Syrian leader Al Shara vows to impose central power as challenges emerge form fringes
Syria's new leader Ahmad Al Shara said on Thursday that he would impose the power of the state on the whole of country as the central authorities deal with challenges in the east and west stemming from the civil war. A rebel coalition that overthrew president Bashar Al Assad declared Mr Al Shara the President of Syria on Wednesday. The coalition, called the Operations Room, is dominated by his Hayat Tahrir Al Sham, a former offshoot of Al Qaeda and Al Nusra Front. "We will concentrate in the coming period on … complete uniting the whole of Syria and bring it under a single authority, and build institutions based on merit and free of corruption," Mr Al Shara said in a three-minute televised statement. The new central authorities will also "instil civil peace and pursue the criminals who have spilt Syrian blood and committed toward us crimes and massacres", he said, referring to loyalists of the former Assad family regime, who ruled Syria from 1970 to 2024. The power of Mr Al Shara, who was until last month ruler of a small fiefdom in northern Syria, is being challenged on two fronts in the outlaying areas of the country. Since the civil war in late 2011, Kurdish militias have carved out large areas in the east of the country, while core loyalists of Mr Al Assad entrenched themselves in the western Alawite mountains overlooking the coast. HTS forces have launched a military campaign to subdue members of the former regime. At the same time, Syrian militias loyal to Turkey and allied with HTS have launched an offensive against the Kurdish-led militias that controls the east. The ascendancy of Mr Al Shara has sparked fears the country will fail to change into a system fundamentally different from the iron rule he played a main role in toppling. He vowed that there will be free elections in Syria, without setting a time. He said first the authorities will appoint a legislature and convene a national dialogue conference to "listen to all views about our upcoming political programme". Mr Al Shara did not directly mention pluralism or democracy. He said that Syria, having been liberated from 54 years of "one the darkest tyrannical rules" the world had known , will be "governed by shura", a form of collective decision making in Islam.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Rights group files legal challenge to remove Hamas from UK terror list
A British rights group has filed a second legal application calling on the UK government to remove the Palestinian militant group Hamas from a list of proscribed terrorist organisations. Cage International said on Tuesday it had instructed lawyers to appeal the decision in 2021 by former UK Home Secretary Priti Patel to proscribe Hamas in its entirety. The proscription of Hamas predates its current war with Israel in Gaza, where the group has been the de facto authority since winning Palestinian elections in 2006, and the Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel in October 2023. Hamas' military wing, the Qassam Brigades, was proscribed by the UK more than two decades ago. But Patel decided to extend the ban to the whole organisation, arguing there was no longer a distinction between the political and military wings of the group. Proscribing a group as a terrorist organisation automatically creates several criminal offences for anyone who is a group member, who wears or publishes the group's symbols, expresses or invites support for the group, or organises a meeting to support it. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Section 4 of the UK Terrorism Act allows any person affected by an organisation's proscription to apply to the home secretary for its de-proscription. Cage, an advocacy group that campaigns on behalf of people affected by counterterrorism policies, is using this clause to lodge its application over concerns its clients, who are mostly British Muslims, have been disproportionately targeted in an "unjust, politically charged manner" as a consequence of Hamas being added to the list of banned organisations. As part of its submission, Cage included 26 case studies involving clients who, it says, have been adversely impacted by the proscription of Hamas. These cases span a wide range of public and professional settings and highlight what the group describes as the overreach of counterterror legislation. The case studies include university students and a lecturer investigated and sanctioned for re-sharing publicly available media headlines related to Hamas. According to Cage, some of its clients also faced the threat of expulsion, visa revocation, or extended disciplinary procedures for allegedly supporting Hamas. The Home Office did not respond to Middle East Eye's request for comment at the time of writing. Muhammad Rabbani, managing director of Cage, said the de-proscription of Hamas is "about reckoning with a political and diplomatic reality in addition to remedying the discriminatory application and abuse of power". "Our case studies show a consistent pattern of arrests and harassment with unsuccessful prosecution, that left victims with lasting damage," Rabbani told Middle East Eye. "Ultimately, the continued proscription of Hamas is violating long-established freedoms enshrined in British law." Why I support the UK taking a more nuanced position on Hamas Read More » Cage's application comes months after Hamas launched its own appeal against its proscription in the UK. Legal papers seen by MEE revealed that Mousa Abu Marzouk, the head of Hamas' foreign relations office, had instructed lawyers to take up the case. Fahad Ansari, the director of Riverway Law, which is leading the challenge; Daniel Grutters, a barrister at One Pump Court Chambers; and Franck Magennis, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, submitted a 106-page application to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claiming the decision "pursued explicitly political objectives by a politically compromised Secretary of State". The lawyers involved in the case stressed that Hamas did not pay them or the experts and lawyers who provided evidence for its submission, as it is illegal to receive funds from a group designated as a terrorist organisation. The home secretary has 90 days to respond to Hamas and Cage's applications. As part of her powers as home secretary, Cooper also has the discretion to add or remove any group engaged in armed conflict from the list of proscribed organisations. If the home secretary rejects the application, Hamas could appeal to the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, where the decision can be challenged on judicial review grounds.
Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
UAE, Syrian Presidents exchange Eid greetings
The UAE President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan on Sunday received a phone call from Ahmad Al Sharaa, President of the Syrian Arab Republic, during which they exchanged Eid Al Adha greetings. Both leaders conveyed their warm wishes for health and happiness to all, praying that the occasion would bring blessings, peace and prosperity to their peoples and to both countries. They also expressed their hopes for continued development and growth, and for lasting security, stability and wellbeing across the Muslim world and wider international community. The call also touched on the close relations between the UAE and Syria and ways to strengthen cooperation in a manner that serves the interests and aspirations of both nations. Recently, His Highness Sheikh Humaid Bin Rashid Al Nuaimi, Member of the Supreme Council and Ruler of Ajman, directed the International Charity Organisation (ICO) to intensify its relief and humanitarian efforts in Syria, in light of the difficult conditions affecting many areas there. During a gathering at the Royal Court, he was briefed on the Organisation's efforts across various humanitarian fields, as well as its programmes aimed at supporting those living under harsh conditions in certain regions in Syria, and assisting refugees and displaced persons in several other countries. This came during a meeting between the Ruler of Ajman and Dr Khalid Abdulwahab Al Khaja, Secretary-General of the ICO, along with the accompanying delegation. He expressed the UAE's full solidarity with the Syrian people, affirming the nation's unwavering support during these challenging times and its readiness to provide all possible forms of assistance to help alleviate their suffering. He stated that such supportive and compassionate stances towards brothers, sisters, and friends in times of crisis are not new to the leadership and people of the UAE. Rather, they are a continuation of the humanitarian legacy established by the late Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan, who was always among the first to extend a helping hand to countries affected by disasters and wars around the world. WAM
Arabian Post
15 hours ago
- Arabian Post
India's Industrial Output Sinks Even As GDP Grows
By Nantoo Banerjee India's economic growth figures seem to be getting increasingly delinked with domestic manufacturing, industrial output, and job generation. The manufacturing sector had a very little contribution to the country's 6.5 percent GDP growth during the last financial year, the slowest in four years. Despite a good monsoon last year, the country's agriculture sector growth rate in the second quarter (October-March) was 3.5 percent. The industrial growth rate for 2024-25 is estimated to be only four percent, also marking the lowest in the last four years. In April, the country's industrial output slowed to an eight-month low at 2.7 percent as per the data released by the National Statistical Office (NSO). What is pushing the country's GDP growth? Obviously, the less reliable estimates of the country's vast services sector backed substantially by imports. Ironically, India's total imports in the last fiscal had grown by 6.85 percent, a little above the country's GDP growth rate. This may give a somewhat wrong impression that the GDP growth is linked with the import growth. Uncontrolled imports, mainly from China, are dampening India's domestic production initiative and new job generation agenda. China's imports from India are rapidly shrinking. In the last fiscal, India's imports from China grossed over $113 billion, a $11.5 percent rise over the previous fiscal. The top imported products from China included electrical and electronic equipment, machinery, organic chemicals, and plastics, most of which should have been manufactured in India. This increase contributed to a widening trade deficit for India. In contrast, India's merchandise exports to China collapsed to only $14.25 billion from $16.66 billion, last year. Export-led China does not seem to like to import anything from India. No one in the government appears to be concerned about the country's massive import growth year after year, especially from China. Imports are mostly at the cost of domestic production and local jobs. A country does not import merchandise alone. It also imports labour that goes into the manufacturing of imported products. China continued to be India's top import source, by far the biggest from any single country. In the last fiscal, India's total imports are estimated to have grown to US$ 915.19 billion. This growth was driven by higher merchandise imports, which reached US$ 720.24 billion, a significant increase compared to the US$ 678.21 billion in the previous fiscal. No department in the government is willing to take the responsibility of the low and slow domestic industrial production and sinking job growth rates since the present BJP-led national government has been in operation. The government has been acting more like a dream merchant often seen busy in forecasting and focussing on India's long-term economic prospects. The so-called 'Make-in-India' initiative made little success in the absence of the import-happy government's liberal investment policy, especially in manufacturing, that could strongly induce foreign industrial investors rush to India as they did in Communist China for several years. Foreign investors are not interested in the political colour of a government. In the first three months of 2025, the foreign direct investment (FDI) in China was as much as US$36.9 billion. Consider this against the FDI inflow of a mere $0.4 billion into India during the whole of 2024-25. It was $10.1 billion, a year ago. This is probably the worst performance in the country's annual FDI inflow records while the government keeps talking about India emerging as a global manufacturing hub. India's own industrial entrepreneurs are investing little in the country. Instead, they are indulging in investing abroad. During the last financial year, India's net outward FDI (OFDI) grew 75 percent year on year to $29.2 billion. Singapore, the US, UAE, Mauritius and the Netherlands together accounted for more than half of the rise in OFDI. The country's Index of Industrial Production (IIP) expanded by only four percent for the 2024-25 fiscal. This growth is lower than the 5.5 percent recorded in March 2024. The manufacturing sector experienced a further slowdown, with growth at 4.5 percent for the year, down from 12.3 percent in 2023-24. The IIP grew by only three percent in March 2025. The industrial output grew by four percent during the April-October period of the last financial year. The share of manufacturing in India's GDP continues to be as low as 12 percent. According to Visual Capitalist, the share of manufacturing in China's GDP is projected to be around 29 percent of global manufacturing output in 2025. This amplifies the significant dominance of China in global manufacturing, potentially matching or exceeding the combined share of the US and its allies. Specifically, China is projected to have a manufacturing output of $4.8 trillion, accounting for 29 percent of the global value. Less than two months ago, India's Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the country plans to raise the share of its manufacturing sector from 12 percent to 23 percent over the next two decades, aiming to create jobs and drive economic growth. While speaking at the Hoover Institution at California's Stanford University, the finance minister said India is focussing on 14 identified sunrise sectors like semiconductors, renewable energy components, medical devices, batteries and labour-intensive industries, including leather and textile, to enhance the share of manufacturing in GDP. However, of these industries, semiconductors may only appear to be a sunrise industry in India. Incidentally, the present form of the global semiconductor industry is almost 70-year-old. The first commercially available microprocessor, Intel 4004, was released in 1971. India is expected to launch its first locally produced semiconductor chip, under foreign equity and technical control, by the end of the current year. India is a major importer of semiconductors. Its local end-use market is projected to double from $54 billion in 2025 to $108 billion by 2030. Lately, the government's highly liberal investment incentives are expected to bring foreign companies to help push up domestic semiconductors production. Until recently, the government appeared to be rather casual about strengthening the country's industrial and manufacturing bases. Even in 2014-15, when the Narendra Modi-led government came to power at the centre (May 26, 2014), India's manufacturing sector contributed 16.3 percent to the country's GDP. While the government's much-touted 'Make-in-India' policy was launched in September 2014, hoping to fast-forward its share, the manufacturing sector's contribution to GDP has subsequently declined mainly due to the lack of a strong commitment to the programme and uncontrolled import growth over the years. That may explain why the country's annual GDP growth rate has generally failed to reflect on its growth of the manufacturing sector and employment. (IPA Service)
