Luigi Mangione Claims Cops Used Dirty Tricks During McDonald's Arrest
Cops pulled a number of dirty tricks on Luigi Mangione during their first encounter with him at a McDonald's in Pennsylvania and later at a local police station, the 26-year-old's lawyer claimed in new court filings this week.
The purportedly illegal tactics included tricking him into accepting a snack to obtain his DNA and seizing his bag at a McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania as a pretext to rummage through his belongings.
The actions violated protections afforded to Mangione under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, lawyer Thomas Dickey alleged in the documents.
Mangione is accused of carrying out the high-profile murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Manhattan last December.
He faces charges in Pennsylvania including possessing an unlicensed firearm, forgery and providing false identification to police. Mangione is facing trial in New York first, however, on separate charges in both federal and state courts, including homicide and terrorism.
One of the federal charges, murder through use of a firearm, means Mangione could face the death penalty if convicted.
Dickey claimed cops formed 'a human law enforcement wall' at the Altoona McDonald's where Mangione was spotted, questioned and eventually arrested—though they did not have a legal basis to seize his belongings: a backpack, plastic bag, and other items.
'Prior to this stop, arrest, seizure and/or detention of the Defendant, the APD Officers had no articulable facts and observed no criminal conduct on the part of the Defendant, nor any other evidence indicating that any criminal activity was afoot,' the document states. 'Accordingly, APD lacked reasonable suspicion to engage in this activity. At no time did the Defendant exhibit any threatening gesture or show of force. These actions by APD, were in violation of the protections afforded to the Defendant under the Fourth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and under Article 1, Section 8, of the Pennsylvania Constitution.'
'Other than the anonymous 911 call, the APD had no independent corroborating evidence that the Defendant was in fact the suspect sought in New York, prior to, or at the time of their stop and/or the investigatory detention of the Defendant.'
In the 36-page document, Dickey writes, 'Any purported identification of the Defendant as the person wanted in New York was speculative and based on a hunch,' and describes actions by APD officers and other law enforcement personnel, as 'coercive.'
Dickey said the discovery of numerous items were illegal and should be removed from the case, including a computer chip, a clip containing bullets which was wrapped up in some undergarments, 9mm handgun with printed lower receiver, mechanized upper receiver, suspected 3D printed suppressor, and a red notebook. Multiple hand written notes were also seized.
'The Altoona Police Department illegally seized a notebook which allegedly contained numerous personal writings covering a plethora of personal experiences of the Defendant,' the filing notes. 'A member of the Altoona Police Department improperly, and without justification, labeled these writings and/or notebook as 'Manifesto'. The use of this characterization of the Defendants alleged personal experiences and writings is incorrect, improper, and without justification and has no probative value.
The document says Mangione believes 'that this characterization was done so solely for the purpose to prejudice the Defendant and put him in a negative light before the public; all in an effort to prejudice any potential jury pool.'
Later, at the police station, cops provided snacks to an unwitting Mangione.
'While illegally seized, arrested, and detained, the Defendant was provided food and soda while at the Altoona Police Department Station,' the document states.
'The purposes for the same, was to obtain DNA from the Defendant for further investigative purposes. Insofar as the Defendants detention was illegal for reasons set forth, infra, any and all DNA samples, profiles, etc. were poisonous fruits obtained in violation of the protections afforded the Defendant by the constitutions of both the United States and this Commonwealth.'
Prosecutors have accused Mangione of shooting Thompson in front of the Hilton in Midtown Manhattan on the morning of Dec. 4, 2024, in a 'frightening, well-planned, targeted' killing. He has pleaded not guilty to state charges but is yet to enter a plea to federal charges.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
APD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy' during anti-ICE protest
The Austin Police Department late Wednesday defended an officer's use of pepper spray during Monday's anti-deportation protest. A viral video posted to Reddit a day after the demonstration shows an Austin police officer pushing back a crowd of protesters while other officers forcibly arrested a protestor. The officer then deployed pepper spray into the scrum, dispersing the crowd. The video sparked a furor online with many commenters condemning the officer. Police Department spokeswoman Anna Sabana said the use of force incident was reported to the department's Force Review Unit, 'as is standard protocol.' But she said that 'early indication shows that it does fall within policy.' According to APD's use of force policy, pepper spray is used to 'disperse violent crowds or riots with (prior) supervisor approval.' The policy explicitly says pepper spray should not be deployed on non-violent crowds. 'As officers arrested the subjects that engaged in graffiti, the crowd closed in on them and pepper spray was used to disperse those that refused to move back after being ordered to back up,' Sabana said in a statement. 'During this time, several officers were hit by rocks that were thrown from the crowd of protestors.' Sabana did not say when the department would make a final determination. Local and state law enforcement deployed pepper spray and arrested over a dozen people during the downtown protest. The Austin chapter of the Party for Socialism and Liberation organized its 'ICE Out of Austin' protest in solidarity with Los Angeles' demonstrations against recent ICE raids. Austin Police Chief Davis had initially said on Tuesday morning that only the Texas Department of Public Safety deployed pepper spray, not APD. She later clarified that while APD did use pepper spray, the department did not use tear gas. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin police defends use of pepper spray during anti-ICE protest
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Austin PD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy'
The Austin Police Department late Wednesday defended an officer's use of pepper spray during Monday's anti-deportation protest. A viral video posted to Reddit a day after the demonstration shows an Austin police officer pushing back a crowd of protesters while other officers forcibly arrested a protestor. The officer then deployed pepper spray into the scrum, dispersing the crowd. The video sparked a furor online with many commenters condemning the officer. Police Department spokeswoman Anna Sabana said the use of force incident was reported to the department's Force Review Unit, 'as is standard protocol.' But she said that 'early indication shows that it does fall within policy.' According to APD's use of force policy, pepper spray is used to 'disperse violent crowds or riots with (prior) supervisor approval.' The policy explicitly says pepper spray should not be deployed on non-violent crowds. 'As officers arrested the subjects that engaged in graffiti, the crowd closed in on them and pepper spray was used to disperse those that refused to move back after being ordered to back up,' Sabana said in a statement. 'During this time, several officers were hit by rocks that were thrown from the crowd of protestors.' Sabana did not say when the department would make a final determination. Local and state law enforcement deployed pepper spray and arrested over a dozen people during the downtown protest. The Austin chapter of the Party for Socialism and Liberation organized its 'ICE Out of Austin' protest in solidarity with Los Angeles' demonstrations against recent ICE raids. Austin Police Chief Davis had initially said on Tuesday morning that only the Texas Department of Public Safety deployed pepper spray, not APD. She later clarified that while APD did use pepper spray, the department did not use tear gas. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin PD defends officer's pepper spray use during anti-ICE protest
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aspen Police Department Warns Kids Having Fun Is a Crime
"When you see this, do you think it's just fun? Or do you think that it's illegal? It is definitely the latter. Whether it's fun or not." This is the beginning of a Facebook post by Colorado's Aspen Police Department (APD). What is this possibly fun but definitely illegal activity? The post includes a photo that shows two children on a bike—one child sitting on the seat and the other on the first rider's lap—riding on a sidewalk. "Colorado law says that two-up riding on a single seat bike is against the law, and of course, bikes are not allowed on sidewalks," the post continues. "These 'Sidewalk Sallys' could potentially hurt themselves or others." (If you had to Google "Sidewalk Sally" you are not alone, as it's not a real term. A daytime talk show seems to have coined and used it once, unrelated to riding a bike on a sidewalk.) The APD post goes on to inform Aspen's citizens that this behavior could result in a "ticket or a trip to the emergency room," both of which seem like rather dramatic consequences for an activity that has been popular since the invention of bikes. The tone-deaf post is signed "The Aspen Police Department—protecting the Wild West on two wheels since the 1880s," which seems to inadvertently imply that APD officers get around exclusively on bikes. The post has garnered over 300 comments—far more than the department's other posts—most of which are not thankful for the Department's caution and concern: "Tell me you don't have real crimes in Aspen without telling me you don't have real crimes." "'Kids never go outside anymore!' Proceeds to police every single thing kids do." "Lol yes. Our children should really be playing IN the traffic. Not away from it. Got it." (That one really resonated. My mom made me ride on the sidewalks, so it's not obvious to all of us that biking on the sidewalk is a crime.) Many of the comments were very libertarian-toned, naturally: "So basically every kid since the bicycle was invented has broken the law!" "Find a crime to deal with or reduce your force." "The more laws you make, the more police you have to hire to enforce new laws, the more police you hire to enforce those new laws, the more criminals you make. This pattern doesn't stop one day. It keeps growing." Several commenters asked if the page was satire, while one dealt a devastating blow: "Colorado used to be cool." Despite this, in 2022, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed the Reasonable Independence for Children law, clarifying that "a child is not neglected when allowed to participate in certain independent activities that a reasonable and prudent parent, guardian, or legal custodian would consider safe given the child's maturity, condition, and abilities." Utah passed the first such law in 2018 and has since been joined by Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, Virginia, Illinois, Connecticut, and Montana. This year alone, Georgia and Missouri also passed similar legislation, with Florida expected to follow soon. Let Grow, the nonprofit I run, supported all of these laws and continues to work with broad coalitions to see legislative protections for childhood independence enacted. No child should be treated like a criminal for riding a bike with a friend. And no police department should be proud of doing so. Facebook commenters know this. Hopefully, the APD will catch up soon. The post Aspen Police Department Warns Kids Having Fun Is a Crime appeared first on