Yana, a 130,000-year-old baby mammoth, goes under the scalpel
But the body they were dissecting is a baby mammoth who died around 130,000 years ago.
Discovered last year, the calf — nicknamed Yana, for the river basin where she was found — is in a remarkable state of preservation, giving scientists a glimpse into the past and, potentially, the future as climate change thaws the permafrost in which she was found.
Yana's skin has kept its greyish-brown colour and clumps of reddish hairs. Her wrinkled trunk is curved and points to her mouth. The orbits of her eyes are perfectly recognisable and her sturdy legs resemble those of a modern-day elephant.
This necropsy — an autopsy on an animal — "is an opportunity to look into the past of our planet", said Artemy Goncharov, head of the Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics of Microorganisms at the Institute of Experimental Medicine in Saint Petersburg.
Scientists hope to find unique ancient bacteria and carry out genetic analysis of the plants and spores Yana ate to learn more about the place and time she lived.
The calf largely avoided the ravages of time because she lay for thousands of years encased in permafrost in the Sakha region in Siberia.
Measuring 1.2 metres (nearly four feet) at the shoulder and two metres long, and weighing 180 kilogrammes (nearly 400 pounds), Yana could be the best-preserved mammoth specimen ever found, retaining internal organs and soft tissues, the Russian scientists said.
- Stomach, intestines -
Dissecting her body is a treasure trove for the half dozen scientists that were carrying out the necropsy in late March at the Mammoth Museum at North-Eastern Federal University in the regional capital, Yakutsk.
Wearing white sterile bodysuits, goggles and facemasks, the zoologists and biologists spent several hours working on the front quarters of the mammoth, a species that died out almost 4,000 years ago.
"We can see that many organs and tissues are very well preserved," Goncharov said.
"The digestive tract is partly preserved, the stomach is preserved. There are still fragments of the intestines, in particular the colon," enabling scientists to take samples, he said.
They are "searching for ancient microorganisms" preserved inside the mammoth, so they can study their "evolutionary relationship with modern microorganisms", he said.
While one scientist cut Yana's skin with scissors, another made an incision in the inner wall with a scalpel. They then placed tissue samples in test tubes and bags for analysis.
Another table held the mammoth's hindquarters, which remained embedded in a cliff when the front quarters fell below.
The scent emanating from the mammoth was reminiscent of a mixture of fermented earth and flesh, macerated in the Siberian subsoil.
"We are trying to reach the genitals," said Artyom Nedoluzhko, director of the Paleogenomics Laboratory of the European University at Saint Petersburg.
"Using special tools, we want to go into her vagina in order to gather material to understand what microbiota lived in her when she was alive."
- 'Milk tusks' -
Yana was first estimated to have died around 50,000 years ago, but is now dated at "more than 130,000 years" following analysis of the permafrost layer where she lay, said Maxim Cheprasov, director of the Mammoth Museum.
As for her age at death, "it's already clear that she is over a year old because her milk tusks have already appeared," he added.
Both elephants and mammoths have early milk tusks that later fall out.
Scientists are yet to determine why Yana died so young.
At the time when this herbivore mammal was chewing grass, "here on the territory of Yakutia there were not yet any humans", Cheprasov said, since they appeared in modern-day Siberia between 28,000 and 32,000 years ago.
The secret to Yana's exceptional preservation lies in the permafrost: the soil in this region of Siberia that is frozen year-round and acts like a gigantic freezer, preserving the carcasses of prehistoric animals.
The discovery of Yana's exposed body came about because of thawing permafrost, which scientists believe is due to global warming.
The study of the microbiology of such ancient remains also explores the "biological risks" of global warming, Goncharov said.
Some scientists are researching whether the melting permafrost could release potentially harmful pathogens, he explained.
"There are some hypotheses or conjectures that in the permafrost there could be preserved pathogenic microorganisms, which when it thaws can get into the water, plants and the bodies of animals -- and humans," he said.
gde/bur/am/cad/jhb/fg
© Agence France-Presse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
9 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Why do screens keep you up? It may not be the blue light
Experts have long warned about the dangers of blue light before bed. When exposed via smartphones, TVs, laptops and other devices, our brains suppress the production of the hormone melatonin, which normally makes you feel drowsy. As a result, you feel more alert, making it harder to fall — and stay — asleep. But the link between blue light and sleep is murkier than we thought, said Lauren E. Hartstein, an assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Arizona. She and other researchers have been taking a closer look at the evidence, which suggests that blue light alone may not be causing poor sleep. And in some cases, screen use could even help you drift off. Here's what studies on blue light actually suggest — and what may help you sleep more soundly: Research on blue light and sleep is mixed Many of the available studies on blue light and sleep are old and are limited by their small sample sizes. They were also often performed in carefully controlled laboratories, so their results don't always reflect real life, Dr. Hartstein said. While it's true that blue light exposure can sink melatonin levels, the limited evidence we have suggests that screen use does not always cause this dip, said Mariana Figueiro, a scientist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City who studies how light influences health. Some of Dr. Figueiro's research suggests, for instance, that how long you use your device for, how close it is to your eyes and how bright it is may play a role. One of her studies from 2013 found that using an iPad at full brightness for two hours caused melatonin levels to drop slightly, whereas using it for one hour caused no change. Another study from 2014 concluded that watching television from nine feet away had no effect on melatonin levels. And using an iPad at a higher brightness level may suppress melatonin more than using it at a lower brightness level, according to a 2018 study. What you do during the day may also influence screen-related melatonin drops at night. The more bright sunlight you're exposed to during the day, some research suggests, the less susceptible you may be to an evening dip. Some people are more sensitive to blue light than others, Dr. Hartstein added. In one study published in 2019, researchers exposed 55 adults to a range of light levels (including blue light) during the evening. They found that one participant needed 40 times more light exposure to get the same degree of melatonin suppression as the most blue-light-sensitive participant. However, it's still not clear whether the levels of melatonin suppression from screen exposure are enough to impair sleep in the first place, Dr. Figueiro said. If a study participant's sleep was disrupted after screen use, it's challenging to know if that was because of the blue light, or something else such as late afternoon caffeine, stress or a snoring bed partner. The conclusions of these studies are also often mixed. In a 2022 review, researchers analyzed two dozen studies on how blue light affected sleep in young adults. Many of the studies found no link between blue light exposure and poor sleep, while a few did. Last year, the National Sleep Foundation concluded that there wasn't enough evidence to demonstrate that blue light exposure from screen use before bed can impair sleep. 'We really need more research,' said Allison Harvey, a professor and clinical psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley. How you use screens may be important While we don't know exactly what it is about screens that affects our sleep, some research suggests that what you're doing on them can play a big role, Dr. Hartstein said. Interactive activities like playing video games, browsing social media, shopping and gambling are among the worst types of screen use for your sleep, said Dr. Daniel Buysse, a psychiatrist and professor focused on sleep at the University of Pittsburgh. These behaviors engage the brain's reward system, which can keep you awake and glued to your device well into the night, he said. Social media use is especially concerning, Dr. Buysse added, because it's designed to keep you immersed for as long as possible. Potentially rewarding digital activities, like communicating with friends and playing games, as well as distressing ones, like endlessly scrolling through unnerving news articles or videos, can also stimulate your brain in a way that makes it difficult to sleep, Dr. Hartstein said. You can switch the device off, but 'you can't turn your brain off,' she said. A 2024 study of about 500 15-year-old boys found that those who said they talked, texted or played video games on a device before bed tended to fall asleep later and sleep for less time than those who said they did not. There's less consensus about how other types of screen use, like watching television or reading, may affect sleep, Dr. Hartstein said. And it may depend on what you're watching or reading on your device, she said. Starting a new, suspenseful drama to read or watch will most likely impair your sleep more than rewatching or rereading an old, comforting series, Dr. Harvey said. If you already know the outcome, you'll have an easier time turning off the TV or e-reader and falling asleep. The 2024 study on teen boys found that those who reported watching television or movies on any device before bed experienced no difference in their sleep than those who said they did not. The study, however, didn't note the type of movie or show they reported watching. Some screen use may actually help you sleep For people who struggle with a cycle of negative thoughts just before bed, watching certain types of TV shows or movies or reading something relaxing on a tablet may be beneficial. The content should be engaging enough to distract from their negative thoughts yet boring enough so that it doesn't keep them up. The 'sweet spot' seems to be something positive and familiar, like a scripted comedy, said Aric Prather, a psychologist at the University of California, San Francisco, who treats insomnia. The 'go-to rumination killer' for one of his patients, Dr. Prather said, is 'It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.' Whatever you decide to read or watch, try to avoid doing it in your bed. That separation helps your brain associate your bed with one thing — sleep, Dr. Hartstein said. Ultimately, you may find that your screen use is not affecting your sleep at all, Dr. Hartstein added. In that case, she sees little reason to cut back. 'If you are able to fall asleep quickly, you sleep well throughout the night, and you feel rested the next day, then that's great,' she said. 'You don't need to constantly adjust your behaviors.'
Khaleej Times
10-08-2025
- Khaleej Times
How older people are reaping brain benefits from new tech
It started with a high school typing course Wanda Woods enrolled because her father advised that typing proficiency would lead to jobs. Sure enough, the federal Environmental Protection Agency hired her as an after-school worker while she was still a junior. Her supervisor 'sat me down and put me on a machine called a word processor,' Woods, now 67, recalled. 'It was big and bulky and used magnetic cards to store information. I thought, 'I kinda like this.'' Decades later, she was still liking it. In 2012 — the first year that more than half of Americans over 65 used the internet — she started a computer training business. Now she is an instructor with Senior Planet in Denver, an AARP-supported effort to help older people learn and stay abreast of technology. Woods has no plans to retire. Staying involved with tech 'keeps me in the know, too,' she said. Some neuroscientists researching the effects of technology on older adults are inclined to agree. The first cohort of seniors to have contended — not always enthusiastically — with a digital society has reached the age when cognitive impairment becomes more common. Given decades of alarms about technology's threats to our brains and well-being — sometimes called 'digital dementia' — one might expect to start seeing negative effects. The opposite appears true. 'Among the digital pioneer generation, use of everyday digital technology has been associated with reduced risk of cognitive impairment and dementia,' said Michael Scullin, a cognitive neuroscientist at Baylor University. It's almost akin to hearing from a nutritionist that bacon is good for you. 'It flips the script that technology is always bad,' said Dr. Murali Doraiswamy, director of the Neurocognitive Disorders Program at Duke University, who was not involved with the study. 'It's refreshing and provocative and poses a hypothesis that deserves further research.' Scullin and Jared Benge, a neuropsychologist at the University of Texas at Austin, were co-authors of a recent analysis investigating the effects of technology use on people over 50 (average age: 69). They found that those who used computers, smartphones, the internet or a mix did better on cognitive tests, with lower rates of cognitive impairment or dementia diagnoses, than those who avoided technology or used it less often. 'Normally, you see a lot of variability across studies,' Scullin said. But in this analysis of 57 studies involving more than 411,000 seniors, published in Nature Human Behavior, almost 90% of the studies found that technology had a protective cognitive effect. Much of the apprehension about technology and cognition arose from research on children and adolescents, whose brains are still developing. 'There's pretty compelling data that difficulties can emerge with attention or mental health or behavioral problems' when young people are overexposed to screens and digital devices, Scullin said. Older adults' brains are also malleable, but less so. And those who began grappling with technology in midlife had already learned 'foundational abilities and skills,' Scullin said. Then, to participate in a swiftly evolving society, they had to learn a whole lot more. Years of online brain-training experiments that last a few weeks or months have produced varying results. Often, they improve the ability to perform the task in question without enhancing other skills. 'I tend to be pretty skeptical' of their benefit, said Walter Boot, a psychologist at the Center on Aging and Behavioral Research at Weill Cornell Medicine. 'Cognition is really hard to change.' The new analysis, however, reflects 'technology use in the wild,' he said, with adults 'having to adapt to a rapidly changing technological environment' over several decades. He found the study's conclusions 'plausible.' Analyses like this can't determine causality. Does technology improve older people's cognition, or do people with low cognitive ability avoid technology? Is tech adoption just a proxy for enough wealth to buy a laptop? 'We still don't know if it's chicken or egg,' Doraiswamy said. Yet when Scullin and Benge accounted for health, education, socioeconomic status and other demographic variables, they still found significantly higher cognitive ability among older digital technology users. What might explain the apparent connection? 'These devices represent complex new challenges,' Scullin said. 'If you don't give up on them, if you push through the frustration, you're engaging in the same challenges that studies have shown to be cognitively beneficial.' Even handling the constant updates, the troubleshooting and the sometimes maddening new operating systems might prove advantageous. 'Having to re learn something is another positive mental challenge,' he said. Still, digital technology may also protect brain health by fostering social connections, known to help stave off cognitive decline. Or its reminders and prompts could partially compensate for memory loss, as Scullin and Benge found in a smartphone study, while its apps help preserve functional abilities like shopping and banking. Numerous studies have shown that while the number of people with dementia is increasing as the population ages, the proportion of older adults who develop dementia has been falling in the United States and in several European countries. Researchers have attributed the decline to a variety of factors, including reduced smoking, higher education levels and better blood pressure treatments. Possibly, Doraiswamy said, engaging with technology has been part of the pattern. Of course, digital technologies present risks, too. Online fraud and scams target older adults, and while they are less apt to report fraud losses than younger people, the amounts they lose are much higher, according to the Federal Trade Commission. Disinformation poses its own hazards. And as with users of any age, more is not necessarily better. 'If you're bingeing Netflix 10 hours a day, you may lose social connections,' Doraiswamy pointed out. Technology, he noted, cannot 'substitute for other brain-healthy activities' like exercising and eating sensibly. An unanswered question: Will this supposed benefit extend to subsequent generations, digital natives more comfortable with the technology their grandparents often labored over? 'The technology is not static — it still changes,' Boot said. 'So maybe it's not a one-time effect.' But the change tech has wrought 'follows a pattern,' he added. 'A new technology gets introduced, and there's a kind of panic.' From television and video games to the latest and perhaps scariest development, artificial intelligence, 'a lot of it is an overblown initial reaction,' he said. 'Then, over time, we see it's not so bad and may actually have benefits.' Like most people her age, Woods grew up in an analog world of paper checks and paper maps. But as she moved from one employer to another through the '80s and '90s, she progressed to IBM desktops and mastered Lotus 1-2-3 and Windows 3.1. Along the way, her personal life turned digital, too: a home desktop when her sons needed one for school, a cellphone after she and her husband couldn't summon help for a roadside flat, a smartwatch to track her steps. These days Woods pays bills and shops online, uses a digital calendar and group-texts her relatives. And she seems unafraid of AI, the most earthshaking new tech. Last year, Woods turned to AI chatbots like Gemini and ChatGPT to plan an RV excursion to South Carolina. Now, she's using them to arrange a family cruise celebrating her fiftieth wedding anniversary. This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Sharjah 24
09-08-2025
- Sharjah 24
Five astronauts depart ISS for return to Earth
Long journey home The returning astronauts — Americans Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan's Takuya Onishi, and Russian cosmonaut Kirill Peskov — are expected to spend over 17 hours in the capsule before splashing down off the coast of California at 15:33 GMT on Saturday. Milestone for NASA's Commercial Crew Programme Their return marks the conclusion of the 10th crew rotation mission under NASA's Commercial Crew Programme, which partners with private industry, including SpaceX, to send astronauts to the ISS following the retirement of the Space Shuttle. Controlled descent and recovery The Dragon capsule detached from the ISS at 22:15 GMT on Friday. Upon re-entry, the spacecraft will slow down significantly, first due to Earth's atmosphere and then with the help of large parachutes for a safe ocean landing. A SpaceX recovery ship will retrieve the capsule and bring it aboard, allowing the astronauts to breathe Earth's air for the first time in months. Scientific contributions in orbit Known as Crew-10, the team conducted numerous experiments during their mission, including research into plant growth in microgravity and how cells respond to gravitational changes. Stranded astronauts finally replaced This mission also marked a turning point for two American astronauts, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, who were unexpectedly stranded on the ISS for nine months after the Boeing Starliner they launched on developed propulsion issues. They had originally planned to spend just eight days in orbit. Looking ahead NASA recently announced Wilmore's retirement after 25 years of service. Meanwhile, a new crew — US astronauts Zena Cardman and Mike Fincke, Japan's Kimiya Yui, and Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov — arrived at the ISS last week for a six-month mission.
