logo
SC refuses to stay QR code directive for eateries along Kanwar Yatra route

SC refuses to stay QR code directive for eateries along Kanwar Yatra route

Justices M M Sundresh & N Kotiswar Singh said it was not going into the other issues over display of names of the hotel or dhaba owner and the QR code, Tuesday being the last day of the Kanwar Yatra
Press Trust of India New Delhi
The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to stay the "QR" code directive for eateries along Kanwar Yatra route in UP, Uttarakhand and directed all hotel owners along the route to display their licences and registration certificates in line with the statutory requirements.
A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh said it was not going into the other issues over display of names of the hotel or dhaba owner and the QR code, Tuesday being the last day of the Kanwar Yatra.
"We are told that today is the last day of the yatra. In any case it is likely to come to an end in the near future. Therefore, at this stage we would only pass an order that all the respective hotel owners shall comply with the mandate of displaying the licence and the registration certificate as per the statutory requirements," the bench said.
The top court was hearing a plea filed by academician Apoorvanand Jha and others.
Senior advocate Abhishek M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, submitted that the UP government should have sought the modification of the court's 2024 order before issuing the QR code directives.
Singhvi argued the state government was trying to ostracise and exclude minorities by its QR code directive for eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route.
"This is the most divisive initiative, to ostracise people during the yatra, as if these people are untouchables. Will my surname ensure that 'kanwariyas' receive good quality food not menu card? This is the most divisive initiative possible," the senior lawyer submitted.
Referring to news reports over the alleged attacks on certain shops by kanwariyas, the senior lawyer said, "When you sow the seeds of divisiveness, the rest is taken care of by the populace." Responding to his submission, Justice Sundresh said people had different food choices and a vegetarian may choose to go to only a place serving exclusively vegetarian food, especially during a religious pilgrimage.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, said directions were issued in line with the requirements of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India regulations.
"There are people in this country who will not eat in there brother's house if meat is cooked. There are sentiments of devotees," Rohatgi said, "and as per the regulations under the Act they require photo identity. Why are you scared of showing your name? I don't understand." Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing other petitioners, said the eateries along this route only sold vegetarian items during this period according to local regulations.
Justice Sundresh observed a customer must have the choice of knowing if a place was exclusively selling vegetarian items throughout.
"If a hotel is running as a vegetarian hotel all through, then the question of indicating names and other things will not arise. But if only for the purpose of yatra, somebody stops serving non-vegetarian and starts selling vegetarian, the consumer should know," the judge remarked.
He continued, "To that extent, consumers should have that flexibility. If one hotel was earlier serving non-vegetarian, and for the purpose of better business they serve only vegetarian during the yatra, it will be an issue for the consideration of the consumer. The choice is of the consumer. Consumer is the king."
The bench further said it was not inclined to examine the petition as the issue was infructuous considering it was last day of the yatra.
The Supreme Court last year stayed similar directives issued by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh governments, asking eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display the names of their owners, staff and other details.
Referring to a press release issued by the UP government on June 25, Jha, said, "The new measures mandate the display of QR codes on all eateries along the kanwar route which reveal the names and identities of the owners, thereby achieving the same discriminatory profiling that was previously stayed by this court." The petitioner said the state government's directive asking stall owners to reveal religious and caste identities under "lawful license requirements" breaches the right to privacy of the shop, dhaba and restaurant owners.
A large number of devotees travel from various places with "kanwars" carrying holy water from the Ganga to perform "jalabhishek" of Shivling during the Hindu calendar month of "Shravan".
Many believers shun the consumption of meat during the month and even avoid meals cooked with onion and garlic.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, Madhya Pradesh on plea against 237 ‘illegal' environmental clearances by SEIAA member-secretary
Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, Madhya Pradesh on plea against 237 ‘illegal' environmental clearances by SEIAA member-secretary

The Hindu

time39 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, Madhya Pradesh on plea against 237 ‘illegal' environmental clearances by SEIAA member-secretary

The Supreme Court on Wednesday (July 23, 2025) decided to hear a petition seeking a declaration that 237 environmental clearances granted by the member-secretary of the Madhya Pradesh State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) are illegal and in systemic violation of the environmental laws. A three-judge Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai issued notice to the Union Government, the State, the SEIAA Chairman, and the member-secretary, Principal Secretary of the State Environment Department. The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Das, a Hindi newspaper publisher, has arraigned the Central Bureau of Investigation too as a respondent. The notices are returnable in two weeks. Mr. Das, represented by senior advocate Vivek Tankha and advocate Sumeer Sodhi, said the clearances were given unilaterally, without convening the mandatory SEIAA meetings and in breach of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986; and the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. The petition alleged that the clearances were the result of a deliberate strategy to bypass the collective decision-making process mandated by the law, and exploited the 'deemed approval' provisions after letting statutory periods lapse. It said that there was no properly constituted SEIAA or SEAC (State Expert Appraisal Committee) between June 11, 2024, to January 6, 2025. A new SEIAA was constituted on January 7 this year. The violations, it was alleged, began from May 23 this year when the first environmental clearance was issued unilaterally by the member-secretary without any SEIAA meeting. The petition said multiple clearances were issued in just one day, May 24, demonstrating the premeditated nature of the alleged violations. 'Despite the chairman of SEIAA writing almost 48 representations between April-June 2025 to prevent these illegal actions, addressed to various authorities including the Member Secretary, Principal Secretary, Chief Secretary, and Union of India, the systematic violations continued unabated. The authorities have turned a blind eye to these representations, which demonstrates not merely administrative negligence but willfull and deliberate facilitation of environmental crimes at the highest levels of the State government,' the petition said. It said the case was a 'classic example' of Secretaries and senior officials abusing their positions for ulterior motives, including personal gains, by facilitating illegal environmental clearances for mining lobbies and industrial interests. 'The member-secretary acted in active collusion with the principal secretary, department of environment, and other public officials, orchestrating a prolonged non-convening of SEIAA meetings with the calculated intention of allowing the statutory period for appraisal to lapse,' the petition argued.

Director General of Shipping to be renamed as Director General of Maritime Administration under the planned new Merchant Shipping Act
Director General of Shipping to be renamed as Director General of Maritime Administration under the planned new Merchant Shipping Act

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Director General of Shipping to be renamed as Director General of Maritime Administration under the planned new Merchant Shipping Act

Advt Advt By , ETInfra Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. Get updates on your preferred social platform Follow us for the latest news, insider access to events and more. The Director General of Shipping will be renamed as the Director General of Maritime Administration in a key institutional reform under the new Merchant Shipping Bill which is expected to be moved in the Lok Sabha reform will 'appropriately reflect the office's duties to oversee maritime affairs , other than commercial aspects of ports, and supervise discharge of obligations of ports under international conventions,' said an Bill seeks to repeal and re-enact the Merchant Shipping Act, it seeks to set up a body responsible for carrying out regulatory and oversight functions in respect of the security of vessels and port facilities.'With a vast coastline and port development by private entities, efficient removal of security lapses and threats is a must. It is also the requirement under international conventions. This also ensures the integrity in operations of ports, which positively impacts the bankability of India as a maritime jurisdiction and has potential to reduce costs to trade,' the official National Shipping Board , under the proposed law, will consist of six Members of Parliament and other members, not exceeding sixteen, of which at least four will be women, to be appointed by the Central government to represent the Central Government, ship owners, seafarers and other interests. It provides that the ship owners and seafarers will be represented equally in Members of Parliament as members or Chairperson of the National Shipping Board are not considered to hold an office of profit for the purposes of Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution of Bill also seeks to introduce digitised processes to enhance ease of doing business and boost investor it seeks to set up an advisory board to be called Seafarer's Welfare Board to advise the central government on the measures to be taken for promoting the welfare of seafarers under the Act.

30 bulldozers to raze forest overnight? Top court raps Telangana over tree felling
30 bulldozers to raze forest overnight? Top court raps Telangana over tree felling

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

30 bulldozers to raze forest overnight? Top court raps Telangana over tree felling

The Supreme Court expressed sharp disapproval over the use of bulldozers to clear forest land in Kancha Gachibowli, Telangana, stating that such overnight operations cannot be justified as sustainable development. Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, who is heading the bench hearing the suo motu case, remarked during the proceedings that while he supported the cause of sustainable development, the nature and speed of deforestation in this case were am myself an advocate for sustainable development but that does not mean that overnight you should employ 30 bulldozers and clear all the jungle,' the Chief Justice said during the matter relates to the clearing of approximately 400 acres of green cover in the Kancha Gachibowli forest area by the Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) for the development of information technology infrastructure. The rapid felling of trees, reportedly over a long weekend, had led to widespread public concern and judicial intervention. Senior Advocate K Parameshwar, appointed as the amicus curiae in the matter, informed the Court that certain private intervenors intended to respond to the state government's affidavit. The bench agreed to grant time for these responses and re-listed the matter for detailed hearing on August an earlier hearing, the Supreme Court had strongly criticised the actions of the state authorities, warning them of contempt proceedings and even suggesting that erring officials could be held in temporary prisons constructed at the site if they failed to comply with Court orders. The Court had directed that restoring the status quo at the site was of utmost priority and had asked the State Wildlife Warden to take immediate steps to protect wildlife impacted by the also granted the state government time to respond to the Central Empowered Committee's spot inspection report and ordered the submission of an action plan to restore the forest to its previous background of the case traces back to a government order issued in 2024 by TSIIC, which sought to alienate forest land for IT development. Although TSIIC claimed to have acquired the land in 2012, the tree-felling gained momentum recently, prompting the filing of multiple public interest litigations before the Telangana High Court. Petitioners argued that the government's actions were in blatant disregard of Supreme Court rulings in TN Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Union of India, which had directed all states to identify forests and forest-like areas as per the dictionary definition of 'forest'.advertisementThe petitioners further contended that the state had not conducted any environmental assessment as required under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006, and alleged that the land was being auctioned off for the construction of an IT park without due defence, the Telangana government maintained that the land in question was already classified as industrial and dismissed the petitioners' claims as being based merely on Google Earth April 2, the Telangana High Court had initially stayed the felling of trees until April 3, with the matter being adjourned to April 24 in view of the Supreme Court's intervention. The top court is now set to hear the matter in detail on August 13.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Telangana

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store