AA calls for transparency about fuel price calculations, criticises fuel levy increase
The Automobile Association (AA) has raised concerns following Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's announcement of an increase to the General Fuel Levy (GFL). The association has, among other things, called for transparency about how fuel prices are calculated in South Africa.
The increase of 16 cents per litre for petrol and 15 cents per litre for diesel – will take effect from June 4.This is the first increase to the GFL in three years.
According to the minister, it is the only new tax proposal for the 2025/26 financial year, citing inflationary pressures as the main reason.
The AA cautioned the repeated turning to fuel levies to cover budget shortfalls is not sustainable, particularly when there is limited transparency about how the money is spent.
The association renewed its call for a full review of South Africa's fuel pricing system. It is calling for:
• A forensic audit of revenue from the GFL and Road Accident Fund (RAF) levy
• Transparency on how the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) calculates fuel prices
• Public engagement with civil society, labour and the transport sector
• Consideration of alternative funding models that reduce the reliance on fuel levies
The AA warned the increase would have far-reaching consequences for consumers and the broader economy.
'Fuel is a key input cost across all sectors. When fuel prices go up, transport and operational costs rise, which increases the price of goods and services,' the AA said in a statement.
The entity added the levy increase comes when South Africans already face high food prices, steep electricity tariffs, elevated interest rates and persistent unemployment.
Lower-income households, which spend the larger portion of their income on transport, are expected to be the hardest hit.
With the new increase, the combined GFL and RAF levy will exceed R6 per litre in some regions. This will account for more than 30% of the pump price, even before adding the base fuel cost, distribution fees and retail markup.
The AA said while the increase appears insignificant, it contributes to a growing financial burden on motorists, transportation-dependent businesses and industries.
It believes South Africa must start a broader conversation on how to fund roads, public transport and infrastructure without placing the burden solely on drivers.
'The AA is ready to work with government and stakeholders to find fair, transparent and sustainable solutions that benefit both the economy and the people who drive it,' the association said.
Read original story on www.citizen.co.za
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
18 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Two law firms get lion's share of RAF's R103m legal services spend
A disproportionately high 84%. Scopa wants to know why. Scopa chair Songezo Zibi was unimpressed that Scopa had to ask three times before the RAF supplied information about the top 10 law firms it uses. Picture: Michel Bega/ The Citizen The Road Accident Fund (RAF) paid 84% of the total R103.1 million it spent on corporate legal services in its 2024 financial year to Malatji & Co Attorneys Inc and Maponya Ledwaba Attorneys – just two of the 43 legal firms on its panel. Malatji & Co was paid R55.87 million by the RAF in 2024 and Maponya Ledwaba R30.75 million. The RAF revealed this in a presentation to Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) last week. These two law firms were also paid the bulk of the amount the fund spent on legal services in the RAF's 2023 financial year, with Malatji & Co paid R15.25 million and Mopanya Ledwaba R14.86 million of the RAF's total corporate legal services bill of R34.26 million that year. Zibi said Malatji & Co in particular received 'an incredibly disproportionate portion of the work allocated by the RAF'. Source: RAF presentation to Scopa, 28 May 2025 This information was initially not made available to Scopa and was only provided after committee chair Songezo Zibi complained that it had twice requested information about the top 10 law firms that received briefs from the RAF and accused the fund of deliberately withholding this information from the committee for improper reasons. ALSO READ: RAF CEO placed on special leave with full pay, as MPs grill fund Law firm selection Acting RAF CEO Phathutshedzo Lukhwareni said a panel of 43 law firms was appointed by the RAF in December 2023 but only 19 were briefed and paid during the 2023 and 2024 financial years 'at the time of preparing the report [presentation]'. Lukhwareni said the RAF has a panel of law firms and the selection takes place depending on the complexity of the matter. Scopa member David Skosana of the ANC asked what criteria is used to allocate briefs among the 43 law firms, why only 19 firms had been briefed and paid, and what measures are in place to ensure cost effectiveness and equitable distribution of work among the firms on the panel. Scopa member Mark Burke of the DA said Maponya Ledwaba Attorneys was extracting R30 million a year from the RAF but 'has got one director, three senior associates and an associate as a secretary and an admin clerk'. 'Does that seem right? Does it seem reasonable that a firm with that staff cohort could be extracting that value and delivering value?' asked Burke. Lukhwareni said some of those disbursements were for counsel fees and the cost is determined by the complexity of the matters they have handled and, if the matter is prolonged for a number of years and goes all the way to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) for instance, the cost will obviously be significant. He said repeat briefings are determined by the successes the law firm have registered in the previous cases but declined to comment on the size of Maponya Ledwaba Attorneys because he is not privy to this information. 'To the extent that they [the two law firms] are in the panel and are competent to be in the panel, I don't see any unreasonability in that,' he said. ALSO READ: RAF needs a Settlement Hub for crash victims – expert The 'complex' cases Mampe Kumalo, who was referred to by Lukhwareni as the RAF's head of legal but is the fund's chief governance officer, said the complex cases these firms had or were handling include the Discovery Health, South African Revenue Service (Sars) and Auditor-General matters. The Discovery Health matters relate to various applications it launched against the RAF linked to the failure of the fund to pay the past medical expenses of claimants. The Sars matter involved an application to stop and prevent the tax collection authority from deducting R5.1 billion – or any part of this amount from the RAF levies it collects – to pay Eskom in terms of a settlement agreement between Sars and the power utility. ALSO READ: R25.5 billion deficit over five years — Can RAF afford to pay out claims? Repeat business despite repeated failure Zibi requested Kumalo to provide Scopa with a detailed breakdown by the close of business on Thursday of the fees paid to the two firms, including attorney fees, party-party costs, the cost of counsel and punitive costs orders against the RAF. 'The reason I want this is that you have persistently been clobbered on the AG matter by a law firm you continue to pay and see absolutely no reason to seek another law firm,' he said. Deputy Minister of Transport Mkhuleko Hlengwa said they must not be ignorant to the fundamental risk which prevails at the RAF because of the lawyers. 'The abuse of the system and the leakages of the money not reaching claimants in part is a result of the construct of the RAF. 'Why are we spending so much money on legal fees?,' he asked. 'We should be spending it on claimants because the whole system is fundamentally structured in a way which is problematic, hence the bill that we will be bringing … to parliament.' ALSO READ: RAF national crisis demands urgent action – expert Malatji responds Approached for comment about how the firm was able to receive such high fees from the RAF and if it has had any engagements with the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), Tebogo Malatji – MD of Malatji & Co Attorneys – told Moneyweb the firm has no way of knowing how the RAF decides to appoint attorneys on matters and what criteria it uses to do so. 'We are thus unable to tender the explanation you seek and suggest that you direct the question to the RAF. As the two directors primarily responsible for the servicing [of] the RAF, I have 31 years practice experience and Ms Sunelle Eloff, 24 years,' he said. 'We have personal injury law experience from the time that we started practice, have acted for the RAF for the most part of our practice lifespan and are therefore experts in the field. 'We are also one of the leading public law specialist firms in the country. 'We can only but speculate that the reasons the RAF instructed us in each instance that they did must have something to do with our years of experience, expertise and suitability for the matter at hand,' said Malatji. 'We have acted for the RAF in several of their most complex matters assisted by senior and junior counsel from the Bar and that accounts for the high value of payments to our firm displayed. 'Moreover, the figures displayed at Scopa as being payments to our firm consist primarily of counsel/advocates and other disbursements and to a lesser extent fees to our firm,' he added 'Until we are confronted with the actual number of instructions issued by RAF to its panel attorneys, we do not accept your assumption that it is our firm that allegedly received a disproportionate number of instructions.' Malatji added that the SIU has not engaged the firm on this issue. Maponya Ledwaba Attorneys has not responded to a Moneyweb request for comment on these same issues. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
IOL News
23 minutes ago
- IOL News
The hidden costs of SA's gambling crisis
In March, an online betting platform shared a story of someone turning a R4 wager into an astounding R83,701.54. While stories like this grab attention, the rise in online sports betting also brings important considerations. South Africans place more than R1 trillion in bets annually, with R700 billion spent on sports betting alone. For many, particularly those with limited financial resources, the appeal of a big win can be incredibly tempting. However, the reality is often more complex. Instead of earning easy money, those who indulge in excessive gambling frequently face financial strain, said John Manyike, Head of Financial Education at Old Mutual. According to the National Gambling Board's 2022/23 gambling statistics, sports betting in South Africa has expanded significantly over the past decade, growing from under 10% of the gambling sector in 2009/10 to over half in 2022/23. 'What stands out is that 36% of those who gamble do so to pay off debts or cover expenses,' explained Manyike, referring to the 2024 Old Mutual Savings and Investment Monitor. Among low-income earners (those earning between R8,000 and R15,000 per month), this figure rises to 41%, highlighting a concerning trend. Despite rising costs of living and economic pressures, gambling has gained popularity, particularly due to the widespread use of mobile phones and internet access. This is especially evident among young African men. Advertising from betting companies further fuels this trend, increasing participation within this demographic. 'This can be risky, particularly for young people and low-income earners, who may see gambling as a way to improve their financial situation,' says Manyike. However, he notes that losses can add up quickly, sometimes leading to financial stress. 'In a country already facing high unemployment and economic challenges, it's important to be aware of the potential financial pitfalls of gambling.' Unlike investing, gambling is based purely on luck, yet many believe they can develop a winning approach. The truth is that the house edge ensures that bookmakers maintain a profit over time. For instance, when odds are at -110 on both sides of a bet, a bettor must risk R110 to win R100, meaning even skilled bettors face a statistical disadvantage in the long run. The belief that that the system can be beaten can lead to risky financial decisions. 'Beyond financial losses, gambling can also take a psychological toll,' said Manyike. 'It can lead to stress, anxiety, and even a cycle of chasing previous bets in the hope of recovering losses.' A 2016 study by the University of Cape Town's Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health noted a significant association between suicidality and pathological gambling. It found that pathological gamblers were five to ten times more likely to have a history of suicide attempts than non-gamblers. Furthermore, gambling doesn't just affect individuals—it can have ripple effects on families, sometimes resulting in financial strain for loved ones. 'While gambling is legal many people don't fully understand the long-term risks involved due to a lack of financial education.' For those who feel their gambling habits might be affecting their financial well-being, Manyike advises seeking support. 'The South African Responsible Gambling Foundation offers free and confidential counselling services,' he added. Additionally, professional counsellors who specialise in gambling addiction can provide guidance. 'Gambling is not a reliable source of income, and without careful management, it can lead to serious financial setbacks. By increasing financial awareness and promoting responsible gambling, we can help people make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary financial risks,' Manyike concluded.
IOL News
34 minutes ago
- IOL News
Here's what you're likely to pay for petrol and diesel from Wednesday, June 04
Petrol and diesel prices are likely to decrease marginally in June. Fuel taxes are set to increase for the first time in three years, but thankfully a stronger rand will shield South African motorists from fuel price hikes in June. The next fuel price adjustment will take place on Wednesday, June 04, and unaudited month-end data from the Central Energy Fund shows that minor price decreases are likely for both petrol and diesel. Petrol was looking set for a decrease of around 20 cents per litre, but with the 16 cent hike in the General Fuel Levy (GFL) set to take effect from Wednesday, a reduction of about four cents is on the cards. 93 Unleaded petrol currently costs R21.29 for a litre in Gauteng, with 95 ULP retailing at R21.40 inland and R20.60 at the coast. Diesel, whose over-recovery for the month pointed to a 51 cent decrease, now looks set to come down by 36 cents following the 15 cent levy hike for that fuel type. A stronger rand outweighed marginally weaker international oil prices to create over-recoveries for both petrol and diesel. However, any further strengthening of oil prices in the coming months will lead to South Africans feeling the pinch of the heavy tax burden that fuel carries. The 2025 levy increase will see the total tax on petrol rising to R6.37, including the R2.18 Road Accident Fund levy. Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana raised the General Fuel Levy, and announced various government expenditure cuts, in his third Budget Speech that was proposed on May 21. These measures were aimed at financing the budget shortfall that resulted after the previously announced Value Added Tax (VAT) increase was cancelled, following considerable political pressure. On Thursday the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) launched an urgent court application to suspend the fuel levy increase. Unless the Western Cape High Court rules in their favour, June's fuel price relief will be muted to say the least. IOL
