Do we actually need a new Archbishop of Canterbury?
And then there's the other Church of England – the one that is represented by its high-ups, that I usually come into contact with at this time of year when the Archbishop of Canterbury hosts his summer party at his Lambeth Palace home.
But this year, there is no clinking of glasses and the Archbishop's apartment lies empty. Justin Welby, who dramatically resigned in November, days after a report into a prolific child abuser associated with the Church of England, finally moved out earlier this summer.
If that departure took a long time, then finding his replacement is taking even longer, and is now predicted to last until the end of the year – 12 months on from his resignation. As my conversations with the people who attend and run Anglican churches highlighted, for them it is business as usual – regardless of Welby quitting just before Christmas.
Meanwhile, Stephen Cottrell, who has the CofE's number two job as Archbishop of York, can sign off any urgent institutional business, while he offers spiritual leadership by way of his current tour of the north, talking about the Lord's Prayer.
So, if the Church of England has carried on regardless, might it not just give up on the protracted process of finding a replacement for Welby? Well, it might not affect Matins in Maidstone or Evensong in Evesham, but it's a certainly a problem for the established Anglican Church.
The Archbishop of Canterbury is always one of the 26 Anglican bishops in the House of Lords, and Welby's speeches were frequently reported on (including his final one, viewed as tone-deaf). Now there's a void.
Then there's the order of precedence; the Archbishop of Canterbury is always first after the Royal Family in this country, so when Donald Trump makes his state visit to Britain in the autumn, there will be an ecclesiastical-shaped hole at the state banquet (unless Cottrell returns from his tour of the north to play stand-in).
Welby's most prominent moment, of course, as part of Establishment Britain, came with his crowning of the King at the Coronation. But there's more to the relationship than that. Meetings may not be as frequent as the weekly audience of the prime minister, but the private talks between the archbishop and the regal Supreme Governor of the Church of England do happen.
It is this aspect of the Church of England – being the established church – that is causing the problem with finding a successor to Welby. A 20-strong Crown Nominations Commission (CNC) headed by former MI5 boss Lord Jonathan Evans with representatives of the Church of England and the Crown is wading through paperwork, studying comments sent in by the public and assessing candidates.
A quarter of the CNC represents the global Anglican Communion. One can imagine the hours of discussion about hot-button topics such as same-sex blessings and whether the Archbishop might be a woman this time. And after that, the chosen name must be submitted to the prime minister and approved by the King.
There is, of course, a simpler way of choosing a church leader. I know, as a Roman Catholic, that I will seem parti-pris, and this will send Henry VIII spinning his grave (no bad thing), but the Vatican knows how to make people focus on the task in hand.
So, Church of England: stick all the members of the CNC in a locked room and only let them out when they've made a decision. It worked for Rome. The conclave took just two days to elect Pope Leo XIV.
Why not have an Anglican conclave, put everyone out of their misery and send up some white smoke?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tax the rich more to fill black hole in public finances, Labour members tell Starmer
Sir Keir Starmer is under growing pressure to introduce a wealth tax to fill a black hole in public finances, after new polling shows almost all Labour members back the move. The prime minister has been urged to adopt a 'radical change of direction' after a survey, shared exclusively with The Independent, showed that 91 per cent of party members think the government should tax the rich more. It comes after deputy prime minister Angela Rayner pressed Rachel Reeves to consider eight wealth taxes rather than impose cuts on departments in a leaked memo earlier this year. Former shadow chancellor Anneliese Dodds also weighed in, backing a wealth tax and warning that spending cuts will not 'deliver the kind of fiscal room that is necessary'. It comes amid mounting questions over how the government will raise the money to fill the black hole in the public finances left by a series of major U-turns and spending commitments, with the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) – a leading economic think tank – last month warning the chancellor is facing a £41.2bn shortfall. Ministers have already squeezed their departmental funding in cuts unveiled at last month's spending review, meaning most expect the chancellor will have no choice but to raise taxes instead. The polling, conducted by Survation for Compass, also found 84 per cent of Labour members want the government should end the two-child benefit cap – a policy which is increasingly unpopular among Labour MPs. Former Labour MP Jon Cruddas, founder of Labour Together and a former policy coordinator for Labour minister Ed Miliband, told The Independent:"The danger now is that the leadership are way out of step with the membership and potentially the country in terms of the policies needed to head off Reform." He added: "These are exactly the ideas we tested at Labour Together and are the basis for winning and transforming the country. The leadership should be listening to members – not out-of-touch factions." Neal Lawson, director of Compass, said the polling showed that Sir Keir Starmer 's 'fence-sitting and aping of Reform's rhetoric isn't wanted'. 'The government were elected on a promise of 'a decade of national renewal' and so far they've tried to cut welfare for disabled people and suspended the whip from MPs who disagreed. 'Party members think what the general public think - that Labour offered change and now simply has to deliver on it. Without a big reset, then the keys to Number 10 are being handed to Reform and Nigel Farage', he added. Last year, just months after Labour took office, the whip was stripped from seven MPs – including former shadow chancellor John McDonnell – for voting against the cap. And in July, the prime minister also suspended Rachael Maskell, Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff from the party for voting against the government's controversial welfare cuts. The polling indicated Sir Keir's party membership thinks he has been too heavy-handed on party discipline, with some 74 per cent believing that challenging the government on controversial legislation should not result in the suspension. It comes amid growing concern over the direction of Sir Keir's government from voters on both the left and the right, with the prime minister's approval rating hitting an all-time low last month. John McDonnell, who served as Jeremy Corbyn's shadow chancellor and lost the Labour whip last year, told The Independent that the survey 'confirms how starkly out of touch Keir Starmer is'. 'It's time for Keir not just to start listening to people beyond the Westminster bubble but also taking some decisive action. All people are saying to him is to behave like a Labour prime minister should', he added. Meanwhile, left-wing MP Rachael Maskell – who led the rebellion against the government's welfare cuts and is strongly in favour of a wealth tax – said it shows that party members are 'clearly attuned to the injustices that they see in their communities'. As Sir Keir embarks on his second year in office, Ms Maskell said the government should ensure the agenda is 'marked by progressive tax policies to be invested in public services and community priorities'. Labour MP Richard Burgon, who was stripped of the whip last year, said the party must 'urgently change course'. 'Unless the Labour leadership completely changes its approach, it will continue to lose support and will open the doors for a Reform government. 'Instead of ignoring Labour members and punishing MPs who stand up for their constituents, the Labour leadership should start listening — and urgently change course', he said. A Labour spokesperson said they do not comment on polling, but added: 'Labour's urgent task when we took office was to fix the foundations after 14 years of Tory chaos. Our next priority is to create a fairer Britain for working people.' 'Through our plan for change we have already boosted the minimum wage for three million of the lowest paid, we're rolling out free school meals, and we're delivering free breakfast clubs for primary school children. 'The stability we've brought to the economy has also seen five interest rate cuts, which means homebuyers now pay £1,000 less on their mortgage than they were a year ago. There's much more to do, but that's the change this Labour government has started to deliver after 14 years of Tory decline', the spokesperson added. The polling surveyed 1,024 party members between August 5 and 6.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Southport victim's family criticises police plan to share suspects' ethnicity
The family of one of the three girls killed in the Southport attack last year has criticised new police guidance that recommends forces share suspects' ethnicity and nationality with the public. The interim guidance by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing comes after mounting pressure on police to increase transparency around the identity of offenders. Police forces have been instructed to share suspects' ethnicity and nationality with the public after authorities were accused of covering up offences carried out by asylum seekers, and in the wake of riots sparked by social media disinformation after the Southport murders. In an interview with The Guardian, Michael Weston King, the grandfather of Bebe King, who along with Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice da Silva Aguiar was killed by Axel Rudakubana, said the ethnicity of serious crime suspects is 'completely irrelevant'. Disclosing the race and immigration status of high-profile suspects became official police guidance on Wednesday. 'I not only speak for myself but for all of the King family when I say that the ethnicity of any perpetrator, or indeed their immigration status, is completely irrelevant,' Mr Weston King said. 'Mental health issues, and the propensity to commit crime, happens in any ethnicity, nationality or race. 'The boy who took Bebe had been failed by various organisations, who were aware of his behaviour, and by the previous government's lack of investment in Prevent. As a result, we were also failed by this.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper called for more transparency from police about suspects, while Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said that he 'absolutely' believes that information about charged suspects' immigration status should be made available by police. It is hoped the change could combat the spread of misinformation on social media, after Merseyside Police was criticised for not revealing the ethnicity of Rudakabana when he was arrested after he attacked a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport in July 2024. Within hours of the attack, posts spread on the internet claiming the suspect was a 17-year-old asylum seeker who had come to the country by boat last year. In the first press conference after the event, at 6.30pm that day, Merseyside Police Chief Constable Serena Kennedy told journalists the suspect was originally from Cardiff. But the police statement did little to quell the misinformation spreading online, and the next day, riots began across the country.
Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage demands right to nominate Reform UK peers
Nigel Farage has demanded the right to appoint Reform UK peers to the House of Lords. The Reform leader said in a letter to the Prime Minister that his party should not be shut out of the process of appointing new peers because it has four MPs and controls 10 councils. The Prime Minister has no obligation to nominate any opposition politicians to the second chamber. Convention dictates that No 10 asks the leaders of opposition parties to nominate their own candidates for peerages at the same time as the Prime Minister nominates theirs. The Green Party, which has the same number of MPs as Mr Farage's party, has two working peers. Reform is leading in the opinion polls and Sir Keir has increasingly been treating the party as the real opposition in recent months. The Reform leader wrote in the letter, first reported by The Times: 'My party received over 4.1 million votes at the general election in July 2024 [and] have since won a large number of seats in local government, led in the national opinion polls for many months and won the only by-election of this parliament. 'The Greens, DUP, Plaid Cymru and UUP [Ulster Unionist Party] have 13 peers between them, but Reform UK has none. The time has come to address the democratic disparity that exists in the upper house.' Potential peers are reported to include Ann Widdecome, who served as a Tory minister in the 1990s and later defected to Reform's predecessor, the Brexit Party. Reform chairman Zia Yusuf and billionaire party donor Nick Candy are also said to be potential candidates. Lord Norton of Louth, a constitutional expert, said there was a 'case for' Reform to be represented in the upper chamber, but any decision was for the Prime Minister. He told The Times: 'Historically appointments to the House of Lords were in the gift of the Crown but that function has been passed to the Prime Minister. So any decision on whether to create Reform MPs would rest with him alone.' Lord O'Donnell, the former cabinet secretary, told the newspaper: 'It is a feature of our system that the Prime Minister can appoint whoever they like to the House of Lords. It is an area where I think we need greater checks and balances.' Baroness Fox of Buckley, who first sat in the upper chamber but is now a crossbench peer, said the Reform leader was making a 'legitimate request'. She added: 'Labour says it wants to improve the diversity of the House of Lords and this seems like a very sensible place to start. There can be no rational reason for Starmer to turn it down.'
