The hidden costs of SA's gambling crisis
In March, an online betting platform shared a story of someone turning a R4 wager into an astounding R83,701.54. While stories like this grab attention, the rise in online sports betting also brings important considerations.
South Africans place more than R1 trillion in bets annually, with R700 billion spent on sports betting alone. For many, particularly those with limited financial resources, the appeal of a big win can be incredibly tempting. However, the reality is often more complex. Instead of earning easy money, those who indulge in excessive gambling frequently face financial strain, said John Manyike, Head of Financial Education at Old Mutual.
According to the National Gambling Board's 2022/23 gambling statistics, sports betting in South Africa has expanded significantly over the past decade, growing from under 10% of the gambling sector in 2009/10 to over half in 2022/23.
'What stands out is that 36% of those who gamble do so to pay off debts or cover expenses,' explained Manyike, referring to the 2024 Old Mutual Savings and Investment Monitor. Among low-income earners (those earning between R8,000 and R15,000 per month), this figure rises to 41%, highlighting a concerning trend.
Despite rising costs of living and economic pressures, gambling has gained popularity, particularly due to the widespread use of mobile phones and internet access. This is especially evident among young African men. Advertising from betting companies further fuels this trend, increasing participation within this demographic.
'This can be risky, particularly for young people and low-income earners, who may see gambling as a way to improve their financial situation,' says Manyike. However, he notes that losses can add up quickly, sometimes leading to financial stress. 'In a country already facing high unemployment and economic challenges, it's important to be aware of the potential financial pitfalls of gambling.'
Unlike investing, gambling is based purely on luck, yet many believe they can develop a winning approach. The truth is that the house edge ensures that bookmakers maintain a profit over time. For instance, when odds are at -110 on both sides of a bet, a bettor must risk R110 to win R100, meaning even skilled bettors face a statistical disadvantage in the long run.
The belief that that the system can be beaten can lead to risky financial decisions. 'Beyond financial losses, gambling can also take a psychological toll,' said Manyike. 'It can lead to stress, anxiety, and even a cycle of chasing previous bets in the hope of recovering losses.'
A 2016 study by the University of Cape Town's Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health noted a significant association between suicidality and pathological gambling. It found that pathological gamblers were five to ten times more likely to have a history of suicide attempts than non-gamblers.
Furthermore, gambling doesn't just affect individuals—it can have ripple effects on families, sometimes resulting in financial strain for loved ones. 'While gambling is legal many people don't fully understand the long-term risks involved due to a lack of financial education.'
For those who feel their gambling habits might be affecting their financial well-being, Manyike advises seeking support. 'The South African Responsible Gambling Foundation offers free and confidential counselling services,' he added. Additionally, professional counsellors who specialise in gambling addiction can provide guidance.
'Gambling is not a reliable source of income, and without careful management, it can lead to serious financial setbacks. By increasing financial awareness and promoting responsible gambling, we can help people make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary financial risks,' Manyike concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Mixed news at the pump: fuel levy rises while prices drop
The Western Cape High Court has dismissed the EFF's urgent bid to block a controversial fuel levy hike—just as fuel prices dip. From midnight, levies rise by 16c (petrol) and 15c (diesel), despite constitutional questions. It's a pump paradox: taxpayers pay more, but pump prices briefly fall. In a ruling handed down yesterday, Judge Nathan Erasmus found that the EFF's application lacked urgency and did not meet the legal threshold for interim relief. The court did not engage with the broader constitutional challenge itself, which the EFF had previously framed in its initial filing as a possible Part B of its legal strategy. A tax fight rooted in Budget 3.0 The levy increase was announced in Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's revised Budget 3.0, tabled in May following the political fallout and eventual withdrawal of VAT hikes in earlier budget versions. Treasury estimates the fuel levy will raise about R4-billion in the 2025/26 fiscal year. The EFF has argued that the use of Section 48(1) of the Customs and Excise Act to implement the fuel levy increase amounts to an unconstitutional bypassing of Parliament. Section 77 of the Constitution requires that all new taxes be passed via a money Bill through the National Assembly. Arguments on constitutional compliance Representing the EFF, Advocate Mfesane Ka-Siboto told the court: 'The fact that this has happened before does not make it lawful. Past practice is not a substitute for constitutional compliance.' He described the move as a case of 'taxation without representation.' The Treasury, represented by Advocate Kameel Premhid, countered that Section 48(1) had long been used lawfully to adjust fuel levy schedules. He argued the measure was an administrative amendment within an existing framework, not the introduction of a new tax requiring legislative approval. What this means for you For consumers, the fuel levy increase translates into higher petrol and diesel prices at the pump, effective immediately. This could lead to broader knock-on effects on transport costs, food prices and inflation, particularly for lower-income households who spend a greater share of their income on fuel-linked expenses. Treasury maintains the hike is necessary to address fiscal gaps left by the abandoned VAT proposal. The fuel levy increase will be offset by a decrease in fuel prices – which also kicks in on Wednesday, 4 June. The Department of Minerals and Petroleum Resources (DMPR) announced the following price decreases yesterday: Petrol 93 (ULP & LRP): ⬇️5cents/litre. Petrol 95 (ULP & LRP): ⬇️5 cents/litre. Diesel (0.05% sulphur): ⬇️ 36.9 cents/litre. Diesel (0.005% sulphur): ⬇️36.9 cents/litre. Commenting on the changes, the DMPR noted that over the last month, there has been a decrease in the average Brent Crude oil price from US$66.40 to US$63.95, largely on the back of continued global trade uncertainty, Parliament distances itself from the damage Parliament, which was cited in the court papers, but not the target of any relief, issued a brief statement after the judgment: 'Although cited in the application, no relief was sought against Parliament. Parliament's position throughout the proceedings was to abide by the outcome of the court process. Accordingly, Parliament will comply with the court's ruling.' Oversight loophole or legal mechanism? In its legal representations, Treasury has argued that Section 48(6) of the Act ensures Parliamentary oversight by requiring the amended tariff to be tabled after the fact. The EFF, however, contends this form of post-implementation tabling falls short of the constitutional threshold for public finance legislation. EFF's Part B remains unclear In a short statement on X after the ruling, the EFF said: 'We are committed to fighting the fuel levy increase in court and in Parliament.' However, the party did not explicitly confirm that it would pursue the Part B constitutional review. Whether the EFF returns to court or not, the broader legal and political debate over fiscal authority, oversight and the democratic control of taxation is likely to persist. DM
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
Discussing BBBEE redress policies effect on the economy
JOHANNESBURG - The critique of South Africa's so-called "racial policies" by the United States has again put BBEE in the spotlight. READ: Ramaphosa defends BEE policies in Parliament Broad-based economic empowerment measures were put in place to counter apartheid policies that disadvantaged different groups of South Africans through poorer education, a lack of promotion and confiscation of their assets and rights. Many have argued it's not working. An academic says that the complex problems affecting the country's economic growth cannot be reduced to policies aimed at redress. Dr Khwezi Mabasa, the Economic and Social Policy Lead at Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung South Africa, discussed this with eNCA.
The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
Sanlam pays out R6.62 billion in death and disease claims
Sanlam paid out 9.24% more than in 2023, with a sharp increase in cancer claims, while cardiovascular claims showed an uptick. Sanlam Risk and Savings has paid out R6.62 billion in 2024 for claims for deaths and diseases, with lifestyle-related conditions taking a growing toll. The statistics point to shifting health challenges facing South Africans today, evidenced by increases in claims for illnesses such as heart disease, certain cancers, musculoskeletal disorders and mental health concerns. Dr Marion Morkel, chief medical officer at Sanlam, says the increase in claims for diseases which have a good prognosis when detected early puts the spotlight on the importance of regular screenings and checks. 'The World Health Organisation recommends that annual health screenings and checks start in our thirties, and we urge South Africans to prioritise these as part of their yearly routine.' ALSO READ: Liberty pays out R600 million for two-pot retirement system in 2024 What the claims statistics show for deaths and diseases The claims statistics show that: R6.62 billion was paid across all claims, including R5.47 billion in death and funeral claims; R501.6 million in disability, loss of income and impairment claims and R650.3 million in severe illness and injury claims. Over the past six years, the group has paid out more than R36 billion in claims, with 2024 being one of the highest annual claim totals aside from the Covid-19 peak in 2021. Cancer accounted for 54% of all severe illness claims, up 30% in the number of cancer claims from 2023. Prostate cancer claims in men doubled, while breast cancer claims in women increased by 33%. Cardiovascular conditions made up 20% of death claims and 17% of disability claims. Sanlam paid more than 99% of all death claims. The highest claim was R36.2 million. Morkel says lifestyle diseases came through very strongly in the claims data, with cardiovascular disease and cancer the top two causes of death and disability. 'Cancer claims under the severe illness category increased by 30%, while prostate cancer claims doubled in men and breast cancer claims increased by 33% in women.' 'These increases, while concerning, are partly the result of the knock-on effect of the Covid-19 pandemic when proactive screenings were delayed for several years.' ALSO READ: How to ensure that your future life insurance claim is paid out Claims statistics also show increase in strokes among women She points out that this year's data also shows an increase in stroke and musculoskeletal disorders among women, including women in the younger age groups under the age of 50. 'While much of the data mirrors that of other countries, South Africa's high blood pressure rate is among the highest in the world, an early indicator of heart disease and stroke.' 'Regular screenings and self-checks, especially for breast cancer, are essential. For heart health, know your numbers: blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose and BMI. And once you reach your mid-40s to early 50s, make regular check-ups a priority.' The claims statistics also show: Disability claims skewed male, with 60% filed for men, compared to 40% for women. Sickness income claims had a higher representation of female clients (61% female vs 39% male), with 20% of total claims for women for being pregnancy and childbirth. Severe illness claims were relatively gender-balanced (52% female, 48% male), reinforcing the universal health risks across both genders. ALSO READ: Why trust is so important when it comes to life insurance Also many claims from younger people Rhoderic Nel, chief executive of Sanlam Risk and Savings, says currently about 24% of all living benefit claims are from clients younger than 35, with increases in income protection claims (up from 15% in 2022 to around 25% in 2024).' 'It is a sobering reminder that life-changing illness can strike at any age. Being financially prepared is not something to delay but something to start now.'
