European leaders to discuss potential security guarantees for Ukraine with Donald Trump
Donald Trump
on Monday.
The meeting follows a summit held in Alaska on Friday between Mr Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin, and claims by a White House envoy that Russia has dropped its opposition to the West providing Nato-style defence pledges to Kyiv.
Steve Witkoff said: 'We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato.'
The Article 5 clause of Nato's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defence, the notion that an attack on a single member is considered an attack on them all.
READ MORE
He told US television on Sunday that this is a 'game changing decision' and 'the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that'. He did not provide details of what was discussed.
There are concerns among Ukraine's supporters that
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
could face significant pressure in Washington on Monday, given his February talks with Mr Trump in the Oval Office descended
into a shouting match
.
However, this time he is expected to be accompanied in Washington by the leaders of Germany, France, Italy, the UK and Finland, along with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte and European Commission president
Ursula von der Leyen
.
Mr Trump's relations with European leaders can be prickly, and it is notable that the group includes several who he reportedly likes: Italy's
Giorgia Meloni
, Britain's
Keir Starmer
, Finland's Alexander Stubb and Mr Rutte of Nato.
[
The Irish Times view on the Trump-Putin summit: a shameful day in Alaska
Opens in new window
]
European leaders who make up the 'coalition of the willing' on Sunday agreed Russia would face more sanctions and wider economic measures if it does not stop its bombardment of Ukraine.
Speaking after the virtual conference, which was co-chaired by Mr Starmer and French president
Emmanuel Macron
, Mr Zelenskiy said: 'It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine.'
'We need security to work in practice like Article 5 of Nato,' he said. Mr Zelenskiy said he also considers EU accession to be 'part of the security guarantees'.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin, who also participated in Sunday's conference, said Ukraine needs 'strong, credible, long-term security guarantees', which means EU membership and sustained support from Europe and the US.
[
Ukraine has right to make decisions on its territory, says Taoiseach after Trump comments
Opens in new window
]
Meanwhile, US secretary of state Marco Rubio said there will 'have to be some security guarantees for Ukraine' because 'if this war were to end, they have to make sure this never happens again'.
[
Trump pressing Ukraine for a quick deal after failed summit is a clear triumph for Putin
Opens in new window
]
'For there (to) be a peace, the Russian side is going to have to accept that Ukraine is a sovereign country that has a right to defend itself and has a right to enter into alliances with other countries to defend itself,' he added.
'What guarantees are built in there that are enforceable, that's what we'll be talking about over the next few days.'
Russia's core demands include Ukraine's handover of five regions, agreement to abandon its bid to join Nato and acceptance of other limits on its sovereignty. Kyiv says any such deal would amount to capitulation. The Kremlin has previously rejected the prospect of western peacekeepers overseeing a deal to end the war.
The Alaska summit was widely seen as a victory for Mr Putin, because Mr Trump scrapped a threat to impose more heavy sanctions on Russia and dropped demands for an immediate ceasefire in favour of Moscow's call for an overarching agreement to end the war.
After the summit, which was lauded by the Kremlin, Mr Trump publicly urged Kyiv to 'make a deal' while reportedly telling Mr Zelenskiy that Russia was demanding the full withdrawal of Ukraine's forces from its Donetsk and Luhansk regions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
38 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Fine Gael is electrified at prospect of Heather Humphreys running for president
'It's a fait accompli for Heather,' one Fine Gael Minister said. In advance of Fine Gael reopening its nominations for presidential candidates on Monday night, the support for former minister Heather Humphreys to run for Áras an Uachtaráin among councillors, TDs and Senators was overwhelming. Ireland South MEP Seán Kelly or people close to him have for days, across various media outlets, been coyly breadcrumbing his desire to run. Kelly may be once-bitten, twice shy about making his intentions known, after already ruling himself out in July. But if he were to put himself forward, it is difficult to see his path to nomination, given the need for him to secure the support of at least 20 members of the Fine Gael parliamentary party. READ MORE There was little evidence that Kelly had used the weekend to lobby TDs and Senators, with a number of Leinster House politicians saying they had not yet heard from him. While the party is respectful of the former GAA chief's record as a quota-bursting poll topper in the European elections, the momentum behind Humphreys seems unassailable. 'It's absolutely no disrespect to Seán,' said a TD, 'it just says more about Heather.' Humphreys does not seem to have been actively lobbying TDs or Senators but she doesn't need to. By Monday afternoon, the former Fine Gael deputy leader and Cavan–Monaghan TD was still yet to confirm her intention to run for president. Yet many in Fine Gael kept talking in the future tense about what her campaign 'will' be like. Some confided they had been given the impression that the party had succeeded in changing the former minister's mind about running, while other politicians were more pragmatic. 'I think people are just manifesting,' one said. Fine Gael is electrified at the prospect of having a Border-county Protestant running for the Áras. Particularly given the mounting optimism within the party's ranks that 2025 is its first, best chance to finally win the coveted constitutional role, which carries so much prestige as a symbol of national unity and cultural identity. Fine Gael councillor and former lord mayor of Dublin Emma Blain told The Irish Times she was supporting Humphreys. 'It's the right time for Heather,' said Blain, a former editor of the Church of Ireland Gazette. 'She would be a shared-island candidate, who as president would be beneficial to the whole island'. Though Fine Gael is jealously guarding Mairead McGuinness 's record and reputation out of respect for its erstwhile front-runner, some concede that Humphreys is starting to seem like an overlooked obvious choice. Her island-traversing record as communities minister and her prominent role in the 1916 commemorations all now seem like kismet, for the blooming campaign behind the woman who insisted she didn't want to be president. If it comes to it, Fine Gael remains relatively relaxed about the prospect of a contest between Kelly and Humphreys for the nomination, with party figures making emollient noises about 'healthy competition'. Though there's some anxiety about time, others feel a contest would inject pace into what had been a lethargic slouch towards September. In Kelly's home kingdom of Kerry, there was some disquiet about Fine Gael's presidential candidate being decided by those above in Dublin. 'Remember one thing, Fine Gael headquarters have not a good track record when it comes to nominating presidential candidates,' Kerry councillor Bobby O'Connell said. Fellow Kerry councillor Michael Foley added that 'what's more than that, they got it wrong here in Kerry in the general election too'. O'Connell said a competition between the two would be the best and fairest for the party and the base. 'I think it should go to a convention,' he said. 'And, if you'll pardon the pun, let the best man win.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Lip-Bu Tan, Intel CEO with Silicon Valley's toughest turnaround job
At the top of the to-do list for many American business leaders is a simple priority: placate Donald Trump. Anyone doubting the need to keep the CEO-in-Chief happy has just been served a stark reminder by Lip-Bu Tan, boss of chipmaker Intel. A week ago, Tan had the dubious distinction of being the most prominent American business executive whose head Trump has demanded on a plate. The presidential call for his resignation appeared to stem not from Intel's struggles and recent threat to abandon cutting-edge chip manufacturing, but from Tan's former existence as a prolific start-up investor in Chinese semiconductor companies. A hastily arranged meeting at the White House on Monday turned the tide. Trump declared Tan's rise 'an amazing story' and hinted mysteriously at 'proposals' from the company that would soon follow. Days later, it emerged that the US has discussed taking a stake in Intel in return for investing in one of its manufacturing plants. READ MORE If Tan has won over the deal-besotted president with a tempting transaction, it is a fitting sign of the times. While the White House experiments with a new form of capitalism-by-fiat, extreme political volatility has descended on the US chip industry. For Tan, a widely-respected industry veteran who landed in the top job at Intel in March, the drama has complicated what was already one of the toughest turnaround jobs in the history of Silicon Valley. 'Semiconductor leaders have had to pivot from being an industry that was under-appreciated, not understood ... to now being in the bullseye,' says Jodi Shelton, chief executive of the Global Semiconductor Alliance, an industry group. The political warning signs should have been obvious. Intel was the biggest beneficiary of the Biden administration's move to pour $39bn into reviving chip manufacturing in the US. Trump has chafed at those grants, though he has so far stopped short of killing them outright. Through Walden International, a US venture capital firm he started more than 40 years ago with just $3 million put up by family friends, Tan has played a significant role as a start-up investor in China's tech industry – investing in China's state-backed chip manufacturers SMIC and Biren Technology, as well as Sina, creator of Weibo, China's answer to X. Those deals made him a natural target for Washington's China hawks. US senator Tom Cotton wrote to Intel's chair last week asking if Tan had a 'conflict of interest'. Tan, who dismissed the queries as 'misinformation', appeared to lack the political antenna to recognise the seriousness of the threat. 'It's taken too long for him to get to Washington. He should have got there sooner,' says Daniel Newman, an analyst at The Futurum Group. That marks Tan out from his predecessor. Pat Gelsinger, who was pushed out late last year after losing the confidence of his company's board nearly four years into an attempted turnaround, worked Washington hard and positioned Intel as a national champion. On Gelsinger's watch (and with Tan on the board until last year) Intel made some headway. But it failed to meet his habitually upbeat predictions and was caught out by the surge in demand for Nvidia's AI chips. 'Intel are losing share in almost every category they're in,' says Ben Bajarin, an analyst at Creative Strategies. Tan (65) is willing to challenge orthodoxy inside one of Silicon Valley's most hidebound cultures, bringing an investor's eye to an engineer-led company. His arrival has been welcomed both in the chip industry and on Wall Street (Intel's stock has risen by more than a fifth since his appointment), though he has taken on a position few envy. 'Intel is where good reputations go to die,' says Michael Marks, a veteran Silicon Valley executive who is partner in a venture capital firm with Tan. Tan has taken a circuitous route to the top of the US corporate world. Born in Malaysia, he obtained a degree in quantum physics in Singapore before moving to the US to study nuclear engineering. By his own account, he dropped out without completing his PhD at Massachusetts Institute of Technology after the Three Mile Island nuclear disaster and moved to Silicon Valley. He went on to build Walden, his VC firm, into a behemoth with $5 billion under management. That was followed by a surprise move in 2009 to become the head of Cadence, which sells software used to design chips. The role cemented Tan's relationships with many of the semiconductor industry's leading figures. In contrast to Gelsinger's optimistic rhetoric, Tan has emphasised the deep problems besetting Intel. According to a former colleague at Cadence, he is 'demanding but very fair, very clear'. Despite taking early action to slim Intel down, the company's finances are still under pressure. Nor has Tan ended uncertainty about its strategy. Last month, he threatened to drop its push into advanced manufacturing. With the future of the last US-headquartered manufacturer of cutting-edge chips in doubt, suspicions in Washington about Tan's role as longtime cheerleader for China's semiconductor industry have been harder to quell. Learning to play by the capital's new rules is now paramount. The fate of a struggling Silicon Valley icon depends on it. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Timeline of territorial shifts in Russia's war on Ukraine
Russia's troops are continuing their slow war of attrition in eastern and northern Ukraine, even as the conflict enters a pivotal phase with a series of high-level meetings that are part of US President Donald Trump's push for peace. In the three-and-a-half years since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the front line has continued to move slowly with some unexpected strikes also redrawing the map. Here is a look at some of the main events in the conflict. An aerial view of Chasiv Yar shows the frontline city in ruins after heavy fighting between Russian and Ukrainian forces for over a year (AP) February 24 2022: Russian President Vladimir Putin launches an invasion of Ukraine from the north, east and south. Russian troops quickly reach Kyiv's outskirts, but their attempts to capture the capital and other cities in the north-east meet stiff resistance. March 5 2022: Russian advances toward Kyiv and Kherson reach their height. The port city of Mariupol is surrounded. April 2 2022: Ukraine defeats Russian forces in Kyiv after throwing them back in Chernihiv. August 29 2022: Ukraine's first counter-offensive starts in the east and south. September 30 2022: Russia illegally annexes Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine, even though it does not fully control either of the four. September to November 2022: Ukrainian forces reclaim vast parts of the Kharkiv, Mykolaiv and Kherson regions in the first counter-offensive, including the city of Kherson itself. President Vladimir Putin and Russian officials during a ceremony to sign the treaties for four regions of Ukraine to join Russia at the Kremlin in 2022 (Kremlin Pool Photo via AP) May 22 2023: Russia claims control of Bakhmut after months of fighting. June 6 2023: As Ukraine's long-anticipated second counter-offensive starts, the Russian-controlled Kakhovka Dam explodes, sending a wall of water into southern Ukraine and upending Ukrainian battle plans. Autumn 2023: The second Ukrainian counter-offensive ends, with little change to the front line. February 18 2024: Russian forces take complete control of the eastern city of Avdiivka after months of combat. April 19 2024: The US House of Representatives approves a 61 billion dollar package for Ukraine after months of delay. May 10 2024: Russia launches a new offensive in the north-eastern region of Kharkiv, capturing a string of villages and opening a new front in the war. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks during a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels (AP) August 6 2024: Ukraine launches a lightning incursion into Russia's Kursk region, holding territory along the border in an unexpected and embarrassing episode for the Kremlin. January 20 2025: Mr Trump is inaugurated as the 47th president of the United States. His election raises uncertainty as to whether Washington will continue to support Ukraine. April 26 2025: Moscow says all Ukrainian troops have been forced out from Russia's Kursk region. Several weeks later, Mr Putin visits the area in a show of strength and is filmed speaking with local volunteers. June 1 2025: Ukraine strikes airfields deep inside Russia by launching drones that have been secretly stored and transported across the country on the back of trucks. The attack is codenamed Operation Spider Web. Summer 2025: Russia and Ukraine both step up drone strikes with the ability to strike deep into each other's territory. June 30 2025: Russia says it has taken full control of Ukraine's Luhansk, one of four regions that Moscow illegally annexed in September 2022. July 31 2025: Russia says it has taken full control of the strategically important Ukrainian city of Chasiv Yar after a grinding, months-long assault. August 2025: Russian forces continue their push in the Donetsk region, where the Kremlin has focused the bulk of military efforts, capturing small villages and closing in on Pokrovsk, a strategically important city. August 15 2025: Mr Putin meets Mr Trump in Alaska for the first Russia-US summit in four years to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and European officials say Mr Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that it controls as part of a deal.
