Aquaculture Animal Welfare Code 'Anti-Kiwi', Oceans And Fisheries Minister Shane Jones Says
It says code would help the sector access international markets where factory farming is increasingly under scrutiny
Oceans and Fisheries Minister says this would be a "luxury" in the current economic environment
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is ruling out an animal welfare code for aquaculture, saying it is "anti-Kiwi" and an "indulgence".
The SPCA has called for a code to protect farmed fish, following a government plan to grow the industry's revenue to $3 billion annually by 2035.
Scientific officer Marie McAninch said a code would also help give the aquaculture sector access to the sorts of international markets that land-based farmers benefit from, thanks to their animal welfare codes.
"New Zealanders care about how farmed animals are treated - and so do people overseas who buy our products. They'll expect that farmed fish in aquaculture are treated well and that their welfare meets our animal welfare laws.
"A code of welfare for aquaculture would help make that happen. But right now, New Zealand's Aquaculture Strategy - and the Aquaculture Development Strategy that Shane Jones announced in March - are both completely silent on the welfare of the animals being farmed."
Jones said he would not be considering an animal welfare code.
"Most certainly not. I think these impositions are anti-Kiwi. We are in the midst of a set of economic challenges where we must expand and grow the footprint of aquaculture. It's all going to end up [as food for] human consumption or pet consumption."
Jones said existing fish farmers already did "a very good job" of looking after their stock. "All of these animal husbandry businesses, there's always scope for improvement. But regulatory codes ... only represent red tape and at a deeper level where does all this end? We're a small economy and a lot of these impositions are, in my view, indulgences. They're vanity projects and these debates need a clear set of contrasting views."
But McAninch said New Zealanders cared about how farmed animals were treated - and so did people overseas who bought products from New Zealand fish farms.
Fish were legally recognised as sentient beings, which meant they were capable of feeling pain, stress and positive emotional states, she said.
The SPCA was not against aquaculture, McAninch said.
"But we do believe it's crucial to make sure all farmed animals - and any wild animals affected by these systems - are properly protected. Our land-based farming sectors take pride in their animal welfare codes, and it's helped them with access to international markets. If the aquaculture sector doesn't plan for this now, they risk falling behind in a global environment where factory farming is increasingly under scrutiny."
Jones said he was "the first to admit some of my views might be a bit difficult to stomach". But animal advocates were "on a trajectory of mission creep, and I kind of feel it's anti-Kiwi," he said.
"I can understand that little kittens and dogs that bite children and other welfare considerations [are] an established part of rural life and our ethos, but suggesting that people growing salmon, new fish species and indeed shellfish ... we already have a system through the Resource Management Act that deals with the effects of such activity."
Jones described a recent outcry by animal lovers about farming octopuses, which are sentient beings, as "the height of this folly".
"We need to grow industry, we don't want to impose these urban based vanity beliefs of basic industrial growth prospects."
Octopus farming was banned in the United States in Washington and California due to animal welfare concerns, and consideration of a ban is also underway in three more states.
But Jones said New Zealand could not afford such "luxury indulgences".
"It's not something that I'm going to encourage, it's certainly not something I'm going to push forward, or agree with, at a time we have large competing objectives and other goals that I think society should set its mind upon."
The SPCA would welcome talks with the minister about how a welfare code could help ensure the aquaculture sector was sustainable and resilient, McAninch said.
There is currently no code of welfare for farmed fish species, although the New Zealand Salmon Farmers Association has developed a voluntary welfare standard for farmed salmon in New Zealand. The Animal Welfare Act 1999 (the AWA) and the Code of Welfare for Commercial Slaughter applies to farmed fish and for any fish that are intended to be held or transported live.
The National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) has identified development of a code of welfare for farmed fish for consideration as a future priority.
The Minister in charge of Animal Welfare, Associate Minister of Agriculture Andrew Hoggard said NAWAC set its own work programme and schedule for code reviews, but he had asked it to prioritise production livestock codes, and the rodeo code.
"Several of these codes have been under review for some time and the industries concerned need certainty. I expect NAWAC to deliver on those codes before turning their attention to other animal species."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Injunction ‘last lifeline' for racing
File photo: Stephen Jaquiery A High Court interim injunction is the "last lifeline" left for the greyhound racing industry, a former trainer says. Greyhound Racing New Zealand is seeking the injunction to stop the government's plan to end greyhound racing in New Zealand. The hearing will be held in Wellington tomorrow. In December last year, Racing Minister Winston Peters announced the government's 20-month plan to wind down the industry to enable the re-homing of racing dogs and to provide a transition period for people involved in the industry. The first race of what could be New Zealand's last season took place last Wednesday. There are six trainers in Southland and Otago and about 40 greyhounds, but not all the dogs race. Southland Greyhound Racing secretary-manager Bronwyn Eade said an interim injunction could buy the industry some time. If the injunction was successful it would stop the process of closing down the industry until a court hearing could be held. "There's a little bit of hope." It would also allow racing to continue beyond July next year when it was scheduled to stop which would extend the time trainers and owners could earn an income, Mrs Eade said. When there was no more racing the owners would be left with the dogs. "The government has said there won't be any compensation for the greyhound owners and trainers." Throughout the country there were about 1500 dogs that would need to be re-homed, Mrs Eade said. Every year about 670 dogs were re-homed at a cost of more than $8 million to Greyhound New Zealand. "You take the racing away, how is that going to be funded?" While the prospect of the sport ending was sad, people were more angry than anything else, she said. Animal welfare was the reason given but the industry had made big improvements in the past eight years, Mrs Eade said. It was hard to know why the government had decided the dogs were not well looked after when the opposite was true, she said. What she found even more puzzling was why the government would continue to allow New Zealanders to bet on Australian greyhound races, which equated to about $48m gross revenue coming into the economy. "There's a double standard and its hypocritical." She said the Australian dogs were not better cared for because New Zealand dogs were the most regulated greyhounds she knew of anywhere in the world. To add insult to injury, the government planned to requisition $15m of Greyhound New Zealand's money. To take money from an incorporated society the government had to prove there was financial misconduct, insolvency or failure to submit returns, she said. As there was no evidence of this the government would need to "fabricate a new law" to allow the money to be taken, Mrs Eade said.
Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Swarbrick will have her pay docked for refusing to leave House
Chlöe Swarbrick's comments in the House on Tuesday: By Craig McCulloch of RNZ The Speaker has 'named' Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick for refusing to leave the House. The punishment means the MP had to once again leave the House, and will have her pay docked. Swarbrick was ejected from Parliament yesterday after refusing to withdraw and apologise for comments suggesting coalition MPs grow a spine and sanction Israel over the war in Gaza. At the time, Speaker Gerry Brownlee barred Swarbrick for the rest of the week, unless she apologised when the House sat this afternoon. Swarbrick refused to do so and refused to leave. Brownlee then named her - a punishment handed down by the Speaker for a MP whose conduct is disorderly. Swarbrick had previously said she had already received her punishment, and that worse things had been said by other MPs without the Speaker's intervention. Speaking to his ruling, Brownlee said the difference was previous comments had been interjections, while Swarbrick's comment was made inside a speech. "If you think about the comment that was made, 68 members of this House were accused of being spineless. There has never been a time where personal insults like delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House - and I'm not going to start accepting it." Brownlee asked MPs what standard they expected of themselves. "We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament. If we don't change the behaviour in here, nothing will change outside." Labour leader Chris Hipkins questioned the precedent of the ruling. "There's not a single instance where a member has been asked to withdraw and apologise the following sitting day, and then named for not doing that." New Zealand First leader Winston Peters also questioned the ruling. "My personal view is I don't agree with a thing Chlöe Swarbrick said at all, but this is a robust House where people have a right to express their views as passionate as they may, within certain rules, but I do not think that eviction was warranted." Peters said there had been many instances of language in the House he had disagreed with, including the use of the c-word earlier in the year. Te Pati Maori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer referred to that in her contribution. "There were many of us that were offended by the c-word, but I do want to be able to assure is that spineless is a word, and it looks like the ruling is a political suppression," she said. Ngarewa-Packer repeated the c-word outright. Speaking to RNZ this morning, Swarbrick said the party had received correspondence from legal experts and the public pointing out "far worse" things had been said by other MPs, where the Speaker had chosen not to intervene. "It just doesn't really wash." Swarbrick said she would prefer Parliament's attention was focused on the "real issues of the day" and re-iterated her call for more action against Israel. "New Zealanders want action, and if our House can come together on the point of sanctioning Israel for its war crimes, then that finally would bring us in line with our legacy of standing for human rights and justice." University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis told RNZ it was unusual for Swarbrick to be asked to withdraw and apologise, given many MPs had made similar comments in Parliament before without consequence. He said the standard penalty for challenging the Speaker's authority was to be ordered out of the House for one day. A week-long punishment, Geddis said, was inconsistent with other rulings made by Speakers in recent times. "If the Speaker is starting to almost make up the rules as he goes along, he puts at risk the preparedness of other MPs to accord him his authority. "MPs might start asking, 'well, if the Speaker is just going to do their own thing with no regard to precedence, do we really trust them to have that sort of power?'"
1News
8 hours ago
- 1News
Winston Peters announces new US ambassador
Senior diplomat Chris Seed has been appointed as New Zealand's next ambassador to the United States, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced. Seed's appointment comes at a crucial time for diplomatic relations between New Zealand and the US, New Zealand's second biggest trading partner. He would step into the role in January 2026. Earlier this month, the Trump administration levelled a surprise 15% tariff on New Zealand. Just a day prior, the FBI opened its new office in Wellington to "strengthen and enhance" its cooperation with a "key Five Eyes partner in the southwestern Pacific region". Director Kash Patel also said the new office would be working to counter China's influence in the Pacific. ADVERTISEMENT Seed was currently filling in as acting High Commissioner to the UK, stepping into the role after Phil Goff was sacked after he made comments about US President Donald Trump. He has previously served as Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade from 2019 to 2024, as well as leading New Zealand High Commissions in Canberra and Port Moresby. Hamish Cooper would take up the role of High Commissioner to the UK in September. Peters today described New Zealand's strategic partnership with the United States as, "one of our most important and long-standing relationships". He said it was "essential" that New Zealand's ambassador to the US was experienced and had the "judgement and influence to effectively represent our country in Washington DC and navigate the range of important and pressing issues that are vital to New Zealanders". 'Mr Seed is one of New Zealand's most senior and accomplished diplomats and is, accordingly, the right person for this vital role." Seed would be replacing Rosemary Banks, who would be completing her second term as ambassador by the time Seed arrives in Washington DC. "Ms Banks has had a most distinguished diplomatic career, having led New Zealand missions in Paris, New York and Washington,' Peters said. 'Twice Ms Banks has been asked by her Government to serve in Washington DC and we are enormously grateful to her that twice she answered that call to serve with distinction as New Zealand Ambassador to the United States. 'Ms Banks' long diplomatic experience and her elevated standing amongst her US counterparts, during such a challenging time in global affairs, has seen her contribute greatly to one of New Zealand's most critical bilateral relationships."
