logo
Washington raising price of Discover Pass

Washington raising price of Discover Pass

Yahoo20-05-2025

The Brief
Starting October 1, 2025, Washington's annual Discover Pass fee will increase from $30 to $45 to help fund state parks, marking the first price hike since its introduction in 2011.
The parks commission anticipates funding 71% of state parks through earned revenue in the next biennium, and the new law will also remove fee exemptions for disabled veterans.
OLYMPIA, Wash. - Get those credit cards out, hikers — Washington is raising the price of its annual Discover Pass.
Starting Oct. 1, 2025, the annual Discover Pass will increase from a one-time fee of $30 to $45. This marks the first price hike for the pass since they were introduced in 2011, and was signed into law by Gov. Bob Ferguson.
The Discover Pass is an annual pass for your car, allowing you to park at state parks and lands, with the funds aimed at maintaining trails, staffing and park amenities. They were first signed into law when the Legislature determined that federal funding for state parks was drying up.
What they're saying
Washington State Parks says the $30 price has stayed in effect for too long, remaining at that price even through periods of high inflation. Additionally, the state's $77.9 billion budget plugged a major deficit, which they say left little room for appropriations for their agency.
The parks commission estimates that during the next biennium, they will have to fund 71% of their state parks through earned revenue, up from 65% in the current biennium.
Lastly, the new law no longer exempts disabled veterans from certain reservation transaction fees, but this also does not go into effect until Oct. 1, 2025. You can learn more on the Discover Pass website.
The Source
Information in this story comes from Washington State Parks.
Viral TikTok warns women of convicted rapist released in Seattle
Over 100 Rite Aid and Bartell Drugs stores to close, including 8 in WA
Seattle Seahawks 2025 schedule released, here are all 17 matchups
Marymoor Park announces 2025 summer concert series lineup in Redmond, WA
Viral TikTok captures truck break-in after Seattle Mariners game, despite police presence
Bryan Kohberger back in court for pretrial hearing in Idaho students murder case
'Scared of accountability': Crowd calls out West Seattle leaders at public safety meeting
FBI nabs Thurston County, WA fugitive hundreds of miles from crime scene
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Effort to restrict Maine police from carrying out federal immigration enforcement splits lawmakers
Effort to restrict Maine police from carrying out federal immigration enforcement splits lawmakers

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Effort to restrict Maine police from carrying out federal immigration enforcement splits lawmakers

Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrest a fugitive in 2020. (Photo via U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) A narrow majority of the Judiciary Committee recommended on Monday that the Legislature pass a bill to restrict local authorities from carrying out federal immigration enforcement. LD 1971 would place restrictions on enforcement activities absent formal agreements with federal authorities, and the version advanced was amended to clarify what would and would not be permitted under the bill as a means to address pushback from police groups. The vote was 7-6, with Passamaquoddy Tribal Rep. Aaron Dana absent. Those opposed — the Republicans on the committee and Democratic Rep. Dani O'Halloran of Brewer — raised objections, both to the bill's substance as well as the decision to take the vote on Monday. The vote came amid growing scrutiny of local law enforcement collaboration with federal immigration authorities and followed days of protests over the Trump administration's workplace raids in Los Angeles with residents and activists facing off with local and federal officers. Rep. Rachel Henderson (R-Rumford), who voted against the measure, said the bill would 'effectively turn Maine into a 'sanctuary state,'' and argued, 'we're actively seeing on a national level how that's playing out currently in California.' President Donald Trump has since deployed the National Guard to the protests, the first time a president has activated a state's National Guard since 1965 without a request from a governor — something Gov. Janet Mills and other Democratic governors condemned in a joint statement. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is now suing Trump over the deployment. Others on the committee asked for more time to consider the bill. Sen. David Haggan (R-Penobscot) requested another work session, but committee co-chair Sen. Anne Carney (D-Cumberland) said that the committee is already working past deadline. Rep. Jennifer Poirier (R-Skowhegan) also tried to push for more time by requesting the bill be carried over into next year, which is what the committee decided to do last week with a related proposal. The committee carried over LD 1259, which would explicitly prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from entering into contracts with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Participation in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's 287(g) program has grown across the country after President Donald Trump revived it to bolster ICE's capacity by deputizing local police officers to detain immigrants, an authority otherwise generally reserved to federal authorities. The program was discontinued in 2012 due to the discovery of discriminatory practices such as racial profiling. Wells Police Department is the only Maine agency that has opted to join. However, Wells paused its agreement to see if the Legislature votes to ban such contracts. The committee also voted down a competing plan, LD 1656, which would prevent local agencies from adopting any policies that restrict them from assisting in the enforcement of federal immigration law. Rep. Elizabeth Caruso (R-Caratunk) requested more time to hear from law enforcement on the latest changes to the bill. A few additional tweaks were made since last week when Auburn Police Chief Jason Moen, who is president of the Maine Chiefs of Police Association, said an earlier amendment assuaged his concerns 'to some extent.' The overarching concern from law enforcement has been about the bill hindering federal task forces that are not primarily for immigration enforcement but sometimes touch on some immigration issues, such as drug enforcement partnerships. Michael Kebede, policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Maine, said the version that passed on Monday was crafted to explicitly address those concerns but that law enforcement did not have a hand in drafting the amendment. 'I just don't feel like this is doing our due diligence,' Caruso said. But Rep. Adam Lee (D-Auburn) said, 'Respectfully, I couldn't disagree more.' Regarding the latest changes, he said, 'We've protected the one thing we've heard from the chiefs of police that is a problem.' The amended version clarifies that the legislation doesn't prohibit state or local law enforcement from conducting investigative and enforcement duties as part of a joint law enforcement task force,as long as its primary purpose is not immigration enforcement. Further, it removed provisions that would have prohibited state and local law enforcement agencies from providing office space for immigration authorities and prohibited state employees from inquiring about a person's immigration status unless necessary to determine service eligibility or ordered by law. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Many people to blame for Layla Ramos' death, but the shooter isn't one
Many people to blame for Layla Ramos' death, but the shooter isn't one

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Many people to blame for Layla Ramos' death, but the shooter isn't one

Contrary to what you may have read, there were two victims this week when a 5-year-old Phoenix girl was shot and killed in her south Phoenix home. Layla Ramos is dead, but she is not the only victim here. Her 9-year-old brother, who Phoenix police say fired the bullet that killed her, also is a victim — one who will have to live with this week's tragedy for the rest of his life. Of course, it wasn't his fault. It was the fault of his father, Irvin Ramos-Jimenez, 33, who shouldn't have even had a rifle, much less stored it in his son's bedroom. It was the fault — though not legally — of whomever sold him the AR-15-style rifle. In Arizona, you can sell your gun privately to any Tom, Dick or dirty Harry, no questions asked. And it's the fault of the Arizona Legislature, which refuses to pass a bill requiring universal background checks. Had the previous gun owner been required to check, he presumably would have learned that he was selling his rifle to a man who can't legally possess one. According to court records, Ramos-Jimenez, 33, told police he has a prior felony drug conviction for narcotics and can't legally possess a firearm. So, he bought one anyway through a private sale, for 'personal protection.' Then he stored it in his 9-year-old son's bedroom closet. Court records say he also had a handgun in his truck. Ramos-Jiminez was arrested after the June 3 death of his daughter, on suspicion of possession of a weapon by a prohibited person. Let me count the ways our leaders could at least attempt to avoid such tragedy in the future. They could pass a bill requiring that every gun sale in Arizona be preceded by a background check, to determine whether the purchaser is legally allowed to own a firearm. They could pass a bill holding a seller liable if he or she doesn't do that background check and a little girl dies. They could pass a bill requiring gun owners to store their weapons responsibly, so that 9-year-old boys can't gain easy access and kill their sisters. So, what will the Arizona Legislature do to try to avoid the tragedy of another 5-year-old being put into a far-too-early grave? Or a 9-year-old put into what likely will be a self-imposed lifelong purgatory? Absolutely nothing. Reach Roberts at Follow her on X (formerly Twitter) at @LaurieRobertsaz, on Threads at @LaurieRobertsaz and on BlueSky at @ Subscribe to today. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Phoenix shooting is no fault of the boy with the gun | Opinion

New WA agency investigating police deadly force incidents sees budget cuts
New WA agency investigating police deadly force incidents sees budget cuts

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New WA agency investigating police deadly force incidents sees budget cuts

This screenshot from Kitsap County Sheriff's Office body camera footage shows the moments before law enforcement killed Justin Moegling near Poulsbo last month. (Kitsap County Sheriff's Office) The night of May 7 was a challenge for Washington's nascent agency tasked with investigating when police kill people. The new state Office of Independent Investigations started looking into such cases in December. But only in a swath of western Washington, stretching from the northwestern edge of the Olympic Peninsula to Clark and Skamania counties on the border with Oregon. Lawmakers established the office as an alternative to cops investigating when other cops use deadly force. Around 9 p.m. May 7 near Poulsbo, officers from the local police department and Kitsap County sheriff's deputies tried to subdue a man who had a knife after a traffic stop, the Office of Independent Investigations later reported. Unable to get Justin Moegling, 41, into custody, a Poulsbo officer and Kitsap County deputy reportedly shot him in the head. The state agency sent 15 investigators to the scene. Minutes before midnight in Ridgefield, a Clark County deputy stabbed Marc Fogle, 54, who was held on suspicion of driving under the influence, after he allegedly tried to steal the deputy's gun, investigators say. Fogle died from his injuries. The agency had to reroute a few investigators from Poulsbo to Ridgefield, more than 150 miles away. Others had to come from as far as Spokane to respond. These are two of the four cases the investigative office has responded to in the past seven months. Elsewhere in Washington, teams made up of local detectives from multiple police departments are the ones investigating after officers kill someone. Creation of the state office was driven by the increased push for police accountability in cases where officers use deadly force, especially against Black people, after the deaths of George Floyd in Minnesota and Manuel Ellis in Tacoma. Now, supporters of the agency say budget cuts passed by the Legislature and signed into law by Gov. Bob Ferguson last month could threaten the fledgling office's momentum. It took years to get off the ground before December's launch, having to hire new staff, develop policies and conduct training from scratch. Last month, investigators issued their first report, on a fatal police shooting in Vancouver that came just a few days after the office opened. The office's director, Roger Rogoff, still expects to expand the office's reach to another of its half-dozen regions this year. Where exactly that'll be remains to be seen. The more dense King and Pierce counties are each considered their own 'region.' Still, community advocates worry about the cuts. Nickeia Hunter, whose brother was killed by police, said it 'sends the wrong message' to scale back funding for an agency created in light of 'decades of injustice and erasure.' 'While I'm glad to hear Director Rogoff still intends to expand into another region, the reality is that underfunding accountability infrastructure directly undermines trust — especially in communities that have been historically harmed by law enforcement,' Hunter said in an email. Coming into 2025, the Office of Independent Investigations asked the governor and Legislature for more than $53 million in the next two-year budget. This would've been a hike of 40% from its current state funding, mostly focused on increasing staffing. A lack of investigators, especially east of the Cascades, is the biggest issue standing in the agency's way of expanding more quickly. 'It is wholly dependent on us having sufficient resources available,' Rogoff said, noting legislators had previously underestimated how many investigators the office would need. The money would've paid for hiring an additional 30 investigators over the next two years. Instead, lawmakers slashed the office's budget by more than 20%, to a biennial total under $30 million, in the face of a multibillion-dollar budget shortfall that forced a range of cuts. 'I worry about our special needs kids in our schools, I worry about food insecurity, I worry about our immigrant community,' said Sen. Manka Dhingra, a Redmond Democrat and chair of the Senate Law and Justice Committee. 'These are the cuts that were felt all across state government.' Part of the cut to the Office of Independent Investigations' budget was driven by several million dollars the agency hadn't spent that lawmakers had previously approved, said Dhingra, who worked with Rogoff at the King County prosecutor's office. Rogoff is thankful the Legislature didn't chop even more funding. And he's proud of his team's work so far. 'We've hired 63 people in two and a half years, and the level of efficiency and talent and work done in these investigations is pretty phenomenal,' said Rogoff, a former King County judge and prosecutor. Hires include investigators, liaisons for the families of victims, and others. Rogoff wishes the agency was already working statewide. But he promised not to put staff in a position where they're investigating cases without the proper training and resources. 'I will continue to abide by that promise,' he said. 'I think that doing these investigations badly is the worst thing that could happen to this agency.' He's confident lawmakers will eventually give his office the money needed for the additional hiring. In the Vancouver shooting, the Clark County prosecutor is currently reviewing the evidence behind the state office's 99-page report before deciding whether to charge the officer involved. Anna Klein, the chief criminal deputy prosecutor in Clark County, said her office hopes to reach a conclusion in the 'near future.' For years, progressive Democrats have wanted to establish an independent prosecutor to make those choices, given how closely county prosecutors work with local law enforcement. But they've repeatedly failed in that goal, a top priority for police accountability advocates like Hunter. Many of the agency's investigators come from law enforcement backgrounds. If candidates have had a policing job within two years, they have to get approval from the office's advisory board. Beyond the inquiries into new cases, those investigators are also tasked with looking at old instances where police used deadly force and new evidence has been discovered. Members of the public can submit review requests online. The agency has taken up nine such cases, from places ranging from Poulsbo to Yakima to Snohomish County. None have been completed. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store