logo
EXCLUSIVE Schools are paying for Labour-backed AI software to set students' homework - but critics fear technology will make teachers 'lazy and incompetent'

EXCLUSIVE Schools are paying for Labour-backed AI software to set students' homework - but critics fear technology will make teachers 'lazy and incompetent'

Daily Mail​01-05-2025

Schools across Britain are paying thousands of pounds for AI software which teachers can use to set pupils homework and give them points based on their behaviour, MailOnline can reveal.
The government-approved software, called Team Satchel, boasts that it is 'giving teachers their weekends and evenings back'.
Its website is littered with high scoring reviews, including three from the same teacher in the space of four months, and claims to be used in a third of secondary schools in Britain.
Some secondary schools could be splashing out as much as £27,000 to have the management information system for three years, according to a pricing document.
As well as setting homework, staff can give or take points away from students depending on their behaviour where they are placed on a virtual 'leaderboard' for teachers to view.
'The ability to assign both positive and negative points to students, from the front of the class, means recognition is timely and supports positive reinforcements ,' the website reads.
But furious campaigners fear it will lead to 'algorithm-based' learning and mark the end of 'inspirational' teaching.
The 'AI revolution in the classroom' is being driven by the Labour government which in March committed £45 million of taxpayers' money into beefing up internet connectivity in schools.
Chris McGovern, chair of Campaign for Real Education, told MailOnline the software would 'provide employment protection for lazy and incompetent teachers'.
'Reliance on AI may have some administrative advantages but it will mark the end of inspirational teaching,' he said.
'Teaching will become algorithm-based and formulaic. It's going to be "Goodbye, Mr. Chips" and "Hello, Mr Deadly-Dull Robot".
'The growing use of such software by schools points to a desolate, depressing and dehumanised experience of learning for pupils.
'Dangerously, it will feed children's harmful addiction to digital technology at a time when they are suffering from a mental health crisis. Schools need to focus as much on "Mind Change" as they do on " Climate Change".
'According to The Children's Society we already have the unhappiest children in Europe. Schools should be encouraging kids to be less reliant on digital technology not strengthening its grip on them.'
Parenting group UsForThem has recently launched its Put The Brakes on EdTech campaign, which calls on secondary schools to suspend the use of pupil-facing technology.
Retired headteacher Chris McGovern (pictured), chair of Campaign for Real Education, said the software would 'provide employment protection for lazy and incompetent teachers'
Co-founder Molly Kingsley told MailOnline that 'tech such as this might well save teachers time but it's disingenuous to pretend that it is in pupils' bests interests'.
She said: 'The core purpose of teaching should be to encourage children to think critically and for themselves, but how can pupils be expected to do this if teachers are actively avoiding doing the same?
'The insertion of tech into the pupil-teacher relationship further erodes the bond between teacher and child and comes at just a moment that children are disengaging from the school system in record numbers.
'In addition, practice indicates that ed tech in general and AI enhanced ed tech in particular presents a whole series of concerns about data and privacy issues which schools are ill equipped to deal with.
'The vast majority of parents would prefer homework to be set by an involved and engaged teacher using nothing more sophisticated than pen and paper.'
Team Satchel was founded in 2011 by vegetarian Naimish Gohil, a former assistant headteacher at the then named Henry Compton Boys School in London and software engineer.
He told the Tech Talks podcast six years ago he wanted his company to become 'synonymous with education'.
'Our job is to serve the school leaders and decision makers to help schools, because if we can help them and provide them with solutions to help them run schools better then that is naturally going to cascade down to teachers, students, and parents,' he said.
James Bore, managing director of cybersecurity consultancy, Bores, has warned schools about using AI in education.
He told MailOnline: 'While everyone's very excited about AI, I cannot stress enough how important it is to recognise that most of the AI out there has absolutely no understanding.
'It is, to simplify, a very powerful predictive autocorrect - a language engine. There is no understanding of that language, there is no distinction between truth and fiction.
'AI, LLMs, can be a powerful tool, and can even be useful, but they cannot be relied upon to be accurate and so any use of them to educate must come with safeguards and human fact-checking to avoid hallucinations.'
The Department for Education said AI would help teachers focus on face-to-face teaching rather than time spent on 'burdensome marking and admin'.
But Britain's 'strictest headteacher' Katharine Birbalsingh has long voiced opposition against it.
The head of Michaela Community School in Brent, north London, warned in February it would 'dumb down lessons'.
The 52-year-old said: 'Your brain remembers stuff if you write it down, if you read it.
'The reason why our children are so literate and so articulate is because they do loads of reading and writing in the classroom.
'If you're on a screen, you're just not going to learn as much and the business of being on a screen actually dumbs you down, so that is devastating for kids that come from more challenging backgrounds.
'We strongly advise our families not to give them smartphones at all, so obviously smartphones aren't allowed in school, but we actually advise them just not to give them smartphones at all.'
Research carried out by the National Literacy Trust found two in five teachers had used generative AI in 2024 to create lesson content.
The rise of AI led the GMB union this week to warn ministers that the technology was 'dehumanising' schools.
In a letter to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, the union's national officer Stacey Booth warned that its members had 'expressed multiple concerns about the use of genAI'.
This included 'cheating and plagiarism, privacy, data security and online safety to the loss of human touch in education'.
Ms Booth said: 'In particular, members' concerns about the dehumanisation of certain areas of education remind us that the increase of technology in schools may lead to a devaluing of the tangible aspects of education, like the social and emotional development that schools support, and the workers who do this.
'This work must not be forgotten in the drive to introduce new technologies and genAI into education.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ed Miliband accused of ‘rewriting history' after claiming winter fuel axe was to stop millionaires cashing in
Ed Miliband accused of ‘rewriting history' after claiming winter fuel axe was to stop millionaires cashing in

The Sun

time37 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Ed Miliband accused of ‘rewriting history' after claiming winter fuel axe was to stop millionaires cashing in

ED Miliband was accused of 'rewriting history' yesterday after he claimed scrapping winter fuel was about stopping millionaires getting payments. The bungling Net Zero Secretary tried to justify Labour's original decision to strip the handout by suggesting the pensioners who would've missed out were all rich. 2 2 But some of them earned as little as £12,000 per year. Mr Miliband said: 'The principal question was, the richest in our society, should they get the winter fuel payment, should millionaires, should the richest get the winter fuel payment? 'I think the answer for most people to that is no.' The Net Zero Secretary's desperate bid to explain scrapping winter fuel payments – before the decision was partially reversed – was blasted by senior Tories, who accused him of spouting a 'pack of lies'. Shadow Energy Secretary Andrew Bowie told The Sun: 'Red Ed is even more out of touch than we thought if he thinks people will believe this pack of lies. 'The economy is worse off than when they found it - taxes higher, unemployment higher and living standards lower. 'He is just trying to rewrite history to try and cover up Labour's embarrassing U-turn.' Meanwhile, a flagship Net Zero plan has been spared ahead of next week's spending review — to opponents' dismay. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has ensured his £13billion warm homes scheme will not be downgraded after negotiations with the Treasury. Chancellor Rachel Reeves decided not to cut the cash which allows heating upgrades through better insulation, solar panels and heat pumps.

UK's Reeves to make $2.7 trillion bet on 'Britain's renewal'
UK's Reeves to make $2.7 trillion bet on 'Britain's renewal'

Reuters

time44 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK's Reeves to make $2.7 trillion bet on 'Britain's renewal'

LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will divide up more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public spending on Wednesday in a speech she hopes will foster a sense of national renewal and make clear the year-old Labour government's political priorities. In an address to parliament due after 1130 GMT, Reeves will set out day-to-day budgets for government departments from 2026 to 2029 and investment plans out to 2030. Reeves set the overall total for spending in an October budget, financing her plan with the biggest tax rise in a generation and looser fiscal rules that make it easier for her to borrow to cover long-term investment. The choices she announces on Wednesday must start paying off quickly if Labour is to achieve its goals of boosting Britain's growth rate and improving the quality of overstretched public services. "This government is renewing Britain. But I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it," Reeves is expected to tell parliament, according to speech extracts released by the finance ministry. Reeves said the government would "invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off." Among the projects announced on Wednesday was likely to be a 39 billion-pound 10-year programme to build lower-cost housing - almost doubling the annual amount spent on this compared with existing support, the finance ministry said. Since its sweeping election victory last July, Labour has seen its popularity slide. The right-wing Reform Party led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage is now ahead of it in the polls and outperformed it in English local elections last month. While Britain's economy recorded the fastest growth of the Group of Seven advanced economies in the first quarter of this year, the International Monetary Fund has forecast that in coming years it will lag behind the United States and Canada and barely outperform the euro zone. Official data on Tuesday showed the jobless rate had hit its highest in nearly four years - which the opposition Conservatives blamed on Reeves' October decision to place the main burden of tax rises on employers and boost workers' rights. Discussions between Reeves and government ministers have continued into this week over how big a slice their departments will receive of a pie whose size was set last year. Plans announced so far include 86 billion pounds on research and development, 16 billion pounds on public transport, 4 billion pounds on a new nuclear power station, 6 billion pounds on nuclear submarines and 4 billion on prisons. The final spending increases are unlikely to be shared out equally. Capital-intensive plans to raise defence spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product, announced by Starmer in February, mean other departments will see no real-terms increase in the pace of investment after this year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimates. Day-to-day spending on public services is due to rise by an average of 1.2% a year on top of inflation between 2026-27 and 2028-29, while capital budgets will increase by an average of 1.3% in real terms through to 2029-30, according to the IFS. Both rates of growth are much slower than in the current financial year, when investment spending is set to jump by 11.6% and current spending rises by 2.5%. For day-to-day spending, increasing the health budget by 2 percentage points more than the average - as was typical when Labour was last in power before 2010 - would mean real-terms cuts of 1% a year for other departments, the IFS said. Chris Jeffery, head of macro strategy at Legal & General, Britain's largest asset manager, said the fact that the overall spending total was known limited the impact for investors. Instead, financial markets would be most focused on whether any proposed cuts looked realistic for the departments affected. "If they're imposing really large real-terms cuts in spending, then I think the market will come to the conclusion that these are less likely to be delivered than if they are less aggressive," he said. ($1 = 0.7409 pounds) ($1 = 0.7410 pounds)

Fact check: Labour claims the economy is ‘in a better place'
Fact check: Labour claims the economy is ‘in a better place'

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Fact check: Labour claims the economy is ‘in a better place'

Labour has justified its U-turn on winter fuel payments by claiming the economy 'is in a better place' and the public finances are on a 'stronger footing', according to James Murray, a Treasury minister. Is he correct? The main statistic backing the government's claim that the economy has turned a corner is the most recent set of official growth figures. Gross domestic product — a broad measure of the size of the economy — expanded by 0.7 per cent in the first three months of the year, exceeding forecasts of about 0.4 per cent and the fastest acceleration in 12 months. It also meant the UK was the fastest-growing economy in the G7 at the start of 2025. Although the growth momentum is expected to peter out over the course of the year, the strong first quarter has led City forecasters and the International Monetary Fund to modestly upgrade their annual growth forecast from 1 per cent to about 1.1-1.2 per cent. The economy expanded by 1.1 per cent last year, so growth is likely to at least match, rather than far outstrip last year's performance. Labour will also take comfort in an improvement in the UK's GDP per capita figures, which is a more accurate measure of living standards. Growth divided by the population rose by 0.5 per cent in the first quarter, after contracting for two consecutive quarters prior. One of the most important economic indicators for living standards and the sustainability of the public finances is productivity growth. This is a broad measure that combines the efficiency of worker output and investment across the economy. The UK's dismal productivity performance since the global financial crisis hasn't turned around since Labour won the election. Productivity was 0.2 per cent lower in the first quarter of the year compared with the same period in 2024. Productivity in the private sector also contracted by a surprising 0.7 per cent last year, pushing it to below pre-pandemic levels and nearly 2 per cent lower than before the financial crisis in 2008. In the public sector, productivity has contracted for the past two years. Along with productivity growth, lifting business investment will be decisive in defining the government's economic record in this parliament. Private sector investment enjoyed a strong start to the year, expanding by 5.9 per cent in the first quarter compared with the end of 2024, and is 8.1 per cent stronger compared with a year ago. However, the figures are likely to have been distorted by a sharp rise in manufacturing investment, as companies rushed to stockpile materials before President Trump's tariffs announcement on April 2. Public and private sector investment is vital to raise innovation, create jobs and ultimately boost productivity. The UK's total rate of investment has been the worst in the G7 for 24 out of the past 30 years, according to the Institute for Public Policy Research. After more than a year of steadily falling inflation, the pace of price rises has started accelerating again this spring. Annual consumer price inflation rose to 3.4 per cent in April, dragged higher by energy and utility costs. The Bank of England does not expect inflation to fall back to its 2 per cent target until the end of next year. Figures released on Tuesday showed that the labour market is in the grip of a pronounced slowdown. Unemployment has hit a four-year high of 4.6 per cent, and the number of payrolled employees contracted by 55,000 in the three months to April. A first estimate for May showed a 109,000 decline in jobs, which if confirmed would be the worst month since the height of the pandemic in April 2022. Labour has been handed some mixed news on the state of the public finances. The Office for National Statistics lowered its borrowing estimate for the last fiscal year by £3.7 billion to £148.3 billion ending in March 2025, but this figure still overshot the £137.3 billion forecast made by the government's independent fiscal watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility. Monthly borrowing data has also consistently come in above forecasts as the government's coffers have suffered from lower-than-expected tax revenues. On the expenditure side, spending on public sector pay deals and welfare has been growing too fast for comfort for the chancellor. Financial market conditions have also turned against the government this year. Investors have driven up the UK's borrowing costs, as reflected by yields on sovereign debt. Since Rachel Reeves's spring statement in late March, higher gilt yields have blown a £5 billion hole in the chancellor's £9.9 billion buffer to meet her main fiscal rule. Labour's difficulty in balancing the books over the course of the parliament has stoked speculation that Reeves will be forced into more tax rises or spending cuts at her autumn budget.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store