Grandfather of incoming MI6 chief was leading Nazi spy, reports say
The grandfather of the incoming head of MI6 was a Nazi spy chief, reports have said.
Blaise Metreweli was announced as the new chief of MI6 earlier this month – becoming the 18th person to take on the role in the organisation's 116-year history.
The Daily Mail reported her grandfather Constantine Dobrowolski had previously defected from the Red Army to become a Nazi informant in the Chernihiv region of Ukraine.
The newspaper said German archives showed Mr Dobrowolski was known as 'The Butcher' or 'Agent No 30' by Wehrmacht commanders.
Reports also said the Nazi spy chief had a 50,000 rouble bounty placed on him by Soviet leaders, and was dubbed the 'worst enemy of the Ukrainian people'.
Ms Metreweli's grandfather also sent letters to superiors saying he 'personally' took part 'in the extermination of the Jews', the newspaper said.
Ms Metreweli will take over as head of MI6 from Sir Richard Moore, a senior civil servant who will step down in the autumn after five years in the role.
Commonly referred to as C, the chief has operational responsibility for MI6, and is the only publicly named member of the organisation.
She first joined the service as a case officer in 1999 and has carried out operational roles in the Middle East and Europe.
In her new post, she will be accountable to the Foreign Secretary.
A Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office spokesperson said: 'Blaise Metreweli neither knew nor met her paternal grandfather. Blaise's ancestry is characterised by conflict and division and, as is the case for many with eastern European heritage, only partially understood.
'It is precisely this complex heritage which has contributed to her commitment to prevent conflict and protect the British public from modern threats from today's hostile states, as the next chief of MI6.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Syrian teen charged in Germany over foiled Taylor Swift concert attack
A Syrian teen has been charged with helping to plan the foiled terrorist attack at a Taylor Swift concert in Vienna last summer, according to a statement by the prosecutor general. German authorities on June 27 identified the suspect as Mohammad A., saying he helped the intended attacker by translating Arabic instructions for making bombs and connecting him online with a member of the Islamic State militia. "Mohammad A. has adhered to the ideology of the terrorist organization Islamic State (IS) since April 2024 at the latest," a government statement said. "Between mid-July and August 2024, he was in contact with a young Austrian who was planning a bomb attack on a concert by singer Taylor Swift in Vienna." Swifties rallied in streets following concert cancellations Swift was set to perform three nights of the Eras Tour in the Austrian capital on Aug. 8-10, 2024. Her promoter, Barricuda Music, posted a cancellation message to social media on Aug. 7. Tickets were refunded and extra safety procedures were put in place for Swift's final shows in London, Miami, New Orleans, Indianapolis, Toronto and Vancouver. Police made multiple arrests over a suspected plot to attack a Swift concert in the Austrian capital's Ernst Happel Stadium, prompting the cancellation of all three of her shows there. The Vienna Federal Ministry of the Interior officials confirmed the arrest of two individuals "suspected of having planned attacks at major events." Swift acknowledged the terrorist threat in a statement following the conclusion of her European shows in August. "Having our Vienna shows cancelled was devastating," the singer wrote in a statement posted to her Instagram story. "The reason for the cancellations filled me with a new sense of fear, and a tremendous amount of guilt because so many people had planned on coming to those shows. But I was also so grateful to the authorities because thanks to them, we were grieving concerts and not lives." After the concerts were canceled, tens of thousands of fans -- already in the Austrian capital -- flooded the streets to sing Swift songs. "Going out to the streets of Vienna this morning was initially scary, but it was a great surprise to see Swifties gathering in the streets," Maria Luís Monteiro, 24, of Portugal told USA TODAY at the time. "The resilience and sense of community displayed was very inspiring and healing." Contributing: Reuters Follow Bryan West, the USA TODAY Network's Taylor Swift reporter, on Instagram, TikTok and X as @BryanWestTV.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
US soldier's son, born on Army base in Germany, is deported to Jamaica
(KTLA) — A man born to an active-duty member of the United States military on an Army base in Germany in 1986 before coming to the states as a child was deported last week to Jamaica, a country he's never been to, according to a report by The Austin Chronicle. Jermaine Thomas, whose Jamaican-born dad became a U.S. citizen during his 18-year military career, spent much of his early life moving from base to base with his father and mother, the latter a citizen of Kenya at the time of his birth. At 11 years old, after his parents' divorce and his mother's second marriage to another soldier, he went to live with his father, who had since retired, in Florida. Unfortunately, his father passed away in 2010 from kidney failure shortly after Thomas had arrived. Much of his life after that, The Chronicle reported, was spent in Texas, homeless and in and out of jail. It's unclear when exactly Thomas was first ordered to leave the country, but court records from 2015 show a case that went all the way to the Supreme Court, in which the U.S. Department of Justice argued that he was not a citizen simply because he was born on a U.S. Army base in Germany. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the DOJ, upholding the U.S. Court of Appeals decision and denied Thomas' petition for a review of the deportation order, saying in part that 'his father did not meet the physical presence requirement of the statute in force at the time of Thomas's birth.' The court also noted Thomas' prior criminal convictions, one for domestic violence and two 'crimes involving moral turpitude.' Without U.S., German or Jamaican citizenship, Thomas was stateless, though he remained in the states, most recently living in Killeen, a city about an hour north of Austin. He told The Chronicle that deportation to Jamaica started with an eviction from his apartment. While moving his belongings out of the apartment, he was arrested by local police on suspicion of trespassing, a misdemeanor in Texas. Told by a court-appointed lawyer that he'd likely stay in jail for the better part of a year while waiting for a trial, Thomas, who had lost his job while in lockup, signed a release agreement with certain conditions, but instead of being released from Bell County Jail, he was transferred to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention camp just north of Houston, where he was detained for two and a half months. Now in Kingston, he told The Chronicle he's living in a hotel, though he's unsure who is paying for it, the U.S. or Jamaican government, and does not know how long he'll be able to stay there. Unsure how to get a job or if he's even allowed, Thomas added that he's unsure if it's even legal for him to be in the country at all. 'If you're in the U.S. Army, and the Army deploys you somewhere, and you've got to have your child over there, and your child makes a mistake after you pass away, and you put your life on the line for this country, are you going to be okay with them just kicking your child out of the country?' Thomas said in a phone call with the outlet's reporter. Neither ICE nor the Department of Homeland Security responded to The Chronicle's request for comment.
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Parents, not progressives, know their kids best. They should control education.
The government should never stand between parents and their right to determine what's best for their children. Democrats and teachers unions (sorry, I repeat myself) may think they own your kids and know best what they should learn. They're wrong. It's parents. Luckily, parents are winning. And the U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 delivered another victory for parental rights in education. That comes as a growing number of states pass laws offering a form of universal private school choice to families – Texas took that step in May, making it the biggest state to do so to date. The Supreme Court considered a case out of Maryland that pitted a school board against parents. The Montgomery County district refused to give parents the ability to opt their children out of being exposed to books related to gender and sexuality. The parents, who are a mix of Jews, Muslims and Christians, want oversight of what their kids – some as young as preschool – are taught at school, especially when it comes to LGBTQ+ topics. The books in question were acquired by the district several years ago as part of a new 'inclusivity' effort. Rather than help kids learn about basic civility, they introduce young children to concepts like gender transitions, preferred pronouns and pride parades. The concerned parents weren't trying to get the books banned. They just didn't want their children exposed to them. The Supreme Court agreed, ruling 6-3, that the school board's actions were an unconstitutional affront to the First Amendment. 'The Board's introduction of the 'LGBTQ+-inclusive' storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, places an unconstitutional burden on the parents' rights to the free exercise of their religion,' wrote Justice Samuel Alito for the conservative majority. Supreme Court stands for religious liberty – and parental rights The main question before the court was whether public schools burden parents' religious exercise when they 'compel elementary school children to participate in instruction on gender and sexuality against their parents' religious convictions and without notice or opportunity to opt out.' The majority answered with a resounding "yes." The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty represented the parents in the case, and the organization's lawyers told me ahead of the decision that the First Amendment was at the heart of the lawsuit. Refusing to give parents an opt out is a clear violation of their religious freedom. As Alito said in the opinion, 'The right of parents 'to direct the religious upbringing of their' children would be an empty promise if it did not follow those children into the public school classroom.' Parents are winning outside of court, too While the court's ruling is a significant victory for parents and should offer families greater say over what goes on in traditional public schools, parents are on a winning streak outside of court, too. With Texas now offering a universal private school choice program, thousands of families will be able to choose from schools they previously wouldn't have been able to afford. 'The Texas win is the biggest day one school choice victory in U.S. history,' Corey DeAngelis, a senior fellow at the American Culture Project and a leading voice on school choice, told me. 'The political winds are shifting in favor of parents.' There are now 17 states that offer robust private school options to all – or nearly all – families. Florida and Tennessee are among them. According to EdChoice, 45% of students nationwide are now eligible to participate in a private school choice program. That's a number that would have seemed impossible a few years ago. President Donald Trump has also made a strong stand for school choice, and Republicans in Congress are working on a generous federal school choice tax credit program. It's included in the 'big, beautiful bill' that has passed the House and is under review in the Senate. As designed, the program could introduce broader school choice to blue states that have resisted it. The latest Supreme Court victory and the expansion of true school choice will benefit millions of American families. And the government should never stand between parents and their right to determine what's best for their children. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X, formerly Twitter: @Ingrid_Jacques
