
Vacaville neighbors push back on proposed battery plant as energy company works to win favor
Developers on the Corby Project website call it an innovative project that features batteries with a capacity of up to 300 megawatts.
The proposed location is on 40 acres of land owned by the company near the intersection of Kilkenny Road and Byrnes Road in Solano County.
NextEra says in its project description online:
"It will provide California with additional flexibility in managing the energy grid, helping keep the lights on even during the hottest months of the year, when demand for electricity is at its peak. It will also help balance the diverse renewable energy resources on the grid minute by minute, filling in the gaps even when the wind is not blowing and the sun is not shining. The Corby Project is more than batteries — it represents a significant capital investment in California. It will create good-paying jobs and millions in additional revenue for the local community."
Stephen Anh, the project developer, told CBS13 at Wednesday's meeting that the project is expected to have minimal environmental impact and should bring in around 200 new jobs.
"The project is also expected to generate over $70 million in property tax revenue to support local initiatives," said Anh.
Some neighbors are sounding the alarm on the project, saying the public safety risks outweigh the benefits, and organizing a campaign against it.
"They do have an inherent risk that they can catch fire in a process called thermal runaway. During that fire, they could burn for multiple days and cause residents to evacuate and emit toxic fumes into the air," said Sarah Dunn, a Vacaville resident volunteering on the county's Technical Working Group researching battery energy storage systems. "Also, particulate matter that could be toxic and potentially contaminate the area surrounding them. So it's really important that they're sited in appropriate locations so they don't pose a hazard to the people that live around them."
For example, in February, a battery storage facility near Monterey caught fire and prompted evacuations due to the unknown hazards in the smoke.
Dunn says Solano County is working to adopt a new ordinance and better safety regulations for these types of battery storage facilities.
Right now, there is a countywide moratorium against them.
"The purpose of that is to research and adopt regulations that would allow for safe siting of these facilities within our county. We want to identify purposeful and thoughtful locations for them. We don't want to have them in places that could pose a hazard," said Dunn.
Neighbor Michael Geller says he lives less than 1,000 feet from where developers want to break ground on the new facility. The criticism is that the proposed site is too close to existing homes, I-80 and a hospital.
"Solano County has a moratorium on these facilities. They've chosen to go directly to the state energy commission for approval rather than the typical land use process," said Geller.
NextEra Energy took the Corby Project to the California Energy Commission to approve their application, saying that it would overrule the county moratorium in light of Assembly Bill 205.
Neighbors, unhappy with the company bypassing the local ordinances, showed up at the open house meeting in protest of the project.
"It's always good to have the support of your neighbors. But it's gonna take much more than that for us to stop this," said Geller.
Anh recognized there was a mixed reaction at the meeting, but said the company wants community input and hoped to educate neighbors about the project.
"These battery storage systems are very safe. We work with reputable vendors that go through very rigorous industry testing and certification," said Anh. "It's the same battery chemistry used in your iPhone."
Anh says the facility would also bring grid reliability for the county and attract new business.
"I am glad we are doing this. We just wanted to get public feedback, incorporate that into our design," said Anh.
The next step is for the California Energy Commission to approve the project. After, a state public hearing would be held where neighbors are already planning to voice their concerns.
For Dunn, the decision should be at the local level.
"It's very disheartening and discouraging and extremely frustrating that the county is doing a phenomenal job researching this and trying to put in best practices in place, and then we have a company that's trying to back door and work around it and put their project where it makes sense for them, but not necessarily makes sense for our county," said Dunn.
A decision by the CEC is expected in the next few months.
NextEra Energy is hoping to start construction next summer and be online by 2027.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Palms Insurance Company, Limited and Palms Specialty Insurance Company, Inc.
OLDWICK, N.J., August 01, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AM Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of A (Excellent) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating (Long-Term ICR) of "a" (Excellent) of Palms Insurance Company, Limited (Palms) (George Town, Cayman Islands). Concurrently, AM Best has affirmed the FSR of A- (Excellent) and the Long-Term ICR of "a-" (Excellent) of Palms Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. (Palms Specialty) (Delaware). The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings) is stable. The ratings of Palms reflect its balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as strongest, as well as its adequate operating performance, neutral business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management (ERM). The ratings of Palms Specialty reflect its balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its adequate operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate ERM. Both companies are wholly owned by NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc. (NEECH), which, in turn, is wholly owned by NextEra Energy, Inc. (NextEra) [NYSE: NEE]. Palms is a single-parent captive, which underwrites the insurance risks of NextEra and its affiliates, providing specialized direct and assumed property, casualty, workers' compensation, automobile liability and employers' liability coverages. Palms Specialty, formed in 2022, is a specialty insurer focusing on U.S. excess and surplus lines accounts, providing coverage for specialty property, professional lines and other specialty lines with manageable gross limits within the risk management structure of its parent. The balance sheet strength assessment of strongest for Palms is supported through its strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR). In addition, Palms has grown its surplus in each of the past five years through organic growth, allowing the captive to maintain sufficient capital in supporting its ongoing obligations. The adequate operating performance assessment reflects a five-year average for both combined and operating ratios that outperform AM Best's captive composite. Palms continues to generate favorable underwriting results and benefits from its low underwriting expense structure as a single parent captive. The very strong balance sheet assessment for Palms Specialty is based on its strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by BCAR. AM Best expects that Palms Specialty will continue to maintain supportive risk-adjusted capital levels throughout its start-up phase. The adequate operating performance assessment is based on the company's favorable operating ratio since inception, in addition to its clearly defined business plan and income statement projections that contemplate a level of implementation and execution risk for a newly formed entity. AM Best views Palms Specialty's business profile as limited, given the execution risk associated with a start-up entity and the degree of competition in its selected market. Negative rating action could occur if Palms Specialty's balance sheet strength or operating performance materially differ to the downside from its initial business plan. Palms and Palms Specialty both benefit from the parent company's established and tested ERM framework and processes that continue to evolve with further improvements tailored to both companies. The ratings also reflect the role of Palms and Palms Specialty within the risk management structure of its parent company. AM Best remains the leading rating agency of alternative risk transfer entities, with more than 200 such vehicles rated in the United States and throughout the world. For current Best's Credit Ratings and independent data on the captive and alternative risk transfer insurance market, please visit This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments. AM Best is a global credit rating agency, news publisher and data analytics provider specializing in the insurance industry. Headquartered in the United States, the company does business in over 100 countries with regional offices in London, Amsterdam, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and Mexico City. For more information, visit Copyright © 2025 by A.M. Best Rating Services, Inc. and/or its affiliates. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. View source version on Contacts Luke Davies Financial Analyst +1 908 882 2467 Fred Eslami Associate Director +1 908 882 1759 Christopher SharkeyAssociate Director, Public Relations +1 908 882 2310 Al Slavin Senior Public Relations Specialist +1 908 882 2318 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NextEra Energy (NEE) Falls Following Q2 Results
The share price of NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE) fell by 7.21% between July 22 and July 29, 2025, putting it among the Energy Stocks that Lost the Most This Week. A wind turbine, its blades spinning to generate clean renewable energy. NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE) is the world's largest generator of renewable energy from the wind and sun and a global leader in battery storage. NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE) fell despite beating estimates for Q2 2025 adjusted profit, boosted by robust growth in its renewables division amid soaring power demand from AI data centers and hyperscalers. However, the company's revenue of $6.7 billion fell below expectations by almost $802 million. Moreover, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE) recently suffered a setback after President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act effectively ended renewable energy tax credits earlier than initially expected. Jeffries analysts recently stated that NextEra's long-term profit growth faces resistance as power projects reduce their reliance on tax credits. While we acknowledge the potential of NEE as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 12 Best Crude Oil Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds and The 5 Energy Stocks Billionaires are Quietly Piling Into. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Dominion Post
3 days ago
- Dominion Post
'It's a no-brainer': Mon Commission opposes passthrough power lines
MORGANTOWN — 'It solves a problem, but somebody else's problem … And to be forced to accept this project without any benefit to our citizens while extremely impacting our citizens isn't something that this commission can stand for.' And with that, the Monongalia County Commission voted Wednesday to take a public position against the 105-mile MidAtlantic Resiliency Link power transmission project looking at parts of West Virginia as a path for 500-kilovolt power lines running from Greene County, Pa. to Frederick County, Va. Five counties – Monongalia, Preston, Hampshire, Jefferson and Mineral – have been identified by NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic as part of the potential route With Wednesday's resolution, all five county commissions have now said, 'No, thank you.' Commissioner Sean Sikora, who offered the remarks that opened this report, explained further. 'When we had the work session with NextEra, everything that they're saying in regards to electricity needs is true. We just don't see a benefit to them running this line across our state – across our beautiful county – and not providing us any benefit.' In regard to this project, one of the major sticking points raised by both residents and elected officials is that West Virginia – a next exporter of energy as the country's fifth-highest producer – is little more than countryside to be cleared in service to power-hungry data centers in northern Virginia. Even so, it's believed the cost of the infrastructure will ultimately be paid through increased rates for all customers across the 13-state power grid operated by PJM Interconnection. 'To me, it's pretty simple. They want to shove these things down our throats and say, 'Oh, by the way, you also get to pay for it, and by the way, you don't get any benefit from it,'' Commission President Jeff Arnett said. 'It's a no-brainer.' Arnett went on to say there was consensus across the political spectrum in terms of the numerous individuals who kept pressure on the commission to get involved. One of those individuals was Delegate David McCormick, R-82nd District. 'This is a bipartisan issue. It's about property values and increased rates for ratepayers. I don't see West Virginia and West Virginians benefiting from this; it being just a vehicle to get more power to Virginia to help their economic development efforts with data centers. I'd rather see them come here, frankly,' McCormick said. 'Virginia doesn't have enough power? Well, maybe they shouldn't have closed all the power plants and they wouldn't have this problem.' In addition to the resolution opposing MARL within Monongalia County, the commission also pledged to honor a recent request from the Hampshire County Commission to coordinate the efforts of the various counties leading up to and including participation in the West Virginia Public Service Commission's review of the final project route presented by NextEra.