
Forbes Recession Tracker: Goldman, JPMorgan Say Recession Incoming If Trump Doesn't Blink On Tariffs
Economists at the U.S.' largest banks warn the U.S. will likely tip into a recession as President Donald Trump's tariffs go into effect, reflecting the bloodbath on Wall Street over the last five days in response to the economic policies which threaten to bring higher inflation and far weaker economic growth.
P{resident Donald Trump speaks to reporters while in flight Sunday on Air Force One.
Goldman Sachs economists hiked their odds of a recession over the next year to 45% in a downbeat note to clients Sunday, far higher than the 20% probability they held in late March and cautioning that without any capitulation from Trump, their baseline economic forecast is for a recession.
Economists at JPMorgan, the U.S.' largest bank by assets and market capitalization, issued an even starker 60% recession odds in a scathing Friday note, labeling Trump's policies as the 'largest tax increase' since 1968 which will 'fall heavily on the US consumer.'
There's a growing chorus of economists warning about the prospect of Trump sending the U.S. into an avoidable downturn.
The UCLA Anderson School of Management published last month an official 'Recession Watch' for the first time in its 73 years of economic forecasts, as economist Clement Bohr issued a scathing assessment of Trump's economic policies, writing the Recession Watch 'serves as a warning to the current administration: Be careful what you wish for because, if all your wishes come true, you could very well be the author of a deep recession.'
A recession is 'entirely avoidable' if Trump's signature economic policies, including the most severe tariffs in nearly a century and the public sector's dismantling at the hands of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are 'pared back or phased in more gradually,' according to Bohr.
Moody's Analytics' chief economist Mark Zandi struck a similar chord in a March 19 interview on CNN's 'Early Start with Rahel Solomon,' saying it 'feels like we're being pushed into recession' by Trump.
Stock prices don't completely correlate with economic growth, but equity investors are clearly pricing in significantly increased odds of a down stretch for the U.S. economy. The S&P 500 dove into a 20% bear market earlier Monday, wiping out about $10 trillion in market value, led by stocks considered the most vulnerable to a slowdown, including artificial intelligence darling Nvidia and Elon Musk's Tesla.
Ahead of the 'Liberation Day' announcement last week, Trump braced Americans for a possible recession. In a Fox News interview aired March 9, he would not rule out the possibility of a recession, cautioning Americans for a period of economic 'transition' as his policies take hold and noting he's paying little attention to stock market losses. In subsequent media appearances, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent similarly declined to dismiss a potential recession and said the U.S. will go through a 'detox period.' Bessent told NBC's 'Meet the Press' in an interview he believes it 'would have been much healthier if someone had put the brakes' on ahead of the Great Recession. 'Be Strong, Courageous, and Patient, and GREATNESS will be the result!,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform Monday.
The technical definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative growth in gross domestic product, a comprehensive measure of all goods and services produced in a country. The official quarterly GDP stats haven't turned negative yet, but the Atlanta Federal Reserve's real-time model ignited concerns by calling for -1.8% annual GDP growth in 2025's first quarter, which would be the worst reading since 2020—though the estimate is likely skewed by its methodology, including how it accounts for a surge in gold imports.
Elsewhere in financial markets, a flight to government-issued debt is evidence of a thirst for safer returns in the face of a potential recession, as yields for benchmark 10-year Treasury bonds have dropped by more than 30 basis points over the past two months (lower yields mean bonds got more valuable). But the most common bond market signal of a recession, the inversion of the yield curve, in which longer-term bonds have lower yields than shorter-dated ones, has actually normalized in recent months. The New York Fed's bond-linked recession model calls for just 30% recession odds over the next year, down from the more than 70% odds in late 2023, a period which failed to materialize into a full-blown recession.
Perhaps the most concerning signal over the last is a breakdown in everyday Americans' conviction in the economy, as the Conference Baord's closely watched consumer confidence survey tumbled this month to its lowest level since 2021. That tracks with weaker spending, as February retail sales grew by just 0.2% from January to February, according to a report released March 17 by the Census Bureau, far worse than the 0.6% month-over-month increase projected by economists.
One of the most important hallmarks of the American economy, the labor market has shown some cracks in early 2025 as job creation slowed and layoffs spiked, but remains overwhelmingly strong, as March's 4.2% unemployment rate sits well within the healthy historic norm. A key labor market recession indicator, the Sahm rule, flashes a far lower likelihood of a recession than it did when it peaked last summer, inspiring a short-lived market selloff in August.
Trading in two of the world's most precious commodities certainly point to the prospect of a global recession. Gold prices are up more than 10% this year to a record $3,000 per troy ounce as investors flood into the historic safe haven asset, while prices for international benchmark Brent Crude sank this month to their lowest point since 2021 as traders braced for a potential global weakening in oil demand as economic activity slows.
Bessent and Trump have made clear they are lasered in on lowering interest rates, which are determined by the politically independent Fed. Typically, rates are only drastically cut during periods of economic distress, as lower rates typically stimulate economic growth as households and businesses are more likely to borrow with lower interest costs, though that uptick in loan activity can simultaneously lead to higher inflation as demand rises. The Fed is likely to hold off on further rate cuts 'until tariff policy becomes clearer,' according to David Mericle, Goldman's chief U.S. economist.
Bank of America's monthly survey of global fund managers released this month revealed some 63% of these influential investors expect the global economy to weaken over the next year, making March the second biggest jump in macroeconomic pessimism since the poll's 1994 inception. The survey also revealed fund managers fled to cash this month at the highest rate since March 2020 and moved away from U.S. stocks at their fastest pace on record, signaling an unraveling of faith in stateside equities. The fund managers heavily agree White House policy is the single biggest risk, with 55% of respondents citing a tariff-driven trade war sending the global economy into a recession as the top threat and 13% naming actions from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency sending the U.S. into a recession as the biggest risk. The Bank of America survey was conducted March 7-13 among 205 global fund managers who collectively manage $477 billion in assets.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance wades into the immigration thicket: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. Happy first day of summer! In today's edition, Jonathan Allen explores the challenges awaiting Vice President JD Vance as he lands in Los Angeles. Plus, we dive into President Donald Trump's penchant for a giving a two-week timetable on big issues. And Dylan Ebs answers this week's reader question on ranked choice voting. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner Vice President JD Vance is wading into the immigration thicket today by traveling to Los Angeles, where Marines and National Guard forces have been deployed to provide backup for federal agents executing raids. For Vance, it's tricky territory because President Donald Trump keeps changing his mind — or at least his rhetoric — on immigration enforcement. On one hand, Trump is anxious to fulfill a campaign promise to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. The MAGA base demands it. And Vance, who hopes to inherit the MAGA base, seldom strays far from its orthodoxy. But on the other hand, Trump has wavered on parts of his own mass deportation plan. After Trump said that workers in certain sectors — farming, hotels and restaurants — would not be targeted in raids, he quickly reversed that policy. Vance finds himself taking on a more visible role just as the MAGA movement is feeling the strain of a president torn between ideology and popularity. It's nothing new for a vice president to land in the middle of a vexing issue. Kamala Harris had the border portfolio in Joe Biden's administration. If Trump's immigration policies end up being a success, Vance will no doubt profit from it. But if they don't, he may suffer. Read more: Appeals court says Trump can keep control of California National Guard troops, by Dennis Romero President Donald Trump's two-week timeline to decide on whether the U.S. will strike Iran's nuclear sites is a familiar one. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' he said in a statement issued through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Since the beginning of May, Trump has promised action on questions or decisions in 'two weeks' around 10 times — and he used the same timeline repeatedly during his first term in office. 'We're going to be announcing something, I would say over the next two or three weeks, that will be phenomenal in terms of tax and developing our aviation infrastructure,' Trump said of tax overhaul plans on Feb. 9, 2017. He released a one-page outline of the plan 11 weeks later, according to a Bloomberg review that year. He went on to repeatedly cite the time frame for impending actions on health care and infrastructure that never materialized during his first four years in office. Trump's use of the timing prediction has accelerated in recent weeks — and he's used it on items ranging from trade deals and tariffs to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Much of what he's predicted hasn't come to pass, with questions he's said he'd answer remaining unanswered. Read more on Trump's frequent two-week timeline → Catch up on our latest reporting on the Israel-Iran conflict: Trump is relying on a small circle of advisers as he weighs Iran strikes, by Courtney Kube, Carol E. Lee, Garrett Haake and Dan De Luce What could happen if Trump does decide to bomb Iran's main nuclear site, by Alexander Smith Iran not sure it can trust America after Israeli attack, Iran's foreign minister tells NBC News, by Dan De Luce 'She's wrong': Trump breaks with Gabbard on Iran assessment, by Vaughn Hillyard Follow live updates → Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's question comes from Thomas Gysegem: 'Will there be ranked voting in the New York City mayoral primary? Please explain how ranked voting works.' To answer that, we turned to our intern, Dylan Ebs, who just put together a helpful explainer on the process. Ranked choice voting, which New York is utilizing for next week's mayoral primary election, is a system that lets voters rank candidates in order of preference rather than pick just one. The number of candidates voters can rank depends on the specific rules in an area. In New York City, voters can rank up to five in one race. Voters don't have to fill their ballots, though. A voter whose heart is set on only one candidate can pick just one. But if that candidate doesn't get the most votes, that voter won't have a say in later rounds of counting. After the votes are tabulated, the last-place candidate is eliminated. Ballots from voters who supported that candidate then have the next choice counted. If no candidate has hit 50%, then counting continues, eliminating another last-place candidate and counting the next-ranked choices on all those ballots in the next round. The process continues until a candidate reaches majority support and wins. ⚖️ In the courts: A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release pro-Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil from immigration custody. Read more → ⚖️ In the courts, cont.: A federal judge in Massachusetts again blocked the government's attempt to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students. Read more → ⚖️ SCOTUS watch: The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that victims of terrorism can sue Palestinian entities in U.S. courts. Read more → ⚖️ SCOTUS watch, cont.: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her colleagues in a scathing dissent in a case involving vehicle emissions regulations. Read more → 🚗 Road rage arrest: An Ohio man who allegedly ran GOP Rep. Max Miller off the road while waving a Palestinian flag and hurling antisemitic threats has been arrested. Read more → 🗽 Big Apple showdown: Progressive candidates in New York City's mayoral election are banding together in an effort to stop former Gov. Andrew Cuomo's comeback tour. Read more → ➡️ Split screen: Trump did not formally mark Juneteenth yesterday and said the U.S. has 'too many non-working holidays,' while his predecessor, Joe Biden, celebrated the occasion at a Black church in Texas. Read more → 🗳️ Running it back: Trump called for a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election, which he lost to Biden more than four years ago. Read more → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Dylan Ebs. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@ And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. This article was originally published on


New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
What will it take for Gavin Newsom to focus on his day job?
President Donald Trump rightly took the ruling upholding his National Guard deployment to Los Angeles as a 'BIG WIN,' but it can be a winner for Californians, too — if it inspires their governor to focus on the job they elected him to. Gov. Gavin Newsom vows to litigate on, but if necessary the Supreme Court will slap him down, too. What will get him to quit his near-nonstop posturing to set himself up for a 2028 presidential run, and get his nose to the gubernatorial grindstone? It's bad enough that he sided with LA Mayor Karen Bass in obstructing ICE efforts to deport child predators, murderers and other worst-of-the-worst 'asylum seekers' — posturing that all but invited the riots that Trump deployed the Guard to shut down. Worse that this rush to the left came after Newsom's fake to the right with a series of podcasts where he pretended sympathy to centrist criticisms of the far-left agenda. That follows his haplessness during the Los Angeles fires — a disaster Trump credibly tied to Newsom's green obsessions. Other Gavin grotesquerie included rushing to meet the president on Trump's LA visit bare weeks after prepping for all-out legal #resistance to the new prez. California is plagued with soaring homelessness, elevated crime rates and brutally high costs of living: Even its welcome to illegal immigrants hasn't prevented a historic switch from growth to decline. That is: On Newsom's watch, Cali is for the first time ever losing seats in the House of Representatives because so many residents are fleeing to less-toxic jurisdictions. The Golden State is a natural near-paradise, but Newsom & co. are destroying it. That governor is still devoting his time and energy to a years-off national run is damning proof that he doesn't care a whit for the people of California.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mastercard (MA) Falters on Stablecoins Passage in Senate
We recently published a list of 10 Stocks Take A Shocking Nosedive. Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE:MA) is one of the worst-performing stocks on Thursday. Mastercard fell by 5.39 percent on Wednesday to end at $538.73 apiece as investors sold off positions on expectations that the Senate's passage of the stablecoins bill would pose a threat to its business. Stablecoins are a type of currency designed to maintain a 1:1 ratio with the US dollar and is widely used by cryptocurrency traders to move funds between tokens. Under the administration of President Donald Trump, Stablecoins gained momentum as an alternative payments method, emerging as a potential competitor to traditional payments companies, including Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE:MA). A woman using a payment terminal at the checkout of a store showing payment products and solutions. In the first quarter of the year, Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE:MA) saw its net income rise to $3.3 billion, higher by 10 percent than the $3 billion registered in the same period last year. Revenues also grew by 15.87 percent to $7.3 billion from $6.3 billion year-on-year. While we acknowledge the potential of MA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data