logo
Move over Apprentice bodycon – this is what soft power dressing looks like now (and it's British)

Move over Apprentice bodycon – this is what soft power dressing looks like now (and it's British)

Telegraph21-02-2025

You may not know Edeline Lee's name – yet – but you'll recognise some of the many women who wear her clothes. Christy Turlington, the Princess of Wales, Amy Adams and Gillian Anderson are just the headline names.
Alicia Vikander used to trek to Edeline's big old Victorian East End studio when she lived in London and hadn't yet signed a lucrative contract to wear Louis Vuitton.
Although tomorrow's show at the Dorchester Hotel is tiny compared with her first one last September – just 50 guests – the Lee army is swelling in size, especially after last season's splash. That was the one at which a certain Lady Starmer appeared in the front row in an Edeline Lee polka-dot two piece
The Labour Party was already in the midst of clothes-gate and accusations that the Starmers, Rachel Reeves and Angela Rayner had all accepted thousands of pounds of free clothes in donations from Lord Alli.
Starmer had been wearing Lee for several years to key public events, but the timing meant this outfit blew up for the Starmers, although it was a blessing, albeit arguably a mixed one, for Lee. The pictures appeared everywhere.
The thing is, there are plenty of other women apart from Victoria Starmer, who rely on Lee to make them look and feel polished. As well as being interesting individually, they're notably eclectic.
From city financiers (Dame Helena Morrissey, the Tory peer) to academics (Mary Beard) art world (Melanie Clore and Manuela Wirth), culture writers (Nancy Durrant) actresses (Hayley Atwell, Sandra Oh, Olivia Williams and Saskia Reeves from Slow Horses) ceramicists (Deborah Brett) restaurant critics (Grace Dent), lawyers (Baroness Fiona Shackleton).
Even some of the Silicone Valley female tribe wear her. 'The men may be in fleeces there, but the women like to show up,' says Lee.
Glamorous and gravitas are no longer mutually exclusive and Lee taps directly into that intersection. Part of her wide appeal is that she's extremely pernickety about fit and cut. It takes a lot of blood and sweat to reduce clothes to this degree of simplicity.'Truth to tell, I think it's harder than doing complicated,' she says.
Whether it's the 'Pedernal' dress that's been in every one of her collections since 2018 (named for the mountain in New Mexico that obsessed Georgia O'Keefe and which the artist painted over and over again) or the inverted pleated 'Plait' skirt that the Princess of Wales has worn repeatedly, Lee's clothes help women to feel subtly powerful without resorting to the cliches of ultra high heels or restrictive silhouettes.
The Pedernal is rapidly becoming a symbol of soft power – just as Roland Mouret's Galaxy dress came to represent sexy power in 2006.
I scoot one over my shoulders when I visit her studio in Limehouse in East London to do this interview three weeks before her latest show. It wasn't meant to be a shopping trip and dresses are not what I'm instinctively drawn to. But it would be remiss not to thoroughly investigate.
Lee always exhorts visitors to try on as much as possible, taking copious notes, in her white lab technician's coat, of the way her clothes fit a multitude of shapes and sizes.
She's the antithesis of a designer who only wants to dress size 4 women.
The Pedernal is gorgeous on and strikingly lightweight (one of her trademarks is a sort of bubble textured jacquard that comes in different colours each season) and has none of the constricting stretch of those early and mid-Noughties power clothes. So far so good, although I'm self-conscious about my thighs and, sad but true, have been since I was about 12.
'So is absolutely every woman I've ever talked to,' says Lee. 'When it comes down to it, whatever field we're working in, women have very similar issues and needs. We need to be visible and upfront, and we don't necessarily want to be showy, or reveal lots of flesh.'
She spends months perfecting her silhouettes and fabrics, repeatedly returning to a design, like O'Keefe and her Pedernal paintings – so that women can accessorise them with classic courts or trainers.
Impressively, everything, apart from her newly launched shoe line which is manufactured in Italy, is made and dyed in London, here, where her studio and home is (she lives above the shop), which means she can constantly tweak, quality check, and make more or less to order, resulting in little to zero waste.
Designs are not discarded after one season. The Pedernal first found life in 2018. 'I never want women to feel they can't wear something they bought three years ago because it's out of date. I don't think these clothes will because they're based on ideas about proportion and lines and that never looks old. The idea is that you find your favourites and add one or two new bits now and then'.
Eventually, women get to know the clothes so well they buy multiples of the same thing and wear them as they would jeans or T-shirts. 'Some of my best clients I don't even see any more. They just email me their orders'. That includes women in Palm Beach who normally wear Carolina Herrera of Oscar de la Renta (this is Melania Land) but who love Edeline Lee because of how well it packs.
Effectively as the Pedernal slims and curves, it's the Plait trousers I want, want, want. As well as being elegant and elongating, they're different enough from every other pair to be striking but not outlandish. You could team them with a cotton shirt or one of her eye-catching tops for a sleek head-to-toe look.
I can see how women get hooked on her clothes. They're so carefully thought out, from the lengths (there are four) and all the other measurements that spark off them. She can give anyone a waist – and more importantly, the confidence to show it.
We trot upstairs to her flat to escape the bustle of the workrooms downstairs where they're working round the clock in shifts to get everything ready in time for the show, as well as the orders that go out to Harrods and various stores around the world (she recently launched a children's line) .
The first thing I notice in her sitting room is that all the books on her shelves are laid horizontally with their spines to the wall. I'm intrigued. How on earth does she find what she wants to read? 'They're all listed according to country of origin,' she explains. This is Alice in Wonderland logic. Country of author, or of subject matter? And how does she remember? 'I just do,' she says. 'When I was studying at college and we lived in dorms, people would constantly be judging what was on your shelves'.
That would have been when she was at McGill in her native Canada. Lee was a bookworm and highly academic. 'My parents were classic Korean immigrants who really didn't think fashion was an appropriate career for their daughter,' she laughs. Her father, who worked in property, struck a deal with his daughter.
If she could secure a place to study law, he'd back her in fashion. But to get on a law course in Canada, you have to study another subject first. So she read sociology and Asian studies: a four year course which she completed in three, spending her spare time making costumes for university drama productions.
Studies done, law course assured, she beelined for Central St Martins in London, interning at Dior and Alexander McQueen before dropping out for a paid job in New York for Zac Posen (now busy resurrecting Gap and Old Navy). 'My tutors told me I'd regret not completing the course, and in the end, I did'.
She returned to London to finish it, married, had a son (now 16) and set up a business almost without intending to. 'It was all word of mouth to begin with. I'd make a dress, then use that money to make another. The first designs were definitely a labour of love' she laughs. 'I think they each had 20 metres of silk'.
She learnt to be more practical, cut her own patterns out of necessity and absorbed all kinds of tricks to ensure her clothes became as hard-working as she was.
The 'Telluride' skirt, another favourite in her collections, comes with contrasting buttons to make it easier to mix and match it with a contrast colour. White-edged, buckled belts with visible metal work are another signature. 'It's graphic and fresh and provides two focal points to match accessories to,' she explains.
For years she didn't do shows, preferring to make experimental videos and drop-in events. One featured models in black versions of the collection introducing 'real' women in coloured replicas, demonstrating how different the same design looks in different shades. We thought people would pop by for ten minutes but a lot stayed for the whole two hours'.
She gets a huge buzz from dressing three generations of the same family, seeing the different ways women style her clothes, from edgy to classic. The business is growing, but this is not an easy time to be selling clothes.
'Sometimes it seems you're battling on all fronts, ' she says. She deserves to flourish. A quiet original, she provides something useful and deceptively simple that's very hard to do.
In an era when women's clothes are often oversized and masculine, or cartoonishly vampy, she delivers a female take on female curves.
'I think we can be completely comfortable in what we wear while celebrating our femininity, ' she says, ' that is a superpower'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 1% Club player makes embarrassing blunder on question that had 11 people stumped – could you guess right?
The 1% Club player makes embarrassing blunder on question that had 11 people stumped – could you guess right?

Scottish Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

The 1% Club player makes embarrassing blunder on question that had 11 people stumped – could you guess right?

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A PLAYER on The 1% Club made an embarrassing blunder on a question that left several others stumped - could you guess correctly? This 70% question eliminated 11 people altogether in the ITV game show. 5 Could you answer this question on The 1% Club? Credit: ITV 5 Lee Mack was shocked by one player's logic Credit: ITV 5 She went on to explain the reasoning behind her choice Credit: ITV Lee Mack had asked the remaining contestants: "Based on the results shown here, which of these sports teams is the best?" The screen showed various final game scores for a selection of fictional teams. Available options included A) Breezers, B) All Stars, C) Flames or D) Gems. Once the 30 second time limit was up, it was revealed 11 people had chosen the wrong team. The correct answer was Breezers, who had successfully won all of their games. Lee then proceeded to turn his attention to eliminated player Zainab. Having asked what she answered, the contestant replied: "I put All Stars. "I didn't even look at the numbers. I just thought, 'Oh, All Stars. They just seem like the best name.'" Lee responded: "Whoa, you didn't just go with what you thought was the best name?" As she nodded to confirm, Lee asked: "What did you think all the numbers were for?" The 1% Club player brands herself 'thick' as she gets easy picture question wrong - but would you have made the same mistake? Zainab explained: "I don't know - I don't watch football or anything like that." To which Lee remarked: "They're not real teams! And it's not even football, it says sport." In another episode, a contestant branded herself "thick" after getting an easy picture question wrong. The players had been asked: "Which of these Vincent van Gogh self-portraits has been altered?" Players had just 30 seconds to examine three photos of the famous painter and pick out the correct answer. The answer turned out to be C - as this featured the legendary Dutch artist wearing earbuds, which weren't invented for another 100-years after his death in 1890. The faked image also played on the fact Van Gogh infamously also cut off one of his ears during a furious row with artist Paul Gaugin. After revealing four people got it wrong, Lee turned his attention to one of these players - Margaret. "Thick as two short planks", Margaret quipped after the spotlight was put on her. The contestant revealed she'd initially chosen C as her answer - only to change her mind. When asked by Lee for her reasons behind changing, Margaret replied: "God alone knows, I don't." The 1% Club airs on ITV1 and ITVX. 5 A total of 11 people got the question wrong Credit: ITV

The 1% Club player brands herself ‘thick' as she gets easy picture question wrong – but would you make the same mistake?
The 1% Club player brands herself ‘thick' as she gets easy picture question wrong – but would you make the same mistake?

Scottish Sun

time12 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

The 1% Club player brands herself ‘thick' as she gets easy picture question wrong – but would you make the same mistake?

A CONTESTANT on The 1% Club branded herself 'thick' after getting an easy picture question wrong - would you make the same mistake? The ITV quiz show, hosted by Lee Mack, has been known to stump players on certain questions. 4 Could you answer this question on The 1% Club Credit: ITV 4 Lee Mack hosts the popular ITV quiz Credit: ITV 4 Margaret branded herself "thick" after answering incorrectly Credit: ITV Those lucky enough to reach the very end - the 1% question - have a chance to win up to £100,000. One contestant was left feeling slightly embarrassed after slipping up on a relatively straightforward picture question. It asked: "Which of these Vincent van Gogh self-portraits has been altered?" Players had just 30 seconds to examine three photos and pick out the correct answer. The answer turned out to be C - as this featured the legendary artist wearing earphones, which weren't invented in his time. After revealing four people got it wrong, Lee turned his attention to one of these players - Margaret. "Thick as two short planks", Margaret quipped after the spotlight was put on her. The contestant revealed she'd initially chosen C as her answer - only to change her mind. When asked by Lee for her reasons behind changing, Margaret replied: "God alone knows, I don't." Previously, a whopping 20 players were wiped out in a brutally challenging picture question. 20 players ELIMINATED in brutal 1% Club picture question - would you have guessed correctly? The result of the 30% question changed the face of the game, shedding half of the remaining current players. Lee read aloud to the group: "How many RIGHT FOOTPRINTS can you see in the sand." An image was then displayed showcasing an assortment of footprints in the sand. Players were then given 30 seconds to differentiate between the right and left feet. Britian's Easiest Quiz Shows Which of these gameshows, if any, do you think you'd find the easiest to win? Tipping Point - 21% The Chase - 10% Pointless - 7% Ant and Dec's Limitless Win - 7% The Weakest Link - 7% The 1% Club - 6% Mastermind - 5% Beat the Chasers - 3% Tenable - 3% Only Connect - 2% None of these - 29% However, it seemed that many of the contestants were unable to do so as they arrived at different answers. Lee then confirmed that the correct answer was in fact, eight. The image then turned the eight right feet green in order to correctly display which of the options the players should have been looking at. The 1% Club airs on ITV1 and ITVX.

Boy's birthday casino early finish fails to stop neighbour's drastic action
Boy's birthday casino early finish fails to stop neighbour's drastic action

Daily Mirror

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Boy's birthday casino early finish fails to stop neighbour's drastic action

Jamie Obrien, from Hampshire, says his kill-joy neighbour complained about his son's birthday gathering. He says he receieved a phone call from environmental health over the 11-person party A furious dad has slammed a nightmare neighbour after they flagged his son's birthday party to their local council despite it only being three-hours long. Jamie Obrien, from Fareham, Hampshire, threw his son Cain the mini party, which featured a roulette wheel, fake money and a speaker system. The 54-year-old was left stunned after he received a call from environmental health following concerns over the event. ‌ But the dad claims the speaker was situated outside of the family's back door from 4.30-6pm on April 26. He blasted the kill joy who reported the casino-themed event and said that only eleven people were invited. ‌ The full-time carer says there are more than 40 flats or semi-detached homes in his close and the neighbouring street, which includes many "elderly" residents. He insists the "whirlwind little party" was finished by 7pm and that it was "pathetic" to call the council instead of explaining their annoyance in person. READ MORE: Top tech: Samsung dishes out free Galaxy tablet, smartwatch and earbuds in £600 giveaway Jamie said: "It was quite a whirlwind little party. It was casino-themed and I was the head of the roulette wheel with fake money and card games. I brought the speaker system down from Cain's bedroom, put it in the utility room that backs onto the back garden, and put one of the speakers just outside the back door. "I put the tunes on from 4.30pm and it was loud but it wasn't full blast - it could have gone a lot louder. I thought it was loud but reasonable. I'm an old-school raver from back in the day. I put one of my rave CDs but within 20 minutes they'd switched to teenager music, which is all grime and drum and bass. "Within an hour the volume of that went right down because they were congregating in groups and having chats more than anything. By 6pm the music had been turned off. We've lived here for five years now and it's the first time the stereo has been an issue. We had a disco dome in the garden with music pumping from it last year. "If I had a problem with something the only way to address it is head-on and be civil. It would have looked pathetic but it's even more pathetic that he's had to bring it up (with the council). It's annoying but deep down it makes me laugh because I see it as a form of jealousy. God forbid anyone enjoy themselves and have a good time." ‌ Jamie, lives with wife Tammy Obrien, 39, and their three children Cain, Mia, 20, and Kurt, 11. He claims the worker, from Fareham Borough Council, sided with him on the call and insists people should explain what the issue is if they make a complaint, reports Wales Online. Jamie said: "I took the call from environmental health and they said the noise complaint had been raised over the volume of our music. I explained we had the party from 4-7 and it was probably on for an hour tops and she told me 'that's absolutely fine. Even I have a party once in a while. Everyone's entitled to have a party'. ‌ "I asked her to tell whoever it is to grow a pair and knock on my door the next time, but she said she can't put it like that. She said she'd make them aware it was a birthday party and there's no foundation for the complaint. "If you've got a baby that's trying to sleep or you've worked a night shift, be logical, explain yourself and then we can all get on. I'd apologise if I offended anybody because my music was that bad or that loud but it genuinely wasn't and that's why they haven't knocked on the door. It's just a problem neighbour. Our house is on an elderly residential plot. There's 44 flats and our house in the close but we've got a really good rapport with all the elderly residents." Jamie says he has not been put off hosting a party at the house in future and would hire a venue if he planned it to run late into the night. His post said: "On Saturday April 26, I had a birthday party for my son and he had a small group of friends attend our home. ‌ "Today I received a phone call from environmental health after a noise complaint was made about the music! Firstly, the party was from 4-7pm and as for the music it was probably fairly loud for about an hour tops! "I would just like to reach out to Karen and advise them to grow a pair and come knock my door in future or just to basically get a life of their own instead of hiding behind phones and computers! This was the first noise complaint in five years of living here as we never really have parties." One commented: "I hope your son had the best party ever. Too many sour people these days!" A second said: "Some people need to get a life. What a pathetic thing to do. Music loud at 7pm wow." ‌ A third said: "What sound in the whole world could possibly be more wonderful than children enjoying themselves to music? Shame on the miserable soul who couldn't appreciate that sound." However one said: "Quite simple. Turn it down and stop being the 'I'm always right' neighbour from hell." Another said: "Isn't it ironic that you are complaining about Karen not knocking on the door and hiding behind phones and computers and then instead of knocking on their door you put up this post." Jamie replied: "Haha you're funny but not in a funny way. 'Neighbour from hell' please, maybe 20 years ago I would have been." Fareham Borough Council said environmental health officers assess noise by taking into account a range of factors such as frequency, time of day/night, background noise levels and volume so it is unlikely they would take any action for one-off parties.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store