logo
Luigi Mangione Claims Cops Used Dirty Tricks During McDonald's Arrest

Luigi Mangione Claims Cops Used Dirty Tricks During McDonald's Arrest

Yahoo18-03-2025

Cops pulled a number of dirty tricks on Luigi Mangione during their first encounter with him at a McDonald's in Pennsylvania and later at a local police station, the 26-year-old's lawyer claimed in new court filings this week.
The purportedly illegal tactics included tricking him into accepting a snack to obtain his DNA and seizing his bag at a McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania as a pretext to rummage through his belongings.
The actions violated protections afforded to Mangione under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, lawyer Thomas Dickey alleged in the documents.
Mangione is accused of carrying out the high-profile murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Manhattan last December.
He faces charges in Pennsylvania including possessing an unlicensed firearm, forgery and providing false identification to police. Mangione is facing trial in New York first, however, on separate charges in both federal and state courts, including homicide and terrorism.
One of the federal charges, murder through use of a firearm, means Mangione could face the death penalty if convicted.
Dickey claimed cops formed 'a human law enforcement wall' at the Altoona McDonald's where Mangione was spotted, questioned and eventually arrested—though they did not have a legal basis to seize his belongings: a backpack, plastic bag, and other items.
'Prior to this stop, arrest, seizure and/or detention of the Defendant, the APD Officers had no articulable facts and observed no criminal conduct on the part of the Defendant, nor any other evidence indicating that any criminal activity was afoot,' the document states. 'Accordingly, APD lacked reasonable suspicion to engage in this activity. At no time did the Defendant exhibit any threatening gesture or show of force. These actions by APD, were in violation of the protections afforded to the Defendant under the Fourth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and under Article 1, Section 8, of the Pennsylvania Constitution.'
'Other than the anonymous 911 call, the APD had no independent corroborating evidence that the Defendant was in fact the suspect sought in New York, prior to, or at the time of their stop and/or the investigatory detention of the Defendant.'
In the 36-page document, Dickey writes, 'Any purported identification of the Defendant as the person wanted in New York was speculative and based on a hunch,' and describes actions by APD officers and other law enforcement personnel, as 'coercive.'
Dickey said the discovery of numerous items were illegal and should be removed from the case, including a computer chip, a clip containing bullets which was wrapped up in some undergarments, 9mm handgun with printed lower receiver, mechanized upper receiver, suspected 3D printed suppressor, and a red notebook. Multiple hand written notes were also seized.
'The Altoona Police Department illegally seized a notebook which allegedly contained numerous personal writings covering a plethora of personal experiences of the Defendant,' the filing notes. 'A member of the Altoona Police Department improperly, and without justification, labeled these writings and/or notebook as 'Manifesto'. The use of this characterization of the Defendants alleged personal experiences and writings is incorrect, improper, and without justification and has no probative value.
The document says Mangione believes 'that this characterization was done so solely for the purpose to prejudice the Defendant and put him in a negative light before the public; all in an effort to prejudice any potential jury pool.'
Later, at the police station, cops provided snacks to an unwitting Mangione.
'While illegally seized, arrested, and detained, the Defendant was provided food and soda while at the Altoona Police Department Station,' the document states.
'The purposes for the same, was to obtain DNA from the Defendant for further investigative purposes. Insofar as the Defendants detention was illegal for reasons set forth, infra, any and all DNA samples, profiles, etc. were poisonous fruits obtained in violation of the protections afforded the Defendant by the constitutions of both the United States and this Commonwealth.'
Prosecutors have accused Mangione of shooting Thompson in front of the Hilton in Midtown Manhattan on the morning of Dec. 4, 2024, in a 'frightening, well-planned, targeted' killing. He has pleaded not guilty to state charges but is yet to enter a plea to federal charges.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawsuit filed in fatal police shooting of man cuffed in Albuquerque officer's vehicle
Lawsuit filed in fatal police shooting of man cuffed in Albuquerque officer's vehicle

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lawsuit filed in fatal police shooting of man cuffed in Albuquerque officer's vehicle

Jun. 11—The fatal shooting by Albuquerque police of Matthew "Solo" Garcia while he was handcuffed in the backseat of an officer's SUV in October prompted a tense protest outside the Central Avenue motel in the hours after the killing. Garcia's family on June 2 filed a lawsuit alleging that the Albuquerque Police Department and city officials failed to follow the law and their own policies throughout the encounter on Oct. 18, 2024. "We want our officers and our department — specifically APD — to comply with our constitution," said Taylor Smith, an attorney who filed the suit. "Had that been the case from the outset, I think we would have a drastically different situation, and probably not a wrongful death lawsuit," he said. The shooting occurred after APD and city officials arrived at the Tewa Lodge to enter apartments and evict tenants, the suit alleges. The action violated the state's Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act and city policies that regulate tenant evictions, it alleges. The lawsuit contends that officers had no right to enter Garcia's room at the Tewa Lodge on Central, just east of San Mateo, without a search warrant or to detain him without cause. It also alleges officers had ample time to search Garcia for a weapon after they cuffed him and placed him in a police vehicle. The 37-page lawsuit, filed last week in 2nd Judicial District Court, seeks undisclosed compensatory and punitive damages and costs. It names the city, APD Chief Harold Medina and three officers and others as defendants. Spokespersons for the city and APD declined Wednesday to respond to the lawsuit. "On APD's side, we will be prepared to respond to the allegations in court," APD spokesman Gilbert Gallegos said in a statement. Garcia had a loaded handgun on his person at the time he was placed into the police SUV. APD officials shared lapel video showing officers Precious Cadena and Zachary Earles firing 11 bullets through the open doors of the vehicle as a third officer wrested the gun from Garcia. "Another important aspect of this case is the fact that the officers were able to get the firearm from Mr. Garcia before they began to shoot him," Smith said. "And there was no communication between the officers when they removed the firearm." APD Chief Medina acknowledged at a news conference that Garcia was placed into the SUV without a pat-down search. An officer had put on gloves to perform a search when Garcia began banging his head against the vehicle, lapel video showed. Officers placed Garcia in the car "in an attempt to calm the situation down," Medina said. The lawsuit alleges that police had ample time to complete the pat-down search in the 40 minutes after Garcia was handcuffed but failed to do so. "It's a good amount of time in which they could have (searched Garcia) while he was being cooperative with officers," Smith said. The lawsuit also contends that the code enforcement operation police and city officials conducted violated city laws and policies and Garcia's constitutional rights. City officials intended to evict all the residents of the Tewa Lodge when they entered the property and began removing tenants from the units without warrants, it alleges. Throughout the interaction, officers "made clear that Mr. Garcia was not free to terminate the encounter and was not free to leave constituting a de facto arrest without reasonable suspicion or probable cause," the suit alleges. Smith said residents in hotel rooms have constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure. "You can't just summarily evict somebody because you believe there may be drugs on the property," he said. "You still have to go through the criminal process."

Lawsuit filed in fatal police shooting of man cuffed in Albuquerque officer's vehicle
Lawsuit filed in fatal police shooting of man cuffed in Albuquerque officer's vehicle

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lawsuit filed in fatal police shooting of man cuffed in Albuquerque officer's vehicle

Jun. 11—The fatal shooting by Albuquerque police of Matthew "Solo" Garcia while he was handcuffed in the backseat of an officer's SUV in October prompted a tense protest outside the Central Avenue motel in the hours after the killing. Garcia's family on June 2 filed a lawsuit alleging that the Albuquerque Police Department and city officials failed to follow the law and their own policies throughout the encounter on Oct. 18, 2024. "We want our officers and our department — specifically APD — to comply with our constitution," said Taylor Smith, an attorney who filed the suit. "Had that been the case from the outset, I think we would have a drastically different situation, and probably not a wrongful death lawsuit," he said. The shooting occurred after APD and city officials arrived at the Tewa Lodge to enter apartments and evict tenants, the suit alleges. The action violated the state's Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act and city policies that regulate tenant evictions, it alleges. The lawsuit contends that officers had no right to enter Garcia's room at the Tewa Lodge on Central, just east of San Mateo, without a search warrant or to detain him without cause. It also alleges officers had ample time to search Garcia for a weapon after they cuffed him and placed him in a police vehicle. The 37-page lawsuit, filed last week in 2nd Judicial District Court, seeks undisclosed compensatory and punitive damages and costs. It names the city, APD Chief Harold Medina and three officers and others as defendants. Spokespersons for the city and APD declined Wednesday to respond to the lawsuit. "On APD's side, we will be prepared to respond to the allegations in court," APD spokesman Gilbert Gallegos said in a statement. Garcia had a loaded handgun on his person at the time he was placed into the police SUV. APD officials shared lapel video showing officers Precious Cadena and Zachary Earles firing 11 bullets through the open doors of the vehicle as a third officer wrested the gun from Garcia. "Another important aspect of this case is the fact that the officers were able to get the firearm from Mr. Garcia before they began to shoot him," Smith said. "And there was no communication between the officers when they removed the firearm." APD Chief Medina acknowledged at a news conference that Garcia was placed into the SUV without a pat-down search. An officer had put on gloves to perform a search when Garcia began banging his head against the vehicle, lapel video showed. Officers placed Garcia in the car "in an attempt to calm the situation down," Medina said. The lawsuit alleges that police had ample time to complete the pat-down search in the 40 minutes after Garcia was handcuffed but failed to do so. "It's a good amount of time in which they could have (searched Garcia) while he was being cooperative with officers," Smith said. The lawsuit also contends that the code enforcement operation police and city officials conducted violated city laws and policies and Garcia's constitutional rights. City officials intended to evict all the residents of the Tewa Lodge when they entered the property and began removing tenants from the units without warrants, it alleges. Throughout the interaction, officers "made clear that Mr. Garcia was not free to terminate the encounter and was not free to leave constituting a de facto arrest without reasonable suspicion or probable cause," the suit alleges. Smith said residents in hotel rooms have constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure. "You can't just summarily evict somebody because you believe there may be drugs on the property," he said. "You still have to go through the criminal process."

APD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy' during anti-ICE protest
APD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy' during anti-ICE protest

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

APD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy' during anti-ICE protest

The Austin Police Department late Wednesday defended an officer's use of pepper spray during Monday's anti-deportation protest. A viral video posted to Reddit a day after the demonstration shows an Austin police officer pushing back a crowd of protesters while other officers forcibly arrested a protestor. The officer then deployed pepper spray into the scrum, dispersing the crowd. The video sparked a furor online with many commenters condemning the officer. Police Department spokeswoman Anna Sabana said the use of force incident was reported to the department's Force Review Unit, 'as is standard protocol.' But she said that 'early indication shows that it does fall within policy.' According to APD's use of force policy, pepper spray is used to 'disperse violent crowds or riots with (prior) supervisor approval.' The policy explicitly says pepper spray should not be deployed on non-violent crowds. 'As officers arrested the subjects that engaged in graffiti, the crowd closed in on them and pepper spray was used to disperse those that refused to move back after being ordered to back up,' Sabana said in a statement. 'During this time, several officers were hit by rocks that were thrown from the crowd of protestors.' Sabana did not say when the department would make a final determination. Local and state law enforcement deployed pepper spray and arrested over a dozen people during the downtown protest. The Austin chapter of the Party for Socialism and Liberation organized its 'ICE Out of Austin' protest in solidarity with Los Angeles' demonstrations against recent ICE raids. Austin Police Chief Davis had initially said on Tuesday morning that only the Texas Department of Public Safety deployed pepper spray, not APD. She later clarified that while APD did use pepper spray, the department did not use tear gas. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin police defends use of pepper spray during anti-ICE protest

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store