Commission to discuss giving Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman a second term
Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman's reappointment is set to be discussed at a May 15 meeting of the Fire and Police Commission, the hiring body for the city's fire and police chiefs. That committee will vote on Norman's reappointment at a later date, a news release said.
If a reappointment offer is extended, Norman told the Journal Sentinel he would accept it.
"I believe our department has made great strides," Norman said. "I desire to continue to build upon that."
Norman would focus on building community trust — long an emphasis of his — and working on the city's crime. He also said the department would continue to hold itself accountable under his possible reappointment.
Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson supports Norman's reappointment, said Jeff Fleming, the mayor's spokesperson. The two have a "solid working relationship," he said.
'I am focused on reducing crime with both accountability and prevention measures. The police chief both supports — and adds to — those approaches," the mayor said in an email through his spokesperson.
Norman's current four-year term ends in November. The May 15 meeting is being held far in advance of the chief's November term expiration to "ensure stability and continuity of leadership," the news release said, citing Fire and Police Commission Chair Miriam Horwitz's wishes.
Norman was hired as acting chief of the department in 2020 and named police chief the following year, following the retirement of another acting chief and the controversial removal of former chief Alfonso Morales in 2020.
A Milwaukee native, he was hired in 1996 by the police department and steadily rose through the ranks, serving as a lieutenant in the homicide unit and later a captain of District 3, which includes parts of the central city and west side.
Since being named chief, Norman has led the department through the crime spikes amid the COVID-19 pandemic, heavy local and state policy change after George Floyd's murder prompted national outrage and leading policing during the Republican National Convention.
In 2024, Norman was a finalist for the police chief position in Austin, Texas, but was ultimately passed on for the role. At that time, a department spokesperson said Norman remained "steadfast" in his commitment to Milwaukee.
The chief declined to say whether he has applied for other jobs as his term approaches its end in Milwaukee. He said he was focused on reappointment locally.
"I'm focused on this particular process now and honored to serve another term," Norman said.
The May 15 meeting will also discuss ways to gather community input before a final vote, according to the news release.
Norman was paid $177,112 in 2024, according to an online city salary database.
David Clarey is a public safety reporter at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He can be reached at dclarey@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Milwaukee police chief Jeffrey Norman's reappointment to be discussed
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Anderson negotiating with 4 unions on new contracts
ANDERSON — A proposed 8% pay raise for city employees would apply only to those who are not members of a union. Anderson Mayor Thomas Broderick Jr. told members of the Anderson City Council Wednesday that an 8% pay increase in the proposed budget is for non-union employees and elected officials. Broderick said the city is in the process of negotiating new contracts with four unions representing employees. An additional union contract will be negotiated in 2026. This year, city employees and elected officials received a 4% pay increase. The proposed 2026 general fund budget is $46.8 million, compared to $41.8 million for this year. City Controller Doug Whitham said the proposed 2026 budget for all funds is $90.5 million. The budget also includes no increase in employee health insurance costs for the 10th consecutive year. The city is anticipating a general fund balance of $24 million at the end of the year and $8.4 million in the Rainy Day fund. 'The city is in fine financial shape,' Broderick said, acknowledging legislation passed by the Indiana General Assembly to lower property taxes. 'Some taxing units are considering layoffs and reducing the number of employees.' Councilman Greg Graham asked how the city was preparing to deal with members of the police department taking employment in other communities for a higher rate of pay. Broderick said the city has increased the base pay for police and firefighters by $4,000 and provided COVID-19 premium pay of up to $7,500. 'Seventy percent of the people hired remain with the city,' he said. 'We're working to plan for retirements in the police and fire departments over a five-year period.' Anderson City Court Judge Jason Jamerson said the death penalty trial of Carl Roy Webb Boards II will take place in the city court starting in January. He said the county asked to move the trial from the Madison County Government Center for security reasons. 'We will be shut down except for essential services,' Jamerson said. 'We may move some of hearings to the hearing rooms in the courthouse.' He said Madison County was purchasing some additional equipment that will remain with the city court after the trial is completed. The Boards trial is expected to start on Jan. 26 and continue through February. Boards is charged with the July 2022 shooting death of Elwood police officer Noah Shahnavaz. He is scheduled to go on trial on charges of murder, two counts of resisting law enforcement, unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, firearm enhancement, habitual offender, life without parole and the death penalty. Play Farm Merge Valley
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
A MAHA Progress Report
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has spent the past six months working fast to embed his Make America Healthy Again creed into American life. Over the summer alone, he has struck deals with some food companies to phase out some petroleum-based food dyes, waged a war against pediatricians over COVID-19 vaccines for young children, seemingly toyed with the idea of shipping fresh food to Americans in ' MAHA boxes,' and pledged to reboot the nation's dietary guidelines from scratch. I spoke with the Atlantic staff writer Nicholas Florko, who reports on health policy, about how the MAHA-fication of the country is coming along. Nicholas Florko: We've seen Robert F. Kennedy Jr. take actions that will weaken our vaccination system in the United States, confirming some of public health's worst fears. But there have also been some surprising successes in his term. RFK Jr. has embraced the role of a dealmaker, and we've seen him leaning on food companies in particular to change their offerings and get rid of synthetic dyes. He's been able to do that simply by asking and by making handshake agreements, as opposed to what we would normally expect from a health secretary—for him to use his regulatory power to force these changes. Stephanie: Why are these handshake agreements proving successful? Nicholas: Food companies likely realize that it's in their best interest to get on the good side of the Trump administration. We see this throughout all sectors of business, but for the food sector, these changes are small enough that companies can make them without dramatically hurting their bottom line, while also earning a lot of brownie points with the administration. Stephanie: That reminds me of President Donald Trump's announcement in July that Coca-Cola, famously his favorite drink, had agreed to make their soda with cane sugar rather than high-fructose corn syrup. To what extent is Trump influencing health policy? Does RFK Jr. have a lot of latitude? Nicholas: The Coca-Cola issue is an interesting one because while it's true that RFK Jr. is very anti–high-fructose corn syrup, he's also publicly called sugar a 'poison.' So this is one of those instances where you wonder what is behind RFK Jr. supporting this change. He must know that this isn't actually going to significantly improve public health, but also probably realizes that this is important to his boss. That being said, I think that RFK Jr. does have some latitude. If you left Trump to his own devices, you probably wouldn't see the same level of aggression toward food companies overall, unless he had a personal stake in the situation. Stephanie: With back-to-school season under way, many students are getting up-to-date on their shots. How does this year's vaccination season compare to years past? Nicholas: We haven't seen huge changes, but we are seeing some hints of what might come. Much of the action thus far is around COVID vaccines. In February the president issued a largely symbolic executive order barring schools from enforcing COVID-19 vaccine mandates, but by the time that was issued, virtually no schools actually had such a policy. RFK Jr. also softened the CDC's recommendation for kids to get the COVID-19 vaccine. That's probably been one of his most controversial decisions, prompting a high-profile clash with pediatricians; a leading pediatrics group put out its own suggestions saying that children should be getting vaccinated. But we haven't seen major changes to the other vaccines typically required for returning to school. Stephanie: That disagreement must make it confusing for parents to know who to listen to. Nicholas: It's reasonable to assume that a good portion of people will listen to RFK Jr., but those people may be already skeptical of vaccines and see him as a trustworthy messenger, versus folks who are on the fence. I think that's really the question: Where do those people who are on the fence go? Do they take RFK Jr.'s suggestion, or do they trust their doctor? Stephanie: In May, you wrote a story that was alarming for salad lovers, specifically about how bagged lettuce should be avoided. What's happening with America's food-safety system? Nicholas: One of the earliest, most concerning changes for food safety happened when DOGE came into the federal agencies. Advisory committees focused on food-safety questions were shut down. People were being laid off—such as the administrative staff in charge of making sure that inspectors can go out to farms. Some layoffs seem to have been rescinded, but there's a broad worry about what will happen to the day-to-day operations that we all depend on to keep us safe. Stephanie: A recent story about the recall of frozen shrimp with potential radioactive contamination has caused a bit of a panic about where America's food safety is headed. How did you take that news? Nicholas: One thing that gives me some hope is the fact that this is the sort of thing that we caught, and there have been recalls by Walmart. That's really the big fear when it comes to food safety: that if we attack these federal programs, they're not going to be able to actually find the food that might get us sick before a lot of people get sick. So I think this is actually a good sign that things are working relatively well. Stephanie: Out of all the stories you've written this past summer about the MAHA movement, is there one that keeps you up at night? And is there one that makes you feel hopeful for where American health and safety is going? Nicholas: Honestly, the stories that keep me up at night are by our colleague Katie Wu. Her recent one on RFK Jr.'s COVID revenge campaign has really stuck with me. My own story that both keeps me up at night and that makes me hopeful is related to states, which are taking up the MAHA charge in a very quick fashion. It's felt like Republican governors and legislatures are all trying to out-MAHA one another to ingratiate themselves to Trump and to RFK Jr. Some of these ideas are good from a public-health perspective, but these states are doing a lot of things really fast, which is what worries me. For example, some states are blocking people from using food stamps to buy soda and other junk food. There's a question of how that policy will be implemented, how the attempts to enact these restrictions could affect the entire food-stamp system. Other states have passed laws banning artificial dyes in their school meals. Again, it's one of those ideas that's a good step, but the devil is in the details of how it's executed. How does this flurry of activity in the states actually affect people in the coming months? Does this ultimately make America healthier, or does it send our food system into chaos? Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News A New York appeals court voided the roughly $500 million civil-fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, calling it 'excessive,' but upheld the finding that Trump and his company committed long-running business fraud. Business restrictions on Trump in New York remain, and the state plans to appeal. More immigrants are leaving the U.S. than arriving, according to the Pew Research Center. The shift, affected by Trump's strict immigration policies, is the first of its kind since the 1960s. California lawmakers passed the first of three bills on a redistricting plan backed by Governor Gavin Newsom that would shift as many as five Republican-held U.S. House seats toward Democrats ahead of the 2026 midterms. The move comes a day after Texas state House Republicans passed a new congressional map that could add five U.S. House seats for the GOP. Evening Read What We Gain When We Stop Caring By Anna Holmes Sometime in the early aughts, the comedian Amy Poehler made a vulgar joke while sitting in the Saturday Night Live writers' room waiting for a midweek read-through to begin. As detailed in Tina Fey's 2011 memoir, Bossypants, Jimmy Fallon, who was also in the show's cast at the time, jokingly recoiled and told Poehler to stop it. 'It's not cute!' Fallon exclaimed. 'I don't like it.' 'Amy dropped what she was doing, went black in the eyes for a second, and wheeled around on him,' Fey writes. ''I don't fucking care if you like it.'' Read the full article. More From The Atlantic Read. In 2022, The Atlantic 's Culture writers recommended the books that they read too late —but that you should read now. Take a look. This is how the 17th-century painter Rachel Ruysch became one of the greatest still-life painters in the history of art, Zachary Fine writes. When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump to probe Smithsonian museums for 'woke' ideology
(The Center Square) - President Donald Trump has promised to crack down on 'woke' ideas promoted in museums across the United States, including the federally funded Smithsonian museums in Washington, D.C. 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been,' Trump wrote in a social media post Tuesday. Trump promised to bring legal action, similar to what his administration has done against universities like Harvard, to rid its practices from the nation's museums. The Smithsonian's fiscal year 2024 federal budget totaled $1.09 billion for its 21 museums, libraries, research centers and the national zoo in Washington, D.C. Across 21 sites, the Smithsonian boasted between 20 to 30 million visitors each year until the COVID-19 pandemic led to a steep decline in visitors between 2020 and 2021. The number of visitors has steadily increased in recent years but still has not surpassed 18 million visitors in a single year since the pandemic. The White House has since highlighted several examples of Smithsonian exhibits and features it deems as 'anti-American.' Some examples include: The National Portrait Gallery featuring art that displays the act of illegally crossing the Southern borderThe American History Museum featuring LGBTQ+ exhibit material including information on identities like 'third sex' and pride flags flying from the tops of National Portrait Gallery was set to feature the painting of a transgender statute of liberty before the artist withdrew National Museum of the American Latino features programming with content from 'A disabled plus size actress' and an 'ambulatory wheelchair user' who 'educates on their identity being Latinx, LGBTQ+, and disabled.' 'The Smithsonian's embrace of woke ideology distorts history and erodes public trust,' a White House news release said. 'It increasingly prioritizes exhibits that undermine our values and rewrite the American story through a lens of grievance and exclusion.' U.S. Rep. Alma Adams, D-NC, rebuked the Trump administration's efforts to address the ideology present in the Smithsonian's museums. 'Museums are centers of preservation, of culture, of speaking unapologetically to the history of our country,' Adams said. 'Museums were never built for comfort. They're built for learning, understanding, and chronicling the truth of our past.' It is unclear how the White House will go about changing the 'woke ideology' it says is present in the Smithsonian's museums. The Smithsonian declined The Center Square's request for comment to discuss details of the Trump administration's proposed plan. The White House did not share specific cost details of the administration's plans for the Smithsonian museums with The Center Square when asked for comment.
