Afghans in Kentucky fear for future after Trump strips deportation protections
BOWLING GREEN, Kentucky - Afghan asylum-seeker Wazir Khan Zadran and his family arrived in Kentucky nearly four years ago as the U.S. military withdrew from his country. Now, he worries about the future of his children, especially his girls, if they are forced to return to Afghanistan.
The Trump administration said it will end Temporary Protected Status for Afghans in July - raising the threat of being sent back to Afghanistan, where the Taliban rule according to Islamic law, if their asylum case is unsuccessful.
"The future of children is bright here and they can study here, they can have a good future here. If we go back to my country, they are not good, especially for the girls," Zadran said. "They cannot go to school, they cannot go to university, they can do nothing. So, I hope they will do some things for the refugees of Afghanistan."
Zadran was a tribal leader who fought 20 years ago against the Haqqani network, a powerful faction within the Taliban. He and his family were picked up in a helicopter by Americans in 2021 and taken to the Kabul airport for travel to the U.S.
His oldest daughter Zuleikha is now preparing for college next year, but without permanent status in the U.S., the risk of deportation looms over her. The Zadrans' asylum application is pending, which means they can remain in the U.S. until a final decision is made on their case.
TPS is available to people already in the U.S. who cannot return to their home countries due to armed conflicts, natural disasters or other extraordinary events. The Trump administration has moved to terminate the status for some 14,600 Afghans as well as hundreds of thousands from Venezuela and other nations.
'I discuss with my girls that you are lucky that you are here, that you are going to school, then you will finish school and go to college," Zadran said.
"But if we were in Afghanistan, they will not have this right. Their future will be dark. But, in my country, the future of girls is so dark, it's so bad for them."
The Taliban administration has barred girls over the age of 12 from school and women from university and has placed restrictions on women from traveling long distances without a male guardian. The Taliban says it respects women's rights in line with its interpretation of Islamic law.
Zuleikha Zadran is happy she has graduated from high school and is heading to college with a scholarship, despite her fears.
"Lately, I have been worried because people are saying that those without documents might be deported," she said.
"I am scared that it will make my future dark, but even with that fear, I am proud of what I have achieved. And I am full of hope for what's ahead."
Afghans in the U.S. can still request asylum, the Trump administration says.
"Although TPS was terminated as required by law, any Afghan who fears persecution is able to request asylum," said Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, adding that those with TPS revoked can apply for financial assistance to get resettled elsewhere.
'REALLY WORRIED'
More than 70,000 Afghans entered the U.S. under former President Joe Biden's 'Operation Allies Welcome' initiative following the Taliban takeover in 2021, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Over 300 settled in Bowling Green, an agricultural and manufacturing city that has received refugees over the decades from Cambodians to Bosnians to Congolese.
Unlike some other immigrant communities, Afghan families in Bowling Green aren't looking back - their investments and dreams are firmly rooted in the U.S.
One such family, the Habibis, bought a house here. Wahida Habibi speaks fluent English, has a wide circle of friends locally, works at a bakery with her husband and two years ago gave birth to a baby boy.
Zadran, meanwhile, works at a car dealership and is learning the business with the goal of opening his own soon. His main complaint is only that legal status cannot come fast enough - he initially thought that would happen in less than a year.
"And the last three years … I was like what's going on?" said Zadran.
Shawn VanDiver, the founder of #AfghanEvac, the main coalition of veterans and advocacy groups that coordinated resettlements of Afghans with the U.S. government, said Republicans need to stand up to Trump so that Afghans are not forced to return a country where their lives are in danger.
"The Taliban hasn't changed. The threats haven't changed," he said. "The only thing that has changed is the guy who sits behind the Resolute Desk."
People who worked with the Afghans on resettlement said the fear is palpable.
'The immigrant community, and especially the Afghans who have resettled a couple of years ago are really worried with all that's going on with immigration," said Albert Mbanfu, executive director of the International Center of Kentucky which helps resettle refugees.
Another Afghan asylum-seeker, Mohamed Azizi, said he is stressed.
"We worry because right now the situation in my country is so bad and we worry about going back and starting life from the beginning," said Azizi. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump's cuts are ‘devastating' for vulnerable women worldwide: UN
The withdrawal of the US from the funding arena for reproductive health has been devastating, said UNFPA chief Natalia Kanen. PHOTO: AFP NEW YORK - The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has faced budget cuts before, but the impact of US President Donald Trump's policies has been even more 'devastating' for reproductive health worldwide, chief Natalia Kanem told AFP. The agency has been targeted by US conservatives since the Kemp-Kasten Amendment's enactment in 1985 by Congress, when the administration of then president Ronald Reagan rallied against China's population policies, accusing Beijing of promoting forced abortions and sterilisations. All subsequent Republican presidencies have cut US funding to UNFPA, and the second Trump administration is no exception. 'We've had over US$330 million (S$424.78 million) worth of projects ended,' virtually overnight, in 'some of the hardest hit regions of the world' like Afghanistan, Ms Kanem said in an interview coinciding with the release of the UNFPA's annual report on June 10. 'So yes, we are suffering.' Ms Kanem pointed to the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan as an example, where over the years more than 18,000 pregnancies were delivered by 'heroic midwives' who 'conducted these over 18,000 deliveries without a single maternal death, which you know, in a crisis situation is extraordinary.' 'Those maternity wards today have closed. The funding cuts immediately have meant that those midwives are no longer able to do their jobs,' Ms Kanem said. Although it is too soon to estimate the precise impacts of the US cuts, they will inevitably result in increased maternal mortality and more unintended pregnancies, according to Ms Kanem. 'What's different this time for UNFPA is that our ecosystem of other reproductive health actors who might be able to fill in for us,' Ms Kanem said, adding they are 'reeling from huge impact of having their funding denied.' The Trump administration has slashed many such external aid programmes. 'So it is very lamentable that this year, to me, has been drastically worse than ever before, precisely because now everybody is caught up in the whirlwind.' 'The withdrawal of the United States from the funding arena for reproductive health has been devastating,' Ms Kanem said. Desire and rights American policy is not only marked by funding cuts, but also a challenge to gender equality matters. 'There will be debates about concepts, but there shouldn't be any debate about the non-negotiability of the rights and choices of women and adolescent girls,' Ms Kanem emphasised. 'We always embrace change, but we should not compromise on these common values which spell the difference between life and death for women and girls all around the world,' she continued. 'Women deserve support. Adolescent girls deserve to finish their schooling, not become pregnant, not be bartered or sent off into marriage as a non-solution to issues that families may face.' The UNFPA's annual report, published on June 10 and based on the results of a survey of 14,000 people from 14 countries – nations which represent over a third of the world's population – also underscores concerns that millions of people around the world cannot create the families they desire. More than 40 per cent of those over the age of 50 reported not having the number of children they wanted – with 31 per cent saying they had fewer kids than they desired and 12 per cent saying they had more than they wanted. More than half of respondents said economic barriers prevented them from having more children. Conversely, one in five said they were pressured into having a child, and one in three adults reported an unintended pregnancy. The majority of people 'live in countries where fertility rates have fallen so far and so fast that they are below replacement,' Ms Kanem said. 'We know that the issue of population pressure takes almost like a headline drastic view. Some people think there are way too many people. Others are saying we don't have enough, women should have more babies,' Ms Kanem said. 'What UNFPA really cares about is a woman's true desire, rights and choices,' she said. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Asia: Markets extend gains as China-US talks head into second day
[HONG KONG] Asian stocks squeezed out more gains on Tuesday as the latest round of China-US trade talks moved into a second day, with one of Donald Trump's top advisers saying he expected 'a big, strong handshake'. There is optimism the negotiations - which come after the US president spoke to Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping last week - will bring some much-needed calm to markets and ease tensions between the economic superpowers. The advances in Asian equities built on Monday's rally and followed a broadly positive day on Wall Street, where the S&P 500 edged closer to the record high touched earlier in the year. This week's meeting in London will look to smooth relations after Trump accused Beijing of violating an agreement made at a meeting of top officials last month in Geneva that ended with the two sides slashing tit-for-tat tariffs. The key issues on the agenda at the talks are expected to be exports of rare earth minerals used in a wide range of things including smartphones and electric vehicle batteries. 'In Geneva, we had agreed to lower tariffs on them, and they had agreed to release the magnets and rare earths that we need throughout the economy,' Trump's top economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, told CNBC on Monday. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But even though Beijing was releasing some supplies, 'it was going a lot slower than some companies believed was optimal', he added. Still, he said he expected 'a big, strong handshake' at the end of the talks. 'Our expectation is that after the handshake, any export controls from the US will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume,' Hassett added. He also said the Trump administration might be willing to ease some recent curbs on tech exports. The president told reporters at the White House: 'We are doing well with China. China's not easy. 'I'm only getting good reports.' Tokyo led gains in Asian markets, with Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Seoul, Singapore, Taipei, Wellington and Jakarta also well up. 'The bulls will layer into risk on any rhetoric that publicly keeps the two sides at the table,' said Pepperstone's Chris Weston. 'And with the meeting spilling over to a second day, the idea of some sort of loose agreement is enough to underpin the grind higher in US equity and risk exposures more broadly.' Investors are also awaiting key US inflation data this week, which could impact the Federal Reserve's monetary policy amid warnings Trump's tariffs will refuel inflation strengthening the argument to keep interest rates on hold. However, it also faces pressure from the president to cut rates, with bank officials due to make a decision at their meeting next week. While recent jobs data has eased concerns about the US economy, analysts remain cautious. 'Tariffs are likely to remain a feature of US trade policy under President Trump,' said Matthias Scheiber and John Hockers at Allspring Global Investments. 'A strong US consumer base was helping buoy the global economy and avoid a global recession.' However, they also warned: 'The current global trade war coupled with big spending cuts by the US government and possibly higher US inflation could derail US consumer spending to the point that the global economy contracts for multiple quarters.' AFP

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump flexes strongman instincts over Los Angeles protests
Mr Trump has talked for years about using the military against protests. PHOTO: EPA-EFE WASHINGTON - Mr Donald Trump likes to show off his strongman credentials at cage fights and military parades – and over the weekend, the US president did it by sending troops into Los Angeles. The move once again showed Mr Trump pushing presidential power to its limits, at the start of a second term that has begun with what critics say is a distinctly authoritarian edge. Mr Trump deployed the National Guard after clashes sparked by immigration raids, marking the first time since 1965 that a president has done so without a request by a state governor. His administration said on June 9 it was also sending 700 active-duty Marines to America's second-largest city. The Republican has warned that troops could be sent 'everywhere' – sparking fears that he will send the military out into the streets across America to crack down on protests and dissent. 'It's a slippery slope,' Dr William Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University, told AFP. 'If the president tries to do more, he's cutting against the grain in the United States of a long history of leaving law enforcement to civilians.' The protests in Los Angeles are in many ways the showdown that Mr Trump has been waiting for. Mr Trump has been spoiling for a fight against California's Democratic governor Gavin Newsom, and he is now doing so on his signature issue of immigration. Mr Newsom has bitterly accused the 'dictatorial' president of manufacturing the crisis for political gain – while Mr Trump suggested the governor, a potential 2028 presidential contender, could be arrested. Democratic California senator Alex Padilla slammed what he called 'the behavior of an authoritarian government.' Rights groups have also opposed it. Ms Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in a statement that Mr Trump's response was 'unnecessary, inflammatory, and an abuse of power.' 'Civil war' Mr Trump said on June 9 that he does not 'want a civil war' – but the situation is a golden opportunity to appear tough to his base. Indeed, Mr Trump has long cultivated a strongman image and has previously expressed admiration for authoritarian leaders like Russia's Vladimir Putin and China's Xi Jinping. This weekend, Mr Trump will spend his 79th birthday watching tanks rumble through Washington at a parade to mark the 250th anniversary of the US army. And the order to send the National Guard into Los Angeles came shortly before Mr Trump attended a UFC fight in New Jersey – a sport he has used frequently to appeal to macho voters. Critics however fear that Mr Trump's actions in Los Angeles are not just for show. Since returning to office, Mr Trump has repeatedly pushed the boundaries of presidential power to target the US bureaucracy, universities, law firms, cultural institutions and anywhere else he believes liberal ideologies linger. Mr Trump seemed to hint at what could come next when he pinned the blame for the Los Angeles unrest – without evidence – on 'insurrectionists.' It appeared to be a clear reference to the Insurrection Act, which would allow the military to be used as a domestic police force. 'Look strong' 'Trump is pretty free and loose when it comes to the use of force,' Dr Todd Belt, a political science professor at George Washington University, told AFP. 'He knows it is popular with his base, and he always likes to look strong in their eyes.' Mr Trump has talked for years about using the military against protests. Although he did not do so during his first term, his former defence secretary Mark Esper said Mr Trump asked why Black Lives Matter protesters could not be shot in the legs. Conversely, Mr Trump made no move to bring in the military when his own supporters attacked the US Capitol in a bid to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden. Mr Trump would not say if he would invoke the Insurrection Act when asked by reporters on June 9 but he and his advisors have been framing the issue in increasingly apocalyptic terms. His top migration advisor Stephen Miller has explicitly framed the Los Angeles protests as a battle for the future of Western civilisation against an 'invasion' of migrants. 'The 'war' and 'invasion' framing have helped the administration make the case for the domestic use of these laws that are normally used to put down rebellions or invasions,' said Dr Belt. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.