Cutting Medicaid could mean the end of living at home for some Tri-Cities older adults
For more than 50 years a Tri-Cities nonprofit has helped seniors relying on Medicaid stay in their homes longer.
The looming threat of cuts to federal funding could mean hundreds of their clients may lose access to services that ensure they have a better quality of life at home.
When a Mid-Columbia Meals on Wheels volunteer notices a senior needs a little more help, their partner program Senior Life Resources can step in to help with everything that medical care doesn't — from running errands to housework, meal preparation and bathing or just spending a little time with someone.
Senior Life Resources helps more than 1,400 daily in the Tri-Cities, allowing them to continue living independently. Executive Director Brandy Hickey said their home care services are 95% paid for by Medicaid.
That funding helped support a group of 800 dedicated home care providers who spent almost 1 million hours with Tri-Cities seniors last year.
They've been serving seniors across Southeast Washington since 1974.
Now the organization is encouraging Tri-Citians to remind lawmakers how important their services are before crucial funding votes later this year.
At-home care is much less expensive than an assisted living facility, and also leads to better health outcomes, say healthcare officials.
Cherie Nobel is Senior Life Resources's director of Home Care Services. She said if Medicaid funding is cut, it will impact all Tri-Citians.
'Clients receiving home care generally have fewer trips to the hospital or doctor's office. Our hospital waiting rooms already have long wait times,' Nobel said.
'If our clients aren't getting essential care like a nutritious meal, medication reminders or to help prevent falls and other things people go to the hospital for, I can see those wait times getting longer and impacting overall health care costs for everyone in southeastern Washington.'
While no one knows what a potential funding cut would look like, hospital administrators across the state are organizing to sound the alarm.
Experts say there is simply no way to achieve the proposed savings to the budgets that oversee Medicare and Medicaid without seriously impacting the programs.
A New York Times analysis found that the proposed $880 billion cut to the Energy and Commerce Committee, which directs Medicare and Medicaid funding, could slash everything not related to healthcare and would still be $600 billion short.
The cuts could potentially impact both at-home healthcare and services like Senior Life Resources.
Industry officials say that's especially concerning for assisted living facilities because their ability to serve Medicaid patients already has been diminished by rising healthcare costs.
Regency Canyon Lakes Skilled Nursing Facility in Kennewick used to fill half its beds with Medicaid patients, even though Medicaid covers only 85% of costs.
But with the increased costs of staffing the center, it had to cut that to a quarter of its space, Parker Rieckelman, administrator of Regency Canyon Lakes recently told the Tri-City Herald Editorial Board.
While the majority of Senior Life Resources is funded through Medicaid, the Meals on Wheels program is more community driven.
It receives about half of its support through the Older Americans Act and the rest comes from the Tri-Cities community.
Some of that state and federal funding also could be in danger.
USAging said the recent Department of Health and Human Services reorganization eliminated the agency that oversees the Older Americans Act funding. It's unclear how those allocations will be handled.
The donor-led funding for that program has ensured it remains more resilient than many of its Meals on Wheels counterparts that are already seeing cuts.
Hickey said that strong community support will be key for both programs as they navigate this new funding landscape.
'Our commitment to delivering exceptional, compassionate service continues without interruption,' she said.
'Both our Home Care and Meals on Wheels programs operate with the same reliability and heart that our clients and their families count on every day. We've built strong foundations and flexible systems that help us navigate challenges and maintain high-quality services.'
Volunteer Josie Beach has seen the impact these services have on the lives of their clients.
She began volunteering by sharing a Meals on Wheels delivery route with her husband Wright in 2019. Eventually they shifted to working at the kitchen and helping out with other projects.
When she was delivering meals to one senior, she noticed bandages on the woman's arm that looked like they needed to be cleaned. So she asked if she could connect her to the Senior Life Resources program. The next time she came by, the bandages had been cleaned and she learned the program also helped her with tasks around the house.
Recently Beach and her husband have been reviving the garden outside of the Meals on Wheels Cafe where they both volunteer.
From the garden to meal preparation and on to the cafe or a meal delivery, her efforts touch every aspect of clients' lives.
'It's rewarding to me. I think I get more out of being a volunteer than they do in some ways. Just because you know you're making a difference,' she said. 'It may just be one person, but if everybody does a little bit it adds up to a lot.'
Beach said while she worries how big of an impact any cuts to funding could have, she knows the team at Senior Life Resources will still be fighting for their clients and finding a way to continue services.
'They're going to keep trying to support as many seniors as they can, regardless of the funding,' she said.
Hickey said their commitment to providing meals and quality cares to seniors remains unwavering
'Despite the uncertainty, Senior Life Resources remains steady. Both our Home Care and Meals on Wheels programs continue operating with the same compassion, care, and consistency that our clients and families have depended on for over 50 years,' she said.
'We are not waiting, we are working. We are not fearful, we are focused. And with the help from our community, we will continue to stand strong together.'
Though the organization is facing a great deal of uncertainty, Hickey said there are many ways Tri-Citians can help.
How You Can Help Seniors
Speak Up - Contact your elected officials, especially Representative Dan Newhouse, and ask them to protect funding for the Older Americans Act and Medicaid/Apple Health. Sign the petition from Central WA Families to preserve Medicaid.
Give Local - Your donations stay right here in our community, supporting real people with real needs.
Volunteer - Whether delivering meals or offering support, your time makes a difference. Just a few hours can change someone's day.
Stay Connected - Follow Senior Life Resources and Mid Columbia Meals on Wheels on social media, sign up for their newsletter, and help spread the word. 'The more voices we have, the stronger our advocacy becomes.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Part D Cancer Drug Launch Prices Soar Past Inflation
Launch prices for Medicare Part D anticancer drugs have risen sharply since 2012, with a mean increase of $1694 per year. In 2025, the observed prices were 15%-200% higher than expected if the increases were due to inflation alone, but the gap between observed and inflation-adjusted prices narrowed over the study period. METHODOLOGY: The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 introduced price negotiation for Medicare-covered drugs and required manufacturers to pay rebates to Medicare for price increases above inflation. But it did not address the launch prices of new drugs. Anticancer drugs, a protected drug class with mandatory Medicare Part D coverage, may now be especially prone to higher launch prices, in part because the Inflation Reduction Act limits out-of-pocket spending and price increases after market entry. Researchers identified 86 branded, self-administered, molecularly targeted anticancer therapies approved by the FDA between January 2010 and December 2024. Data on drug prices were obtained from the Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Formulary and adjusted for inflation. The researchers looked at launch prices by year and compared drug prices in 2025 with those expected if launch prices had increased due to inflation alone since the drug's market entry. TAKEAWAY: The mean monthly launch price increased from $10,954 for drugs first observed in the Medicare formulary in 2012-2014 to $27,891 for drugs first observed in 2023-2025. After adjusting for inflation, the mean launch price increased by $1694 per year ( P < .001). < .001). In 2025, actual drug prices were 14.8%-200.9% higher than expected if they had only kept pace with inflation. Although the gap between observed and inflation-adjusted prices narrowed over time, price increases continued to outpace inflation in 2023 and 2024, despite the Inflation Reduction Act rebate requirement, which will result in rebates to Medicare starting in fall 2025. IN PRACTICE: 'Launch prices for self-administered targeted anticancer therapies have grown precipitously, although no evidence was found of disproportionate increases in recent years. Instead, continued launch price growth for anticancer therapies was observed, consistent with prior research,' the study authors wrote. 'This suggests that companies were already engaging in price maximization for anticancer therapies and continued to do so after the implementation of the [Inflation Reduction Act].' SOURCE: This study, led by Stacie B. Dusetzina, PhD, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee, was published online in JAMA . LIMITATIONS: This study used example indications to determine monthly doses and pricing. Additionally, variations in available price measures were noted over the study period. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Arnold Ventures. Several authors reported receiving grants or personal fees and having other ties with various sources.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The impact of Medicaid, SNAP cuts in Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
ST. LOUIS – Last week, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued its analysis of President Donald Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill.' The CBO predicted the legislation would increase the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade and leave nearly 11 million people without health insurance. 'They're asking the poorest Americans to tighten their belts, so that the richest Americans can loosen their belts, and that's what makes it so extra unfair,' Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, said. Kogan says the president's tax bill could feature the largest Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) cuts in history. 'By putting up so much red tape, tons of people who're doing everything right fall through the cracks,' Kogan said. 'These are incredibly meager benefits and all of the sudden, lots of people are going to lose them.' Police crackdown on reckless, disabling dozens of cars Kogan says the bill freezes Medicaid provider taxes, which many states use to help pay for large portions of their Medicaid programs. 'Already, a lot of hospitals are struggling, and this would definitely make the situation much worse,' he said. Senator Josh Hawley warned this could force rural hospitals to close. 'You've got some senators who now want to change this bill to cut Medicaid benefits. That's ridiculous. That's insane. 1.3 million people in Missouri are on Medicaid, including hundreds of thousands of kids. These are working people who cannot afford health insurance otherwise,' Hawley said in a June 5 interview. Last week, Hawley posted on his X social media account, 'Just had a great talk with President Trump about the big, beautiful bill. He said again, no Medicaid benefit cuts.' 'Failure is not an option. And we intend to deliver, along with the president, for the American people,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said. With Senate Republicans planning to get the bill to the president's desk by July 4, Kogan fears the fallout. 'There's a lot at stake here and a lot of people's livelihoods could be upended, so I hope the senators could see differently,' Kogan said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
700 Rhode Islanders to lose Medicaid coverage; state blames old mistake
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — While Democrats are fighting proposed Medicaid cuts at the federal level, Rhode Islanders are facing their own cuts on the state level due to a change in the program's income limit. 'I think the only reason that a state would be motivated to do that is to save money,' said Sam Salganik, executive director of RIPIN, a nonprofit that helps people navigate the health care system. Salganik said the state used to have an income limit of about $19 an hour for a single parent of two. But he said the state is now lowering that to roughly $18.30. REPORT: 366K+ Rhode Islanders would be impacted by proposed Medicaid cuts A spokesperson for the state's Executive Office of Health and Human Services (EOHHS) said 700 parents and caretakers will lose Medicaid coverage because of the new income limit, which was put in place due to a mistake made years ago. According to the state agency, it will take effect for new patients beginning this month. 'If [the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)] has not approved the state to spend federal Medicaid money for a certain group at a certain income level, the state is not allowed to do so,' spokesperson Kerri White wrote. But Salganik said the federal income limit is the floor, not the ceiling. 'States always have the flexibility to have higher income limits than the minimums that were established by the Affordable Care Act, as long as it's part of the approved state Medicaid plan,' he explained. 'And this has been part of the approved state Medicaid plan for many, many years.' Salganik is also concerned this is being done through agency regulations rather than the legislative budget process. 'This is an example of why administrative departments need to do the fundamental things right the first time,' House Speaker Joe Shekarchi wrote in a statement to 12 News. 'Errors like these have real consequences.' MORE: Suspected Medicaid fraud in RI sparks criminal probe, proposed changes EOHHS said affected Medicaid recipients will be sent a letter, but they'll be able to keep their benefits until their annual renewal, or until a quarterly post-eligibility verification process. White said the change will save $1.9 million in state funds and $4.5 million when federal money is included. And while EOHHS said people will be able to buy coverage through HealthSource RI, Salgank said that will still cost low-income parents hundreds of dollars each year, if not more. 'It's just one more cost that is really difficult for them to afford,' he said. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.