Byrnihat battles respiratory issues, skin rashes
1
2
Byrnihat: Two-year-old Sumaiya Ansari, a resident of Byrnihat town, which is ranked as the world's most polluted metropolitan area by Swiss Group IQAir, was battling breathing problems for several days before she was hospitalised in March and given oxygen support.
She is among many residents of the industrial town on the border of Assam and Meghalaya — otherwise known for their lush, natural beauty — inflicted by illnesses that doctors say are likely linked to high exposure to pollution.
Byrnihat's annual average PM2.5 concentration in 2024 was 128.2 micrograms per cubic meter, according to IQAir, over 25 times the level recommended by WHO.
PM2.5 refers to particulate matter measuring 2.5 microns or less in diameter that can be carried into the lungs, causing deadly diseases and cardiac problems.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
"It was very scary, she was breathing like a fish," said Abdul Halim, Ansari's father, who brought her home from hospital after two days.
According to govt data, the number of respiratory infection cases in the region rose to 3,681 in 2024 from 2,082 in 2022.
"Ninety percent of the patients we see daily come either with a cough or other respiratory issues," said Dr J Marak of Byrnihat Primary Healthcare Centre.
Residents say the toxic air also causes skin rashes, eye irritation and other health problems, damages crops, and restricts routine tasks like drying laundry outdoors. "Everything is covered with dust or soot," said farmer Dildar Hussain.
Unlike other parts of India that face pollution every winter, Byrnihat's air quality remains poor through the year, govt data indicates.
Home to about 80 industries - many of them highly polluting - experts say the problem is exacerbated in the town by other factors like emissions from heavy vehicles, and its 'bowl-shaped topography'.
"Sandwiched between the hilly terrain of Meghalaya and the plains of Assam, there is no room for pollutants to disperse," said Arup Kumar Misra, chairman of Assam's pollution control board.
The town's location has also made a solution tougher, with the states shifting blame to each other, said a Meghalaya government official who did not want to be named.
Since the release of IQAir's report in March, however, Assam and Meghalaya have agreed to form a joint committee and work together to combat Byrnihat's pollution. Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Gaza's Al-Amal hospital 'virtually out of service': WHO
Geneva: The Al-Amal Hospital in Gaza, one of the few still operating in the Palestinian territory, is now "virtually out of service" due to intense military activity, the head of the WHO said Monday. "Access to the hospital is obstructed, preventing new patients from reaching care, and leading to more preventable deaths," the World Health Organization's director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus posted on X. Tedros said two emergency medical teams - one local, the other international - "are still doing their best to serve the remaining patients with the limited medical supplies left on the premises." "With the closure of Al-Amal, Nasser Medical Complex is now the only remaining hospital with an intensive care unit in Khan Younis," he said. The WHO said June 5 that al-Nasser and Al-Amal hospitals were unable to fully treat the wounded that continue to pour in because of serious shortages of medicines and medical supplies after two months of total blockade. Israeli authorities have recently allowed in some humanitarian aid, but way less than what is needed. Nearly 20 months of relentless war, triggered by Hamas' October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel, has created one of the most serious humanitarian crises in the world, with civilians exhausted by bombardments, forced displacement and hunger.
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
These 3 (common) foods can damage the liver
Our liver is one of the most important organs of the body that plays a crucial role in numerous bodily functions, including filtering blood, producing bile, and metabolizing nutrients. It acts as a primary filtration system, removing toxins and waste products from the blood. However, certain foods, that otherwise seem harmless, can seriously damage the liver, and can manifest in the form of fatty liver, Cirrhosis, Fatty Liver Disease, Acute Liver Failure, and Chronic Liver Disease. The good news is that you can avoid consuming these foods in your regular diet, and prevent all these ailments. Let's take a look at top 3 foods that damage your liver (source: Fructose-Heavy Foods Fructose is a type of sugar found naturally in fruits, honey, and some sweeteners like high-fructose corn syrup. While small amounts of fructose from whole fruits are generally safe, consuming too much fructose, especially from processed foods and sweetened drinks, can damage the liver. When you eat a lot of fructose, your liver works hard to break it down. Unlike glucose, fructose is mostly processed in the liver, where it can quickly turn into fat. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo This can lead to fat building up inside the liver, a condition called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Over time, this fat buildup can cause inflammation, scarring, and even liver cancer. High fructose intake also increases oxidative stress and inflammation in the liver. It can raise uric acid levels and blood pressure, and cause insulin resistance, which means your body doesn't respond well to insulin. These changes increase the risk of liver disease and other health problems like diabetes and heart disease. The problem is especially serious with processed foods and drinks that contain added fructose, such as sodas, candies, and many baked goods. These foods can overwhelm the liver's ability to process fructose safely, leading to liver damage. Industrial Seed Oils Industrial seed oils are oils extracted from seeds like sunflower, safflower, cottonseed, soybean, and corn. These oils are common in many processed and fried foods. While they may seem healthy because they come from plants, they can harm your liver and overall health. These oils are high in omega-6 fatty acids, which are essential in small amounts but harmful when consumed excessively. A high intake of omega-6 fats can cause chronic inflammation in the body, including the liver. This inflammation can contribute to liver damage and diseases like fatty liver. Moreover, industrial seed oils are unstable and easily oxidize when exposed to heat, light, or chemicals during processing and cooking. This oxidation produces harmful substances such as trans fats and lipid peroxides. Trans fats are linked to heart disease and type 2 diabetes, while lipid peroxides can damage liver cells by harming DNA and proteins. Repeatedly heating these oils, as happens in frying, makes them even more toxic and increases the risk of liver inflammation and damage. Studies also suggest that these oils may disrupt the balance of good and bad bacteria in the gut, further promoting inflammation and liver problems. Experts advise limiting the use of industrial seed oils and instead choosing healthier fats like olive oil, coconut oil, rice bran oil, and ghee. These alternatives are more stable and less likely to cause inflammation. Fruit Juices Many people think fruit juices are healthy, but most commercially available fruit juices are high in sugar and low in fiber. When fruit is juiced, the natural fiber is removed, leaving mostly sugar, especially fructose. Drinking large amounts of fruit juice can cause the same problems as eating too much fructose-heavy processed food. The liver has to process all that sugar, which can lead to fat accumulation, inflammation, and oxidative stress in liver cells. Unlike whole fruits, fruit juices cause a rapid spike in blood sugar and fructose levels, which overloads the liver. This can worsen fatty liver disease and increase the risk of liver damage. For those concerned about liver health, it is better to eat whole fruits rather than drinking fruit juices. Whole fruits contain fiber that slows sugar absorption and reduces the burden on the liver. Avoid fruit juices without pulp and those with added sugars, as they can contribute to liver fat and inflammation just like sugary sodas One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Indian Express
11 hours ago
- Indian Express
Should Type 5 diabetes be a category at all? Top diabetologists question lack of evidence, data
Top endocrinologists have questioned the way Malnutrition-Related Diabetes Mellitus (MRDM) has been hastily rechristened as Type 5 diabetes by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). In an expert review, Dr Anoop Misra (chairman, Fortis C-DOC Hospital for Diabetes and Allied Sciences), Dr Ambrish Mithal (chairman, Endocrinology and Diabetes at Max Healthcare) and Dr Shashank Joshi (diabetologist, Lilavati Hospital, Mumbai) have argued that the new classification runs ahead without robust modern evidence or clearly defined diagnostic criteria. Their critical analysis was published in Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews recently. 'Reclassifying MRDM as Type 5 diabetes is premature and not supported by current evidence,' they wrote. They argue that MRDM, though first recognised in 1985, was declassified in 1999 due to poor evidence. They say the same holds true today as overlapping symptoms continue to be misleading, the body mass index (BMI) criteria are considered outdated and there is not enough data to warrant a separate type of diabetes. 'We still need rigorous research and definitive biomarkers for such a classification. Besides, there has to be a global consensus,' says Dr Misra. Excerpts: Why can't MRDM be classified as Type 5 diabetes? There's no conclusive evidence that MRDM is a distinct disease rather than a variant or complication of existing diabetes types. Only a distinct phenotype (traits which define the 'what' of a disease) with robust data different from established types merits new classification. MRDM overlaps with other types of diabetes — type 1 (due to autoimmune markers in some cases), type 2 (with insulin resistance or secretory defects), and secondary diabetes (when the pancreas doesn't produce enough digestive enzymes). There's inadequate evidence. Only a few, small-scale studies, such as the 2022 study by Lontchi-Yimagou, exist. Rest are 25-40 year old data, some of which is mostly clinical. These studies are largely cross-sectional and limited in scope, sample size and generalizability. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) and WHO have never formally acknowledged type 3 or type 4 diabetes, making the proposal of a 'type 5' both arbitrary, confusing and unacceptable. What's needed for a classification? A valid classification demands a clearly distinct cause or causes, well-defined diagnostic criteria, international consensus and therapeutic utility. MRDM does not currently satisfy these requirements. Did MRDM ever receive the attention it deserved? The WHO classified it as a separate category in 1985 and it was discussed in international diabetes forums such as the 1976 IDF Congress. However, this attention waned due to the poor quality and limited quantity of research, which was largely descriptive and observational. Eventually, the WHO removed MRDM from its classification in 1999, citing insufficient evidence. In India, MRDM has become increasingly rare. Many experts report not encountering it at all, suggesting its relevance has significantly declined. Should MRDM be treated as a type or a subset of diabetes? MRDM is best viewed not as a separate type of diabetes but as a subset or modified form of existing types, most likely falling under secondary diabetes or as a variant of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. This type is influenced by factors such as chronic undernutrition. Defining it as a distinct 'type' risks oversimplification and could introduce unnecessary confusion in diagnosis and management. What is the classification's impact in India? India historically played a major role in defining and reporting MRDM, contributing to a significant volume of early literature. But MRDM was also reported from many other tropical countries. However, current data reveal a steep decline in the prevalence of undernutrition (proxy by BMI). For instance, thinness among women aged 20–54 dropped from 31.7% in 1999 to 14.2% in 2021. Moreover, many individuals with low BMI in India are constitutionally thin and not necessarily malnourished or unhealthy. Reintroducing MRDM as a major category today risks diverting clinical attention and public health resources away from the pressing and widespread problem of type 2 diabetes, which remains the dominant and surging diabetes burden in India. What more evidence is needed? We need large-scale, prospective cohort studies with long-term follow-up; detailed nutritional, immunological and metabolic profiling; insulin secretion and sensitivity assessments using gold-standard methods; standardized malnutrition definitions; and comprehensive genetic research. Without this evidence base, the proposal to reclassify MRDM is premature, unsubstantiated and unacceptable. How does Type 5 classification hamper treatment protocol? Classifying MRDM as 'Type 5 diabetes' may introduce more confusion than clarity. It suggests a degree of diagnostic and therapeutic precision that does not exist. Moreover, such a label does not provide actionable clinical guidance, as patients show variable insulin needs and mixed autoimmune markers. It could also mislead policymakers and healthcare providers, diverting attention and funding from more prevalent and well-characterized diabetes forms such as type 2.
