10 million more people will be uninsured because of Trump's mega-package, CBO forecasts
The projection reflects last-minute alterations to the Senate legislation that changed the CBO's prior forecast that 11.8 million more people would be uninsured in a decade. (The Senate version of the 'big, beautiful bill' ultimately became the law.)
Just before it approved its version of the bill, the Senate yanked a provision that would have reduced federal Medicaid support for states that use their own funds to provide undocumented residents and others with health insurance similar to Medicaid. The CBO's prior coverage loss estimate included 1.4 million people in such state programs.
Separately, the CBO has projected that an additional 5.1 million more people would be uninsured in 2034 due to the expiration of the enhanced Affordable Care Act premium subsidies that are set to lapse at year's end, as well as a rule proposed by the Centers on Medicare and Medicaid Services governing Obamacare enrollment and eligibility. (The rule has since been changed and finalized, but CBO has yet to update that part of its estimate.)
Although the CBO's latest estimate did not break down the impact of different provisions in the law, it previously provided details of the House-passed version, which has some differences.
The Medicaid provisions are expected to drive the most loss in coverage by far. Some 7.8 million more people would be uninsured in 2034 due to the changes, with 4.8 million of them being affected by the addition of work requirements for many low-income adult enrollees who gained coverage under Medicaid expansion, according to the CBO's review of the House bill.
(The final law extends the requirement to work, volunteer, enroll in classes or attend job training for at least 80 hours a month to parents of children ages 14 and older. The House bill exempted parents of dependent children.)
Other Medicaid provisions that are expected to result in coverage loss include requiring more frequent eligibility reviews of Medicaid expansion enrollees, delaying implementation of two Biden administration enrollment and eligibility rules, and barring states from levying new or increased taxes on health care providers, according to the CBO's review of the House bill. (The final law also reduces the cap on provider taxes in expansion states.)
The CBO estimate released Monday reaffirmed its earlier forecast that the mega-package is expected to increase the deficit by $3.4 trillion over the next decade when compared with current law, under which the individual income tax provisions of the 2017 tax cuts law would have expired at year's end.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The former NBC host blasted the former president's son for a series of media appearances in which he blasted Joe Biden's critics.
Former NBC host Chuck Todd says Hunter Biden isn't doing himself—or Democrats—any favors with his media tour. The wayward member of the Biden family sat down for two interviews—with Andrew Gallaghan's popular Channel 5 podcast last weekend, and then with former Democratic National Committee chair Jaime Harrison on the At Our Table podcast on Tuesday—going off on an expletive-laden rant against his father's detractors and opening up about his alcohol and drug addictions. 'I don't think this does Hunter Biden any good. I don't think this does Joe Biden any good. It certainly doesn't do the Democratic Party any good,' Todd said Friday on his podcast, adding that he's generally an advocate for going to therapy, 'but let's not do it public. Try to deal with your issues amongst yourself.'
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pink Salt Trick Recipe to Weight Loss Trend 2025: An Analysis of Slumber Slim as a Science Informed Option
The viral, weight loss TikTok trend Pink Salt Trick is not scientific; Slumber Slim has a scientifically backed alternative as a metabolic support. Slumber SlimAlbany, New York, July 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- An internet-viral pink salt recipe has swept the TikTok platform purporting to be a weight loss trick. This report pays attention to the sources of this tendency, to what extent using the AI-created celebrity promotes this tendency, and to what the health concerns of using salt water-based interventions may be. It also discusses Slumber Slim, non-stimulant supplement, as an alternative that caters to scientific principles since it is suitable in terms of metabolic health especially among women above 30. Visit Here to Explore the Full Slumber Slim Formula In This Report You Will Know: The contents and assertions of the so-called Pink Salt Trick recipe and its emergence as one of the trends of TikTok in 2025 The information about the spread of misinformation by AI-created celebrity videos Health hazards that could accompany exploitation of saltwater as a weight loss strategy Comments of doctors and nutritionists regarding the effectiveness of the trend The reason why women older than 30 are especially prone to wellness misinformation The comparison between the formulation of Slumber Slim and other salt-based solutions The biologic processes that would contribute to Slumber Slim being a long term metabolic support Click Here to Learn More About Slumber Slim What Is the Recipe of Pink Salt Trick? The Pink Salt Trick is sometimes known as a homemade beverage that has become highly popular in 2025 on popular social media platforms such as TikTok and Youtube. It is also called a weight loss drink or a morning metabolism tip and it has the following common ingredients: The Recipe: 1/2 teaspoon of pink Himalayan/ Hawaiian salt half a lemon juice 812 ounces of warm or room-temperature water Optional extras: 1 teaspoonful apple cider vinegar or a sprinkle of cayenne pepper The beverage is marketed by saying that once you drink it in the morning you can eat, reset your metabolism, suppress your hunger and cleanse your system and start burning fat without caffeine or fasting involved. The rhetoric of social media is usually raving with such claims: My pants fall off literally! This is what celebrities are applying these days. It is superior to Ozempic! But there is scientific support behind these allegations which is narrow. There is no evidence that any concerns the result of using pink salt water in water, and which has the positive effect of the body losing fat. According to the experts, perceived gains can be based on short-term effects of hydration or placebo effect instead of long-term physiological influence. As Dr. Hans Schmidt, the chief of the bariatric surgery at the Hackensack University Medical Center stated, metabolism is a complex process and a little bit of salt cannot make too much impact. The Role of Artificial Intelligence Produced Celebrity endorsed Products One of the important conditions of the spread of the Pink Salt Trick is the use of AI-generated videos of popular faces, including Oprah Winfrey, seemingly appreciating the recipe. These are videos that employ sophisticated technology in face-mapping and voice-cloning to produce the most realistic yet false contents. Supporting the idea, in 2022 Oprah Winfrey discussed such frauds on Instagram and said: It is a cheat. It is bogus. It is not true. I am not involved in any gummies weight loss or pink salt beverages. Her explanation notwithstanding, such AI-created videos continue to spread, setting the trend in motion. Social media platforms also have difficulties in moderating such content as it flows in real time and this misinformation goes to large populations. Journalist Cassandra Brooklyn identified the problem on this creation in a series of videos on Yahoo What the Deal with the Miracle Pink Salt Trick to Lose Weight, and What Up with the Oprah Pink Salt Trick to Lose Weight, where she pointed out that the videos were not searched by her but showed up in her feed. The application of the deepfake technology puts into perspective the moral question of the spread of misinformation, especially in an industry like the wellness industry where those who struggle with such issues can easily be influenced by apparently honored endorsement. The same phenomenon emphasizes a critical assessment of online health claims, in particular, those that are associated with celebrity figures. The Pink Salt Trick could be dangerous to Health Although the Pink Salt Trick might seem harmless, health experts warn that it has health hazards especially when one uses it on a regular basis or when there is overuse. As Dr. Alison Childress, a Texas Tech University registered dietitian, describes: An excess of sodium may cause a water build-up... this may cause weight increase but not fat, but fluid, namely, among salt-sensitive individuals. The sodium level in the drink can be too high leading to bloating or victimizing those who are already challenged by diseases such as heart high blood pressure. The American Heart Association suggests taking in less than 2,300 mg of sodium on a daily basis and excessive use of pink salt may help to exceed the given mark. Also, the pink Himalayan salt does not contain much iodine that is an essential nutrient in thyroid functioning. Frequent use of non iodized salt, especially lack of legitimate sources of dietary iodine can contribute to the development of iodine deficiency. This situation may cause symptoms including tiredness, low levels of cold tolerance, dry skin and the strangest of all, this situation may result in weight gain- the opposite of what this drink is supposed to do. Read: Pink Salt Recipe for Weight Loss Spotlighted in New Consumer Briefing on Metabolic Reset with Slumber Slim The presence of the optional components of lemon juice and other elements, such as apple cider vinegar may be considered to present minor advantages and benefits, such as enhanced digestion or short-term satiety, which have been reported in journals, Nutrients and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. Nevertheless, none of these effects is exclusive to the Pink Salt Trick and does not lead to meaningful or long-term weight reduction without more problems to lifestyle. The Reason Why Women Over 30 are Vulnerable to Wellness Fads Females of the age group beyond 30 tend to have special physiological and psychological difficulties and are therefore highly susceptible to the alternate wellness trends such as the Pink Salt trick. Changes caused by hormonal status like perimenopause or cortisol surges during stress may change the metabolism leading to cravings and reducing the amount of energy. Bad sleep habits, which influence such hormones as ghrelin and leptin, are other triggers of these problems, contributing to the desire to eat more and emotional consumption. In her writing, Cassandra Brooklyn noted: I never began to search videos on pink salt but they began appearing in my feed. I wondered how many other women were finding them and especially seeking help'? Social media algorithms do nothing to reduce this vulnerability as they target users with bare-bones interactions, e.g., a like or a view, and forward diet-related information to users who might not be interested in such information at all. In an International Journal of Behavioral Medicine study, it has been shown that receiving messages of rapid weight loss can cause the increase of body dissatisfaction and stress eating in women, which develops the wish-seeking cycle of finding quick fixes. Slumber Slim: An Alternative Based on Science Slumber Slim is a non-stimulant nutental supplement that attempts to alleviate some of the metabolism and hormonal stress experienced by women and especially women who are over the age of 30. Differently to the Pink Salt Trick that has questionable truths, Slumber Slim consists of the substances that were researched to be beneficial to metabolic health. It consists of formulation comprising: - Magnesium and Calcium: These minerals assist in cortisol normalization as well as energy stabilization, which can reduce the metabolic upheavals caused by stress. Beta-Hydroxybutyrate (BHB): BHB resembles what the body produces of its ketones, thus could be beneficial to satiety and cravings reduction, and research claims that BHB could have an effect on appetite control (Gibson, 2015). Turmeric Extract (95% curcuminoids): Turmeric is frequently used in many cultures owing to its anti-inflammatory effects that aid in eliminating inflammation in the gut that is risky to metabolic health (Youm, 2015). BioPerine Black pepper extract: This boosts nutrient absorption, making sure that the body gets the best use of the constituents of the supplement. The overall goal of Slumber Slim is to facilitate appetite hormones such as ghrelin, stay away of the trigger of emotional eating, and maintain a normal metabolic rhythm. Designed without stimulants, its consumption does not cause energy crashes or hormonal disruptions that can be caused by the use of caffeine-based supplements and hence it can be used daily. The supplement is not promoted as a short-term solution and as a supplement to a regular practice of maintaining metabolic health, and dramatic-sounding messages are not pursued. A comparison of Slumber Slim and the Pink Salt Trick Although both products, The Pink Salt Trick and Slumber Slim, target the problem of metabolic health, they do so in very different ways. The Pink Salt Trick is based on a very basic salt water soltion that has little scientific support behind it, whereas Slumber Slim has ingredients that have proven effects regarding controlling appetite and inflammations as well as control of energy. As an example, BHB was proven to increase satiety, and magnesium can help to decrease anxiety-inspired craving eliminating the causes of weight management difficulties. The Pink Salt Trick is based on the main mechanism, which is the hydration with the trace minerals there is no evidence of prolonged metabolic effect. Conversely, the Slumber Slim formula is focused on the gut-brain axis stressing the eating patterns mindful and lowering the emotional response to the urge. This strategy follows recommendations of studies arguing about the relevance of hormonal and psychological issues in regulating weight. Considerations and Risks to Health Although the ingredients of Slumber Slim have been researched, the supplement still has not been tested by the FDA, and the effects can differ depending on a person. Like any diet modification, it should always be done under the guidance of a medical professional to prevent any dire effects and be safe and compatible with their conditions. The Pink Salt Trick is not only easy to do, it has the dangers of sodium excess along with iodine insufficiency, especially to individuals with particular health hypersensitivities. Much Wider repercussions of the Trend The Pink Salt Trick points to a bigger problem in the wellness sector, which is the spreading of emotionally manipulative advertising and misinformation, frequently increased by AI outputs. Their trends take advantage of weak spots, especially in women who were going through the hormonal changes, and feed them simple answers about dealing with complex problems. The use of false claims and endorsements accentuates the critical thinking aspect in judgment of health strategies. Although Slumber Slim is not a panacea, it is a deliberate effort at bringing in a science-augmented solution that lays greater emphasis on biology than on viral hysteria. The company utilizes non-stimulant, research-backed compounds, and this factor gives it a possible solution when someone needs a long-term impact on metabolism. Final Thoughts The popularity of the Pink Salt Trick is indicative of the demand of easy, natural weight management solutions, yet absence of scientific data, as well as potential dangers, demonstrate the necessity of caution. Slumber Slim is a solution that is consistent with the new body of evidence regarding the importance of improving hormonal and metabolic health, which is based on consistency rather than ways to achieve fast results. Those that are experiencing hormonal changes, cravings or metabolism issues require science-based approaches that do not demean the bio physiology. More sustainable results could be achieved by consulting medical experts and focusing on long-lasting health at the expense of viral tendency. Click Here to Learn How Slumber Slim Works About Slumber Slim Slumber Slim is a non-stimulant nutrition supplement to boost women whose hormones cause peculiar appetite change, deposits as a result of stress, as well as slowing metabolism. Its formula containing the ingredients that have been studied in order to promote metabolic health provided an alternative daily ritual to maintain support on a daily basis, with no need to rely on un-proven claims and recommendations. Customer Support Email: support@Slumber Brand website: Phone (US): 1-800-390-7035 Phone (INT): 1-208-345-5245 Disclaimer: The article is informational. Slumber Slim is not to diagnose, treat, heal or avert any disease. The FDA has not examined statements. Individual results can be different. Do not self-instigate any diet regime or input without the advice of a healthcare Slumber Slim CONTACT: Customer Support Email: support@Slumber Brand website: Phone (US): 1-800-390-7035 Phone (INT): 1-208-345-5245Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump notches winning streak in Supreme Court emergency docket deluge
President Trump is on a winning streak at the Supreme Court with conservative-majority justices giving the green light for the president to resume his sweeping agenda. Their recent blessing of his firings of more independent agency leaders is the latest example of the court going the administration's way. This White House in six months has already brought more emergency appeals to the high court than former President Biden did during his four years in office, making it an increasingly dominant part of the Supreme Court's work. But as the court issues more and more emergency decisions, the practice has sometimes come under criticism — even by other justices. Trump prompts staggering activity Trump's Justice Department filed its 21 st emergency application on Thursday, surpassing the 19 that the Biden administration filed during his entire four-year term. The court has long dealt with requests to delay executions on its emergency docket, but the number of politically charged requests from the sitting administration has jumped in recent years, further skyrocketing under Trump. 'The numbers are startling,' said Kannon Shanmugam, who leads Paul, Weiss' Supreme Court practice, at a Federalist Society event Thursday. Trump's Justice Department asserts the burst reflects how 'activist' federal district judges have improperly blocked the president's agenda. Trump's critics say it shows how the president himself is acting lawlessly. But some legal experts blame Congress for being missing in action. 'There are a lot of reasons for this growth, but I think the biggest reason, in some sense, is the disappearance of Congress from the scene,' Shanmugam said. In his second term, Trump has almost always emerged victorious at the Supreme Court. The administration successfully halted lower judges' orders in all but two of the decided emergency appeals, and a third where they only partially won. On immigration, the justices allowed the administration to revoke temporary legal protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants and swiftly deport people to countries where they have no ties while separately rebuffing a judge who ruled for migrants deported to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act. Other cases involve efforts to reshape the federal bureaucracy and spending. The Supreme Court allowed the administration to freeze $65 million in teacher grants, provide Department of Government Efficiency personnel with access to sensitive Social Security data, proceed with mass firings of probationary employees and broader reorganizations and dismantle the Education Department. Last month, Trump got perhaps his biggest win yet, when the Supreme Court clawed back federal judges' ability to issue universal injunctions. The most recent decision, meanwhile, concerned Trump's bid to expand presidential power by eviscerating independent agency leaders' removal protections. The justices on Wednesday enabled Trump to fire three members on the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Decisions often contain no explanation Unlike normal Supreme Court cases that take months to resolve, emergency cases follow a truncated schedule. The justices usually resolve the appeals in a matter of days after a singular round of written briefing and no oral argument. And oftentimes, the court acts without explanation. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, two of Trump's three appointees, have long defended the practice. Last year, the duo cautioned that explaining their preliminary thinking may 'create a lock-in effect' as a case progresses. At the Federalist Society event, Shanmugam suggested the court might have more energy for its emergency cases if the justices less frequently wrote separately on the merits docket — a dig at the many dissents and concurrences issued this term. But the real challenge, he said, is the speed at which the cases must be decided. 'It takes time to get members of the court to agree on reasoning, and sometimes I think it's therefore more expedient for the court to issue these orders without reasoning,' he said. 'Even though I think we would all agree that, all things being equal, it would be better for the court to provide more of that.' The frequent lack of explanation has at times left wiggle room and uncertainty. A month ago, the Supreme Court lifted a judge's injunction requiring the Trump administration to provide migrants with certain due process before deporting them to a country where they have no ties. With no explanation from the majority — only the liberal justices in dissent — the judge believed he could still enforce his subsequent ruling, which limited plans to deport a group of violent criminals to the war-torn country of South Sudan. The Trump administration accused him of defying the Supreme Court. Ultimately, the justices rebuked the judge, with even liberal Justice Elena Kagan agreeing. The Supreme Court's emergency interventions have also left lower judges to grapple with their precedential weight in separate cases. After the high court in May greenlit Trump's firings at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), the administration began asserting lower courts still weren't getting the message. The emergency decision led many court watchers to believe the justices are poised to overturn their 90-year-old precedent protecting independent agency leaders from termination without cause. But several judges have since continued to block Trump's firings at other independent agencies, since the precedent still technically remains on the books. The tensions came to a head after a judge reinstated fired CPSC members. The Supreme Court said the earlier case decides how the later case must be interpreted, providing arguably their most succinct guidance yet for how their emergency rulings should be interpreted. 'Although our interim orders are not conclusive as to the merits, they inform how a court should exercise its equitable discretion in like cases,' the unsigned ruling reads. Liberals object to emergency docket practices The lack of explanation in many of the court's emergency decisions has frustrated court watchers and judges alike, leading critics to call it the 'shadow docket.' Those critics include the Supreme Court's own liberal justices. 'Courts are supposed to explain things. That's what courts do,' Kagan said while speaking at a judicial conference Thursday. Kagan pointed to the court's decision last week greenlighting Trump's mass layoffs at the Education Department. She noted a casual observer might think the president is legally authorized to dismantle the agency, but the government didn't present that argument. Her fellow liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor and, particularly, Ketanji Brown Jackson, have made more forceful criticisms. Jackson increasingly accuses her colleagues of threatening the rule of law. She called one recent emergency decision 'hubristic and senseless' and warned another was 'unleashing devastation.' Late last month, Jackson wrote that her colleagues had 'put both our legal system, and our system of government, in grave jeopardy.' But in Wednesday's decision letting the CPSC firings move forward, the trio were united. Kagan accused the majority of having 'effectively expunged' the Supreme Court precedent protecting independent agency leaders, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, from its records. 'And it has accomplished those ends with the scantiest of explanations,' she wrote. Kagan noted that the 'sole professed basis' for the stay order was its prior stay order in another case involving Trump's firing of independent agency heads. That decision — which cleared the way for Trump to fire NLRB member Gwynne Wilcox and MSPB member Cathy Harris — was also 'minimally (and, as I have previously shown, poorly) explained,' she said. 'So only another under-reasoned emergency order undergirds today's,' Kagan wrote. 'Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under reasoned) orders to cite.'
