Players in Stanley Cup playoffs may be called to testify in Hockey Canada trial
By Chris Johnston, Michael Russo and Katie Strang
Members of the 2018 Canadian World Juniors team currently playing for NHL teams in the Stanley Cup playoffs could be called as witnesses during a sexual assault trial that is slated to begin next week in London, Ont.
Teams have yet to be notified if the players will be required to travel to London to take the stand or if they may participate virtually, league sources told The Athletic.
Advertisement
'It's not finalized but we were told players in the playoffs would have to be accommodated,' said an agent for one of the players. 'That must mean video.' The agent added that while he didn't expect his client to be required to travel to London during the playoffs, a criminal lawyer advised him that the decision would depend on the 'mood of the court.'
One general manager of a playoff team with a potential witness on its roster added: 'My thoughts would be that it would be virtual. That's what I expect.'
There are other players who could be called to testify who no longer play in the NHL or are on teams that did not qualify for the playoffs.
An NHL official told The Athletic that 'everyone who has been asked to participate has indicated a willingness to do it, as far as I know.' That official believes that the players will be 'participating in various ways depending on circumstance.'
The trial is expected to last approximately eight weeks, meaning it could extend into the Stanley Cup Final.
Five players from that 2018 World Juniors team — Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube and Cal Foote — will stand trial on sexual assault charges stemming from a June 2018 incident in which a 20-year-old woman alleged she was assaulted over several hours in a London hotel room.
The alleged sexual assault took place following a Hockey Canada gala celebrating the group's championship. In the woman's original statement of claim, filed in Ontario Superior Court in April 2022, she said there were eight players in the room when she was allegedly assaulted.
Nineteen of the 22 members of the Canadian World Juniors team attended the festivities in London. Of those 19, five were charged with assault. (McLeod is the only one of the five facing two charges; he was also charged 'for being a party to the offense.')
Advertisement
Seven players currently in the playoffs were in London the weekend the alleged incident occurred: Brett Howden (Vegas Golden Knights), Drake Batherson (Ottawa Senators), Taylor Raddysh (Washington Capitals), Sam Steel (Dallas Stars), Cale Makar (Colorado Avalanche), Jonah Gadjovich (Florida Panthers) and Robert Thomas (St. Louis Blues).
Another seven are no longer in the NHL or are on teams that did not make the playoffs: Colton Point (last played in ECHL), Dante Fabbro (Columbus Blue Jackets), Conor Timmins (Pittsburgh Penguins), Jake Bean (Calgary Flames), Tyler Steenbergen (last played in Europe), Maxime Comtois (KHL) and Boris Katchouk (AHL).
None of those 14 players have been charged with a crime.
Jordan Kyrou, Victor Mete and Kale Clague were on the 2018 championship team but were not in London the weekend of the alleged incident.
(Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; top photos: Adam Glanzman, Patrick Smith / Getty Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canadiens Amongst Most Active Teams According To Friedman
Former Canadiens Player Takes Part Of Team To Stanley Cup Final Corey Perry may have only played one year for the Montreal Canadiens, but he has built friendships that will last a lifetime and taken something else away from the experience. During the 2021 playoffs, the right winger began using teammate Josh Anderson's sticks, and four years later, in the Stanley Cup final with the Edmonton Oilers, Sportsnet's Elliotte Friedman revealed that the 40-year-old is still using Anderson's stick. 1:52 Now Playing Paused Ad Playing
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Edmonton Oilers Should Ride Or Die With Stuart Skinner
All season long and well before it, the Edmonton Oilers' goaltending situation has been a subject of intense debate. For most of the past two seasons, the Oilers ran with Stuart Skinner and Calvin Pickard in net. Despite trade speculation suggesting the Oilers need an upgrade in net, they've stuck with their tandem. Advertisement But after Monday's 6-1 debacle at the hands of the Florida Panthers in Game 3 of the Stanley Cup final, Edmonton now has a tough decision to make – whether to stick with Skinner after two consecutive subpar performances or have Pickard come in and try to even up the series. Pickard replaced Skinner in the first round and went 6-0 with an .888 save percentage before suffering an injury. That said, it's not really a tough decision. The Oilers should be living or dying with Skinner as their guy. While Pickard has his supporters, Skinner has done enough to earn the trust of his team as they try to dig out of a 2-1 series hole. We're not for a minute suggesting Skinner should be free of criticism. Giving up the first goal of the game just 56 seconds into the first period is hardly the start the Oilers were looking for from Skinner. Before he got the hook in the third period, Skinner allowed five Panthers goals on just 23 shots. His .783 save percentage in Game 3 is not ideal, nor is his .860 save percentage in the Cup final. However, Skinner has had moments where he looked terrific this post-season. Stuart Skinner (Jim Rassol-Imagn Images) In three of Edmonton's five games against Dallas in the Western Conference final, Skinner posted a save percentage of .966 or better. He also has three shutouts in these playoffs. Advertisement While there were serious doubts about his play early in the playoffs, he has since done enough for the Oilers to win more games than they lose. Sure, they'd want him to be sharper in the past couple of games, but have you seen how poorly Edmonton has defended in front of him? There aren't many goalies out there who could steal wins when their teammates are turnstiles, and Skinner isn't a superhero who can stand on his head on every shot from the deep and strong Panthers. Pickard isn't, either. If the Oilers do go on to lose the Cup final, Skinner's future with the team will be called into question. That's fair. It doesn't matter which team or player we're talking about – if you can't get the job done in two consecutive Cup finals, your job security will be in doubt. While the 26-year-old Skinner is under contract next season at a very reasonable $2.6-million cap hit, you have to think Oilers GM Stan Bowman will be seeking out a different look between the pipes. Maybe that's current Anaheim Ducks goalie John Gibson or someone else, but the status quo in net probably won't be an option for Edmonton. Advertisement For now, though, Skinner is the best option for the Oilers. He's battled his way through the muck for a while now, and he can still control his future in Edmonton by coming up with strong performances whenever he's called upon. But he certainly needs a stronger effort from the players in front of him, which is why Skinner can't be scapegoated – at least, right now. Get the latest news and trending stories by following The Hockey News on Google News and by subscribing to The Hockey News newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Who says no to these NHL trades (involving things that cannot actually be traded)?
In the NHL, you can't trade coaches. There was a time when you could, and it happened in 1987, when New York Rangers GM Phil Esposito sent a first-round pick to the Quebec Nordiques for head coach Michel Bergeron in a surprise swap. It was a creative move. It also didn't work, with Bergeron lasting less than two seasons, and the league quickly moved to make sure it wouldn't be tried again. These days, coaches are one of many assets a team is not allowed to trade. Advertisement Or are they? After all, we occasionally see coaching quasi-trades, like when John Tortorella and Alain Vigneault essentially swapped teams after being fired in 2013. More recently, the Rangers and Penguins didn't actually pull off a Mike Sullivan and David Quinn for Dan Muse trade, but it kind of worked out that way. Let's use that as inspiration. We've got time to kill between Stanley Cup Final games, so I put out a call to readers: Send me your 'who says no?' trade proposals involving things that cannot actually be traded. And you sure did. Can we pull off a blockbuster, or will it just be too complicated to make a trade in the cap era NHL? Let's find out. Note: Submissions have been edited for clarity and style. What are the Leafs lacking? Heart and grit. They vowed to change their DNA in the offseason. They need to disrupt their core even if it means losing some skill and finesse. So: To Edmonton: Carlton the Bear To Toronto: Hunter the whatever that is — Mike H. As mascots go, Hunter is a lot worse but also more intimidating, which is probably exactly the sort of move the Leafs will be looking to make this summer. After all, if you're going to acquire a vicious, ugly animal with crazed eyes and no instincts beyond preying on the weak and vulnerable, at least Hunter comes cheaper than Sam Bennett. But what's in it for the Oilers? Is the upgrade from Hunter to Carlton enough to justify disrupting a winning mix? I wasn't sure, so I reached out to the world's foremost experts on NHL mascots: Mark Lazerus' children. Here's what his daughter had to say: 'I think that a Hunter and Carlton trade wouldn't be good because real lynxes live in Alberta. Also, Carlton doesn't wear pants and Edmonton is really cold, so Carlton would freeze. In conclusion, Hunter is with his family and Carlton won't freeze his butt off.' Advertisement The no-pants thing is a strong catch. Sorry, Leafs fans, but the Oilers say no. To Pittsburgh: The rights to 'Brass Bonanza' To Carolina: Exclusive naming rights to Sebastian Aho — Dan H. I kind of love this one. Both teams are getting something of value. We might have a match. And sure, it looks lopsided at first glance. 'Brass Bonanza' is a legitimate star in this league. It's solidly in the GOAT conversation when it comes to novelty goal songs. But it's also the source of controversy among Hurricanes fans, with some embracing it while others see it as nostalgia for a team that they have no personal connection to. So you could argue that the Hurricanes would benefit from making a clean break from the Whalers stuff, and getting the exclusive naming rights to your biggest star isn't a bad way to do it. And of course, the Penguins get a fun new goal song that they can play (checks current roster) dozens of times during the season. I honestly think this one is a win-win. (In related news, Other Sebastian Aho apparently signed with the Penguins last summer. Who knew?) The PWHL receives: The Lady Byng, the Mark Messier, the Jennings, the King Clancy, the Clarence S. Campbell Bowl, the Prince of Wales trophy and a sixth-round pick The NHL receives: The PWHL expansion process and the PWHL Gold Plan — Peter B. Terrible trade. The PWHL doesn't just say no, it hangs up and immediately blocks the number as spam. Seriously, what kind of HFBoards madness is this? It's a classic 'seven nickels for a silver dollar' trade proposal. You're bundling up all the trophies that nobody wants and trying to get not one but two superstar-level concepts in return. This kind of lopsided offer would get you kicked out of my fantasy football league, Peter, do better. St. Louis receives: the 2012 and 2014 Stanley Cup runs Los Angeles receives: the Greatest Show on Turf success and the 1999 Super Bowl — Dylan C. As if L.A. would ever care about Rams football. Advertisement To the Arizona hockey ownership group: Terry Pegula To Buffalo: Alex Meruelo Meruelo is immediately placed on waivers and goes unclaimed. — Todd C. Yeah, we had a lot of Sabres fans trying to offload Pegula, and let's just say you weren't asking for much in return. Real buy-low opportunity right here. I can't imagine why. Still, Arizona says no. This is a classic salary dump, where a big-money player who hasn't been productive in years gets sent out to pasture. Given that, having the destination be Arizona is a nice touch. But while you're taking a bad contract bad in Meruelo, I think Arizona's going to want a few assets in return for taking Pegula's bigger commitment. To the Rangers: Jim Ramsay To Montreal: Dancin' Larry — 'Zach' Other fan bases may need an explainer on this one. Ramsay is the trainer the Rangers fired a few years ago. He was hired in Montreal, but many Rangers fans still view his exit as a symptom of the dysfunction of the Chris Drury/Jim Dolan era. So from the New York perspective, you could view this as trying to right a wrong. But Dancin' Larry, the Rangers superfan and scoreboard regular? He's fine, I guess, but I'm not completely sure he's a fit for Montreal. They're not really a dancing bunch, you know? Maybe if it was 'Telling a Boring Story About Some Guy From the 1930s Larry' we'd have a fit, but right now I think Montreal says no, holding out for more. Maybe toss in a proper hot dog recipe, New York. (By the way, I can't recommend Dancin' Larry's Instagram page highly enough. Just page after page of photos of him with Rangers fans, and he's doing the exact same face and pose in all of them. Not a pixel of difference. Seriously, it might just be a template. How do you move this guy? Get an NTC in that next extension, Larry, this can be a cruel business.) To Dallas: Hosting the Minnesota state high school tournament through 2030 To Minnesota: The Stars/North Stars name, mascots, colors, jerseys — Anonymous I'll admit, I was surprised how many of you want to trade the old North Stars branding back to Minnesota. Apart from trades involving palm trees going to Buffalo or lower tax rates for California and New York, the North Stars stuff was the most common concept by far. Does this deal work? It might. At least Dallas is getting something of value, which it could use to continue to build its fan base. I think the price is just too steep, given it'd be losing its name and branding. Dallas says no, but I could see a counteroffer involving just the classic North Stars stuff heading to Minnesota instead. Then again, what if there were a way for Dallas to acquire new branding? Well, about that … Vancouver needs new ownership and it's always better if it's someone local. If only there was a Vancouverite who randomly owned another team in the league … and if that team happened to have bad uniforms, that would be great, since the Canucks have three completely different logo/uniform/color schemes in their arsenal and can't seem to decide which one to run with. To Vancouver: Owner Tom Gaglardi, who has always wanted to own the Canucks anyway To Dallas: The orange, red and black 'Flying Skate' uniform/color scheme, and an agreement to pay all costs associated with rebranding Dallas to something more appropriate, like Outlaws. — Phil G. Hmm … I mean, part of the art of pulling off a truly great trade is finding an asset that's underappreciated, maybe because it's stuck down the depth chart. As Phil points out, the Canucks have one of the greatest uniform designs of all time just sitting around. The Flying Skate should be Vancouver's primary uniform — it never should have lost the job in the first place — but for whatever reason, it's not. OK, so let's send it somewhere that will give it the chance to be the superstar it should be. The logic is solid. Advertisement That said, you're not getting Gaglardi for a uniform. The owner may be the most important position on a modern NHL team, and Gaglardi would be a massive upgrade for the Canucks franchise. Dallas says no. But it's amicable. It's not closing the door if the Canucks wanted to circle on something down the road. In the meantime, one more for the Canucks … To Vancouver: The Leafs' 1950-51 Stanley Cup win To Toronto: The Canucks' 2011 Stanley Cup Final appearance The Canucks get a Stanley Cup, but one so long ago they'll still be mocked by opposing fans. But one is better than zero. Did they exist in 1951? Let's not worry about the details. The Leafs get yet another devastating loss to the Bruins in the playoffs, but at least this time in a Stanley Cup Final and all the good memories that go with that sort of run. A team that locals mostly like and have fond memories of, legends in the market. (Do not ask what other markets think.) All it costs is a Cup so long ago most fans don't remember it. Note: Canucks retain the riot, due to a NMC. — Greg P. On the surface, this one makes a lot of sense. The Canucks are getting the better asset — a Cup win is obviously better than a near-miss — but the recency bias plays a factor. And the Leafs are dealing from a position of strength, with the 'old Cup wins that nobody really remembers' cupboard pretty much overflowing. That said, Greg mentions the potential problem. While Vancouver fans hate how 2011 ended, it's still a pretty beloved version of the team. If you trade the whole run, that means you lose the Game 7 OT win over the Blackhawks, the Kevin Bieksa bank shot and other fun memories. Do you give all of that up just so you can ditch the Sabres at the 'zero Cups in franchise history' table? You have to give up something to get something, but that's pretty steep. My gut is that Vancouver says no, partly because it just doesn't want to let Leafs fans be happy. But I'd like to hear from Canucks fans in the comments to confirm. And since we're trying to end some Leaf droughts … To Montreal: The 1967 Stanley Cup championship To Toronto: The 1993 Stanley Cup championship The 1967 Cup would give Montreal the last Original Six win and a second run of five straight Cups within a decade. And having won in 1986 would mean their current drought wouldn't be appreciably longer. The '93 Cup reduces Toronto's drought dramatically, and gives them the honor of being the last Canadian team to win a Cup. Plus, we could stop talking about Kerry Fraser forever. — Sean B. Who says no? Every other fan base. They lose out on making fun of the Leafs' record Cup drought, the Habs get even more ammo for their history-firehose, and the last Canadian Cup win somehow becomes even more of a thing because Toronto won't shut up about it. The only gain for the other fan bases would be Leafs fans giving the Fraser stuff a rest after 33 years, and let's be honest, we wouldn't honor that part of the deal. Advertisement So yeah, everyone else hates this deal … which means there may be something here for the two teams involved. As beloved as that rag-tag band of old-timers from the 1967 team has become, I think this is a pretty easy 'yes' for the Leafs. It's a little dicier for Montreal, although I think Sean B. is making a decent case. Ultimately, while it's close, I think Montreal probably says no. Somebody break the bad news to Marty McSorley. Want to send in your trade proposal for a future version of this column? Email this address. (Top photo of Hunter the Lynx: Steph Chambers / Getty Images)
