Elon Musk calls Trump's big bill ‘utterly insane and destructive' as senate debates
The billionaire tech entrepreneur Elon Musk on Saturday criticized the latest version of Donald Trump's sprawling tax and spending bill, calling it 'utterly insane and destructive.
'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Musk wrote on Saturday as the Senate was scheduled to call a vote to open debate on the nearly 1,000-page bill.
'Utterly insane and destructive,' Musk added. 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.'
Passing the package, Musk said, would be 'political suicide for the Republican Party.'
Musk's comment reopens a recent fiery conflict between the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) and the administration he recently left. They also represent yet another headache for Republican Senate leaders who have spent the weekend working overtime to get the legislation through their chamber so it can pass by Trump's Fourth of July deadline.
Earlier this month, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO also came out against the House version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill', denouncing that proposal as a 'disgusting abomination'.
'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it, he wrote at the time.
Musk's forceful denouncement of Trump's spending plans triggered a deep and public rift between the billionaire and the president, though Musk in recent weeks has been working to mend relations.
On Saturday, Musk posted a series of disparaging comments about the senate version of the bill, which argued the legislation would undermine US investments in renewable energy.
Musk boosted several comments from Jesse Jenkins, a macro-scale energy systems engineer who teaches at Princeton.
After Jenkins wrote, 'The energy provisions in the Republicans' One Big Horrible Bill are truly so bad! Who wants this? The country's automakers don't want it. Electric utilities don't want it. Data center developers don't want it. Manufacturers in energy intensive industries don't want it.' Musk replied: 'Good question. Who?'
Musk's continued criticism of Trump's budget proposals comes as the bill faces a rocky path in the senate. Republicans are hoping to use their majorities to overcome Democratic opposition, but several Republican senators are concerned over provisions that would reduce spending on Medicaid and food stamps to help cover the cost of extending Trump's tax breaks. Meanwhile, fiscal conservatives are worried about the nation's debt are pushing for steeper cuts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Iran's judiciary says at least 71 were killed in Israel's attack on Tehran's notorious Evin prison
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
Geeky Gadgets
12 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
You Won't Believe What macOS Tahoe Is Hiding!
Apple's macOS Tahoe marks a pivotal step forward in the evolution of its desktop operating system. With the introduction of the 'liquid glass' design, touch-friendly interface updates, and hints of cellular connectivity, this update signals a potential reimagining of the Mac experience. These changes suggest a future where Apple's ecosystem becomes even more unified and versatile, offering you a seamless and innovative way to interact with your devices. The detailed video below from GregsGadgets giuves us more details on what to expect from macOS Tahoe Watch this video on YouTube. What Is the Liquid Glass Design? The 'liquid glass' design in macOS Tahoe introduces a sleek and modern aesthetic that prioritizes both form and function. This design emphasizes depth, smooth transitions, and a tactile user experience, creating a visually engaging interface. Rounded corners, larger interface elements, and a refined color palette bring macOS closer in appearance to iOS and iPadOS, establishing a unified design language across Apple's product lineup. For you, this means a more intuitive and consistent experience when switching between devices. The enlarged buttons and rounded display corners are not only visually appealing but also suggest that macOS is evolving to support touch interaction. These design choices hint at Apple's preparation for a future where Macs may offer new ways to interact with their interfaces, bridging the gap between traditional desktop functionality and modern touch-based usability. Is Apple Finally Embracing Touchscreen Macs? Apple has historically resisted the idea of touchscreen Macs, arguing that macOS is optimized for precision input through a mouse or trackpad. However, macOS Tahoe challenges this long-standing stance. The updated interface includes larger sliders, toggles, and buttons, which are ergonomically suited for touch input, mirroring the design principles seen in iPadOS. This shift aligns with Apple's methodical approach to innovation. For example, the introduction of windowed multitasking on iPadOS—a feature originally exclusive to macOS—demonstrates Apple's strategy of gradually bridging functionality across platforms. If this trend continues, it is plausible that a touchscreen MacBook Pro could debut as early as 2026, potentially featuring OLED displays for enhanced responsiveness and visual clarity. For users like you, this could mean a more versatile Mac experience, blending the precision of traditional input methods with the convenience of touch interaction. What Does This Mean for Future Mac Hardware? The design updates in macOS Tahoe are likely indicative of broader changes in Apple's Mac hardware lineup. Industry speculation suggests that rounded display corners, already a signature feature of iPhones and iPads, will soon make their way to MacBook Pro and iMac models. This would further unify Apple's product design across its devices, creating a cohesive aesthetic that enhances the overall user experience. Another anticipated development is the integration of OLED touchscreen displays. These displays could enable thinner and lighter Macs while maintaining the durability and responsiveness required for touch interaction. For you, this would mean not only a sleeker and more portable device but also new ways to interact with your Mac, enhancing both productivity and creativity. These hardware advancements, combined with the software updates in macOS Tahoe, signal a future where Macs are more adaptable to diverse user needs. Cellular Connectivity: A New Frontier for Macs? One of the most intriguing possibilities hinted at in macOS Tahoe is the integration of cellular connectivity. Apple's development of the C1 modem suggests that future Macs could connect directly to cellular networks, allowing you to stay online without relying on Wi-Fi. This feature would be particularly valuable for professionals who work remotely or frequently travel, offering greater flexibility and reliability in staying connected. The inclusion of a phone app in macOS Tahoe further supports this speculation. This app could enable you to make calls and send messages directly from your Mac, aligning macOS with the capabilities of iOS and iPadOS. For you, this would create a more seamless experience across Apple devices, making it easier to stay connected no matter where you are. Cellular-enabled Macs could also open up new possibilities for mobile productivity, allowing you to work efficiently from virtually anywhere. How Does This Fit into Apple's Ecosystem? The updates in macOS Tahoe reflect Apple's broader strategy to create a more unified and integrated ecosystem. By aligning macOS with iOS and iPadOS in terms of both design and functionality, Apple is working to provide you with a consistent and seamless experience across all its devices. This alignment ensures that features, aesthetics, and usability remain familiar, regardless of whether you are using a Mac, iPhone, or iPad. This strategy also positions Apple to compete more effectively in a market where versatility and connectivity are increasingly important. Whether through the potential introduction of touchscreens, the integration of cellular connectivity, or the adoption of a unified design language, macOS Tahoe represents a step toward a future where your Mac is more adaptable, intuitive, and connected than ever before. For you, this means a more cohesive and efficient workflow, with fewer barriers between devices and greater flexibility in how you use them. Uncover more insights about macOS Tahoe in previous articles we have written. Source & Image Credit: GregsGadgets Filed Under: Apple, Laptops, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Herald Scotland
35 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Could Michelle Obama be the voice Democrats need right now?
"I feel like at 60, this is the first time where all my decisions are for me," Obama said on her June 19 episode with radio show host Angie Martinez. With her daughters Sasha and Malia launched in their own young adult lives, "this is a period of freedom." Each week, Obama and Robinson are joined by celebrities like comedians Damon and Marlon Wayans, producer Issa Rae or actress Keke Palmer - with just a glint of politics. It's her space to talk with friends. References to her husband, former President Barack Obama, or the eight years they spent raising young children in the White House are matters of fact, but the political wildfire of the second Trump administration is barely noted, except as a launching point to talk about how people are impacted by Trump's new policies. As recently as last July, an Ipsos poll revealed that only Michelle Obama stood a chance of besting Donald Trump in the presidential election. Even before leaving the White House in early 2017, a corner of the Democratic Party clamored for her to run. She has repeatedly slammed the door on that. But as Democrats search for a liberal counter to the right-wing media ecosystem that helped Trump win back the White House by reaching millions who don't pay attention to mainstream media, the online show of a relatable and popular Democrat could be what they are looking for. Regardless of what Democrats want her podcast to be, Michelle Obama has demonstrated she'll do her show her way. For now, she's using a platform that reflects the former first lady's larger, and perhaps more effective, cultural strategy that mirrors how Black women voters - part of the party's loyalist base - are coping after former Vice President Kamala Harris' loss in the 2024 election, said Democratic strategist Nina Smith. "So this is the best way that she can create space and show the multi-dimensional nature of Black women: our thinking; how we engage friends; how we engage with people across racial lines; how we engage with our siblings; and the fullness of us, while also allowing her to speak to the issues of the moment," Smith said. IMO (short for "in my opinion"), is largely devoid of juicy gossip, let alone talk about any current or former White House occupants. The Father's Day episode, which featured Bruce Springsteen and watched by roughly 216,000 viewers on YouTube, came just days after Trump berated the rock music icon for calling the administration "corrupt, incompetent and treasonous." While Trump's name never came up, they both chuckled when Michelle Obama made a joke about some people being president who need therapy. Instead, they talked about going to therapy, building relationships with absentee parents and being present for their children during formative years "I realized that parenting is pennies in the bank," Springsteen said. "It's that time when you were working and you didn't want to stop, but you did. That made a huge difference to me. I always felt that if I had failed with my kids I would have failed tremendously at life." More: Pop stars, massive crowds and history: How the Obama and Harris campaigns compare Michelle Obama responded with a story from her childhood about what it meant when her father, who worked long hours as a city worker in Chicago, turned his full attention to her and her brother. "When he was present he was present in very small but meaningful ways," she said. 'She hates politics' Michelle Obama, a corporate lawyer specializing in marketing and intellectual property law, was carried into the national spotlight when a skinny senator with a Muslim middle name beat the old guards in both parties with a message of a new America founded upon hope. For most of that time she had to be more mindful of her husband's agenda and image. Since Trump took office, she's been openly critical of him, but on her terms, such as at the 2024 Democratic National Convention in her hometown of Chicago, rather than on her podcast. Speaking up and what she considers the right moment will likely continue, said Democratic strategist Lynda Tran. "I would not be surprised to see her using her voice to rally Democrats in the future assuming the appropriate venues and strategic value. And I would expect an overwhelmingly positive response from Democrats when she does," Tran, who worked in the Obama administration, told USA TODAY. But her participation in politics might be through raising money and giving speeches, rather than a central role in the party's future. Her focus in the last few years has been on outside projects, her family and now the new podcast she co-hosts with her brother. Demands to do more from either Barack or Michelle Obama are often met with scoffs by longtime supporters, such as Natalie Graves, a clinical social worker who was at Chicago's Grant Park when the couple took the victory stage in November 2008. More: Obama warns Trump administration has 'weak commitment' to democracy in Connecticut speech "My first response is an eye roll," Graves, a 55-year-old registered Democrat, said of ongoing efforts to recruit the former first lady to run for president. "If a person says that they don't want to run, what are we talking about? They're ignoring the fact that she has made it very clear that she hates politics." 'Served their time' The former first lady firmly shut the door on running for president in March, saying her daughters, who are both in their 20s, had "served their time" in the limelight and should get to be private young adults. "I wanted them to have the freedom of not having the eyes of the world on them. So when people ask me would I ever run, the answer is no," Obama said on Kyle Kelcie's "Not Gonna Lie" podcast. "If you ask me that, then you have absolutely no idea the sacrifice your kids make when your parents are in that role." Democrats are casting about for trusted voices to better connect with different voters and help create a left-wing media ecosystem to match that of the right. Some liberal strategists are asking donors to contribute to finding voices and influencers on the left to counter people like Steve Bannon and Joe Rogan who helped propel Trump to office, the New York Times reported last month. Democrats statistically have more trust in mainstream media than Republicans, said Texas Christian University political science professor Adam Schiffer. The Democratic brain trust is asking "who is the Democratic Joe Rogan?" he said, but "it's not necessarily clear that there could be one because Democrats don't necessarily find that gratifying and entertaining." More: Town halls, f-bombs and Elon Musk: How Democrats are waging a new messaging war Younger people have a radically different media consumption than their parents, Schiffer said, and it "could become a critical problem for Democrats" if they don't figure out how to get in front of them. No matter how popular, a former first lady in her sixties might not be the best emissary to young people, he said. Influencers played a large role in Harris' abridged presidential campaign last summer and fall, but they couldn't compete with a Republican online juggernaut that has been building for over a decade. And not everyone is an "IMO" fan. Some are calling out the former first lady's complaints about living in the White House. For example, former Fox News host Megyn Kelly mocked the podcast in a June 26 video posted to X, later saying Michelle Obama was "trashing her children and husband again." When Michelle Obama does talk about politics in her podcast, it mostly orbits around the future for Americans in her daughters' generation and how political decisions impact ordinary people. She's often echoing the kind of kitchen table politicking that only voters in swing states get to hear about every four years from presidential candidates. "I'm talking to so many young people who are deathly afraid of their futures in this climate," she said in the May 21 episode. "They're not just worried about jobs, they're worried about being able to become the next entrepreneur, they're wondering whether, you know, they'll have healthcare and housing [and] whether they'll be able to pay off their student loans." In that episode, Obama and her brother spoke with Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky about the future of businesses under the Trump' administration's new tariffs. They talked about how the taxes on goods brought into the country are being passed on to consumers and hindering the ability of younger Americans trying to make it to reach their goals in the current economy. More: Will TikTok be banned? Donald Trump says he has a 'warm spot' for app as it faces January deadline "I mean, some people can hold on, but other people are not only losing their businesses, but they're losing their homes in the process," she said. "It's kind of scary." Michelle Obama did use the podcast to defend her decision not to attend Trump's January inauguration, which sparked rounds of criticism and speculation about her marriage. She insisted she was simply "making the choice that was right" for her. "Whatever the backlash was, I had to sit in it and own it. But I didn't regret it, you know? It's my life now, and I can say that, now," the mom of two said on a June 26 NPR podcast. Dems in a ditch Michelle Obama's show also arrives at a time when the Democratic brand remains in the ditch with progressive voters. About one-third of Democrats said they are optimistic about their party's future, a May poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found. Though several Democrats are starting to make moves toward 2028, liberals have struggled with the lack of a main character to match Trump's political moxie the way then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi did in his first term. Lately, Democratic officeholders have clashed with federal agents at press conferences, immigration hearings and ICE facilities, creating viral moments that have been cheered by mainstream and more left-leaning progressives. More: Vance defends using military to quell protests, refers to Sen. Alex Padilla as 'Jose' Such actions have never been in either of the Obamas' style, and some Black political activists and artists have been emphasizing the need for "self-care" over political action in the aftermath of the 2024 election. "It's important for her to stay within the public space, so it's good that she wants to be active. She endorses candidates and stuff of that nature. I have no problem with that," said Steven Uzoukwu, a 33, a cybersecurity analyst from Baltimore, Maryland. "I just think we shouldn't rely on the Obamas to save America."
