logo
Hong Kong's top legal body head urges global unity against planned US sanctions on judges

Hong Kong's top legal body head urges global unity against planned US sanctions on judges

The Hong Kong Bar Association's new chairman has called for legal associations worldwide to join hands in opposing potential punitive measures from the US against judges and prosecutors, saying any interference in judicial processes will undermine the administration of justice.
Senior Counsel Jose-Antonio Maurellet, in his first interview with an English-language media outlet since helming the group representing barristers in Hong Kong, also shared plans to relaunch the body's pro bono scheme later this year and partner with more non-profit groups to help those who could not afford legal services.
Maurellet, a Hong Kong-born Eurasian and a corporate law specialist fluent in English, Cantonese and French, succeeded Victor Dawes last month amid uncertainty surrounding United States President Donald Trump's return to the White House and concerns over the potential implications for Hong Kong's legal community.
A bipartisan group of American lawmakers recently introduced a bill aimed at sanctioning Hong Kong's judges and prosecutors involved in the cases of activists charged under the national security law.
The bill, if passed, would require the US president to decide within six months whether to introduce the sanctions under existing legislation.
When asked about the impact of such potential actions, Maurellet said: 'All forms of interference [in legal and judicial work] are actually bad and undermine the administration of justice. So we hope that other legal associations around the world will join us in opposing this.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong to begin Legislative Council nominations on October 24
Hong Kong to begin Legislative Council nominations on October 24

South China Morning Post

time6 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong to begin Legislative Council nominations on October 24

Hong Kong will begin the nomination process for its next Legislative Council on October 24, with the current legislature standing prorogued on the same day, the government has announced. Chief Secretary for Administration Eric Chan Kwok-ki said on Wednesday that the date was set after taking the election date of December 7 into consideration. In a letter from Chan to Legco President Andrew Leung Kwan-yuen, the city's second-highest official said that the current Legislative Council would recess on October 24 'to prevent giving undue advantage to incumbent members over other candidates during the election period, or creating an impression to that effect.' He added that the arrangement, which would be gazetted on Friday, was consistent with the procedure followed by the previous Legco. The letter did not specify the duration of the nomination period. For the previous election in 2021, it lasted 14 days. The legislature is currently on its final summer recess and will hold its first chamber meeting on September 3. Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu is scheduled to deliver his fourth Policy Address to the lawmakers in September.

Looming Hong Kong university spot crunch as 150,000 more pupils eligible over 5 years
Looming Hong Kong university spot crunch as 150,000 more pupils eligible over 5 years

South China Morning Post

time9 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Looming Hong Kong university spot crunch as 150,000 more pupils eligible over 5 years

Competition for university places in Hong Kong is expected to intensify. In the next five years, over 150,000 children born in Hong Kong to mainland Chinese parents will become eligible to apply for subsidised tertiary education. Hong Kong experienced a 'baby boom' from 2006 to 2012, partly due to children born to mainland parents in the city after a landmark court ruling in 2001. This ruling declared that newborns should be given the right of abode regardless of their parents' immigration status, and most of the children went to the mainland for their foundational education. After the government banned mainland women from giving birth in the city in 2013, the number of newborns dropped drastically to 790. According to the government, 150,139 children – born from 2008 to 2012 to parents who were not Hong Kong residents – would be eligible to apply for subsidised university places after sitting the Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE) exams in the next five years. 'They now come back to sit the DSE to compete for university places and they can compete for subsidised university places,' Danny Lai Tsz-kit, co-president of Greater Bay Area Education Resource Centre, said on a radio programme. 'But the number of subsidised university places has remained at 15,000. Should the number be reviewed?'

Why smear Hong Kong's prosecution of secession as political persecution?
Why smear Hong Kong's prosecution of secession as political persecution?

South China Morning Post

time12 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Why smear Hong Kong's prosecution of secession as political persecution?

The Hong Kong government recently declared bounties against a number of former residents now in the United Kingdom and the United States for alleged offences against the Hong Kong national security law . This prompted a strong reaction from the UK government, which considered the move to be an example of ' transnational repression '. This week, The Guardian published an interview with Chloe Cheung Hei-ching , who faces a warrant for her arrest that was issued last year. Its article portrayed her as someone fleeing political persecution for daring to criticise the Hong Kong government and advocate for democratic reform. This framing is misleading. Cheung is being charged with incitement to secession and foreign collusion. Contrary to common misconceptions, the national security law does not criminalise political advocacy or criticism of the authorities. The Hong Kong Basic Law stipulates in Articles 45 and 68 that universal suffrage is a political ideal for the entire city. Moreover, according to the 2024 Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, defendants can argue against the statutory offence of sedition – inherited from British colonial times – in court if they were giving 'an opinion on the system or constitutional order … with a view to improving the system or constitutional order'. However, Hong Kong's national security laws do in fact criminalise acts of secession. According to Article 52 of the Chinese constitution, citizens have the obligation to safeguard national unity. Article 1 of the Basic Law stipulates that Hong Kong is an 'inalienable part of the People's Republic of China'. What is more, those in the UK, in particular, should not lose sight of Article 1 of the Sino-British Joint Declaration , which states that it is the 'common aspiration of the entire Chinese people' that China should resume sovereignty over Hong Kong.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store