logo
British woman laments Brexit rules that would stop her Italian husband moving to UK

British woman laments Brexit rules that would stop her Italian husband moving to UK

The Guardian5 hours ago

A British woman whose family cannot return to the UK because of Brexit visa rules has said she feels 'forgotten and rejected' by the country of her birth.
Sarah Douglas moved to Italy to teach English in 2007 before marrying Matteo Ricci, an Italian software developer, in 2010.
The couple had always planned to settle in the UK, where Douglas wants to be closer to her parents, who are in their 70s.
But under the current, post-Brexit immigration regime, she must earn more than £29,000 and have been working in a job paying that for at least six months in the UK before she can apply for a family visa that would allow her husband to move here, or have £88,500 in cash savings.
The rules mean she would have to return to the UK from the family's home in Perugia, Umbria, with their three children – Alba, 13, Mirryn, 10 and Arthur, five – before Ricci could join them.
On Tuesday, a review by the migration advisory committee (Mac) raised the hopes of families separated by the rules.
The panel suggested ministers could cut the amount a British citizen or settled resident must earn to apply for a partner's visa and suggested scrapping a Tory plan to raise the minimum income requirement to £38,700, saying it would conflict with the right to family life (article 8, EHCR).
'It sounds really promising so far, but I still can't get hopeful,' Douglas, who grew up in the Scottish Borders, said.
'We're very secure, but this visa policy would push us into instability by being separated, funding two households, being a single parent home, essentially, for at least six months,' she added.
Ricci earns more than the income requirement, but under the current rules, his salary is not taken into account.
'The other crazy thing is that my children are also British citizens,' Douglas added. 'We could come anytime alone and be completely dependent on the state for benefits, but we're not allowed to bring my husband who would work to support us.
'It's an awful lot of hoops to jump through to be able to live in my own country. It's really upsetting for my kids. Most of their family lives in the UK. They speak English fluently. They really don't understand why they can't live in their own country close to their cousins.
'We just basically feel forgotten about, rejected. We can't make any concrete future plans. But we would not be considering moving if we didn't think we would be financially independent.'
Until April 2024, the income requirement was £18,600, or two and half times that figure in cash savings. The couple were close to meeting the savings requirement when the threshold was changed.
Caroline Coombs, the executive director of Reunite Families UK, said families' voices had been 'ignored for too long', adding that the policy had 'caused untold damage to those whose only 'fault' has been to fall in love with someone born abroad' with a 'horrendous impact on children'.
'We appreciate Mac's reference to the fact that should the government decide to maintain an MIR [minimum income requirement], this should be lowered … however we firmly believe that there shouldn't be an MIR. Any threshold, even at minimum wage would still separate people who just want to be a family.'
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We are now considering [the Mac review's] findings and will respond in due course. The government has already committed to legislate to clarify the application of article 8 of the ECHR for applicants, caseworkers and the courts.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BCC Mining's mobile app: Democratizing 'crypto' mining in 2025
BCC Mining's mobile app: Democratizing 'crypto' mining in 2025

Coin Geek

time29 minutes ago

  • Coin Geek

BCC Mining's mobile app: Democratizing 'crypto' mining in 2025

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... In May 2025, BCC Mining, a U.K.-based cryptocurrency platform, launched a mobile app that has sparked significant interest in the digital currency community by offering 'free cloud mining' for BTC, Litecoin, and Dogecoin. Unveiled on May 26, 2025, the app aims to make digital currency mining accessible to everyday users, eliminating the need for expensive hardware or technical expertise. As BTC's price surges past $110,000 and global interest in mining intensifies, BCC Mining's app represents a bold step toward democratizing digital asset accumulation. However, amid a landscape of illicit mining operations and profitability challenges, the app's promise of passive income raises excitement and skepticism. The BCC Mining app, available for Android and iOS, allows users to mine digital currencies directly from their smartphones, leveraging cloud-based technology to bypass the energy-intensive demands of traditional mining. Users can monitor progress, adjust settings, and track earnings in real-time, with the platform operating 24/7 to maximize profits. The app's user-friendly interface requires only an email registration and a small initial investment—sometimes as low as $100—to start earning. BCC Mining claims its AI-powered system and renewable energy sources enhance returns, with some users reportedly earning up to $18,600 daily, though such figures invite scrutiny for their feasibility. The platform's FCA registration in the U.K. adds a layer of credibility, positioning it as a legitimate option in a market rife with scams. The launch comes at a pivotal moment for digital currency mining. The 2024 Bitcoin halving reduced block rewards, squeezing miner profitability, with hashprices dropping to $55 per petahash per second, well below pre-halving levels. Rising global hash rates—up 6.7% in April 2025—have intensified competition, pushing some miners toward illicit operations, as seen in recent crackdowns in Bradford, U.K., Kuwait, and Malaysia. BCC Mining's cloud-based approach sidesteps these challenges by eliminating the need for costly ASICs or high electricity bills, making it appealing to retail investors. The app's launch aligns with a broader trend of mobile mining platforms, such as Bitcoin Solaris's Nova App and Pi Network, prioritizing accessibility and low-energy consumption. BCC Mining's appeal is amplified by its focus on retail investors diversifying from traditional brokerage platforms like Robinhood (NASDAQ: HOOD). A May 29, 2025, report noted a growing user base, with many drawn to the app's promise of passive income without technical barriers. For example, a user named James reportedly turned a $100 investment into $13,700 in 10 days, reinvesting to reach $100,000 in a month. Such stories fuel optimism but also raise red flags, as high returns in digital currency often signal risk. The platform offers a $15 sign-up bonus and flexible mining contracts, with transparent pricing and no hidden fees, making it attractive to beginners and seasoned investors alike. However, the digital currency mining landscape is fraught with challenges. Illegal operations, like the Bradford 'Bitcoin factory' uncovered on May 21, 2025, highlight the risks of energy theft, with stolen electricity powering illicit rigs. Globally, Kuwait's crackdowns and Malaysia's 300% rise in power theft underscore the ethical and infrastructural strains of mining. BCC Mining's use of renewable energy, such as solar panels, addresses environmental concerns, aligning with platforms like MasHash, which prioritize sustainability. Yet, a Harvard study in 2025 linked U.S. Bitcoin mines to pollution affecting millions, raising questions about the broader industry's environmental impact, even for cloud-based solutions. Regulatory developments add complexity. The U.K.'s push for compulsory digital currency regulation in April 2025 aims to curb fraud, providing a safer environment for platforms like BCC Mining. In contrast, the U.S.'s pro-crypto policies, including Texas's proposed Bitcoin reserve, encourage mining growth, though proposed 36% tariffs on Asian-made rigs threaten profitability. BCC Mining's FCA approval gives it an edge in a market where trust is paramount, especially after scams like Russia's $3.2 million mining fraud exposed vulnerabilities. The app's launch taps into a bullish market, with BTC ETF inflows outpacing mined coins (26,700 BTC bought vs. 7,200 mined in May). However, profitability concerns persist. A PCWorld report estimated that mining one BTC in the U.S. costs $137,000, far exceeding its $95,000 market value, making cloud mining apps like BCC's more appealing. Still, critics warn that 'free' mining platforms may overpromise returns or rely on unsustainable models, urging users to approach cautiously. BCC Mining's mobile app represents a significant step toward making digital currency mining inclusive, leveraging technology to lower barriers in a high-stakes industry. Its focus on accessibility, sustainability, and regulatory compliance positions it as a leader in the cloud mining space. Yet, as illegal mining surges and profitability challenges loom, users must weigh the app's potential against the risks of a volatile market. For now, BCC Mining's launch signals a new era of mobile-driven crypto participation, but its long-term success will depend on delivering consistent, transparent returns in a rapidly evolving landscape. Watch: Bitcoin mining in 2025: Is it still worth it? title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen>

Work to get US steel tariffs removed to go on in coming ‘days, weeks and months'
Work to get US steel tariffs removed to go on in coming ‘days, weeks and months'

Western Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Work to get US steel tariffs removed to go on in coming ‘days, weeks and months'

US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer signed off a US-UK deal that will slash trade barriers on goods from both countries at the G7 on Monday. But US tariffs for the steel industry will stand at 25% for now rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. This is less than the US global rate of 50% for steel and aluminium. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the UK Government is keen for the site to be part of a commercially-operated business (Chris Radburn/PA) The two leaders pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed', the Department for Business and Trade said. The Chinese ownership of the British Steel could be a sticking point in the deal on steel as the executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances that the metal originates in the UK. 'The United Kingdom also committed to working to meet American requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminium products intended for export to the United States and on the nature of ownership of relevant production facilities,' the order states. After signing it, the US President was asked whether steel tariffs would be eliminated, to which he replied: 'We're gonna let you have that information in a little while.' In April, the UK Government used emergency powers to take control of British Steel and continue production at the site after Chinese owners Jingye proposed shutting the Scunthorpe site's two blast furnaces and other key steelmaking operations. But its future is still uncertain, with Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander saying the Government is eager for it to be 'part of a commercially-operated business with private investment'. 'We're talking to a number of third parties about that. At the moment, no options are off the table,' she told Sky News. She said there was still 'more work to do' to get steel tariffs eliminated, including on 'technical detail'. 'We're working through some technical detail around steel because we want to bring that 25% tariff that applies at the moment obviously down further,' she told BBC Breakfast. She said the UK is 'working on getting that implemented'. 'And we're determined to go further and we'll be working on those issues around steel in the coming days, weeks and months,' she added. Alasdair McDiarmid, assistant general secretary of the Community union, said it was 'absolutely vital' to secure a deal on steel as quickly as possible. Mr Trump did not say when the tariffs would be eliminated (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) 'Our steel producers and their US customers need an end to the current state of uncertainty to allow normal business to resume. 'Crucially, we must see a full exemption for all UK steel exports to the US – without that guarantee some of our leading steel businesses could be left behind, with a threat to jobs and livelihoods.' It comes as a £500 million five-year deal has been struck between Network Rail and British Steel, which Ms Alexander said was a 'vote of confidence'. Workers at the British Steel site in Scunthorpe will make rail tracks (Danny Lawson/PA) British Steel is to supply 337,000 tonnes of rail track, with a further 80-90,000 tonnes to be provided by other European manufacturers. The Network Rail contract will start on July 1 and is set to provide the company with 80% of its rail needs. Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, launched a consultation in March which it said would affect between 2,000 and 2,700 jobs, despite months of negotiations and a £500 million co-investment offer from the Government. The Scunthorpe plant has been producing steel for Britain's railways since 1865. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is finalising the deal (Joe Giddens/PA) The Network Rail agreement is the first major public procurement since the Government's emergency legislation was passed. Network Rail's group director for railway business services Clive Berrington said: 'We are committed to buying British where it makes economic sense to do so and British Steel remain extremely competitive in the provision of rail and will remain our main supplier in the years ahead.' Craig Harvey, British Steel's commercial director for rail, added: 'The contract represents a huge vote of confidence in UK workers and British industry, underpinning the vital role we play in ensuring millions of passengers and freight operators enjoy safe, enjoyable and timely journeys on Britain's railways.' Charlotte Brumpton-Childs, national officer at the GMB union, said it was a 'crucial first step in securing the future of our steel industry' and urged ministers to make sure British Steel has a 'constant flow of orders' from other infrastructure projects.

Work to get US steel tariffs removed to go on in coming ‘days, weeks and months'
Work to get US steel tariffs removed to go on in coming ‘days, weeks and months'

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Work to get US steel tariffs removed to go on in coming ‘days, weeks and months'

Work to get US tariffs on UK steel removed will go on in the coming 'days, weeks and months', the Transport Secretary has said, after a deal was finalised that left the future of those levies up in the air. US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer signed off a US-UK deal that will slash trade barriers on goods from both countries at the G7 on Monday. But US tariffs for the steel industry will stand at 25% for now rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. This is less than the US global rate of 50% for steel and aluminium. The two leaders pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed', the Department for Business and Trade said. The Chinese ownership of the British Steel could be a sticking point in the deal on steel as the executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances that the metal originates in the UK. 'The United Kingdom also committed to working to meet American requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminium products intended for export to the United States and on the nature of ownership of relevant production facilities,' the order states. After signing it, the US President was asked whether steel tariffs would be eliminated, to which he replied: 'We're gonna let you have that information in a little while.' In April, the UK Government used emergency powers to take control of British Steel and continue production at the site after Chinese owners Jingye proposed shutting the Scunthorpe site's two blast furnaces and other key steelmaking operations. But its future is still uncertain, with Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander saying the Government is eager for it to be 'part of a commercially-operated business with private investment'. 'We're talking to a number of third parties about that. At the moment, no options are off the table,' she told Sky News. She said there was still 'more work to do' to get steel tariffs eliminated, including on 'technical detail'. 'We're working through some technical detail around steel because we want to bring that 25% tariff that applies at the moment obviously down further,' she told BBC Breakfast. She said the UK is 'working on getting that implemented'. 'And we're determined to go further and we'll be working on those issues around steel in the coming days, weeks and months,' she added. Alasdair McDiarmid, assistant general secretary of the Community union, said it was 'absolutely vital' to secure a deal on steel as quickly as possible. 'Our steel producers and their US customers need an end to the current state of uncertainty to allow normal business to resume. 'Crucially, we must see a full exemption for all UK steel exports to the US – without that guarantee some of our leading steel businesses could be left behind, with a threat to jobs and livelihoods.' It comes as a £500 million five-year deal has been struck between Network Rail and British Steel, which Ms Alexander said was a 'vote of confidence'. British Steel is to supply 337,000 tonnes of rail track, with a further 80-90,000 tonnes to be provided by other European manufacturers. The Network Rail contract will start on July 1 and is set to provide the company with 80% of its rail needs. Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, launched a consultation in March which it said would affect between 2,000 and 2,700 jobs, despite months of negotiations and a £500 million co-investment offer from the Government. The Scunthorpe plant has been producing steel for Britain's railways since 1865. The Network Rail agreement is the first major public procurement since the Government's emergency legislation was passed. Network Rail's group director for railway business services Clive Berrington said: 'We are committed to buying British where it makes economic sense to do so and British Steel remain extremely competitive in the provision of rail and will remain our main supplier in the years ahead.' Craig Harvey, British Steel's commercial director for rail, added: 'The contract represents a huge vote of confidence in UK workers and British industry, underpinning the vital role we play in ensuring millions of passengers and freight operators enjoy safe, enjoyable and timely journeys on Britain's railways.' Charlotte Brumpton-Childs, national officer at the GMB union, said it was a 'crucial first step in securing the future of our steel industry' and urged ministers to make sure British Steel has a 'constant flow of orders' from other infrastructure projects.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store