NCLAT to hear Maruti Suzuki's appeal against CCI order on THIS date
'This is in furtherance to our letter dated 15th April 2025, regarding the CCI matter. We would like to inform you that National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has notified the next date of hearing and the case is listed on 14th May 2025,' Maruti Suzuki said in an exchange filing on Wednesday.
Back in 2021, CCI had imposed a penalty of ₹ 200 crore on Maruti Suzuki for restricting discounts by dealers.
This case was taken up by CCI based on an anonymous e-mail dated November 17, 2017. The allegations against Maruti were that a 'Discount Control Policy' implemented by India's largest automaker restricted dealers from giving discounts to their customers beyond the discounts prescribed by the company, and dealers providing extra discounts were punished by levying a penalty and/or restriction of supply.
'The Competition Commission of India (CCI) passed a final order against Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL) for indulging in anti-competitive conduct of Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) in the passenger vehicle segment by way of implementing Discount Control Policy vis-à-vis dealers, and accordingly, imposed a penalty of ₹ 200 crore upon MSIL,' Ministry of Corporate Affairs said in a statement in August 2021.
As per the ministry order, Maruti Suzuki reportedly used mystery shopping agencies (MSAs) to secretly visit its dealerships while posing as regular customers. This exercise aimed to find out whether dealerships were offering unauthorised discounts to buyers.
If such discounts were found, the MSAs would collect audio or video evidence and report it to Maruti Suzuki's management. The company would then send an email to the dealership titled 'Mystery Shopping Audit Report,' confronting them about the discount and requesting an explanation.
If the dealership failed to provide a satisfactory explanation, Maruti Suzuki would impose penalties—sometimes even warning of halting vehicle supplies. The company also controlled where the penalty had to be paid and how the collected amount was used, according to a statement from the ministry.
However, Maruti had appealed this decision before the NCLAT, and obtained a stay on the penalty imposed by CCI.
Maruti Suzuki share price was trading on a firm note on Wednesday, emerging as one of the top index gainers. Maruti Suzuki shares gained as much as 3.5% in trade today, hitting the day's high of ₹ 12273.
The automaker started off the session on a subdued note but soon witnessed strong buying action and was trading close to the day's high in the afternoon trade. As of 1.45 pm, Maruti Suzuki stock was at ₹ 12218.40, up 3.13%.
First Published: 30 Apr 2025, 01:13 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court dismisses Byju's settlement plea
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed pleas filed by the BCCI and Riju Raveendran — brother of Byju Raveendran — seeking withdrawal of insolvency proceedings against Byju's and to consider the settlement between the beleaguered edtech company and the BCCI. A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadeven refused to interfere with the April 17 order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which had ruled that since the settlement proposal was filed after the formation of Committee of Creditors (CoC), it required the approval of the lender's body under the provisions of section 12 A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Earlier in February 2025, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had directed the petitioners to place their settlement offer before the new CoC, in which US-based Glas Trust, the trustee for lenders to which Byju's owes $1.2 billion, is a member. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Byju's was initiated in July last year by the NCLAT, admitting a Rs 158.90 crore claim from the BCCI as an operational creditor of edtech major. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was also appointed in this matter. Later, a settlement was reached between the parties, and Byju Raveendran approached the NCLAT. The appellate tribunal set aside the insolvency proceedings against Byju's on August 2, 2024, after approving a dues settlement with the BCCI, which had entered into a Team Sponsor Agreement with the cricket body in 2019. This was challenged by Glas Trust before the Supreme Court. A Bench headed by then Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud halted the NCLAT order and directed the BCCI to deposit the amount in question in a separate escrow account till further orders. Meanwhile, Byju's Alpha, a special purpose financing vehicle established by Byju's in the US to receive proceeds of a $1.5 billion Term Loan B, has sued Byju Raveendran, co-founder and his wife Divya Gokulnath for "orchestrating theft of $533 million". Byju's Alpha said that following the $533 million judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware against Riju Ravindran and Byju's ultimate corporate parent in India, the company has now filed a lawsuit against Byju Raveendran, his co-founder and wife Divya Gokulnath, and his consigliere (advisor), Anita Kishore. The lawsuit states that each of them co-orchestrated and executed a lawless scheme to conceal and steal $533 million of loan proceeds (the 'Alpha Funds'), according to a press release. They further stated that "it is clear that Byju, Divya, and Anita deliberately hid the assets of Byju's Alpha and repeatedly were deceptive about the location of the money in order to steal funds rightfully owed to the Lenders".
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Maruti Suzuki to launch Hyundai Creta, Kia Seltos rival? Date revealed, expectations
Image used for representational purposes and isn't of the Escudo. Maruti Suzuki is preparing to further expand its SUV portfolio with the launch of a new midsize model on September 3, 2025 . While the company has yet to confirm the name or official details, the upcoming SUV is likely to be called the Maruti Escudo. There are also chances that the manufacturer might finally launch the eVitara but as of now, it is not widely expected. Speaking of the Escudo, the model is being positioned as a potential rival to popular names like the Hyundai Creta and Kia Seltos. Here's a look at what we can expect. Maruti Suzuki Escudo: What to expect This new SUV will be retailed exclusively through Maruti Suzuki's Arena network, unlike the Grand Vitara which is sold via the Nexa channel. In fact, the Escudo will likely share its platform, design cues, and features with the Grand Vitara, but with a few notable changes to create its own identity and possibly appeal to a wider, more price-conscious audience. As so far seen in the spy images, it appears that it still carries over key styling elements from the Grand Vitara. The Escudo is also expected to be slightly longer than the Grand Vitara, offering more cabin space without significantly moving away from the compact footprint of a midsize SUV . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dubai's Next Icon: Experience Binghatti Aquarise Luxury Binghatti Developers FZE Learn More Undo The interior is likely to mirror the Grand Vitara and the upcoming e-Vitara in terms of features. Key highlights might include a nine-inch touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, semi-digital instrument cluster, sunroof, and more. Tata Harrier EV Review: Brilliant but just One Flaw! | TOI Auto Under the hood, the Escudo is expected to use the same 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol mild-hybrid engine that powers the Grand Vitara. This unit produces 103 bhp and is mated to either a 5-speed manual or a 6-speed torque converter automatic transmission. Maruti may skip the stronger hybrid powertrain to keep costs in check and better differentiate its Arena and Nexa product lines. With the launch just months away, the Escudo looks poised to add another strong contender to the highly competitive midsize SUV space. Full details will be revealed at its official debut on September 3. Discover everything about the automotive world at Times of India .
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court rejects BCCI, Byju's plea to withdraw insolvency case
The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed an appeal by the Board of Control for Cricket in India, an operational creditor, seeking withdrawal of the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of Think & Learn, the parent company of online education services company Byju's. The apex court also dismissed another appeal of Byju's co-founder Riju Raveendran, who also wanted withdrawal of the insolvency proceedings against Think & Learn. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Artificial Intelligence Finance Product Management Data Science Healthcare Digital Marketing MBA Project Management others CXO Management Public Policy Leadership Data Analytics Design Thinking Operations Management Cybersecurity Data Science Others Technology Degree PGDM healthcare Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and the Bengaluru bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had directed the resolution professional to present the withdrawal application before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) of the debt-laden company. The cricket board told the SC that the NCLAT had erred in not appreciating the uncontested fact that the settlement culminated prior to the constitution of the CoC of Think & Learn. Besides, the tribunal could not have shifted the responsibility of deciding the withdrawal application to the lenders, it added. Supporting BCCI's stand, Raveendran argued that the NCLAT order was 'erroneous and perverse' as the SC, despite setting out various scenarios in which the filing of the withdrawal application arises, had not held that the parties are relegated to post-CoC constitution stage in the present case. 'On the contrary, it states that when the settlement was permitted before the NCLAT, it was a situation where there was a withdrawal before the constitution of the CoC. However, while finally remitting the parties to the NCLT to seek such remedies as available to them in law, the SC (August 14 order) has specifically not held that such a withdrawal can only be after approval of CoC,' Raveendran said, adding the BCCI's claims stand fully settled as per the settlement terms of July 30. He further submitted that the SC stay on settlement proceedings last year did not automatically revive the CIRP. Stating the purported constitution of the CoC was wholly illegal and perverse, the appeal contended that ICICI Bank, which had nil dues, could not have been included. 'Even US lender GLAS Trust Co. LLC is not a financial creditor. It is an alleged agent of a consortium, and under Section 21(6) of the IBC, the IRP should have received authorisation from each member of the consortium before permitting it to be part of the CoC, and the first CoC was provisional and not final,' the appeal added. The entire CIRP process has been vitiated by fraud, first on the part of the erstwhile IRP in connivance with Glas, Raveendran said, adding that the erstwhile IRP has now filed an affidavit admitting that he was pressured by Glas to take a series of decisions and the whole process was 'premeditated.' In an earlier round in October, the Supreme Court had set aside the NCLAT order that approved a Rs 158 crore settlement between Think & Learn and the BCCI. It also overturned the appellate tribunal's August 2 order and restored the insolvency proceedings on an appeal made by Aditya Birla Finance and Glas Trust, the trustee for lenders owed $1.2 billion, which had opposed the settlement and had sought a halt to the insolvency proceedings. Subsequently, the BCCI filed a fresh application to withdraw its insolvency plea against Think & Learn, but this was again rejected by both the tribunal and the appellate tribunal.
