logo
Scanlon's campaign asks BOE to clarify contribution limits in Ryan's campaign

Scanlon's campaign asks BOE to clarify contribution limits in Ryan's campaign

Yahoo24-04-2025

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — Acting Buffalo Mayor Chris Scanlon's campaign, along with attorney Laurence Laufer, sent a letter to the New York State Board of Elections asking them to clarify contribution limits in State Senator Sean Ryan's campaign for Buffalo mayor.
In the letter, Laufer accused Ryan of a 'sweeping evasion of election law limits' and asked the board to confirm if he is taking money from his senate campaign fund to his mayoral campaign.
Scanlon's campaign said Ryan raised over $450,000 from less than 60 donors that were mostly from outside of Buffalo and Western New York.
A spokesperson for Ryan's campaign said Ryan is in full compliance with campaign finance laws and is confident the board will confirm that.
'This is just the latest desperate distraction from the Scanlon campaign, meant to deflect attention from the acting mayor's own serious issues,' the spokesperson said in a statement to WIVB News 4.
The spokesperson accused Scanlon of violating election laws by using city resources for his campaign promotion, though no complaint was filed with the board.
Katie Skoog joined the News 4 team in April 2024. She is a graduate from the University at Buffalo. You can view more of her work here.
Marlee Tuskes is an award-winning anchor and reporter who has been part of the News 4 team since 2019. See more of her work here and follow her on Twitter.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel Will Block Greta Thunberg's Boat From Reaching Gaza: IDF Chief
Israel Will Block Greta Thunberg's Boat From Reaching Gaza: IDF Chief

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Israel Will Block Greta Thunberg's Boat From Reaching Gaza: IDF Chief

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Israel's government has ordered the country's military to intercept the humanitarian ship carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists to Gaza and stop it from reaching the embattled territory. "I have instructed the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] to act so that the Madleen does not reach Gaza, and to take whatever measures are necessary to that end," Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a statement published on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday, referring to the vessel carrying the Swedish activist. Why It Matters Israel's 11-week blockade of aid into Gaza was condemned by activists, NGOs and even some of the country's closest allies, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government repeatedly ignored calls to ensure Palestinians in the occupied territory receive enough food and humanitarian assistance to avoid starvation. While Israel has recently allowed aid into Gaza under the management of U.S. contractors, the delivery of lifesaving essentials to the Palestinian population has been botched, with several people being killed by Israeli gunfire in a series of incidents at an aid distribution center. The U.N.'s humanitarian chief said that the aid allowed into the Gaza Strip now by Israel was just "a drop in the ocean of what is urgently needed." Thunberg, possibly the most prominent climate activist in the world, is onboard the Madleen flotilla together with 15 other people to bring aid to Gaza directly, picking up where she says Western governments are failing. But the success of the humanitarian aid ship's mission is in doubt as the Israeli government shows a strong hostility to the activists' plan. What To Know According to the latest update provided by the crew aboard the ship, Thunberg and her fellow activists were getting closer to Gaza and had reached Egypt on Saturday after having left from Catania, Italy, a week ago. The activists, who come from several countries across Europe and the world, expect to broadcast their arrest once they reach Gaza. They may not make it that far, based on Katz's statement. Already the human rights group operating the ship, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC), reported that drones have been flying over the vessel for hours. Greta Thunberg speaking at a press conference in Catania, Italy, on June 1, 2025. Greta Thunberg speaking at a press conference in Catania, Italy, on June 1, a video published on Instagram, Brazilian activist Thiago Avila, who is aboard the ship, said that the activists' best defense is their visibility. "We are just 12 people here. We carry all the aid we can. We carry food, medicine, crutches. We carry prosthetics for amputated children. We carry water filters and everything else we could but, of course, it's a drop in the ocean for the necessities of Gaza," he said. "The best security measure we have is visibility. It is you sharing, you pressuring your nation states, pressuring your governments for them to pressure for a safe passage." A previous journey planned by the FFC, which should have picked up Thunberg in Malta, was canceled in early May after the group said the boat came under attack by drones in international waters near the Mediterranean island. What People Are Saying Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz wrote on X: "To the antisemitic Greta and her fellow Hamas-propaganda spokespeople, I say clearly: You should turn back—because you will not reach Gaza. Israel will act against any attempt to break the blockade or assist terrorist organizations—at sea, in the air, and on land." In a statement published on Instagram, Humanti Project, a grassroots collective advocating for Palestinian liberation, wrote: "The Madleen is sailing toward Gaza with unarmed civilian and humanitarian aid. Israel has threatened to attack. We must act now." It added: "The Flotilla is not a threat—it is a lifeline. The only threat here is Israel's brutal enforcement of a blockade, and its genocide of the Palestinian people that has turned Gaza into a death camp." In a recent video published on Instagram, Greta Thunberg said: "What is happening in Gaza right now is unprecedented, and we do not accept this genocide…There can be no climate justice on occupied land. No climate justice without social justice." She told Al Jazeera this week: "We will try to break the siege and open humanitarian corridors to Gaza. What Happens Next The situation is now critical in Gaza since Israeli authorities stopped humanitarian aid entering the territory 11 weeks ago. Netanyahu lifted the aid blockade saying that a "starvation crisis" would damage his country's global standing—but it remains to be seen how its reputation would be hit should the Israeli military use force to prevent Thunberg's ship from reaching Gaza.

Clarence Page: Big, beautiful bromance breaks up — live on social media
Clarence Page: Big, beautiful bromance breaks up — live on social media

Chicago Tribune

time8 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Clarence Page: Big, beautiful bromance breaks up — live on social media

For those who think government should be run like a business, the messy social media spat that played out last week between President Donald Trump and billionaire CEO Elon Musk suggested that business could be doing a lot better. That may help to explain why shares of Musk's company Tesla dropped 14% Thursday, falling for the second straight day as the spat between the richest man in the world and the most powerful man in the world oozed into a meltdown. Ironically, the fight played out on the social media platforms Truth Social, majority-owned by the president, and X, formerly Twitter, which Musk bought and renamed in 2023 and subsequently turned into a megaphone for far-right politics and Trumpism. To many observers, the breakup of this bromance seemed inevitable, less because of the bros' differences than the great deal they share in common. 'Like 'Alien v. Predator' for political nerds,' The Guardian ballyhooed — and, as a dedicated political nerd, I agree. What else can we expect from two megalomaniacs dedicated to fame, money and far-right politics and experienced with messy divorces? 'I suppose it was in the stars,' Rep. Jamie Raskin, of Maryland and top Democrat on the House judiciary committee, told reporters on Capitol Hill. 'Everybody was predicting it when it first began. You've got two gentlemen with gargantuan egos and both appearing to suffer from malignant narcissistic personality disorder.' Ah, how far the oligarchic dream team has tumbled since Trump and Musk joined forces to wage war against what Musk branded 'the woke mind virus' — and of course to pursue riches through tribute (Trump) and government contracts (Musk). The table for the breakup was set in late May when the U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a domestic policy spending bill, which among other things would eliminate subsidies for electric vehicles such as those Tesla makes. Musk began grousing about the bill early last week, but he mostly confined his criticism to the amount by which the bill would increase the deficit. Trouble began in earnest Thursday, while Trump was meeting in the Oval Office with Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany. A reporter asked Trump about Musk's criticism of the bill. Trump pointedly referred to the relationship in the past tense and cast doubts on its happy future. Musk later slipped in a jab, suggesting that Trump and the Republicans could never have prevailed in last year's elections without the $288 million that Musk spent to put them over the top. 'Such ingratitude,' he huffed. The exchange became more heated as Musk lashed the legislation as a 'disgusting abomination' that would bankrupt the country. He then rallied his online followers to 'Kill the Bill' and things only got nastier. Among the highlights — and lowlights — Musk accused Trump of keeping the company of a pedophile. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk tweeted. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That's the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The reference is to the late registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who can be seen in widely circulated video partying with Trump. Musk later replied 'Yes' to a post that suggested Trump should be impeached and replaced with Vice President JD Vance. By Thursday afternoon, White House staff were calling the fracas 'the one big, beautiful breakup,' a reference to the legislation that ignited Musk's fury. That led to more speculation and debate as to where the feud would go next. Would it disrupt serious legislation? Who was winning the public relations battle on an ever-shifting playing field? A poll taken by YouGov asked respondents whose side they were on in the feud and found 52% said, perhaps sensibly, neither one. Only 28% picked Trump and a meager 8%, perhaps tech bros, picked Musk. Frankly, in a country loaded with people who have serious concerns about government and feel weary over such shenanigans, I hear a message in the polls: Make it stop! What happened to all the people who say government should be run like a business? The answer I hear is another question: Whose business?

Elon deletes Epstein tweet, sort of
Elon deletes Epstein tweet, sort of

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Elon deletes Epstein tweet, sort of

Elon Musk appears to be walking back one of his more explosive claims in an ongoing online feud with Donald Trump. On Saturday morning, Musk quietly deleted a post on X (formerly Twitter) in which he directly stated that Trump's name appears in the Jeffrey Epstein files. While that post is gone, several reposts remain up on Musk's account echoing the same allegation through the words of others. The now-deleted post capped off a dramatic week for Musk on the platform he owns. Earlier, he publicly slammed the 'Big Beautiful Bill Act,' calling it a betrayal of American taxpayers. The commentary sent ripples through conservative circles, with figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene admitting she hadn't even read the bill before voting in favor. By Thursday, Musk escalated his attacks, targeting Trump directly by resurfacing the former president's old tweets and pointing out contradictions in his current positions. What began as criticism of a piece of legislation quickly turned into a personal, highly visible spat between two of the most influential figures in Republican politics. The Epstein reference marked the lowest point in the exchange until Musk backtracked by deleting it. Still, the damage may be done, as there are many screenshots still circulating online. On Friday, Musk launched a poll asking users if they wanted a new political party aimed at the less extreme majority, and then spent the day proposing this new party for the American people – the 'American Party.' As of Saturday morning, Musk has yet to post again. Whether this is a cooldown or a calm before the next storm remains to be seen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store