logo
Remembering Stanley Fischer: An economist for all

Remembering Stanley Fischer: An economist for all

Indian Express5 days ago

When news came about Stanley Fischer having passed away, I got emotional. I am penning these lines in the hope that people will learn about this unique human being. He was a three-dimensional Donald Bradman, a pinnacle reached by very few — indeed I don't know of any other. First, he was every (wo)man's economist. It is impossible for a student of macroeconomics to not have heard of him, and learnt from him. His Macroeconomics with Rudi Dornbusch is the go-to textbook if you want to understand macroeconomics.
His students included our own Isher Ahluwalia (his second PhD supervision), a pre-eminent Indian macroeconomist and institution builder. Other formal PhD students have included Ben Bernanke, former chairman of the US Fed, Mario Draghi, former president of the European Central Bank, and Kazuo Ueda, present governor of the Bank of Japan. If that is not a lifetime's achievement award by itself, consider that among his students were Lawrence H Summers, former secretary of the US Treasury and president of Harvard University, and two chairpersons of the US Council of Economic Advisers, Christina Romer and Greg Mankiw.
In a fundamental way, all policy economists were his students. In several seminars/discussions where I had the good fortune to be in the same room as Stan, it was obvious that we were all in awe of him. When he spoke, people listened. Because the quality of his insight commanded attention.
His second mega-dimension achievement was in policy. He started on this path in 1988 when he was named chief economist at the World Bank. He left in 1990 for MIT, only to forever return to dominate and influence policy-making from 1994 onwards.
I did not have the good fortune of being Stan's student or colleague. Then why am I emotional at his departure? Because of his third, and most important dimension, his humaneness. The dictionary defines humaneness as being about kindness, compassion, and consideration for others. Any story about Stan, and especially my story, is heavily one-sided. I cannot speak for others, but this is likely to be the case with them as well. It is about how he helped those in need, guided us and mentored us, without possibly recognising that he was having this influence.
Two episodes from my interactions with him show this. I wasn't even an academic (just a proprietary currency trader at Goldman Sachs) when in 1993 he invited me to give a talk to his class at MIT. The policy topic: Do democratic societies grow at a faster rate than non-democratic countries? At that time, China had been growing at above 10 per cent per annum since the Great Economic Leap of 1978 and many assumed that dictatorship was the way to go. But not Stan, and not me — hence the unusual invitation to a non-academic for a seminar.
Another example: My draft of a book on currency misalignments achieved a stop-the-press status in 2010 at a leading think tank, the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE). I was an ordinary author — Stan was Stan. His response to my email requesting his help was short (as were all his emails) and accurate. 'This must have fallen prey to some issues relating to countries that intervene in their FX markets — and must therefore be all the harder to accept. I can understand your frustration… Best — and we should talk at some point.' It was only because of Stan's intervention and guidance (to PIIE and me) that allowed the book, Devaluing to Prosperity, to be finally published in 2012.
Prakash Loungani documents in erudite detail Stan's conversion to policy (IMF Finance and Development, September 2013, 'A Class Act'). Stan found it hard adjusting to academic life at MIT from 1990-1993. 'I remember going to theory seminars and saying to myself, what difference does it make whether this guy is right or wrong?' Even becoming chairman of the Economics department at MIT 'was only partly inspiring,' says Fischer, likening the role to Alfred Kahn's description of a dean's role: 'The dean is to the faculty as the fire hydrant is to the dog.' Another of his attributes — his wicked, but polite, sense of humour.
On policy influence — and paraphrasing Jane Austen — it is a truth universally acknowledged, that a country in economic trouble, wanted Stan Fischer to help steer it right. Stan, as first deputy managing editor at the IMF was in charge and helped resolve the East Asian currency crisis. He was governor at the Bank of Israel, 2005-13, and helped Israel both reform and most effectively face the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. He cut policy rates a week before even the Fed did.
He was born in Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe. That explains his special connection with issues of development, growth and poverty reduction. It also explains part of my bond with him — he followed cricket. He was a unique multi-dimensional Bradman — there won't be another.
The writer is chairperson of the Technical Expert Group for the first official Household Income Survey for India

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India central to key supply chains: Canada's Mark Carney on G7 invite to PM
India central to key supply chains: Canada's Mark Carney on G7 invite to PM

India Today

time40 minutes ago

  • India Today

India central to key supply chains: Canada's Mark Carney on G7 invite to PM

India is the fifth-largest economy in the world, and it is central to a number of critical global supply chains, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said, arguing that the leadership of the country must be part of discussions at the upcoming G7 comments came after some of his political opponents in Canada criticised him for inviting Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit in view of a probe into allegations of Indian links to the killing of a Khalistani separatist in Minister Modi accepted Carney's invitation to attend the G7 summit during a phone conversation on Friday. Canada is hosting the G7 summit in the Alberta province from June 15 to 17 in its capacity as the current chair of the a specific question on the case of the killing of pro-Khalistan separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in 2023, Carney told reporters that it is not appropriate for him to comment as the legal process in the case is Canadian prime minister said the G7 summit will deliberate on a range of key issues including energy security, digital future, critical minerals and on partnerships in building infrastructure in the emerging and developing suggested that he extended the invitation to Modi after talking to other G7 member are certain countries that should be at the table for those discussions," he said when asked why PM Modi was invited when there have been allegations of Indian links to the Nijjar case."India is the fifth-largest economy in the world; effectively the most populous country in the world. (It is) central to a number of those supply chains; (it is) at the heart of a number of those supply chains, so it makes sense," he elaborating, Carney noted that India and Canada have agreed to continue law enforcement dialogue."Bilaterally, we have now agreed importantly to continue law enforcement dialogue. There has been some progress on issues of accountability," he NDP party slammed Carney for extending the invitation to Modi. "This decision is profoundly troubling," it India-Canada relations hit rock bottom following then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's allegations in 2023 of a potential Indian link to the killing of October last year, India recalled its high commissioner and five other diplomats after Ottawa attempted to link them to the Nijjar case. India also expelled an equal number of Canadian Liberal Party leader Carney's victory in the parliamentary election in April triggered hopes for reset of the the last few months, the security officials of India and Canada resumed contacts and both sides were looking at the possibility of appointing new high had accused Trudeau's government of allowing pro-Khalistani elements to operate from Canadian Trudeau's exit, New Delhi said it hoped to rebuild ties with Canada based on "mutual trust and sensitivity".Tune InMust Watch

Little Caesars enters India with first outlet in Delhi-NCR this month
Little Caesars enters India with first outlet in Delhi-NCR this month

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Little Caesars enters India with first outlet in Delhi-NCR this month

Little Caesars, a Detroit, Michigan-based world's third largest pizza chain, is entering the Indian market. India -- one of the fastest growing quick service restaurant markets -- will be the 30th market for Little Caesars, which is also the world's largest family-owned pizza chain, for which it has roped in Harnessing Harvest as its franchise partner. It has planned to open its first outlet in Delhi-NCR in this month, with plans for additional locations to follow, according to a statement from the company. "Launching in India marks an exciting milestone for Little Caesars as we expand into our 30th country. With our delicious pizzas and unbeatable value, we're eagerly anticipating introducing a unique menu that we believe will captivate India," said Paula Vissing, President, Global Retail, Little Caesars Pizza. Its entry into India market reflects the brand's commitment to global growth, bringing its signature menu and exceptional value to a new market, it said. Recently, Little Caesars has launched in markets such as Cambodia and Kuwait as part of its global expansion. Little Caesars, was founded by Mike and Marian Ilitch as a single, family-owned restaurant in 1959 and is headquartered in downtown Detroit, Michigan. The brand is known for its 'hot-n-ready' pizza, crazy puffs, and famed crazy bread in the US market. Its franchise partner, Harnessing Harvest, has nearly nine decades of operations in the Indian food and hospitality industry. According to a report from IMARC Group, the Indian pizza market size reached USD 5.3 billion in 2024. Looking forward, it expects the market to reach USD 11.8 billion by 2033, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 9.24 per cent during 2025-2033. The Indian pizza market is led by global QSR brands as Domino's, Pizza Hut operated by their local franchise partners. Besides, several home-grown brands such as La Pino'z, Brik Oven, BOCS Pizza, etc, are also key players in the market.

Slighted by Trump, India must rejig foreign policy paradigm
Slighted by Trump, India must rejig foreign policy paradigm

Scroll.in

timean hour ago

  • Scroll.in

Slighted by Trump, India must rejig foreign policy paradigm

Indians were shocked by US President Donald Trump asking American CEOs and industrialists to not base their manufacturing facilities in India. Trump reportedly told Apple CEO Tim Cook that he does not want him to manufacture iPhones in India. He threatened Apple with 25% tariffs if they did so. This is not the first time that Trump directed major industry leaders not to manufacture in India. Earlier, in February, he had told Elon Musk not to set up a Tesla factory in India as that would be 'unfair' to the US. This directive came just after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met the US President and the Tesla CEO on February 13 with the hope that Tesla would build in India. These provocative actions have sorely disappointed Indians who were expecting to be beneficiaries of Trump's benevolence as US companies moved out of China. In addition, Indians were shocked at the way illegal migrants from the country were degraded, criminalised and transported back to India in fetters on a military aircraft. And now, Indian students are not getting visas or their visas are being cancelled disrupting their studies at US universities. Indians recovering from shock Trump's comeback electoral win of November 2024 was welcomed in India as he was seen by the establishment virtually as 'Our man in Washington'. This perception was bolstered by the hyped chemistry between him and Modi. However, public opinion has started shifting in the opposite direction. Trump's core foreign policy objectives rest on trade, tariffs, transactions and targets. He chose to target India as a ' very high tariff nation ' in his very first address to the joint session of the US Congress on March 7 when he implied that India imposed the most unfair tariffs on the US. Trump called India a 'tariff king' and a 'big abuser'. The US trade deficit of US$100 billion with India irked Trump. Now, he is pushing for an almost zero tariff on US goods, especially cars – now that Tesla is ready to enter the Indian market. However, Trump wants the opening of markets for free and easy entry of US goods – irrespective of whether they are in demand in India or not; for example, he seeks to replace Scotch with American bourbon whiskey. The US is targeting both China and India. Others in the Global South are likely to be targeted next. Trump's 'Make America Great Again' policy seems to be about cutting the bottom out of any potential manufacturing adversary. Trump equates India and Pakistan As if the economic hit was not hard enough, the Trump team has gone after India's strategic interests in the light of the ghastly terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, on April 22, which India believes was Pakistan-sponsored, and the Indian retribution that followed. Trump called the terror attack a 'bad one', without naming Pakistan, but turned it into an even-handed India-Pakistan conflict, stating incorrectly that the two had been ' fighting for 1,500 years '. As usual, Trump put the focus on himself as he said he was 'close to both countries', and the two would ' figure it out one way or another ', distancing himself from any special relation with India that Indian strategic analysts used to boast about. As India carried out military strikes against Pakistan, named Operation Sindoor, the US Presidential team reiterated 'good relations with both' countries and Trump said that if he could 'help I will be there'. In the two days of the military operations that followed, the US Secretary of State repeatedly said that they were speaking to both sides, which subsequently agreed to an immediate ceasefire and start talks. He claimed that the ' US stopped nuclear conflict '. Trump further said he would 'soon' give trade access to India-Pakistan, a claim that the US Commerce Secretary put on record. India took pains to claim that while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio did speak to Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, the military operation was halted after the Pakistani Director General of Military Operations asked for a halt; ie, the ceasefire was reached bilaterally. India upset with US Why did India feel slighted by the alleged US role? The US hyphenated India-Pakistan, something that India does not like. It has sought to de-hyphenate itself with Pakistan by improving relations with the US for years. India perhaps also saw the US infantilising both countries with its rhetoric that only a politically mature US could stop the two squabbling neighbours. US claims also demonstrated its ability to intervene in South Asian affairs and underlined that the US remains a hegemon in this region. India also saw in the US statements a challenge to its strategic autonomy. It was seen by India as siding with Pakistan's nuclear blackmail and threat, as it helped demonstrate that the US had saved the world from a possible nuclear escalation. Lastly and most importantly, by pointing to Kashmir as the root cause of the war, the US was seen as internationalising an issue that India sees as an internal issue. It is quite possible that now, US think tanks will do their bit to showcase the US role and heighten this agenda. What India needs to do What can India conclude about the US behaviour? First, that the US has no permanent friends or enemies – only permanent interests. Second, that the US has a hub and spokes policy towards all – the US is the central hub and all other countries are spokes of different sizes that the US can manipulate and manage. Third, that the US military-industrial technology complex will seek to derive the greatest benefits from both countries and across the region. India will, therefore, have to rejig both its thinking and paradigm in foreign policy at the global, regional and bilateral levels as also in its domestic debates. India must also be wary of US interests drowning Indian interests – the US has always been a predatory power and embeds itself in regional conflicts and gains from these. India has been committed to multi-polarity, BRICS and other such forums and should stick with and enhance this. India must continue with self-reliance and its traditional time-tested partners. It also needs to curb the domestic war rhetoric as that does not help the interest of peace or show India as a sane voice of the Global South.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store