5.1. It did get an Android 15 update this year, after months of delays — hopefully that was just a snag in the path to seamless updates from Samsung. Meanwhile, the Fold 7 should arrive with Android 15 and One UI 7 out of the box, but some rumors suggested Android 16? That'd be... an interesting turn of events.Both devices are expected to enjoy 7 years of software support, which is fantastic for future-proofing, but again — don't make us wait for months to get the next Android build, please. One of the biggest knocks on the Fold 5? The camera system. It borrowed the same 50MP main shooter, 12MP ultrawide, and 10MP 3X telephoto from the Fold 4 — and while it was fine, it felt outdated for a $1,800 phone.
The Fold 7 might finally change that. Rumors suggest Samsung is packing in a new 200MP main sensor — the same monster seen in the Galaxy S25 Ultra. That would instantly leapfrog the Fold's photography game from 'pretty good' to 'flagship-grade.'
The rest of the camera setup might remain the same, but that's fine. A higher-res main sensor paired with Samsung's aggressive image processing could finally make the Fold's camera not just functional, but fun to use. Here's where Samsung still refuses to evolve.
Both the Fold 5 and the rumored Fold 7 pack around 4,400mAh of battery — give or take a few mAh. And neither one is pushing charging boundaries. The Fold 5 capped out at 25W wired and 15W wireless, and all signs point to the Fold 7 sticking with the same setup. In 2025, that's going to draw some ire — especially when foldables from China are pushing 100W+ charging and 6,000mAh silicon-carbon batteries.
The only silver lining? With a newer, more efficient chip, the Fold 7 might still outlast the Fold 5 on a single charge, even with the same capacity. But don't expect a two-day phone here.
Here's how the Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Galaxy Z Fold 5 will likely compare, based on rumored specs. Subject to change, of course, once the Z Fold 7 is official:
Also read: The Galaxy Z Fold 5 was reliable, refined, and very Samsung. But if you skipped it hoping for something better, the Z Fold 7 might be your reward. A sleeker design, a flagship-level camera, and a much more powerful internal setup will keep the Z Fold 7 in the game. But will it help it stay ahead?Some long-standing weaknesses remain. Charging speed is stuck in the past, and battery innovation continues to be MIA. But for anyone holding out for the right moment to fold, this might be it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
How come this $649 phone has better hardware than the Galaxy S25 Ultra?
It seems that smartphones are getting more and more expensive nowadays. This is especially true about flagship models. Take the Galaxy S series, for example. Some years ago a Galaxy S flagship used to cost around $700 (the Galaxy S8 and S9), then the Plus and Ultra came along. The S23 Ultra launched at $1,199, and now we have the latest S25 Ultra model at $1,299. Don't get me wrong, the S25 Ultra is a great device, but one recent event kind of changed my perspective and got me thinking. Dozens of phones from different brands and price points go through my hands constantly. And after the last one, I ended up asking myself, "How come this $649 phone has better hardware than the Galaxy S25 Ultra?" Enter the RedMagic 10S Pro, a gaming phone from China that comes with some very exciting features, many of which people would call "innovative." And yet, this phone costs $649. How is this possible? Galaxy S25 Ultra vs RedMagic 10S Pro Can't beat the camera system on the Galaxy S25 Ultra | Image by PhoneArena Now, to be totally fair, not ALL of the hardware on the RedMagic 10S Pro is better than what the Galaxy S25 Ultra has on board. The camera system on the S25 Ultra and the S Pen as a built-in accessory both can't be overlooked in this comparison. Even though the RedMagic 10S has a good main camera, it lacks the flexibility and also the quality of the two zoom cameras the S25 Ultra comes equipped with. But with that out of the way, let's see where the RedMagic 10S Pro gets the Galaxy S25 Ultra . Let's first look at the chipset—the beating heart of any phone and the thing that pops up into our mind when we say "hardware." Chipset Leading version versus for Galaxy - fight! | Image by PhoneArena Both phones feature the Snapdragon 8 Elite, the latest and greatest silicon from Qualcomm. The S25 Ultra has it tuned "for Galaxy," while the RedMagic 10S Pro uses a version of the chip called Leading Version. If we put those two head-to-head, we see that the clock frequencies for the CPU cores are identical. The benchmark scores paint the same picture; there's just a 2-point difference in the Geekbench single-core test (one of the smallest we've ever had between two different phones) and around 50 points in the multi-core test. So far, so good—both phones are almost identical when it comes to CPU performance. Where things start to sway in RedMagic's favor is the GPU tests. The Adreno 830 inside the RedMagic 10S Pro is clocked 100 MHz higher than the one inside the S25 Ultra. And it shows. We have a significant difference in the 3DMark score, both in the highest achieved result and also sustained performance under load. Which leads us to another very cool (pun intended) feature of the RedMagic 10S Pro. The cooling system. Cooling The active cooling system does wonders to the phone temperatures, especially under load | Image by PhoneArena Active cooling on smartphones isn't anything new; many "gaming" phones have such systems, but the one inside the RedMagic 10S Pro seems to work wonders. The 23,000 RPM silent fan works in tandem with liquid metal cooling material (indium alloy) and a pretty substantial vapor chamber (12,000 mm²). The result? During the stress test, the RedMagic 10S Pro's GPU performance dropped around 20%, while this number for the Galaxy S25 Ultra was more than 50%. RAM and storage The basic RAM and storage configurations are identical on both phones (12/256GB), but the RedMagic 10S Pro can be purchased with up to 24GB of RAM. The price goes up, of course, but the 24/1TB model is still cheaper ($999) than the 12/256GB model of the Galaxy S25 Ultra ($1,299). Display 1.25 mm bezels and an under-display selfie camera equal a futuristic look | Image by PhoneArena Both phones come with similar display sizes—the S25 Ultra features a 6.9-inch Super AMOLED panel, while the RedMagic 10S Pro comes equipped with a 6.85-inch screen. On the one hand, the Galaxy S25 Ultra has an LTPO display covering 1-120 Hz and everything in between. But on the other hand, the RedMagic 10S Pro screen can go up to 144 Hz, and the phone has thinner bezels coming in at 1.25 mm (1.32 mm for the S25 Ultra). Furthermore, the RedMagic 10S Pro features an under-display selfie camera. The result is an edge-to-edge display that looks very futuristic (the camera is almost invisible, and you can spot it only under a very bright light). Display Measurements: Then again, the S25 Ultra has the amazing anti-glare coating that helps with reflections and, according to many of my colleagues, is one of the best display innovations of the past couple of years. Last but not least, the S25 Ultra is brighter at 20% APL, while the RedMagic 10S Pro manages to light up 100% of the pixels more efficiently and make them output more nits. It depends on what's more important to you, but what I can say from my personal experience is that both displays look amazing in person. So, this one looks like a bit of a tie. What's not a tie is the battery life and charging situation. Battery and Charging The RedMagic 10S Pro has a 7,050 mAh battery. Let this number sink in. The battery life of this phone is second only to the Vivo X200 Ultra when we talk about Snapdragon 8 Elite-equipped phones, and it ranks #3 overall among phones tested in the past two years. The Galaxy S25 Ultra ranks #23 on the same list with its 5,000 mAh cell. When it comes to charging, the difference is even bigger. The RedMagic 10S Pro is able to fill its huge 7,050 mAh battery from 0 to 100% in just 38 minutes thanks to the 80W wired charging support, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra does so in 1 hour and 9 minutes. We should point out that the RedMagic 10S Pro doesn't have wireless charging support, so for people who use it often, this is a disadvantage. Design and aesthetics The back of the RedMagic 10S Pro does look cool, though | Image by PhoneArena Design is a largely subjective thing, but in a world where you can't tell the S23 Ultra from the S25 Ultra, we encourage and applaud original designs. The RedMagic 10S Pro has three color options, two of which feature a transparent back glass that looks awesome. The RGB LED lighting around the phone might not be everyone's cup of tea, but you can switch it off, and the look instantly becomes much more restrained. Another cool thing we welcome is the flat back. And we mean absolutely flat—the camera system is flush with the back and housed under the glass. How come the RedMagic 10S Pro is so much cheaper (half the price)? Is Samsung robbing you blind with the prices of its smartphones? No, it's not that simple. First, there's the bill of materials cost (BoM), and for the past couple of Galaxy S Ultra generations, the number has been rising steadily. The S23 Ultra BoM was $469, and Samsung subsequently raised the prices for the S24 Ultra by $100 to offset the increased cost (around $569). The latest reports on the BoM for the S25 Ultra stated that the cost is around $110 more compared to the previous generation, so we end up with around $679 just to manufacture the S25 Ultra. Image by Counterpoint The distribution network and the fact that you can get the S25 Ultra through almost every carrier in the US are also reflected in the price. Plus, there are physical Samsung stores with a lot of employees (salary costs) where you can go check out the devices in person. RedMagic, on the other hand, doesn't have any physical stores outside China and no carrier contracts, so there are no additional costs for distribution other than shipping when you make an order on the online store. You can try-before-you-buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra in the Samsung Experience store | Image by Samsung The software is another big cost-cutting point for RedMagic, both as pure development and also support. Samsung spent a lot of time and resources developing its Galaxy AI, and the company also supported all of its latest flagships and upper-midrange phones for seven years. In contrast, the RedMagic 10S Pro is outsourcing most of the AI to Gemini, and the phone comes with only two years of software support. We should also mention that Samsung has a great trade-in program in place, and you can upgrade to a new phone, saving some cash when you return your old device. RedMagic doesn't hold its value as well, and there are no trade-in deals to help you get the newest model. This is even more important when you consider the short software support cycle. Finally, RedMagic is a Chinese brand that sells huge volumes on the Chinese market. The company can operate at smaller margins to try and win market share, but this comes at all the aforementioned costs. What does all this mean, and should you rush to the (online) stores to buy the RedMagic 10S Pro? It's a render in an online store, but the device offers a lot of bang for your buck | Image by RedMagic Well, at the end of the day, the RedMagic 10S Pro is half the price of the Galaxy S25 Ultra . And if you just want a powerful device right now without troubling your head with update cycles, software support, resale value, and brand recognition, that phone is a great choice. However, with the Galaxy S25 Ultra , you're getting peace of mind and a future-proof device. It will not only get the latest software for seven long years, but Samsung will gladly take it off your hands and give you the next one with a substantial discount. Plus, you can just walk into a store and try before you buy, whereas getting a RedMagic 10S Pro online is a bit of a gamble. If you had to choose, which one would you buy? The Galaxy S25 Ultra at $1,299 or the RedMagic 10S Pro for half of that?


Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Motorola and Google are coming for Samsung's foldable crown in a major market
The world's number one smartphone vendor is also ranked in first place as far as European foldable sales are concerned, but just like all of its other recent trophies from around the globe, Samsung's latest achievement is overshadowed by a big misfire. The old continent's foldable smartphone market as a whole, meanwhile, continues to be described by Counterpoint Research analysts as a "niche segment", showing worryingly low year-on-year progress for an "emerging" product category "supposedly in its early growth stage." Probably not. After all, its 26 percentage point advantage over silver medalist Motorola in Q1 2025 market share continues to look mighty comfortable... despite obviously being significantly smaller than the 38 percent lead over Honor from the first three months of 2024. Then again, you "probably" didn't expect Samsung's global supremacy in the foldable segment to end as quickly and as abruptly as it did either, so let's just focus on how the numbers look right now and refrain from making any short or long-term predictions. The Razr 60 Ultra could soon become a European and global foldable best-seller. | Image Credit -- PhoneArena That seems especially wise when you consider how many exciting new foldable models are unveiled by top industry brands practically every month. Motorola, for instance, took the wraps off the Razr 60, aka Razr (2025), family in April, while Samsung is widely expected to "unpack" anywhere between two and five Z Fold and Z Flip devices sometime in July. The Razr 50, aka Razr (2024), series, mind you, was the driving force behind Motorola's impressive 58 percent European foldable sales growth between Q1 2024 and the same period of this year, so the company could well be looking at a further improvement of its 15 percent share in Q2 2025 as the aforementioned upgraded models come into the equation. Like the European foldable champion, the former number two vendor reported a decline of over 20 percent in its Q1 sales between 2024 and 2025 despite releasing some "fantastic" models like the Magic V3 over the last year or so. Surpassed by Motorola, Honor did manage to keep Google, Tecno, and Xiaomi at bay, at least for the time being. That, my friends, is the million-dollar question I don't have an answer for, especially with high prices being blamed for both Samsung's struggles and the market's woes in its entirety. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold, remember, starts at a whopping $1,799 in the US and €1,899 in European markets like France or Germany, nonetheless managing (presumably almost by itself) to boost Google from 2 to 8 percent market share in only 12 months. That's a 265 percent (!!!) year-on-year growth in sales, mind you. Google and Tecno's progress is simply staggering. Can the Pixel 10 Pro Fold help Big G threaten Samsung's supremacy or at least Motorola or Honor's places on the European podium? That seems highly unlikely, but weirder things have already happened, like Tecno's rise to the top five vendors group. If you've never heard of Tecno, don't worry, you're probably not alone, but that's what happens when foldables only account for 1.5 percent of an entire continent's smartphone sales. Tecno is somehow ranked ahead of both Xiaomi and Oppo in Europe's foldable segment thanks largely to a device called Phantom V Fold 2, which is almost unbelievably affordable for a book-style powerhouse with a 7.85-inch primary display and a 6.4-inch cover screen in tow. Clearly, the way forward for a lot of big and small names of the mobile industry in the foldable category will be a larger focus on budget-friendly models with stylish but also robust designs, as well as respectable specifications. In other words, it sounds like Samsung should start fearing Motorola and Google should consider releasing more than one (overpriced) foldable a year.


GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic prototype appears on eBay, confirms squircle rumors
The squircle rumors are true – the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic will adopt a design similar to the Galaxy Watch Ultra. We say this because someone has a prototype watch and is selling it on eBay. The watch reports itself as OZXT (or maybe that's a 'zero' instead of an 'oh'). The model number listed by the seller is SM-L505U – a 46mm Watch8 Classic with LTE and 64GB storage. Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic prototype The leather strap comes in the retail box – though it likely varies depending on the watch color you choose. There's also a magnetic charging adapter with a USB-C plug at the end. The Galaxy Watch8 Classic is expected to feature a rotating bezel, which was last seen on 2023's Watch6 Classic. There's an extra button this time too, the crown, though it's probably not a rotating crown (it wasn't on the Watch Ultra). You can see a fairly prominent speaker on the left side of the watch, similar to the Ultra. Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic, charger and box The Samsung Galaxy Watch8 series is expected to be powered by the same Exynos W1000 as the previous generation, though with larger batteries. Here are photos of the older models for comparison: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Samsung Galaxy Watch6 Classic The Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic (and the vanilla Watch8) will probably be unveiled at the Galaxy Unpacked event for the new Galaxy foldables in mid-July, according to the latest chatter (Samsung hasn't sent out an official 'save the date' yet). Thanks to the anonymous tipster who sent this in! Source