Irish EEZ passed through hundreds of times by Russian shadow fleet
According to satellite data from maritime intelligence firm Windward, nearly 250 ships believed to be part of the covert fleet passed through Ireland's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) between January and July.
The vessels are linked to efforts by Russia to sidestep EU and US sanctions imposed in response to its invasion of Ukraine.
These sanctions target the export of Russian oil, which continues to fund the country's war effort.
Many of the tankers are described by Windward analysts as ageing, under-maintained, and lacking proper insurance.
They often operate under 'flags of convenience' from countries like Liberia, Panama, Malta, and the Marshall Islands, jurisdictions known for minimal oversight.
Windward's analysis found that more than 70 of the ships that transited through Irish waters were directly listed in EU and US sanctions databases.
During the first five months of the year alone, 40 vessels had clear Russian ties, including several flying the Russian flag and others owned by Russian companies.
Their passage through Irish waters, often without docking, has raised the alarm among maritime experts and political observers.
Ireland's EEZ, which stretches around 370 km off the west coast, is a critical maritime zone with several major international shipping lanes and undersea cables.
Experts warn that the continued movement of these ships through Irish waters undermines international efforts to isolate Russia economically.
'These ships are like vehicles on Irish roads without an NCT or insurance,' said Tony Cudmore, a retired brigadier general with the Irish Defence Forces, to RTE.
'They're poorly maintained, possibly crewed by underqualified personnel, and pose a real danger—not just to the environment, but to Irish sovereignty.'
Some shadow fleet vessels have been linked to damage to subsea infrastructure, particularly in the Baltic Sea.
Recent examples include Sweden seizing a ship suspected of damaging a cable linking the country with Latvia, at the beginning of the year.
Furthermore NATO launched its new 'Baltic Sea Mission' this year, after numerous cables were damaged in 2024.
Another example is an open investigation by Finland, into suspected Russian sabotage into cables damaged between their country and Estonia.
There are worries that similar incidents could happen off the Irish coast, where undersea cables are vital to global communications and trade.
Several of the ships tracked this year have engaged in suspicious or high-risk behaviour, including turning off their location transponders or conducting ship-to-ship oil transfers.
One such vessel, the Valentin Pikul, passed through Irish waters in March and was later involved in oil transfers near Murmansk.
Others, including the Russian-flagged Bratsk, Belgorod, and Primorye, were recorded going 'dark' for periods while navigating near Donegal, Clare, and off the western seaboard according to Windward.
The Irish Defence Forces said they monitor maritime activity continuously and share intelligence with national and international partners.
The Irish Coast Guard, through its search and rescue and pollution response roles, also tracks ship movements and has detected multiple sanctioned Russian vessels in Irish waters since the start of the year, according to RTE
A recent EU directive requires all vessels transiting through EU EEZs, including Ireland's, to provide valid proof of insurance, even if they don't dock.
However, enforcement of such rules remains challenging.
Earlier this year, German authorities seized a Panama-flagged tanker off the Baltic coast carrying 100,000 tonnes of Russian oil.
The incident has been cited as an example of the type of enforcement Ireland could pursue.
Despite sanctions from the EU, Britain and the US, including bans on over 400 Russian-linked tankers, Russia's oil export levels have remained relatively stable.
The International Energy Agency reported an average of 7.5 million barrels per day exported in 2024, only slightly down from pre-war figures.
Professor John O'Brennan of Maynooth University said the persistence of shadow fleet operations highlights a gap in enforcement across EU member states.
'Russia has successfully exploited inconsistent national responses,' he said. 'If countries like Ireland don't step up their enforcement efforts, these vessels will continue to slip through the cracks.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Europe 'capitulated' on US tariff deal, says Ibec CEO
CEO of Ibec Danny McCoy has described the deal reached by the European Union and the United States on trade tariffs as a capitulation by Europe. The agreement will see EU exports taxed at 15% in a bid to resolve a transatlantic tariff stand-off that threatened to explode into a full-blown trade war. The deal was announced following a meeting between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump. Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, Mr McCoy said: "The good news, if there is good news on this, is that uncertainty may be dissipating and that's going to be important for people in business to make decisions." However, he said the deal was "fairly punishing" for the EU and added "Europe has capitulated". "It's quite tragic that we are in this situation. If Europe had equal strength, it could have confronted the United States," he said. Mr McCoy said that while the EU is a "strong economic zone", its weakness is that "we cannot defend the European Union". Under the deal, the EU pledged to buy US military equipment and European companies are to invest $600 billion in the US over President Trump's second term. "US businesses are now favoured coming into Europe without tariffs and our European businesses are facing 15%. "In time, this will lead to a lot of changes in terms of businesses having to look at different markets than the United States or suffer significant losses trading with the United States," Mr McCoy said. He also raised concerns for Ireland that goods from the UK entering the US will have a smaller tariff rate of 10%. The US and UK agreed to a trade deal in early May, which included a baseline 10% tariff on most goods exported to the US, with certain exemptions. The agreement includes goods being exported from Northern Ireland. EU-US tariffs deal gives clarity, says minister Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke said that the deal brings clarity and avoids a trade war that could have resulted in 30% tariffs on EU goods. Speaking on the same programme, he said: "It gives certainty which is key, but there's three key areas I think we have to focus on. "We are about four days away, which would have been a 30% tariff for the US and that would have been very significant for all our companies right across the country. "Secondly, I think it avoids a direct trade war because we're very much aware that there was about €100 billion of countermeasures that were ready to be deployed, which would have a very significant effect on Ireland and as well on the north-south economy." Mr Burke added that "the devil is in the detail and we do need to see those key areas, those carve-outs that have been specifically called out by the President of the Commission yesterday". He said that the Irish Government "is very, very clear and has been that tariffs are bad" and said 15% is a "very significant tariff". In relation to pharmaceuticals, Mr Burke said that the understanding is that the 15% tariff "will be a ceiling" subsequent to the US investigation. "Pharmaceuticals are very complex, a lot of the product that is exported over to the US is not a complete product. Almost 70% of it is components of the final product that will come together. "And that's why we do need to ensure that we have a very keen rate to ensure we incentivise innovation in that sector because that's so important for the global economy. "We've about 100,000 employees in Ireland, 130 billion exports in the life science sector and the Government will be bringing forward a separate life science strategy later on this year, which will be key in continuing the investment and offering a very competitive proposition from Ireland's perspective," Mr Burke added.
Extra.ie
an hour ago
- Extra.ie
Viral restaurant sensation to close Dublin diner less than a year after opening
A city centre restaurant known for its cheeky service and viral concept has announced its permanent closure, citing financial pressures faced by many small businesses. Karen's Diner, which opened on Dublin's O'Connell Street in early 2024, was originally part of a global chain inspired by the viral 'Karen' meme – where waiters and waitresses playfully adopt rude personas and pretend to deal with difficult customers. In November 2024, the venue rebranded as Karen's Gone Wild, becoming an independently owned Irish restaurant. Karen's Diner on O'Connell Street in Dublin. Pic: Fran Veale Despite the local ownership and loyal customer base, the team confirmed via social media over the weekend that the business will close for good on Sunday, August 3. 'After a wild ride, we've decided it's time to shut our doors. Karen's will officially close after Sunday, August 3rd. 'So if you've ever wanted to experience the madness (or come back for round two), now's your last chance. Like many independent spots, we've felt the pressure — VAT at 13.5%, rising costs, tight margins, and so much more. 'A huge thank you to everyone who supported us, shouted at us, laughed with us, and made this place what it was. It's been unreal. Once again thank you for being part of it — we hope to see you one last time before we turn off the lights.' Karen's closure adds to a growing list of hospitality venues struggling to stay afloat in Ireland, as rising operational costs, VAT increases, and narrow profit margins continue to pressure small businesses across the country.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
How the EU succumbed to Trump's tariff steamroller
The path to the EU's capitulation to Donald Trump's trade blitz was set on April 10th. The sweeping 'liberation day' tariffs that the US president had inflicted on most of the world earlier that month had sent financial markets into a tailspin as investors dumped US assets over recession fears. With the sell-off intensifying, Trump blinked and on April 9th dropped the tariffs to 10 per cent. But Brussels blinked too. On April 10th it suspended its retaliatory tariffs and accepted the US offer of talks with a knife at its throat: 10 per cent tariffs on most of its trade, along with higher levies on steel, aluminium and vehicles. Rather than join Canada and China with instant retaliation and inflict pain on US consumers and businesses, the EU – hamstrung by divergent views among its member states – chose to take the pain in the hope of securing a better deal. READ MORE Under the framework deal struck by European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Trump at his Turnberry golf resort on Sunday, the EU has swallowed a broad-based 'baseline' US tariff of 15 per cent, including crucially for cars, but not for steel, which will be subject to a quota system. Relief among policymakers about avoiding an immediate transatlantic trade war was tinged with regret: could the EU, the world's largest trading bloc and supposedly an economic heavyweight, have extracted better terms had it not pulled its punches early on? 'He's the bully in the schoolyard and we didn't join others in standing up to him,' said one diplomat. 'Those who don't hang together get hanged separately.' Georg Riekeles, a former commission official who helped negotiate the UK's exit from the bloc, said the EU's most recent threat to apply €93 billion of retaliatory tariffs against US goods came far too late. 'With the benefit of hindsight, the EU would have been better off answering the US vigorously in April in a one-two combo with China's retaliation against the US tariff hikes, which left markets and Trump reeling,' said Riekeles, now at the European Policy Centre think-tank. Trump views the EU as a parasite, feeding off the lucrative US market while closing its own through regulation and standards. The US president has said the union was 'formed to screw the US' and 'nastier than China'. The EU's response to his return to power in January was flat-footed. Months of planning beforehand by a dedicated team, which included senior trade officials led by another Brexit talks veteran Sabine Weyand and von der Leyen's trade adviser Tomas Baert, went up in smoke. They had drawn up a three-point plan modelled on the approach taken in Trump's first term: offer to reduce the near €200 billion goods trade deficit by buying more liquefied natural gas, weapons and agricultural products. Second, offer mutual tariff reductions on each other's goods. If that failed, they would prepare retaliation and rely on a market response to a possible trade war, or increasing inflation in the US, to force Trump to back down. But Trump moved faster than expected and by March had levied 25 per cent tariffs on steel, aluminium and cars. At a meeting in Luxembourg that month, many trade ministers were on the war path. Germany, France and a few others pushed for the commission to consult on using its new 'trade bazooka', the anti-coercion instrument. Designed after Trump's first term to counter trade policy being used to pressure governments over other matters, it would allow Brussels to bar US companies from public tenders, revoke intellectual property protection and restrict imports and exports. However, it was not clear a majority of member states agreed with the threatening move, diplomats said. Weyand told EU ambassadors, who met at least weekly to discuss progress, to show 'strategic patience'. When the UK struck a trade deal with Washington in May, accepting Trump's 10 per cent baseline tariff, it encouraged those EU member states seeking a settlement, especially Berlin. Meanwhile, a severe tit-for-tat escalation between the US and China ended in partial détente, easing investor fears of global trade turmoil. Stock markets reached record highs, despite the large tariff increases and continued uncertainty unleashed by Trump. Italy's prime minister Giorgia Meloni and German chancellor Friedrich Merz for months held on to the EU's early offer to drop all industrial tariffs if the US did the same, even though Washington had long made clear it wanted unilateral concessions. Berlin was preoccupied with obtaining a complicated 'offset' scheme to provide tariff relief for European – in practice German – car companies that manufactured and exported from the US. While EU technocrats were boxing under Queensberry rules, Trump was in a New York street fight. Maroš Šefčovič, the EU's avuncular trade commissioner, was dispatched to Washington seven times to propose areas of agreement, deliver homilies on the importance of the transatlantic relationship and promote Germany's car offset scheme. In total, Šefčovič held more than 100 hours of frustrating talks with his US counterparts. A deal for a permanent 10 per cent 'reciprocal' tariff, hatched in July with US trade representative Jamieson Greer and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, was flatly rejected by Trump, who instead threatened to raise levies on the EU to 30 per cent, rather than 20 per cent, from August. And his threats had worked before. The retaliatory package the EU paused in April had been reduced from €26 billion to €21 billion after lobbying by France, Ireland and Italy to ensure bourbon was removed from the list, after Trump threatened to hit European distillers in return. If everything member states requested had been removed, only €9 billion of goods would have been left on the list, officials told the Financial Times. Over the months of talks, Šefčovič's phone rang regularly with ministers urging caution. Minister for Trade Simon Harris was a frequent caller. He wanted to save Ireland's pharmaceutical, spirits and beef industry from any US counterpunch and let the world – not least the Americans – know with frequent social media posts. Business leaders also called loudly for restraint, preferring to accept a cut to profit margins than risk punitive tariffs that would hit sales. A second package of retaliatory tariffs on the US was also cut to €72 billion before finally being approved on July 24th to be used if talks collapsed, bringing the total to €93 billion. The months-long uncertainty over the direction of negotiations has also exposed divisions inside the commission itself. Weyand, the steely expert whose hardball approach to Brexit often outfoxed her UK counterparts, has consistently argued for a stronger stance towards Trump and the use of the EU's retaliation tools, in opposition to the more dovish von der Leyen, multiple diplomats and officials told the FT. The French government, notwithstanding its attempts to shield French business from retaliation, has also repeatedly called for a more muscular commission approach to Trump's tariffs. But the commission president and her close aides argued that the potential damage from additional Trump measures – including threats to impose specific tariffs on critical sectors such as EU pharmaceuticals – meant the risk of a spiralling trade war was too great. There was also concern that a more confrontational stance towards Washington could spill over into other areas. Europe's dependency on America's security guarantee was a further argument against trade confrontation, especially for the bloc's eastern and northern members. Fears that Trump would cut off weapons supplies to Ukraine, pull troops out of Europe or even quit Nato overshadowed the talks, diplomats said. A further priority for the commission president was to preserve the EU's right to regulate. The US tech industry has pushed hard for Trump to pressure the EU to weaken laws regulating online speech and data management. They also opposed national digital taxes. So far von der Leyen has refused to compromise on those issues. 'Some in the commission's trade directorate viewed this as a classical trade dispute and were pushing for retaliation, but von der Leyen had to consider the bigger picture which drove her caution and risk aversion,' said Mujtaba Rahman, Europe managing director at Eurasia Group, the risk consultancy. After Trump rebuffed the deal hatched by his own officials, the commission's negotiating team concluded they had no option but to accept a US tariff of 15 per cent. They pitched the number to member state ambassadors this week. Officials will try to present it as a status quo deal, since the 15 per cent theoretically includes the pre-existing average US tariff of 4.8 per cent. In fact, on a trade weighted basis, the pre-existing US tariff on imports from the EU was only 1.6 per cent. There is no hiding the fact the EU was rolled over by the Trump juggernaut, said one ambassador. 'Trump worked out exactly where our pain threshold is.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
